In:Possibility and Necessity: Concepts and expressions of modality
Edited by Jean Albrespit, Christelle Lacassain and Tracey Simpson
[Studies in Language Companion Series 237] 2025
► pp. 310–325
The cabins (can) sleep four — possibility in the capacitive structure in English
Published online: 4 November 2025
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.237.13mar
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.237.13mar
Abstract
This paper focuses on the expression of possibility in the capacitive structure, which can be
found in sentences such as The tent sleeps four or The bench seats two. The
complementation pattern predicates a quantified capacity of the referent of the subject. The modality expressed here
is root, dynamic possibility, and it can be linked to permission (in a broad sense) — the location allows the event to
happen. Possibility is presented as emanating directly from the properties of the referent of the subject. Therefore,
it is an internal possibility stemming from an inanimate entity. This type of possibility is at the crossroads of two
major semantic domains: circumstantial possibility, which originates from the outside world, and ability, whose source
is the internal faculties and knowledge of the referent of the subject. When using the capacitive structure, the
speaker topicalises the locative constituent and presents it as the sole source of possibility. This must be linked to
the genres in which the capacitive structure is generally used (magazines, manuals, Internet reviews). In such
specific contexts, the main topic is the inanimate entity denoted by the subject. In the great majority of
occurrences, no modal auxiliary is used to denote possibility explicitly. It is suggested that the modal
interpretation comes from the relationship between the nominal constituents of the pattern, i.e. the subject and the
measure complement. The verb is only present to instantiate the operation of predication in the structure. More
precisely, it is the congruence of the relationship between a container and its content that allows for the capacitive
interpretation to emerge at sentence level.
Keywords: capacitive structure, modality, possibility, ability, congruence
Article outline
- Introduction
- 1.Presentation of the pattern and of the database
- 1.1Description of the constituents
- 1.1.1The subject
- 1.1.2The verb
- 1.1.3The post verbal complement
- 1.2Syntactic and semantic profile of the pattern
- 1.1Description of the constituents
- 2.Possibility in the capacitive structure: From external circumstances to internal ability
- 2.1Epistemic v. root possibility
- 2.2Root possibility in the capacitive structure
- 3.Building the capacitive meaning
- 3.1Copular meaning of the capacitive verb
- 3.2Congruent relationship between the nominal entities
- Conclusion
?ack? Notes References
References (15)
Cotte, Pierre. 1998. L’Explication
grammaticale de textes
anglais. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
Creissels, Denis. 2006. Syntaxe
générale, une introduction
typologique. Tome 1. Catégories et
constructions. Paris: Hermès.
Dreschler, Gea. 2019. ‘Fifty
pounds will buy me a pair of horses for my carriage’: the history of permissive subjects in
English. English Language and
Linguistics (24.4): 719–744.
Gaudin-Bordes, Lucile & Geneviève Salvan. Le
sens en marche : le cas de l’hypallage. L’Information
grammaticale 116: 15–19.
Huddleston, Rodney D. & Pullum, Geoffrey K. (Eds.). 2022. The
Cambridge Grammar of the English
Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Larreya, Paul. 1984. Le
possible et le nécessaire : modalités et auxiliaires modaux en anglais
britannique. Paris: Nathan.
Lemmens, Maarten. 1998. Lexical
Perspective on Transitivity and
Ergativity. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Marty, Caroline. 2021. Complément
ou circonstant ? La catégorisation du constituant de lieu dans les énoncés
capacitifs. In Complément, Complémentation,
Complétude -2- Du lacunaire au complet [Travaux linguistiques du
CerLiCO 32.], Catherine Moreau & Jean Albrespit (Eds.), 169–184. Rennes: Presses Universitaires de Rennes.
Quirk, Randolph, Greenbaum, Sidney, Leech, Geoffrey & Svartvik, Jan. 1985. A
Comprehensive Grammar of the English
Language. London: Longman.
Real Puigdollers, Cristina. 2013. Lexicalization
by phase: the role of prepositions in arguments structure and its cross-linguistic
variation. PhD dissertation, The Autonomous University of Barcelona.
