Cover not available

In:The Progressive Revisited: Historical and Quantitative Studies in Germanic and Romance Languages
Edited by Alessandro Carlucci and Jerzy Nykiel
[Studies in Language Companion Series 236] 2025
► pp. 1–20

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
authorization required

Introduction

 | University of Oxford | University of Bergen
 | University of Bergen
Published online: 12 September 2025
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.236.intro
Article outline
  • 1.Grammatical aspect and progressive aspect
  • 2.Typological and comparative perspectives
  • 3.How progressive structures develop
  • 4.Open questions
  • 5.Overview and summary of the contributions in this volume
  • Notes
  • References
References (83)
References
Anthonissen, Lynn, De Wit, Astrid & Mortelmans, Tanja. 2019. (Inter)subjective uses of the Dutch progressive constructions. Linguistics 57(5): 1111–1159. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bach, Emmon. 1986. The algebra of events. Linguistics and Philosophy 9: 5–16. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Baglioni, Daniele & Rigobianco, Luca. 2024. Rethinking fragmentariness and reconstruction: An introduction. In Fragments of Languages: From ‘Restsprachen’ to Contemporary Endangered Languages, Daniele Baglioni & Luca Rigobianco (eds), 1–25. Leiden: Brill. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bentein, Klaas. 2013. Prog imperfective drift in Ancient Greek? Reconsidering eimi ‘be’ with present participle. Transactions of the Philological Society 111(1): 67–107. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bertinetto, Pier Marco. 1986. Tempo, aspetto e azione nel verbo italiano. Il sistema dell’indicativo. Florence: Accademia della Crusca.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1995. Vers une typologie du progressif dans les langues d’Europe. Modèles Linguistiques 16: 37–61.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2000. The progressive in Romance, as compared with English. In Tense and Aspect in the Languages of Europe, Östen Dahl (ed.), 559–604. Berlin & New York: De Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bertinetto, Pier Marco & Delfitto, Denis. 2000. Aspect vs. actionality: Why they should be kept apart. In Tense and Aspect in the Languages of Europe, Östen Dahl (ed.), 189–225. Berlin & New York: De Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bertinetto, Pier Marco, Ebert, Karen H. & de Groot, Casper. 2000. The progressive in Europe. In Tense and Aspect in the Languages of Europe, Östen Dahl (ed.), 517–558. Berlin & New York: De Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bertinetto, Pier Marco & Squartini, Mario. 2016. Tense and aspect. In The Oxford Guide to the Romance Languages, Adam Ledgeway & Martin Maiden (eds), 939–953. Oxford: OUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas, Johansson, Stig, Leech, Geoffrey, Conrad, Susan & Finegan, Edward. 1999. Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. Harlow: Pearson.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brinton, Laurel J. 1988. The Development of English Aspectual Systems. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bybee, Joan L., Perkins, Revere & Pagliuca, William. 1994. The Evolution of Grammar: Tense, Aspect, and Modality in the Languages of the World. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bybee, Joan. 2015. Language Change. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Comrie, Bernard. 1976. Aspect: An Introduction to the Study of Verbal Aspect and Related Problems. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1995. Tense and aspect. In Syntax: An International Handbook of Contemporary Research, volume 2, Joachim Jacobs, Arnim von Stechow, Wolfgang Sternefeld & Theo Vennemann (eds), 1244–1252. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2020. Introduction. In Perfects in Indo-European Languages and Beyond, Robert Crellin & Thomas Jügel (eds), 1–13. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
D’Achille, Paolo. 2010. L’italiano contemporaneo (3rd ed.). Bologna: Il Mulino.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2016. Architettura dell’italiano di oggi e linee di tendenza. In Manuale di linguistica italiana, Sergio Lubello (ed.), 165–189. Berlin: De Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dahl, Östen. 2000. Tense and Aspect in the Languages of Europe. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
De Miguel, Elena. 1999. El aspecto léxico. In Gramática descriptiva de la lengua española, Ignacio Bosque & Violeta Demonte (eds), vol 2, 2977–3060. Madrid: Espasa.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Denison, David. 1993. English Historical Syntax: Verbal Constructions. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2000. Combining English auxiliaries. In Pathways of Change: Grammaticalization in English, Olga Fischer, Anette Rosenbach & Dieter Stein (eds), 111–148. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dessì Schmid, Sarah 2019. Aspectuality: An Onomasiological Model Applied to the Romance Languages. Berlin: De Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dessì Schmid, Sarah & Momma, Lydia. 2024. Progressivity between lexicon, grammar and context. In Tense, Aspect and Discourse Structure, Jakob Egetenmeyer, Sarah Dessì Schmid & Martin G. Becker (eds), 67–90. Berlin: De Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
De Wit, Astrid, Petré, Peter & Brisard, Frank. 2020. Standing out with the progressive. Journal of Linguistics 56(3): 479–514. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dowty, David R. 1979. Word Meaning and Montague Grammar. Dordrecht: Reidel. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Drinka, Bridget. 2017. Language Contact in Europe: The Periphrastic Perfect through History. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Durante, Marcello. 1981. Dal latino all’italiano moderno. Bologna: Zanichelli.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ebert, Karen H. 2000. Progressive markers in Germanic languages. In Tense and Aspect in the Languages of Europe, Östen Dahl (ed.), 605–653. Berlin & New York: De Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Eide, Kristin Melum & Fryd, Marc. 2021. The perfect volume: papers on the perfect. In The Perfect Volume: Papers on the Perfect, Kristin Melum Eide & Marc Fryd (eds), 1–40. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fanego, Teresa. 2024. English motion and progressive constructions, and the typological drift from bounded to unbounded discourse construal. Language Sciences 101: 1–19. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Filip, Hana. 2021. Lexical aspect (Aktionsart). In The Wiley Blackwell Companion to Semantics, Daniel Gutzmann, Lisa Matthewson, Cécile Meier, Hotze Rullmann & Thomas Ede Zimmermann (eds), Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Filppula, Markku. 2003. The quest for the most “parsimonious” explanations: Endogeny vs. contact revisited. In Motives for Language Change, Raymond Hickey (ed.), 161–173. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Filppula, Markku & Klemola, Juhani. 2014. Celtic influences in English: A re-evaluation. Neuphilologische Mitteilungen 115(1): 33–53.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Halliday, Michael & Matthiessen, Christian. 2004. An Introduction to Functional Grammar (3rd ed.). London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hansen, Björn. 2017. What happens after grammaticalization? Post-grammaticalization processes in the area of modality. In Aspects of Grammaticalization: (Inter)subjectification and Directionality, Daniel van Olmen, Hubert Cuyckens & Lobke Ghesquière (eds), 257–280. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Harbert, Wayne. 2007. The Germanic Languages. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Heine, Bernd & Kuteva, Tania. 2005. Language Contact and Grammatical Change. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hengeveld, Kees. 2011. The grammaticalization of tense and aspect. In The Oxford Handbook of Grammaticalization, Heiko Narrog & Bernd Heine (eds), 580–594. Oxford: OUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Johannessen, Janne Bondi. 1998. Coordination. Oxford: OUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jóhannsdóttir, Kristín M. 2011. Aspects of the Progressive in English and Icelandic. PhD dissertation, University of British Columbia. [URL]
Killie, Kristin. 2004. Subjectivity and the English progressive. English Language and Linguistics 8(1): 25–46. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2008. From locative to durative to focalized? The English progressive and “PROG imperfective drift”. In English Historical Linguistics 2006: Selected Papers from the Fourteenth International Conference on English Historical Linguistics (ICEHL 14), Bergamo, 21–25 August 2006. Volume I: Syntax and Morphology, Maurizio Gotti, Marina Dossena & Richard Dury (eds), 69–88. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kinn, Torodd. 2018. Pseudocoordination in Norwegian. Degrees of grammaticalization and constructional variants. In Grammaticalization Meets Construction Grammar, Evie Coussé, Peter Andersson & Joel Olofsson (eds), 75–106. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2023. Meaning integration in pseudocoordination. In Constructional Approaches to Nordic Languages, Evie Coussé, Steffen Höder, Benjamin Lyngfelt & Julia Prentice (eds), 114–144. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kinn, Torodd, Blensenius, Kristian & Andersson, Peter. 2018. Posture, location, and activity in Mainland Scandinavian pseudocoordinations. CogniTextes 18, online. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Koops, Christian. 2004. Emergent aspect constructions in Present-Day-English. In Studies in Linguistic Motivation, Günther Radden & Klaus-Uwe Panther (eds), 121–154. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kranich, Svenja. 2007. Subjectification and the English progressive: The history of ALWAYS + progressive constructions. York Papers in Linguistics 2(8): 120–137.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2010. The Progressive in Modern English: A Corpus-based Study of Grammaticalization and Related Changes. Amsterdam & New York: Radopi. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kruisinga, Etsko. 1931. A Handbook of Present-day English. Part II: English Accidence and Syntax, vol. 1. Groningen: P. Noordhoff.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kuryłowicz, Jerzy. 1965. The evolution of grammatical categories. Diogenes 13(51): 55–71. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kuteva, Tania A. 1999. On ‘sit’/‘stand’/‘lie’ auxiliation. Linguistics 37(2): 191-213.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kuteva, Tania, Heine, Bernd, Hong, Bo, Long, Haiping, Narrog, Heiko & Rhee, Seongha. 2019. World Lexicon of Grammaticalization. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Langacker, Ronald W. 2007. Constructing the meanings of personal pronouns. In Aspects of Meaning Construction, Günter Radden, Klaus-Michael Köpcke, Thomas Berg & Peter Siemund (eds), 171–187. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ledgeway, Adam & Vincent, Nigel. 2022. Periphrasis and inflexion: Lessons from Romance. In Periphrasis and Inflexion in Diachrony: A View from Romance, Adam Ledgeway, John Charles Smith & Nigel Vincent (eds), 11–60. Oxford: OUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Leech, Geoffrey N., Hundt, Marianne, Mair, Christian & Smith, Nicholas. 2009. Change in Contemporary English: A Grammatical Study. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Levin, Magnus. 2013. The progressive verb in modern American English. In The Verb Phrase in English: Investigating Recent Language Change with Corpora, Bas Aarts, Geoffrey Leech, Joanne Close & Sean Wallis (eds), 187–216. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mallory, James & Adams, Douglas Q. 2006. The Oxford Introduction to Proto-Indo-European and the Proto-Indo-European World. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Núñez-Pertejo, Paloma. 2004. The Progressive in the History of English. Munich: Lincom.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Petré, Peter. 2016. Grammaticalization by changing co-text frequencies, or why [BE Ving] became the “progressive”. English Language and Linguistics 20(1): 31–54. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pfaff, Meike, Bergs, Alexander & Hoffmann, Thomas. 2013. I was just reading this article — on the expression of recentness and the English past progressive. In The Verb Phrase in English: Investigating Recent Language Change with Corpora, Bas Aarts, Geoffrey Leech, Joanne Close & Sean Wallis (eds), 217–238. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pountain, Christopher J. 2000. Capitalization. In Historical Linguistics 1995, Volume 1: General Issues and non-Germanic Languages, John Charles Smith & Delia Bentley (eds), 295–309. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rei, Luis, Mladenić, Dunja & Krek, Simon. 2016. A multilingual social media linguistic corpus. In Proceedings of the 4th Conference on CMC and Social Media Corpora for the Humanities. Ljubljana: University of Ljubljana.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rohe, Udo. 2019. The Progressive in Present-Day Spoken English: Real-Time Studies of Its Spread and Functional Diversification. PhD dissertation, Albert-Ludwigs-Universität. [URL]
Smith, Carlota. 1991. The Parameter of Aspect. Dordrecht: Kluwer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Smith, Nicholas. 2005. A Corpus-Based Investigation of Recent Change in the Use of the Progressive in British English. Unpublished PhD dissertation, Lancaster University.
Smitterberg, Erik. 2005. The Progressive in 19th-century English: A Process of Integration. Amsterdam: Rodopi. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Taylor, Barry. 1977. Tense and continuity. Linguistics and Philosophy 1: 199–220. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Teleman, Ulf, Hellberg, Staffan & Andersson, Erik. 1999. Svenska Akademiens Grammatik. Stockholm: Svenska Akademien.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Thomason, Sarah G. 2004. Contact as a source of language change. In The Handbook of Historical Linguistics, Brian D. Joseph & Richard D. Janda (eds), 686–712. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2020. Contact explanations in linguistics. In The Handbook of Language Contact (2nd ed.), Raymond Hickey (ed.), 33–49. Oxford: Blackwell. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs. 1989. On the rise of epistemic meanings in English: An example of subjectification in semantic change. Language 65(1): 31–55. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs & Dasher, Richard B. 2001. Regularity in Semantic Change. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
van der Auwera, Johan & Plungian, Vladimir A. 1998. Modality’s semantic map. Linguistic Typology 2(1): 79–124. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vendler, Zeno. 1957. Verbs and times. Philosophical Review 56: 143–160. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Viola, Lorella. 2023. On the use of sentiment analysis for linguistics research: Observations on sentiment polarity and the use of the progressive in Italian. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence 6. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Visser, Frederikus Th. 1963–1973. An Historical Syntax of the English Language. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wiklund, Anna-Lena. 1996. Pseudocoordination is subordination. Paper presented at the XVIth Scandinavian Conference of Linguistics, Turku.
Wright, Susan. 1994. The mystery of the modal progressive. In Studies in Early Modern English, Dieter Kastovsky (ed.), 59–77. Berlin: De Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue