Cover not available

In:Free Variation in Grammar: Empirical and theoretical approaches
Edited by Kristin Kopf and Thilo Weber
[Studies in Language Companion Series 234] 2023
► pp. 74–98

Get fulltext
PDF logo with download linkDownload Chapter PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload Chapter EPUB

Chapter 4
Non-verbal plural number agreement. Between the distributive plural and singular

Blocking factors and free variation

ORCiD logo with link | University of Gdańsk
ORCiD logo with link | Charles University in Prague
Open Access logo
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) 4.0 license.

For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at rights@benjamins.nl.

Published online: 31 October 2023
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.234.04rud
Abstract
Unlike Slavic languages, such as Polish and Czech, English is assumed to prefer distributive plural agreement between the plural subject and the noun in the predicate part of the sentence. The aim of this paper is to verify this claim and (since this preference is apparently not without exceptions) provide an overview of scenarios in which the tendency for the distributive plural is overruled. We start with a classification of factors blocking the use of the plural and enabling the use of distributive singular. The preference is tested by reviewing the occurrences of two constructions, lose one’s life and lose one’s job, in the BNC and COCA, In view of the distributive singular cases in the dataset, the chapter investigates the possibility of the distributive plural and singular cases being in a free variation and proposes a new condition for them to be seen as such: they need to have a similar distribution across different genres.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction, structure and relevance of the chapter
    • 1.1Distributive plural in the literature
    • 1.2The distributive plural – the general norm and blocking factors
      • 1.2.1Avoidance of ambiguity
      • 1.2.2Fossilisation/the force of invariability
      • 1.2.3Singularisation to achieve generalisation
      • 1.2.4Countability-related factor(s)
      • 1.2.5The wish to indicate joint possession
      • 1.2.6The wish to convey ideas of a figurative, abstract or universal kind
      • 1.2.7Do blocking factors always block?
      • 1.2.8Classification of blocking factors according to their strength
  • 2.Free variation
  • 3.The distributive plural and singular displayed by selected expressions in English corpora
    • 3.1Methodology
    • 3.2Results
      • 3.2.1Results: The BNC
      • 3.2.2Results: COCA
    • 3.3Comparison of the datasets: Implications for the two varieties of English and free variation
  • 4.Genre and free variation
  • 5.Conclusions
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
  • Language corpora & dictionaries
  • Software
References (33)
References
Aarts, Bas, Chalker, Sylvia & Weiner, Edmund S. C. 2014. The Oxford Dictionary of English Grammar. 2nd fully rev. and updated ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brown, Keith & Miller, Jim. 2013. The Cambridge Dictionary of Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cappelle, Bert. 2009. Can we factor out free choice? In Describing and Modeling Variation in Grammar [Trends in Linguistics. Studies and Monographs 204], Andreas Dufter, Jürg Fleischer, Guido Seiler (eds), 183–201. Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Casagrande, June. 2013. A Word, Please: Sometimes subjects disagree with their objects. [URL] (20 July 2020).
Clutterbuck, Peter. 2000. Excel Essential Skills: Student Grammar and Vocabulary Handbook. Years 7–8. Sydney: Pascal Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cowie, Anthony P., Mackin, Ronald & McCaig, Isabel R. 1983. Oxford Dictionary of Current Idiomatic English. Vol. 2: Phrase, Clause & Sentence Idioms. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dušková, Libuše et al. 2006. Mluvnice současné angličtiny na pozadí češtiny [Grammar of Contemporary English against the Background of Czech]. 2nd ed. Praha: Academia.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Follett, Wilson. 1998. Modern American Usage: A Guide. Revised by Erik Wensberg. New York: Hill and Wang.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Forsyth, James. 1970. A grammar of aspect: usage and meaning in the Russian verb [Studies in the Modern Russian Language. Extra Volume]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gibbs, Raymond W. & Gonzales, Gayle P. 1985. Syntactic frozenness in processing and remembering idioms. Cognition 20(3): 243–259. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gries, Stefan T. 2003. Multifactorial Analysis in Corpus Linguistics: A Study of Particle Placement. London, New York: Continuum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Koïchi, Jin. 2012. Vademecum of English Grammar for Cross-Culture Communication With Occasional Reference to German, Danish, and Icelandic. e-Bookland.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lohse, Barbara, Hawkins, John A. & Wasow, Thomas. 2004. Domain minimization in English verb-particle constructions. Language 80(2): 238–261. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Quirk, Randolph, Greenbaum, Sidney, Leech, Geoffrey & Svartvik, Jan. 1985. A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rappaport, Jennifer. 2017. Singular or Plural? Sometimes, It Depends. [URL] (28 October 2020).
Scheurweghs, Gustave. 1961. Present-Day English Syntax. A Survey of Sentence Patterns. 2nd ed. London: Longmans Green & Co.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schibsbye, Knud. 1970. A Modern English Grammar. 2. ed. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sørensen, Knud. 1985. The distributive plural and its limits. English Studies 66(4): 338–350. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vallins, George Henry. 1960. Good English. How to write it. 10th ed. London: Pan Books.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wood, Frederick T. 1957. Singular or Plural? A Question of Concord. Moderna Språk 51.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Yusifova, Gunel I. 2013. Syntactic Features of English Idioms. International Journal of English Linguistics 3(3): 133–138. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zandvoort, Reinard W. 1957. A Handbook of English Grammar. London: Longmans, Green and Co.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Language corpora & dictionaries
Cambridge Online Dictionary, s. v. lose your life. [URL] (13 November 2020).
, s. v. spontaneity. [URL] (26 November 2020).
Cowie, Anthony P., Mackin, Ronald & McCaig, Isabel R. 1985. Oxford Dictionary of Current Idiomatic English. Vol. 2: Phrase, Clause & Sentence Idioms. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Davies, Mark. 2004–. British National Corpus. [URL] (6 March 2023).
. 2008–. The Corpus of Contemporary American English (COCA): One billion words, 1990–2019. [URL] (6 March 2023).
. 2013. Corpus of Global Web-Based English: 1.9 billion words from speakers in 20 countries (GloWbE). [URL] (6 March 2023).
. 2013. Corpus of News on the Web (NOW): 3+ billion words from 20 countries, updated every day. [URL] (6 March 2023).
Merriam-Webster, s. v. lose one’s job. [URL] (13 November 2020).
Software
R Core Team. 2013. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. [URL] (6 March 2023).
RStudio Team. 2020. RStudio: Integrated Development for R. [URL] (6 March 2023).
Wickham, Hadley. 2016. ggplot2: Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis. 2nd ed. Cham: Springer. [URL] (6 March 2023).
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Chmarzyńska, Aleksandra
2024. A corpus-driven analysis of the usage patterns of adverb indeed. Forum Filologiczne Ateneum :1(12)2024 ► pp. 27 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 4 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue