In:Predication in African Languages
Edited by James Essegbey and Enoch O. Aboh
[Studies in Language Companion Series 235] 2024
► pp. 263–283
Chapter 10From injecting to planting
The semantics of dó
Published online: 18 July 2024
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.235.10ess
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.235.10ess
Abstract
Ewe, like many Kwa languages, has very few verbs. Some of them are said to be meaningless or light
because they either do not have a translation equivalent in Standard Average European languages (SAE) or, where they
do, they appear on the surface to have several meanings. In this paper, I discuss one of these verbs, namely dó.
Although Westermann (1933) has only one entry for dó, he provides more than 20 subentries all with
different categories of internal arguments. The entries include ‘to stretch out’, ‘trade’, ‘lend’, ‘fix a price’, and
‘plant. Rongier (2015), on the other hand, has more than a hundred entries for dó. Following Ameka
(2019), I argue that while the multiple interpretations are presented in the dictionaries as though they are different
meanings, they are actually contextual interpretations. I argue that when the argument structure constructions in
which the verb occurs, and the semantics of the arguments with which it occurs are taken into consideration, many of
the different interpretations that are provided for dó fall out from one invariant meaning.
Keywords: argument structure construction, dó, Ewegbe, monosemy, verb semantics
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Dictionary-based analysis
- 3.Separating meaning from interpretation
- 4.On the semantics of dó
- 4.1One-place construction with dó
- 4.2Two-place with dó
- 4.2.1Dó with items of clothing
- 4.2.2Dó with plants
- 4.2.3Dó with solid food
- 4.2.4Dó with needles and tobacco
- 4.2.5Dó with non-count entities
- 4.2.6Dó with price
- 4.2.7Dó with money
- 4.2.8Dó with debt
- 4.2.9Dó with voice
- 4.2.10Dó with directional ɖa or allative prepositional phrase
- 4.2.11Dó with emotions
- 4.3Three-place construction with dó
- 4.4Conclusion
Abbreviations References
References (18)
Ameka, Felix. 1990. The
grammatical packaging of experiencers in Ewe: A study in the semantics of
syntax. Australian Journal of
Linguistics 10(2): 139–181.
. 2019. ‘The
nut opens’ and ‘hunger ends’: Verb constructions at the syntax-semantics
interface. In The Grammar of Verbs and their
Arguments: A Cross-linguistic Perspective, James Essegbey, Dalina Kallulli & Adam Bodomo (eds), 59–84. Cologne: Rüdiger Köppe.
Ameka, Felix & Terkourafi, Marina. 2019. What
if…? Imagining non-Western perspectives on pragmatic theory and
practice. Journal of
Pragmatics 1–11.
Clements, George N. 1972. The Verbal
Syntax of Ewe. PhD dissertation, University of London.
Essegbey, James. 1999. Inherent
Complement Verbs Revisited: Towards Understanding Argument Structure in
Ewe. Leiden: Leiden University (MPI Dissertation Series).
Fillmore, Charles J., Kay, Paul & O’connor, Mary C. 1988. Regularity
and idiomaticity in grammatical constructions: The case of let
alone. Language 64(3): 501–538.
Goddard, Cliff & Wierzbicka, Anna. 2014. Words
and Meanings: Lexical Semantics Across Domains, Languages and
Cultures. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Goldberg, Adele. 1995. A
Construction Grammar Approach to Argument
Structure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Levinson, Stephen C. 1995. Three levels of
meaning. In Grammar and Meaning: Essays in Honour of
Sir John Lyons, 90–115. Cambridge University Press.
Westermann, Diedrich. 1930. A
Study of the Ewe Language. [translated by L. Bickford-Smith] London: Oxford University Press.