References (52)
Bibliography
Alber, Birgit & Rabanus, Stefan. 2011. Kasussynkretismus und Belebtheit in germanischen Pronominalparadigmen. In Dynamik des Dialekts – Wandel und Variation. Akten des 3. Kongresses der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Dialektologie des Deutschen, Elvira Glaser, Jürgen Erich Schmidt & Natascha Frey (eds), 23–46. Stuttgart: Steiner.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Anderson, Stephen R. 1992. A-Morphous morphology [Cambridge Studies in Linguistics 62]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ball, Martin J. & Müller, Nicole. 1992. Mutation in Welsh. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Baumgartner, Heinrich. 1922. Die Mundarten des Berner Seelandes [Beiträge zur schweizerdeutschen Grammatik 14]. Frauenfeld: Huber.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Biedermann, Karl. 1888. Us Stadt und Land: Erzellige. Vol. 1. Winterthur: Ziegler.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1889. Us Stadt und Land: Erzellige. Vol. 2. Winterthur: Ziegler.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1932. Us Stadt und Land: Erzellige. Vol 3. Winterthur: Ziegler.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bonami, Olivier, Boyé, Gilles & Tseng, Jesse. 2014. An integrated approach to French liaison. In: Proceedings of Formal Grammar 2004, Paola Monachesi, Gerhard Jäger, Gerald Penn & Shuly Wintner (eds), 29–45. Stanford: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bréal, Michel. 1900. Essai de sémantique [Semantics: studies in the science of meaning]. London: Heinemann.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chumakina, Marina, Hippisley, Andrew & Corbett, Greville G. 2004. Istoričeskie izmenenija v russkoj leksike: slučaj čeredujuščegosja suppletivizma [Historical changes in the Russian lexicon: A case of alternating suppletion]. Russian Linguistics 28(3): 281–315.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Clark, Eve V. 1987. The Principle of Contrast: A constraint on language acquisition. In Mechanisms of language acquisition. The 20th Annual Carnegie Mellon Symposium on Cognition, Brian MacWhinney (ed), 1–33. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Corbett, Greville G. 2005. The canonical approach in typology. In Linguistic Diversity and Language Theory [Studies in Language Companion Series 72], Zygmunt Frajzyngier, Adam Hodges & David S. Rood (eds), 25–49. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2007a. Canonical typology, suppletion, and possible words. Language 83(1): 8–42. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2007b. Deponency, syncretism, and what lies between. In Deponency and morphological mismatches [Proceedings of the British Academy 145], Matthew Baerman, Greville G. Corbett, Dunstan Brown & Andrew Hippisley (eds), 21–43. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Corbett, Greville G. & Fedden, Sebastian. 2016. Canonical gender. Journal of Linguistics 52(3): 495–531. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dal Negro, Silvia. 2004. Artikelmorphologie. Walserdeutsch im Vergleich zu anderen alemannischen Dialekten. In Alemannisch im Sprachvergleich. Beiträge zur 14. Arbeitstagung für Alemannische Dialektologie in Männedorf (Zürich) vom 16. – 18.9.2002, Elvira Glaser, Peter Ott, & Rudolf Schwarzenbach (eds), 101–111. Stuttgart: Steiner.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dal Negro, Silvia & Musso, Michele. 2003. L’articolo determinativo nel dialetto Walser di Issime. Fenomeni di (apparente) allomorfia. Studi alemannici 2: 155–173.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dieth, Eugen. 1938. Schwyzertütschi Dialäktschrift. Leitfaden einer einheitlichen Schreibweise für alle Dialekte. Nach den Beschlüssen der Schriftkommission der Neuen Helvetischen Gesellschaft (Gruppe Zürich). Zürich: Füssli.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ebert, Robert P., Reichmann, Oskar, Solms, Hans-Joachim & Wegera, Klaus-Peter. 1993. Frühneuhochdeutsche Grammatik. Tübingen: Niemeyer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ellis, Rod. 1999. Item versus system learning. Explaining free variation. Applied Linguistics 20(4): 460–480. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Eschmann, Ernst. 1912. De Sängertag: Idylle. Zürich: Füssli.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fehringer, Carol. 2004. How stable are morphological doublets? A case study of /schwa/ ~ Ø variants in Dutch and German. Journal of Germanic Linguistics 16(4): 285–329. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2011. Allomorphy in the German genitive. A paradigmatic account. Zeitschrift für Germanistische Linguistik 39(1): 90–112. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fleischer, Jürg & Schmid, Stephan. 2006. Zurich German. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 36(2): 243–253. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Green, Antony D. 2006. The independence of phonology and morphology: The Celtic mutations. Lingua 116(11): 1946–1985. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Harris, Alice C. 2017. Multiple Exponence. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hasse, Anja. 2019. The interaction of phonological and morphological variation. In Morphological variation. Theoretical and empirical perspectives, ed. by Antje Dammel, and Oliver Schallert, 223–242. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. in press. Morphologische Variation in der Indefinitartikelflexion des Zürichdeutschen [Zeitschrift für Dialektologie und Linguistik. Beihefte]. Stuttgart: Steiner.
Hasse, Anja, Mächler, Patrick & Bachmann, Sandro. 2020. Genus- und Kasusprofilierung beim schweizerdeutschen Definitartikel. In Regiolekt – Der neue Dialekt? Akten des 6. Kongresses der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Dialektologie des Deutschen (IGDD) [Zeitschrift für Dialektologie und Linguistik. Beihefte 182], Helen Christen, Brigitte Ganswindt, Joachim Herrgen & Jürgen Erich Schmidt (eds), 249–267. Stuttgart: Steiner.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hotzenköcherle, Rudolf. 1934. Die Mundart von Mutten: Laut- und Flexionslehre. Frauenfeld: Huber.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hotzenköcherle, Rudolf & Trüb, Rudolf (eds). 1975. Sprachatlas der deutschen Schweiz. Vol. 3: Formengeographie. Bern: Francke.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Klein, Thomas, Solms, Hans-Joachim & Wegera, Klaus-Peter. 2018. Mittelhochdeutsche Grammatik. Teil II: Flexionsmorphologie. Vol. 1: Substantive, Adjektive, Pronomina. Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kroch, Anthony. 1994. Morphosyntactic variation. In Papers from the 30th regional meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society 1994, Katharine P. Beals (ed), 180–201. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Labov, William. 1972. Sociolinguistic Patterns [Conduct and Communication 4]. Philadelphia: University of Philadelphia Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Marti, Werner. 1985. Berndeutsch-Grammatik für die heutige Mundart zwischen Thun und Jura. Bern: Francke.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mörth, Karlheinz & Dressler, Wolfgang U. 2014. German plural doublets with and without meaning differentiation. In Morphology and Meaning. Selected Papers from the 15th International Morphology Meeting, Vienna, February 2012 [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 327], Franz Rainer, Francesco Gardani, Hans Christian Luschützky & Wolfgang U. Dressler (eds), 249–258. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nübling, Damaris. 1992. Klitika im Deutschen. Schriftsprache, Umgangssprache, alemannische Dialekte [ScriptOralia 42]. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nübling, Damaris & Schrambke, Renate. 2004. Silben- vs. akzentsprachliche Züge in germanischen Sprachen und im Alemannischen. In Alemannisch im Sprachvergleich. Beiträge zur 14. Arbeitstagung für Alemannische Dialektologie in Männedorf (Zürich) vom 16. – 18.9.2002 [Zeitschrift für Dialektologie und Linguistik. Beihefte 129], 281–320.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Paul, Hermann. 2007. Mittelhochdeutsche Grammatik [Sammlung kurzer Grammatiken germanischer Dialekte. A: Hauptreihe 2], 25th edition, revised by Thomas Klein, Hans-Joachim Solms & Klaus-Peter Wegera. Tübingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schallert, Oliver & Dammel, Antje. 2019. Introduction. On the benefits of analyzing morphological variation by linking theory and empirical evidence. In Morphological variation. Theoretical and empirical perspectives [Studies in Language Companion Series 207], Antje Dammel, and Oliver Schallert (eds), 1–26. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schmidt, Jürgen Erich, Dammel, Antje, Girnth, Heiko & Lenz, Alexandra N. 2019. Sprache und Raum im Deutschen: Aktuelle Entwicklungen und Forschungsdesiderate. In Sprache und Raum. Ein internationales Handbuch der Sprachvariation. Vol. 4: Deutsch [Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft/Handbooks of Linguistics and Communication Science 30.4], Joachim Herrgen & Jürgen Erich Schmidt (eds), 28–60. Berlin, Berlin: De Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schobinger, Viktor. 2008. Säit me soo oder andersch? Dialäkt zum Naaschlaa wien im Wörterbuech. 5th, revised edition. Zürich: Schobinger.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Seiler, Guido. 2003. Präpositionale Dativmarkierung im Oberdeutschen [Zeitschrift für Dialektologie und Linguistik. Beihefte 124]. Stuttgart: Steiner.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stalder, Franz J. 1819. Die Landessprachen der Schweiz: Oder, Schweizerische Dialektologie mit kritischen Sprachbemerkungen beleuchtet. Nebst der Gleichnißrede von dem verlorenen Sohne in allen Schweizermundarten. Aarau: Sauerländer.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stewart, Thomas. 2016. Contemporary morphological Theories. A User’s Guide. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Thornton, Anna M. 2010–2011. La non canonicità del tipo it. braccio // braccia // bracci: Sovrabbondanza, difettività o iperdifferenziazione? Studi di grammatica italiana 29–30: 419–477.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2011. Overabundance (multiple forms realizing the same cell): A non-canonical phenomenon in Italian verb morphology. In Morphological autonomy. Perspectives from Romance inflectional morphology, Martin Maiden, John Charles Smith, Maria Goldbach & Marc-Olivier Hinzelin (eds), 358–381. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2012. Reduction and maintenance of overabundance. A case study on Italian verb paradigms. Word Structure 5(2): 183–207. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Trubetzkoy, Nikolai S. 1939. Grundzüge der Phonologie [Travaux du Cercle Linguistique de Prague 7]. Prag: Cercle Linguistique.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Weber, Albert. 1923. Die Mundart des Zürcher Oberlandes [Beiträge zur Schweizerdeutschen Grammatik 15]. Frauenfeld: Huber.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1948. Zürichdeutsche Grammatik: Ein Wegweiser zur guten Mundart. Zürich: Schweizer Spiegel Verlag.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Weinhold, Karl. 1863. Grammatik der deutschen Mundarten: Vol. 1: Das alemannische Gebiet [Alemannische Grammatik]. Berlin: Dümmler.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Ellsäßer, Sophie
2025. Grit Nickel. 2023. Nominale Flexionsmorphologie in den ostoberdeutschen Dialekten (Open Germanic Linguistics 6). Berlin: Language Science Press. 380 S.. Zeitschrift für Rezensionen zur germanistischen Sprachwissenschaft 17:1-2  pp. 122 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 4 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue