Cover not available

In:Micro- and Macro-variation of Causal Clauses: Synchronic and Diachronic Insights
Edited by Łukasz Jędrzejowski and Constanze Fleczoreck
[Studies in Language Companion Series 231] 2023
► pp. 184–220

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload Book EPUB
authorization required

Chapter 7
Layers of subordinate clauses

A view from causal af-því-að-clauses in Icelandic

 | University of Iceland
 | University of Cologne
Published online: 1 March 2023
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.231.07ang
Abstract
The main aim of this chapter is to examine adverbial causal af-því-að-clauses in modern Icelandic. Semantically, we argue that af-því-að-clauses can be interpreted as eventuality-related, as evidential or as speech-act-related causal clauses. Syntactically, we show that af-því-að-clauses can be analyzed as central, peripheral or disintegrated adverbial clauses in the sense claimed by Haegeman (2010, 2012), Schönenberger and Haegeman (this volume), and Frey (2011, 2012, 2016). Based on Krifka (to appear) and Frey (2020, to appear, this volume), we assume af-því-að-clauses to be assertive clauses attaching – depending on their interpretation – as Tense Phrase, Judge Phrase or Act Phrase adjuncts. Essentially, we take interpretative differences to follow from the distinct attachment heights. Main arguments for this three part division are based on binding data, embeddability, movement restrictions, and clausal anaphora.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Semantic variation of causal af-því-að-clauses
    • 2.1Semantic diversity
    • 2.2Syntactic heterogeneity
    • 2.3Interim conclusion
  • 3.Analysis
  • 4.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • Abbreviations
  • References
References (90)
References
Angantýsson, Ásgrímur & Jędrzejowski, Łukasz. 2020. On causal af-því-að-clauses in Icelandic with a brief comparison to German verb final weil-clauses. Working Papers in Scandinavian Syntax 104: 29–55.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Angantýsson, Ásgrímur. 2011. The syntax of embedded clauses in Icelandic and related languages. PhD dissertation, Reykjavík: University of Iceland.
. 2017. Stylistic fronting and related constructions in the Insular Scandinavian Languages. In Syntactic Variation in Insular Scandinavian [Studies in Germanic Linguistics 1], Höskuldur Thráinsson, Caroline Heycock, Hjalmar P. Petersen & Zakaris Svabo Hansen (eds), 277–306. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2020. The distribution of embedded V2 and V3 in modern Icelandic. In Rethinking Verb Second, Sam Wolfe & Rebecca Woods (eds), 240–264. Oxford: OUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Angantýsson, Ásgrímur & Jonas, Dianne. 2016. On the syntax of adverbial clauses in Icelandic. Working Papers in Scandinavian Syntax 96: 126–139.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Angantýsson, Ásgrímur & Jónsson, Jóhannes Gísli. 2021. The relative order of sentential adverbs in Icelandic and Faroese. Fróðskaparritið 67: 81–95. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Antomo, Mailin & Steinbach, Markus. 2010. Desintegration und Interpretation: Weil-V2-Sätze an der Schnittstelle zwischen Syntax, Semantik und Pragmatik. Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft 29(1): 1–37. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Büring, Daniel. 2005. Binding Theory. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Blühdorn, Hardarik. 2013. Syntaktische Nebensatzklassen im Deutschen. Pandaemonium 16(21): 149–218. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Blümel, Andreas. 2019. Adnominal conditionals in German. Linguistics Vanguard 5(s3): 1–9. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Charnavel, Isabelle. 2017. Non-at-issueness of since-clauses. In Proceedings of the 27th Semantics and Linguistic Theory Conference, University of Maryland, College Park, 12–14 May, Dan Burgdorf, Jacob Collard, Sireemas Maspong & Brynhildur Stefánsdóttir (eds), 43–58. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2020. French causal puisque-clauses in the light of (not)-at-issueness. In Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 16. Selected Papers from the 47th Linguistic Symposium on Romance Languages (LSRL47), Newark, Delaware [Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 16], Irene Vogel (ed.), 50–64. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1981. Lectures on Government and Binding. The Pisa Lectures [Studies in Generative Grammar 9]. Dordrecht: Kluwer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cinque, Guglielmo. 1999. Adverbs and Functional Heads. A Cross-linguistic Perspective [Oxford Studies in Comparative Syntax]. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Copley, Bridget & Wolff, Phillip. 2014. Theories of causation should inform linguistic theory and vice versa. In Causation in Grammatical Structures [Oxford Studies in Theoretical Linguistics 52], Bridget Copley & Fabienne Martin (eds), 11–57. Oxford: OUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cristofaro, Sonia. 2003. Subordination. Oxford: OUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Davidson, Donald. 1967. Causal relations. The Journal of Philosophy 64(21): 691–703. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dowty, David R. 1979. Word Meaning and Montague Grammar: The Semantics of Verbs and Times in Generative Semantics and Montague’s PTQ [Synthese Language Library 7]. Dordrecht: Reidel. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
van Dijk, Teun A. 1977. Text and Context. Explorations in the Semantics and Pragmatics of Discourse [Longman Linguistics Library 21]. London: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Eberhardt, Ira. 2017. From a focus particle to a conjunction. Diachronic and synchronic analysis of German zumal. Language 93(2): e66–e96. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Eberhardt, Ira & Featherston, Sam. 2019. Focus particles and negative scope: Both evidence for syntactic integration? Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics 4(126): 1–18. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Enç, Mürvet. 1989. Pronouns, licensing, and binding. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 7(1): 51–92. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Endo, Yoshio. 2012. The syntax-discourse interface in adverbial clauses. In Main Clause Phenomena. New Horizons [Linguistik Aktuell / Linguistics Today 190], Lobke Aelbrecht, Liliane Haegeman & Rachel Nye (eds), 365–383. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Endo, Yoshio & Haegeman, Liliane. 2019. Adverbial clauses and adverbial concord. Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics 4(48): 1–32. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Faller, Martina. 2002. Semantics and pragmatics of evidentials in Cuzco Quechua. PhD dissertation, Stanford, CA: Stanford University.
Frana, Ilaria. 2017. Modality in the nominal domain: The case of adnominal conditionals. In Modality across Syntactic Categories [Oxford Studies in Theoretical Linguistics 63], Ana Arregui, María Luisa Rivero & Andrés Salanova (eds), 49–69. Oxford: OUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Frey, Werner. 2011. Peripheral adverbial clauses, their licensing and the prefield in German. In Satzverknüpfungen. Zur Interaktion von Form, Bedeutung und Diskursfunktion [Linguistische Arbeiten 534], Eva Breindl, Gisella Ferraresi & Anna Volodina (eds), 41–77. Berlin: De Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2012. On two types of adverbial clauses allowing root-phenomena. In Main Clause Phenomona. New Horizons [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 190], Lobke Aelbrecht, Liliane Haegeman & Rachel Nye (eds), 405–429. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2016. About some correlations between formal and interpretative properties of causal clauses. In Co- and Subordination in German and Other Languages [Linguistische Berichte Sonderheft 21], Ingo Reich & Augustin Speyer (eds), 153–179. Hamburg: Buske.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2020. German concessives as TPs, JPs and ActPs. Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics 5(110): 1–31. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. To appear. On the status of different dependent clauses. In Propositionale Argumente im Sprachvergleich: Theorie und Empirie / Propositional Arguments in Cross-Linguistic Research: Theoretical and Empirical Issues [Studien zur deutschen Sprache], Jutta M. Hartmann & Angelika Wöllstein (eds). Tübingen: Narr.
Gärtner, Hans-Martin & Steinbach, Markus. 2006. A skeptical note on the syntax of speech acts and point of view. In Form, Structure, and Grammar. A Festschrift Presented to Günther Grewendorf on Occasion of his 60th Birthday [Studia Grammatica 63], Patrick Brandt & Eric Fuß (eds), 213–222. Berlin: Akademie Verlag. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gärtner, Hans-Martin & Eyþórsson, Þórhallur. 2020. Varieties of dependent verb second and verbal mood: A view from Icelandic. In Rethinking Verb Second, Sam Wolfe & Rebecca Woods (eds), 208–239. Oxford: OUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Green, Mitchell S. 2000. Illocutionary force and semantic content. Linguistics and Philosophy 23(5): 435–473. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Haegeman, Liliane. 2003. Conditional clauses: External and internal syntax. Mind and Language 18(4): 317–339. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2006. Conditionals, factives and the left periphery. Lingua 116(10): 1651–1669. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2009. Parenthetical adverbials: The radical orphan approach. In Dislocated Elements in Discourse: Syntactic, Semantic and Pragmatic Perspectives, Benjamin Shaer, Philippa Cook, Werner Frey & Claudia Maienborn (eds), 331–347. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2010. The internal syntax of adverbial clauses. Lingua 120(3): 628–648. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2012. Adverbial Clauses, Main Clause Phenomena, and the Composition of the Left Periphery [The Cartography of Syntactic Structures 8]. Oxford: OUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Haider, Hubert. 2005. How to turn German into Icelandic – and derive the OV-VO contrast. Journal of Germanic Linguistics 8(1): 1–53. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2012. Symmetry Breaking in Syntax [Cambridge Studies in Linguistics 136]. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2014. The VO-OV split of Germanic languages – A T3 and V2 production. Interdisciplinary Journal of Germanic Linguistics and Semiotic Analysis 19(1): 57–79.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Holmberg, Anders. 2015. ‘Verb second’. In Syntax – Theory and Analysis. An International Handbook III [Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft / Handbooks of Linguistics and Communication Science 42/1], Tibor Kiss & Artemis Alexiadou (eds), 242–283. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hooper, Joan B. & Thompson, Sandra A. 1973. On the applicability of root transformations. Linguistic Inquiry 4(4): 465–497.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hróarsdóttir, Thorbjörg. 2000. Word Order Change in Icelandic – From OV to VO [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 35]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Johnston, Michael James Robert. 1994. The syntax and semantics of adverbial adjuncts. PhD dissertation, Santa Cruz, CA: University of California Santa Cruz.
Jónsson, Jóhannes Gísli. 2019. The XP-þá-construction and V2. In The Sign of the V – Papers in Honour of Sten Vikner, Ken Ramshøj Christensen, Henrik Jørgensen & Johanna L. Wood (eds), 341–360. Aarhus: Department of English, School of Communication & Culture, Aarhus University. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Krifka, Manfred. 2014. Embedding illocutionary force. In Recursion: Complexity in Cognition [Studies in Theoretical Psycholinguistics 43], Tom Roeper & Margaret Speas (eds), 59–87. Cham: Springer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2015. Bias in Commitment Space Semantics: Declarative questions, negated questions, and questions tags. In Proceedings of the 25th Semantics and Linguistic Theory Conference, Stanford University, 15–17 May, Sarah D’Antonio, Mary Moroney & Carol Rose Little (eds), 328–345. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2018. Semantic types of complement clauses: Propositions, judgements and commitmens. Talk delivered at the Conference ‘Ars Grammatica: Theorie und Empirie im Sprachvergleich zum Schwerpunktthema Sachverhalts-/propositionale Argumente’ at the Institut für Deutsche Sprache in Mannheim.
. 2019. Commitments and beyond. Theoretical Linguistics 45(1–2): 73–91. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. To appear. Layers of assertive clauses: Propositions, judgements, commitments, acts. In Propositionale Argumente im Sprachvergleich: Theorie und Empirie / Propositional Arguments in Cross-Linguistic Research: Theoretical and Empirical Issues [Studien zur deutschen Sprache], Jutta M. Hartmann & Angelika Wöllstein (eds). Tübingen: Narr.
Lang, Ewald. 2000. Adversative connectors on distinct levels of discourse: A re-examination of Eve Sweetser’s three-level approach. In Cause – Condition – Concession – Contrast. Cognitive and Discourse Perspectives [Topics in English Linguistics 33], Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen & Bernd Kortmann (eds), 235–256. Berlin: De Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Larson, Richard. 2004. Sentence-final adverbs and “scope”. In Proceedings of the North Eastern Linguistics Society Annual Meeting 34 (NELS 34) at the Stony Brook University, Keir Moulton & Matthew Wolf (eds), 23–43. Amherst MA: GLSA.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Larson, Richard & Sawada, Miyuki. 2012. Root transformations & quantificational structure. In Main Clause Phenomena. New Horizons [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 190), Lobke Aelbrecht, Liliane Haegeman & Rachel Nye (eds), 47–78. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lasersohn, Peter. 1996. Adnominal conditionals. In Proceedings of the 6th Semantics and Linguistic Theory Conference, 26–28 April, Rutgers University, Teresa Galloway & Justin Spence (eds), 154–166. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lubomierski, Lisa. 2020. Adnominale Kausalsätze im Deutschen. Bachelor thesis, Universität zu Köln.
Maché, Jakob. 2019. How Epistemic Modifiers Emerge [Trends in Linguistics. Studies and Monographs 292]. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Morreall, John. 1979. The evidential use of because. Papers in Linguistics 12(1–2): 231–238. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Murray, Sarah E. 2017. The Semantics of Evidentials [Oxford Studies in Semantics and Pragmatics 9]. Oxford: OUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pasch, Renate. 1983. Die Kausalkonjunktionen da, denn und weil: Drei Konjunktionen – drei lexikalische Klassen. Deutsch als Fremdsprache 20(6): 332–337.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pittner, Karin. 2011. Subsidäre Begründungen. In Konnektoren im Deutschen und im Sprachvergleich: Beschreibung und grammatische Aspekte [Studien zur deutschen Sprache 53], Gisella Ferraresi (ed.), 157–182. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Potts, Christopher. 2005. The Logic of Conventional Implicatures [Oxford Studies in Theoretical Linguistics 7]. Oxford: OUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rapp, Irene. 2018. Wenn man versucht, JA nichts Falsches zu sagen – Zum Auftreten von Modalpartikeln in Haupt- und Nebensätzen. Linguistische Berichte 254: 183–228.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ravetto, Miriam & Blühdorn, Hardarik. 2011. Die Kausalkonjunktionen denn, weil, da im Deutschen und perché, poiché, siccome im Italienischen. In Konnektoren im Deutschen und im Sprachvergleich. Beschreibung und grammatische Analyse [Studien zur deutschen Sprache 53], Gisella Ferraresi (ed.), 207–250. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Reis, Marga. 2013. Weil-V2-Sätze und (k)ein Ende? Anmerkungen zur Analyse von Antomo & Steinbach (2010). Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft 32(2): 221–262. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rutherford, William E. 1970. Some observations concerning subordinate clauses in English. Language 46(1): 97–115. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sæbø, Kjell Johan. 1991. Causal and purposive clauses. In Semantik. Ein Internationales Handbuch der zeitgenössischen Forschung [Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaften 6], Arnim von Stechow & Dieter Wunderlich (eds), 623–631. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Scheffler, Tatjana. 2008. Semantic operators in different dimensions. PhD dissertation, Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania.
. 2013. Two-dimensional Semantics. Clausal Adjuncts and Complements [Linguistische Arbeiten 549]. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schenner, Mathias & Sode, Frank. 2014. Modal particles in causal clauses. The case of German weil wohl. In Modes of Modality: Modality, Typology, and Universal Grammar [Studies in Language Companion Series 149], Elisabeth Leiss & Werner Abraham (eds), 291–315. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schiffrin, Deborah. 1987. Discourse Markers [Studies in Interactional Sociolinguistics 5]. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sigurðsson, Halldór Ármann. 1981. Fjölyrtar aukateningar? [‘Multi-word subordinate conjunctions?’] Íslenskt Mál 3: 59–76.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1990. Long distance reflexives and moods in Icelandic. In Modern Icelandic Syntax [Syntax and Semantics 24], Joan Maling & Annie Zaenen (eds), 41–69. San Diego CA: Academic Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Simons, Mandy, Tonhauser, Judith, Beaver, David & Roberts, Craige. 2010. What projects and why. In Papers Presented at the 20th Conference on Semantics and Linguistic Theory (SALT), University of British Columbia and Simon Fraser University, Vancouver, 29 April – 1 May, Nan Li & David Lutz (eds), 309–327. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Speas, Peggy & Tenny, Carol L. 2003. Configurational properties of point of view roles. In Asymmetry in Grammar, Vol. I: Syntax and Semantics [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 57], Anna Maria Di Sciullo (ed.), 315–344. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Speas, Margaret. 2004. Evidentiality, logophoricity and the syntactic representation of pragmatic features. Lingua 114(3): 255–276. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stede, Manfred & Walter, Maik. 2011. Zur Rolle der Verknüpfungsebene am Beispiel der Kausalkonnektoren. In Satzverknüpfungen. Zur Interaktion von Form, Bedeutung und Diskursfunktion [Linguistische Arbeiten 534], Eva Breindl, Gisella Ferraresi & Anna Volodina (eds), 149–179. Berlin: De Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sweetser, Eve. 1990. From Etymology to Pragmatics. Metaphorical and Cultural Aspects of Semantic Structure [Cambridge Studies in Linguistics 54]. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Thráinsson, Höskuldur. 2005. Setningar: Handbók um íslenska setningafræði. Íslensk tunga III [‘Sentences: A Handbook on Icelandic Syntax. Icelandic Language III’]. Co-authors: Eiríkur Rögnvaldsson, Jóhannes Gísli Jónsson, Sigríður Magnúsdóttir, Sigríður Sigurjónsdóttir & Þórunn Blöndal. Reykjavík: Almenna bókafélagið.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2007. The Syntax of Icelandic. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Thráinsson, Höskuldur & Angantýsson, Ásgrímur. 2015. Orðaröð í aukasetningum [‘Word order in embedded clauses’]. In Tilbrigði í íslenskri setningagerð. II. Helstu niðurstöður. Tölfræðilegt yfirlit [‘Variation in Icelandic Syntax. II. Main Results. Statistical Overview’], Höskuldur Thráinsson, Ásgrímur Angantýsson & Einar Freyr Sigurðsson (eds), 299–330. Reykjavík: Málvísindastofnun Háskóla Íslands.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Thurmair, Maria. 1989. Modalpartikeln und ihre Kombinationen [Linguistische Arbeiten 223]. Tübingen: Niemeyer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tonhauser, Judith. 2012. Diagnosing (non-)at-issue content. Semantics of Under-represented Languages of the Americas 6: 239–254.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tonhauser, Judith, Beaver, David, Roberts, Craige & Simons, Mandy. 2013. Toward a taxonomy of projective content. Language 89(1): 66–109. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Volodina, Anna. 2011. Sweetsers Drei-Ebenen-Theorie: Theoretische Überlegungen vor dem Hintergrund einer korpuslinguistischen Studie über konditionale und kausale Relationen. In Konnektoren im Deutschen und im Sprachvergleich: Beschreibung und grammatische Analyse [Studien zur deutschen Sprache 53], Gisella Ferraresi (ed.), 127–155. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Williams, Edwin. 1974. Rule ordering in syntax. PhD dissertation, Cambridge, MA: MIT.
Wood, Rebecca Louise. 2016. Investigating the syntax of speech acts: Embedding illocutionary force. PhD dissertation, York: University of York.
Zimmermann, Malte. 2004. Zum Wohl: Diskurspartikeln als Satztypmodifikatoren. Linguistische Berichte 199: 253–286.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2008. Discourse particles in the left periphery. In Dislocated Elements in Discourse, Benjamin Shaer, Philippa Cook, Werner Frey & Claudia Maienborn (eds), 200–231. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Jędrzejowski, Łukasz
2023. Speech act adverbial clauses: The case of conditionaljeśli-clauses in Polish. Zeitschrift für Slawistik 68:2 ► pp. 282 ff. DOI logo
Jędrzejowski, Łukasz
2025. On the synchrony and diachrony of causal jako-że-clauses in Polish. Linguistics Vanguard DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 4 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue