In:The Documentarist Turn: From observable linguistic behaviour to typological generalizations
Edited by Sonja Riesberg, Uta Reinöhl and Birgit Hellwig
[Studies in Language Companion Series 240] 2026
► pp. 429–463
Chapter 17The phonetics and phonological behaviour of vowel length in Meto
This content is being prepared for publication; it may be subject to changes.
Abstract
This paper examines the acoustic cues and phonological behaviour of vowel length in Meto
(Austronesian, Timor), which is described as having a distinction between “double” (/aa/ → [aː]) and “single”
(/a/ → [a]) vowels. We examine acoustic evidence for this distinction, finding that putative double vowels are
~40% longer than single vowels. There is also some evidence of following consonant duration and vowel quality
differences between single and double vowels.
We then examine the phonological behaviour of the putative double vowels, showing that
their phonotactic patterning and (morpho)phonological behaviour is identical to unambiguous vowel sequences.
This study highlights how field data can be used in phonetic and phonological research, and the importance of
analysis in language documentation.
Keywords: vowel length, double vowels, phonological analysis, Timor
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Background
- 2.1Acoustic cues of vowel length
- 2.2The phonological patterning of vowel length
- 3.Language background
- 4.Acoustic cues of vowel length in Meto
- 4.1Data selection and annotation
- 4.2Measurements, outlier removal and normalisation
- 4.3Statistical analysis
- 4.4Results
- 4.4.1Vowel duration
- 4.4.2Consonant duration
- 4.4.3Vowel quality
- 4.4.4Summary
- 5.Phonological behaviour of vowel length in Meto
- 5.1Phonotactic distribution (criterion (1c))
- 5.2Morphophonological behaviour
- 5.2.1Evidence for a lack of integrity (criterion (1a)): Glottal stop infixation
- 5.2.2No evidence of being inalterable (criterion (1b)): Plural enclitic allomorphy and consonant insertion
- 5.2.3Double vowels arise from a morphological process (criterion (1d)): Metathesis
- 5.3Analytical parsimony (criterion (1e))
- 5.4Summary
- 6.Discussion and conclusion
Acknowledgments Notes Abbreviations References
References (83)
Abramson, Arthur S., and Nianqi Reo. 1990. “Distinctive
Vowel Length: Duration vs. Spectrum in Thai”. Journal of
Phonetics 18: 79–92.
Barnes, Jonathan Allen. 2002. “Positional
neutralization: A phonologization approach to typological
patterns.” PhD thesis, University of California, Berkeley. ProQuest
(288390119).
Bates, Douglas, Martin Mächler, Ben Bolker, and Steve Walker. 2015. “Fitting
Linear Mixed-Effects Models using lme4.” Journal of Statistical
Software 67: 1–48.
Beckman, Jill N. 1998. “Positional
Faithfulness”. PhD thesis, University of Massachusetts, Amherst. ProQuest
(304424695).
Blust, Robert, and Stephen Trussel. 2020. “The
Austronesian Comparative Dictionary.” [URL]
Boersma, Paul, and David Weenink. 2023. “Praat:
Doing Phonetics by Computer.” [URL]
Brand, James, Jen Hay, Lynn Clark, Kevin Watson, and Márton Sóskuthy. 2021. “Systematic
Co-Variation of Monophthongs across Speakers of New Zealand
English.” Journal of
Phonetics 88: 101096.
Chen, Chun-Mei. 2006. “A
Comparative Study on Formosan Phonology: Paiwan and Budai Rukai.” PhD
thesis, The University of Texas at Austin. ProQuest
(304981925).
Chen, Matthew. 1970. “Vowel
Length Variation as a Function of the Voicing of the Consonant
Environment.” Phonetica 22: 129–159.
Culhane, Kirsten. 2017. “Amfo'an
Recordings (KC1).” Paradisec. [URL]
. 2018. “Consonant
Insertions: A Synchronic and Diachronic Account of Amfo'an.” BA
Honours thesis, The Australian National University.
. 2022. “The
Phonology and Typological Position of Waima’a Consonants.” Oceanic
Linguistics 61: 528–559.
. 2024. “The
Prosodic Foot: A Typological Study of Greater Timor Languages.” PhD
thesis, University of Freiburg.
Culhane, Kirsten, and Owen Edwards. 2025. “Consonant
Epenthesis in Meto: Typologically Rare but Diachronically
Explicable.” In Rarities in Phonetics and
Phonology, ed. by Natalia Kuznetsova, Cormac Anderson, and Shelece Easterday 167–219. Berlin: Language Science Press.
Dmitrieva, Olga. 2012. “Geminate
Typology and the Perception of Consonant Duration.” PhD
thesis, Stanford University.
Dryer, Matthew S. 2006. “Descriptive
Theories, Explanatory Theories, and Basic Linguistic
Theory.” In Catching Language: The Standing
Challenge of Grammar Writing, ed. by Alan Dench, Felix K. Ameka, and Nicholas Evans, 207–234. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
Edwards, Owen. 2017. “Epenthetic
and Contrastive Glottal Stops in Amarasi.” Oceanic
Linguistics 56: 415–434.
Esposito, Anna, and Maria Gabriella Di Benedetto. 1999. “Acoustical
and perceptual study of gemination in Italian stops.” The Journal of
the Acoustical Society of
America 106: 2051–2062.
Gil, David. 2001. “Escaping
Eurocentrism: Fieldwork as a Process of
Unlearning.” In Linguistic
Fieldwork, ed. by Paul Newman, and Martha Ratliff, 102–132. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Goldsmith, John. 1976. “Autosegmental
Phonology.” PhD
thesis, MIT.
Guy, Gregory R., and Charles Boberg. 1997. “Inherent
Variability and the Obligatory Contour Principle.” Language Variation
and
Change 9: 149–164.
Harvey, Mark, Nay San, Margaret Carew, Sydney Strangways, Jane Simpson, and Clara Stockigt. 2019. “Pre-Stopping
in Arabana.” Australian Journal of
Linguistics 39: 419–462.
Hayes, Bruce. 1986a. “Assimilation
as Spreading in Toba Batak.” Linguistic
Inquiry 17: 467–499. [URL]
Heston, Tyler. 2015. “The
Segmental and Suprasegmental Phonology of Fataluku.” PhD
thesis, University of Hawaiʻi at Mānoa. [URL]
2006. “Language
Documentation: What is it and what is it good
for?” In Essentials of language
documentation, ed. by Jost Gippert, Nikolaus P. Himmelmann, and Ulrike Mosel, 1–30. Berlin and New York: De Gruyter Mouton.
Hui, C. T. Justine, and Takayuki Arai. 2019. “Elderly
Listeners’ Identification of Japanese Long Vowel Pair ‘obasan’ and ‘obaasan’ using Pitch and
Duration.” Acoustical Science and
Technology 40: 105–115.
Idemaru, Kaori, and Susan G. Guion. 2008. “Acoustic
covariants of Length Contrast in Japanese Stops.” Journal of the
International Phonetic
Association 38: 167–186.
Jakobi, Angelika. 1990. A
Fur Grammar: Phonology, Morphophonology, and
Morphology. Hamburg: Helmut Buske. [URL]
Jepson, Kathleen. 2019. “Prosody,
Prominence and Segments in Djambarrpuyŋu.” PhD
thesis, The University of Melbourne.
. 2025. “Contrastive
Vowel Length and Segment Duration in Production and Perception in
Djambarrpuyŋu.” Laboratory
Phonology 16: 1–49.
Kaland, Constantijn. 2021. “Praat
Scripts.” [URL]
Keating, Patricia Ann. 1985. “Universal
Phonetics and the Organization of
Grammars.” In Phonetic Linguistics: Essays in
Honor of Peter Ladefoged, ed. by Victoria Fromkin, 115–132. Orlando: Academic Press.
Kehrein, Wolfgang. 2002. Phonological
Representation and Phonetic Phasing: Affricates and
Laryngeals. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer.
Kenstowicz, Michael J., and Charles Pyle. 1973. “On
the Phonological Integrity of Geminate
Clusters.” In Issues in Phonological
Theory, ed. by Michael J. Kenstowicz, and Charles W. Kisseberth, 27–43. Berlin and Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.
Klamer, Marian. 2009. “The
use of language data in comparative research: A note on Blust (2008) and Onvlee
(1984).” Oceanic
Linguistics 48: 250–263.
Kluender, Keith R., Randy L. Diehl, and Beverly A. Wright. 1988. “Vowel-length
differences before voiced and voiceless Consonants: an auditory
explanation.” Journal of
Phonetics 16: 153–169.
Lahiri, Aditi, and Jorge Hankamer. 1988. “The
timing of geminate consonants.” Journal of
Phonetics 16: 327–338.
Leben, William R. 1973. “Suprasegmental
Phonology.” PhD
thesis, MIT. [URL]
. 1976. “Influence
of fundamental frequency pattern on the perception of
duration.” Journal of
Phonetics 4: 113–117.
Lehnert-LeHouillier, Heike. 2007. “The
influence of dynamic f0 on the perception
of vowel duration: Cross-linguistic evidence.” Proceedings of the 16th
International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (ICPHS XVI). Universität des Saarlandes.
Lemon, Tyler. 2024. “The
Morphosyntax of Verbal Agreement in Uab Meto.” PhD
thesis, University of California, Berkeley. ProQuest
(Lemon_berkeley_0028E_23660).
Lenth, Russell V. 2024. emmeans:
Estimated Marginal Means, aka Least-Squares Means. R package version
1.10.6, [URL]
Maddieson, Ian. 1985. “Phonetic
cues to syllabification.” In Phonetic
Linguistics: Essays in Honor of Peter Ladefoged, ed.
by Victoria Fromkin, 203–221. Orlando: Academic Press.
Middelkoop, Pieter. 1939. “Amarassische-Timoreesche
Teksten.” Bandung: Verhandelingen van het Bataviaasch Genootschap voor Kunsten en Wetenschappen 74 (2).
. 1950. “Proeve
van een Timorese grammatica.” Bijdragen tot de Taal-, Land- en
Volkenkunde 106: 375–517.
Myers, Scott. 1997. “OCP
Effects in Optimality Theory.” Natural Language and Linguistic
Theory 15: 847–892.
Myers, Scott, and Benjamin B. Hansen. 2007. “The
Origin of Vowel Length Neutralization in Final Position: Evidence from Finnish
Speakers.” Natural Language and Linguistic
Theory 25: 157–193.
Odden, David. 1986. “On
the Role of the Obligatory Contour Principle in Phonological
Theory.” Language 62: 353–383.
. 2011. “The
Representation of Vowel Length.” In The
Blackwell Companion to Phonology, ed. by Marc van Oostendorp, Colin Ewen, Elizabeth Hume, and Keren Rice. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.
Paschen, Ludger, Susanne Fuchs, and Frank Seifart. 2022. “Final
lengthening and vowel length in 25 languages.” Journal of
Phonetics 94: 101179.
R Core
Team. 2024. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical
Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. [URL]
Remijsen, Bert, and Leoma Gilley. 2008. “Why
are Three-Level Vowel Length Systems Rare? Insights from Dinka (Luanyjang
Dialect).” Journal of
Phonetics 36: 318–344.
Ridouane, Rachid. 2007. “Gemination
in Tashlhiyt Berber: An Acoustic and Articulatory Study.” Journal of
the International Phonetic
Association 37: 119–142.
van Santen, Jan P. H. 1992. “Contextual
Effects on Vowel Duration.” Speech
Communication 11: 513–546.
Steinhauer, Hein. 1993. “Notes
on Verbs in Dawanese.” In Topics in
Descriptive Austronesian Linguistics, ed. by Ger Reesink, 130–158. Leiden: Vakgroep Talen en Culturen van Zuidoost-Azië en Oceanië.
. 1996a. “Morphemic
Metathesis in Dawanese (Timor).” In Papers in
Austronesian Linguistics 3, ed. by Hein Steinhauer, 217–232. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics. [URL]
. 1996b. “Synchronic
Metathesis and Apocope in Three Austronesian Languages of the Timor
Area.” In Pan-Asiatic Linguistics;
Proceedings on the Fourth International Symposium on Language and Linguistics, 8-10
January, ed. by Suwilai Premsrirat, 471–492. Thailand: Institute of Language and Culture for Rural Development, Mahidol University. [URL]
Summers, W. Van. 1987. “Effects
of Stress and Final-Consonant Voicing on Vowel Production: Articulatory and Acoustic
Analyses.” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of
America 82: 847–863.
Tabain, Marija, and Birgit Hellwig. 2023. “Qaqet.” Journal
of the International Phonetic
Association 53: 1073–1094.
Tan, Tamisha. 2022a. “Amarasi
Texts and Meto Elicitation Recordings
(TLT1).” Paradisec: [URL]
. 2023. “Voice
and Valency in Amarasi: Topics in Synchronic and Diachronic
Morphosyntax.” PhD thesis, Harvard University.
Treis, Yvonne. 2008. A
Grammar of Kambaata, 1: Phonology, Nominal Morphology and Non-Verbal
Predication. Köln: Rüdiger Köppe.
Trubetzkoy, Nikolai S. 1939. Grundzüge
der Phonologie. Prague: Travaux du Cercle Linguistique de Prague.
Wagner, Petra, Jürgen Trouvain, and Frank Zimmerer. 2015. “In
defense of stylistic diversity in speech research.” Journal of
Phonetics 48: 1–12.
Wilkinson, Melanie P. 1991. “Djambarrpuyŋu:
A Yolŋu Variety of Northern Australia.” PhD.
thesis, University of Sydney. [URL]
Wilson Black, Joshua, and James Brand. 2022. nzilbb.vowels:
Functions for Vowel Covariation Studies. [URL]
