In:Possibility and Necessity: Concepts and expressions of modality
Edited by Jean Albrespit, Christelle Lacassain and Tracey Simpson
[Studies in Language Companion Series 237] 2025
► pp. 217–234
Entailment, necessity and time relations in some non prototypical conditional constructions
Published online: 4 November 2025
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.237.09roc
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.237.09roc
Abstract
This article analyses some non-prototypical conditionals: first, when non-volitional
will occurs in the if clause and when temporal and logical relations are
apparently reversed from what is usual. Comrie’s analysis of such examples as bicausal conditionals met criticisms.
Yet, the regular presence of cataphors in the if clause supports his view. The second construction
studied here also deals with a reversed order of temporal relations: the if clause refers to the
future and the actualisation of the event mentioned in it depends on the prior fulfilment of a necessary condition
expressed in the q clause; concerning the reversal of logical relations, it is this time due to the
semantic component and interclausal relationships. These types of conditionals are the result of complex
operations.
Article outline
- Introduction
- 1.Usual relationships in prototypical conditionals
- 1.1Three main types of conditional sentences
- 1.2The speaker’s stance
- 1.2.1Presupposition
- 1.2.2Sufficient and necessary conditions
- 2.Bicausal conditionals and the reversal of relations between P and Q
- 2.1Comrie’s analysis
- 2.2Criticisms of Comrie’s analysis
- 2.3An iterated conditional relation
- 3.Explicit reference to the future in the if clause and possible changes in temporal and logical
relations
- 3.1Reference to the future in if p with be going to and be
to
- 3.1.1Logical and temporal relations are oriented from P to Q
- 3.1.2Q expresses a necessary condition for the actualisation of the event in P
- 3.2Reference to the future and intentionality
- 3.1Reference to the future in if p with be going to and be
to
- Conclusion
Notes References Corpus
References (24)
Close, Reginald A. 1980. Will
in if clauses. In Studies in English
Linguistics for Randolph Quirk, Sidney Greenbaum, Geoffrey Leech & John Svartvik (Eds.), 100–9. London: Longman.
Comrie, Bernard. 1986. Conditionals:
a typology. In On
Conditionals, Elisabeth C. Traugott, Alice Ter Meulen, Judy Snitzer Reilly & Charles A. Ferguson (Eds.), 77–99. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Dancygier, Barbara. 1998. Conditionals
and Prediction, Time, Knowledge and Causation in Conditional
Constructions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Dancygier, Barbara & Sweeter, Eve. 2005. Mental
Spaces in Grammar, Conditional
Constructions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Declerck, Renaat. 2010. Future
time reference expressed by be to in Present-day
English. English Language and
Linguistics 14(2): 271–291. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Declerck, Renaat and Susan Reed. Conditionals,
a Comprehensive Empirical Analysis. 2001. Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Geis, Michael & Zwicky, Arnold Z. 1971. On
invited inference. Linguistic
Inquiry 2: 561–566. MIT Press.
Larreya, Paul. 1984. Le
Possible et le nécessaire, modalités et auxiliaires modaux en anglais
britannique. Paris: Nathan.
. 2001. Modal
verbs and the expression of futurity in English, French and Italian. Belgian
Journal of
Linguistics 14: 115–129. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
. 2009. Towards
a typology of modality in language. In Modality in
English, Theory and Description, Raphael Salkie, Pierre Busuttil & Johan Van Der Auwera (Eds.), 9–29. Berlin/NewYork: Mouton de Gruyter.
British National Corpus, BNC. [URL]
Brown, Gillian, Currie, Karen & Kenworthy, Joanne. (1980)
2015. Questions of
intonation. London: Routledge.
Corpus of Contemporary American English,
COCA. [URL]
