In:Possibility and Necessity: Concepts and expressions of modality
Edited by Jean Albrespit, Christelle Lacassain and Tracey Simpson
[Studies in Language Companion Series 237] 2025
► pp. 117–137
How true is scientific discourse?
A comparative study of epistemicity in on-page and on-screen media
Published online: 4 November 2025
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.237.05con
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.237.05con
Abstract
This chapter examines the visual-cum-verbal encoding of epistemic modality in scientific discourse
by comparing IMRD-format research articles with infographic synopses. Words and visuals use different strategies that
co-operate in the validation and dissemination of evidence-based knowledge: while the former symbolise empirical data
through written, abstract, discontinuous and temporal resources, the latter shape it into sensorial, contiguous and
spatial patterns that facilitate cognitive functions such as quantification, recognition and comparison. Within the
framework of Systemic Functional Grammar, and incorporating multimodal social semiotics and medical linguistics, I
compare cross-semiotic epistemicity in on-page vs. on-screen media, looking at how differently words and graphics can
codify possibility, probability, necessity and certainty, and at the pragmatic and epistemological impact of
multi-literacy in scientific discourse.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Materials
- 3.Method
- 3.1Verbal epistemicity
- 3.2Visual epistemicity
- 4.Results
- 4.1Verbal epistemicity
- 4.2Visual epistemicity
- 5.Discussion and conclusion
Notes References
References (42)
Bazerman, Charles. 1988. Shaping
Written Knowledge. The Genre and Activity of the Experimental Article in
Science. Wisconsin: University of Wisconsin Press.
Benking, Heiner. 2005. Using
maps and models, Supersigns and Superstructures. [URL] (20 June 2023)
Bernstein, Basil. 1981. Codes,
modalities and the process of cultural reproduction. A model. Language and
Society 10: 327–363.
Coopmans, Catelijne. 2014. Visual
analytics as artful revelation. In Representation in
Scientific Practice Revisited, Cateljine Coopmans, Janet Vertesi, Michael E. Lynch & Steve Woolgar (Eds.), 37–59. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
D’Angelo, Larissa. 2006. Academic
Posters. A Textual and Visual Metadiscourse
Analysis. Bern: Peter Lang.
Friendly, Michael. 2009. Milestones
in the History of Thematic Cartography, Statistical Graphics, and Data
Visualization. [URL] (20 June
2023)
Giordano, Michela & Marongiu, Maria Antonietta. 2021. Metadiscourse,
rhetoric and the pandemic: A verbal-visual analysis of public information
posters. In New Explorations in Digital
Metadiscourse, Larissa D’Angelo & Stefania Consonni (Eds.), 25–56. Bergamo: CERLIS Series.
Gotti, Maurizio. 2003. Specialized
Discourse: Linguistic Features and Changing
Conventions. Bern: Peter Lang.
Greenhalgh, Tricia. 2010. How
to Read a Paper. The Basics of Evidence Based
Medicine. Oxford: Wiley/Blackwell.
Huckin, Thomas N. 2001. Abstracting from
abstracts. In Academic Writing in Context:
Implications and Applications, Martin Hewings (Ed.), 93–103. Birmingham: University of Birmingham Press.
Hyland, Ken. 1998. Boosting,
hedging and the negotiation of academic knowledge. Text &
Talk 18(3): 349–382.
. 2003. Multimodality,
resemiotization: Extending the analysis of discourse as multi-semiotic
practice. Visual
Communication 2(1): 29–57.
Jakobson, Roman. 1959. On
linguistic aspects of translation. In On
Translation, Reuben Arthur Brower (Ed.), 232–239. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Kiryushchenko, Vitaly. 2016. Maps,
diagrams, and signs: Visual experience in Peirce’s
semiotics. In International Handbook of
Semiotics, Peter Trifonas (Ed.), 115–123. Dordrecht: Springer.
Knorr-Cetina, Karin. 1999. Epistemic
Cultures. How the Sciences Make
Knowledge. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Kostelnick, Charles. 1993. Viewing
functional pictures in context. In Professional
Communication: The Social Perspective, Nancy R. Blyler & Charlotte Thralls (Eds.), 243–256. London: Sage.
Kress, Gunther & Van Leeuwen, Theo. 2001. Multimodal
Discourse. The Modes and Media of Contemporary
Communication. London: Arnold.
Lemke, Jay. 1998. Multiplying
meaning: Visual and verbal semiotics in scientific
texts. In Reading
Science, J. R. Martin & Robert Veel (Eds.), 87–113. London: Routledge.
Maci, Stefania M. 2022. Evidential Verbs in the
Genre of Medical Posters. A Corpus-Based
Analysis, Bern: Peter Lang.
Marta, Monica M. 2015. A brief history
of the evolution of the medical research article. Clujul
Medical 88(4): 567–570.
Myers, Greg. 1990. Writing
Biology. Texts in the Social Construction of Scientific
Knowledge. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
Nuyts, Jan. 2001. Epistemic
Modality, Language, and Conceptualization. A Cognitive-Pragmatic
Perspective. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
O’Halloran, Kay L., Marissa, K. L. E., Podlasov, Alexey & Tan, Sabine. 2013. Multimodal
semiotics: The interaction of language with other resources. Text &
Talk 33(4–5): 665–690.
O’Halloran, Kay L., Tan, Sabine & Wignell, Peter. 2016. Intersemiotic
translation as resemiotization: A multimodal
perspective. Signata 7: 199–229.
Rowley-Jolivet, Elizabeth. 2002. Visual
discourse in scientific conference papers: A genre-based study. English for
Specific
Purposes 21(1): 19–40.
Sackett, David L., Rosenberg, William M. C., Muir Gray, J. A., Haynes, R. Brian & Richardson, W. Scott. 1996. Evidence
Based Medicine: What it is and what it isn’t. British Medical
Journal 312: 71–72.
