Cover not available

In:Micro- and Macro-variation of Causal Clauses: Synchronic and Diachronic Insights
Edited by Łukasz Jędrzejowski and Constanze Fleczoreck
[Studies in Language Companion Series 231] 2023
► pp. 129–166

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload Book EPUB
authorization required

Chapter 5
English rationale since and a reassessment of the typology of adverbial clauses

 | University of Geneva
 | University of Geneva | Ghent University
Published online: 1 March 2023
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.231.05hae
Abstract
This chapter examines the syntactic and semantic properties of English causal adverbial clauses, starting from the fact that the conjunctions since and as can both introduce either a temporal clause or a rationale clause. Where relevant, the material is supplemented with data from Dutch causal adverbial clauses, focusing on the interaction with the syntax of Verb Second. It is shown that the bipartite distinction between ‘central’ adverbial clauses and ‘peripheral’ adverbial clauses (Haegeman 1984a, 1991/2009, a.o.) should be reconsidered. Frey’s (2016, 2018) ternary distinction is adopted, which differentiates between central adverbial clauses (CACs) and peripheral adverbial clauses (PACs), both regarded as syntactically integrated, and non-integrated clauses. Evidence is provided for Frey’s hypothesis that PACs are related to JudgementP (Krifka 2017).
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction: aim and scope of the chapter
  • 2.A comparison
    • 2.1Scope effects: temporal, modal, negative, and interrogative operators
    • 2.2Information structure: focus, it-clefts, new information
    • 2.3VP ellipsis and VP anaphora
    • 2.4Argumental status/complement of P
    • 2.5Resumption
    • 2.6Embedding
    • 2.7Echoic adverbial clauses
    • 2.8Summary
  • 3.Re-assessing the typology and the analysis
    • 3.1Rationale clauses are syntactically integrated
    • 3.2An analysis: (rationale) since2/as2-clauses and JudgementP
    • 3.3A third type of adverbial clause: Speech-event modifiers
    • 3.4Some speculations on non-integration
  • 4.Summary
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
References (71)
References
van der Auwera, Johan. 1986. Conditionals and speech acts. In On Conditionals, Elizabeth Traugott, Alice ter Meulen, Judith Snitzer Reilly & Charles A. Ferguson (eds), 197–214. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Axel, Katrin & Wöllstein, Angelika. 2009. German verb-first conditionals as unintegrated clauses. A case study in converging synchronic and diachronic evidence. In The Fruits of Empirical Linguistics [II] [Studies in Generative Grammar 102], Susanne Winkler & Sam Featherston (eds), 1–37. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Biasio, Marco & Castro, Enrico. 2019. Will in the English protasis: A proposal for motivating the constraint. Paper presented at the Incontro di Grammatica Generativa. Universita degli Studi di Padova.
Catasso, Nicholas. 2015. On postinitial aber and other syntactic transgressions: Some considerations on the nature of V2 in German. Journal of Germanic Linguistics 27(4): 317–365. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Charnavel, Isabelle. 2020. French causal puisque-clauses in the light of (not)-at-issueness. In Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 16 – Selected Papers from the 47th Linguistic Symposium on Romance Languages (LSRL47), Newark, Delaware [Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 16], Irene Vogel (ed.), 50–64. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cinque, Guglielmo. 1999. Adverbs and Functional Heads. A Cross-Linguistic Perspective [Oxford Studies in Comparative Syntax]. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2004. Issues in adverbial syntax. Lingua 114(6): 683–710. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2008. Two types of non-restrictive relatives. In Empirical issues in Syntax and Semantics, Olivier Bonami & Patricia Cabredo Hofherr (eds), 99–137. Paris: CNRS.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Close, Reginald. A. 1980. Will in if-clauses. In Studies in English Linguistics, Sidney Greenbaum, Geoffry Leech & Jan Svartvik (eds), 100–109. London: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Comrie, Bernard. 1982. Future time reference in the conditional protasis. Australian Journal of Linguistics 22(2): 143–152. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Davies, Eirean. 1979. On the Semantics of Syntax, Mood and Condition in English. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Declerck, Renaat. 1984. Pure future will in if-clauses. Lingua 63(3–4): 279–312. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1991. Tense in English. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Declerck, Renaat & Depraetere, Ilse. 1995. The double system of tense forms referring to future time in English. Journal of Semantics 12(3): 269–310. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Declerck, Renaat & Reed, Susan. 2001. Conditionals: A Comprehensive Empirical Analysis [Topics in English Linguistics 37]. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ducrot, Oswald. 1983. Le sens commun. Le dire et le dit. Paris: Les Editions de Minuit.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Elhadad, Michael & McKeown, Kathleen R. 1990. Generating connectives. Proceedings of COLING 90(3): 97–101. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Endo, Yokio & Haegeman, Liliane. 2019. Adverbial clauses and adverbial concord. Glossa – A Journal of General Linguistics 4(1): 48. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ernst, Thomas. 2002. The Syntax of Adjuncts [Cambridge Studies in Linguistics 96]. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2007. On the role of semantics in a theory of adverb syntax. Lingua 117(6): 1008–1033. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2009. Speaker-oriented adverbs. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 27(3): 497–544. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fabb, Nigel. 1990. The difference between English restrictive and non-restrictive relative clauses. Journal of Linguistics 26(1): 57–79. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Frey, Werner. 2012. Peripheral adverbial clauses, their licensing and the prefield in German. In Satzverknüpfung – Zur Interaktion von Form, Bedeutung und Diskursfunktion [Linguistische Arbeiten 534], Eva Breindl, Gisella Ferraresi & Anna Volodina (eds), 41–77. Berlin: De Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2016. On some correlations between formal and interpretative properties of causal clauses. In Co- und Subordination in German and Other Languages [Sonderheft Linguistische Berichte 21], Ingo Reich & Augustin Speyer (eds), 153–179. Hamburg: Buske.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2018. On the syntax-discourse interface with different kinds of not-at-issue expressions. CGSW 33, 27–28 August 2018, Georg-August-Universität Göttingen.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2019. Linking some syntactic and semantic features of concessives and adversatives. Paper presented at DGfS, AG 5, Bremen.
. 2020. On the categorical status of different dependent clauses. Ms, Leibniz-Zentrum Allgemeine Sprachwissenschaft, Berlin.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Giorgi, Alessandra. 2014. Prosodic signals as syntactic formatives in the left periphery. In On Peripheries, Exploring Clause Initial and Clause Final Positions, Anna Cardinaletti, Guglielmo Cinque & Endo Yoshio (eds), 161–188. Tokyo: Hituzi Syobe.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Greco, Ciro & Haegeman, Liliane. 2020. Frame setters and microvariation of subject-initial verb second. In Rethinking Verb Second, Rebecca Woods & Sam Wolfe (eds), 61–89. Oxford: OUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Haegeman, Liliane. 1984a. Parasitic gaps and adverbial clauses. Journal of Linguistics 20(2): 229–232. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1984b. Pragmatic conditionals in English. Folia Linguistica 18(3–4): 485–502. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1984c. Remarks on adverbial clauses and definite anaphora. Linguistic Inquiry 15(4): 712–715.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2003a. Conditional clauses: External and internal syntax. Mind and Language 18(4): 317–339. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2003b. Notes on long adverbial fronting in English and the left periphery. Linguistic Inquiry 31(4): 640–649. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1991/2009. Parenthetical adverbials: The radical orphanage approach. In Aspects of Modern English Linguistics: Papers Presented to Masatomo Ukaji on His 60th Birthday, Shuki Chiba, Akira Ogawa, Yasuaki Fuiwara, Norio Yamada, Osamu Koma & Takao Yagi (eds), 232–254. Tokyo: Kaitakushi. Republished in 2009 in Dislocated Elements in Discourse: Syntactic, Semantic and Pragmatic Perspectives, Benjamin Shaer, Philippa Cook, Werner Frey & Claudia Maienborn (eds), 331–347. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2010. The movement derivation of conditional clauses. Linguistic Inquiry 41(4): 595–621. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2012. Adverbial Clauses, Main Clause Phenomena and the Composition of the Left Periphery [The Cartography of Syntactic Structures 8]. Oxford: OUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Haegeman, Liliane & Greco, Ciro. 2018. West Flemish V3 and the interaction of syntax and discourse. Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 21 (1): 1–56. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Haegeman, Liliane & Robinson, Brian. 1979. A note on some aspects of the use of will in affirmative declarative sentences. Journal of Linguistics 15(1): 109–110. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Haegeman, Liliane & Wekker, Herman. 1984. The syntax and interpretation of futurate conditionals in English. Journal of Linguistics 20(1): 45–55. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Haegeman, Liliane, Shaer, Benjamin & Frey, Werner. 2009. Postscript: Problems and solutions for orphan analyses. In Dislocated Elements in Discourse: Syntactic, Semantic, and Pragmatic Perspectives, Benjamin Shaer, Philippa Cook, Werner Frey & Claudia Maienborn (eds), 348–365. New York NY: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hornstein, Norbert. 1990. As Time Goes By. Tense and Universal Grammar. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jespersen, Otto. 1909–49. A Modern English Grammar. Heidelberg: Karl Winter, Copenhagen / Einar Munksgaard, London / Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kearns, John T. 2006. Conditional assertion, denial, and supposition as illocutionary acts. Linguistics and Philosophy 29(4): 455–485. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kortmann, Bernd. 1997. Adverbial Subordination. A Typology and History of Adverbial Subordinators Based on European Languages [Empirical Approaches to Language Typology 18]. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Koster, Jan. 2000. Extraposition as parallel construal. Ms, University of Groningen.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Krifka, Manfred. 2017. Assertions and Judgements, Epistemics and Evidentials. Paper presented at the Workshop Speech Acts: Meanings, Uses, Syntactic and Prosodic Realizations, Leibniz-ZAS Berlin, 29–31 May. <[URL]> (2 September 2022).
. To appear. Layers of assertive causes: Propositions, judgements, commitments, acts. In Propositionale Argumente im Sprachvergleich: Theorie und Empirie. / Propositional Arguments in Cross-Linguistic Research: Theoretical and Empirical Issues. [Studien zur Deutschen Sprache], Jutta M. Hartmann & Angelika Wöllstein (eds). Tübingen: Narr.
Leech, Geoffrey N. 1971. Meaning and the English Verb (2nd and 3rd edn: 1987, 2004). London: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Li, Yafei, Shields, Rebecca & Lin, Vivian. 2012. Adverb classes and the nature of minimality. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 30(1): 217–260. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McCawley, James D. 1971. Tense and time reference in English. In Studies in Linguistic Semantics, Charles J. Fillmore & D. Terence Langėndoen (eds), 96–113. Irvington.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Niewint, Pieter. 1986. Present and future in conditional protases. Linguistics 24(2): 371–392. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Palmer, Frank. 1965. A Linguistic Study of the English Verb. London: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1974. The English Verb. London: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1990. Modality and the English Modals. London: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Potts, Christopher. 2015. Presupposition and implicature. In Handbook of Contemporary Semantic Theory, 2nd edn], Shalom Lappin & Chris Fox (eds), 168–202. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Quirk, Randolph, Sidney Greenbaum, Geoffrey Leech & Jan Svartvik. 1973. A Grammar of Contemporary English. London: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1985. A Comprehensive Grammar of the English language. London: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rizzi, Luigi. 1997. The fine structure of the left periphery. In Elements of Grammar. Handbook in Generative Syntax [Kluwer International Handbooks of Linguistics 1], Liliane Haegeman (ed.), 281–337. Dordrecht: Kluwer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ros, Hilke. 2005. Functional Phrase Structure: Integrating functional ideas in generative adverbial syntax. PhD dissertation, Ghent: Ghent University.
Rutherford, William E. 1970. Some observations concerning subordinate clauses in English. Language 46(1): 97–115. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Safir, Kenneth. 1986. Relative clauses in a theory of binding and levels. Linguistic Inquiry 17(4): 663–690.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Shaer, Benjamin. 2009. German and English left-peripheral elements and the “orphan” analysis of nonintegration. In Dislocated Elements in Discourse: Syntactic, Semantic, and Pragmatic Perspectives, Benjamin Shaer, Philippa Cook, Werner Frey & Claudia Maienborn (eds), 366–397. New York NY: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Takami, Ken-ichi. 1988. The syntax of if-clauses: Three types of if-clauses and X’-theory. Lingua 74(4): 263–281. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vandepitte, Sonia. 1993. A Pragmatic Study of the Expression and Interpretation of Causality. Conjuncts and Conjunctions in Modern Spoken British English. Brussels: Sonia Vandepitte.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Verstraete, Jean-Christophe. 2002. Interpersonal grammar and clause combining in English. PhD dissertation, Leuven: University of Leuven.
Wakker, Gerry. 1996. Conditionals at different levels of the clause. In Complex Structures [Functional Grammar Series 17], Betty Devriend, Louis Goossens & Johan van der Auwera (eds), 177–199. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wekker, Herman C. 1976. The Expression of Future Time in Contemporary British English. Amsterdam: North Holland.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wekker, Herman. C. 1977. Future reference in adverbial clauses. Interlanguage Studies Bulletin 2: 64–77.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zandvoort, Reinart Willem. 1975. A Handbook of English Grammar. London: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zufferey, Sandrine. 2012. “Car, parce que, puisque” revisited: Three empirical studies on French causal connectives. Journal of Pragmatics 44(2): 138–153. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (3)

Cited by three other publications

Ferroni, Sofia & Emanuela Sanfelici
2025. Refining the Italian clausal spine in light of Central Adverbial Clauses. Isogloss. Open Journal of Romance Linguistics 11:7 ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Letuchiy, Alexander
2025. Interpretation of complex sentences with different types of matrix predicates in the context of negation and modal operators. Russian Linguistics 49:1 DOI logo
Olga E. Pekelis
2024. Russian kak as a temporal conjunction: Synchronic, diachronic and typological perspective. Voprosy Jazykoznanija :5 ► pp. 7 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 4 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue