Cover not available

In:Micro- and Macro-variation of Causal Clauses: Synchronic and Diachronic Insights
Edited by Łukasz Jędrzejowski and Constanze Fleczoreck
[Studies in Language Companion Series 231] 2023
► pp. 1–12

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload Book EPUB
authorization required

Chapter 1
Outline of the volume

 | University of Cologne
 | Leibniz University Hannover
Published online: 1 March 2023
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.231.01jed
References (42)
References
Bayer, Josef. 2001. Two grammars in one: Sentential complements and complementizers in Bengali and other South Asian languages. In The Yearbook of South Asian Languages – Contact, Convergence and Typology, Peri Bhaskarorao, Kamuri V. Subbarao & Rajendra Singh (eds), 11–36. New Delhi: Sage. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Charnavel, Isabelle. 2017. Non-at-issueness of since-clauses. In Proceedings of the 27th Semantics and Linguistic Theory Conference, University of Maryland, College Park, 12–14 May, Dan Burgdorf, Jacob Collard, Sireemas Maspong & Brynhildur Stefánsdóttir (eds), 43–58. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cinque, Guglielmo. 1999. Adverbs and Functional Heads. A Cross-Linguistic Perspective [Oxford Studies in Comparative Syntax]. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2017. On the status of functional categories (heads and phrases). Language and Linguistics 18(4): 521–576. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Curme, George O. 1922. A Grammar of the German Language. Designed for a Thorough and Practical Study of the Language as Spoken and Written to Day. New York NY: The MacMillan Company.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
van Dijk, Teun A. 1977. Text and Context. Explorations in the Semantics and Pragmatics of Discourse [Longman Linguistics Library 21]. London: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Eberhardt, Ira. 2017. From a focus particle to a conjunction: Diachronic and synchronic analysis of German zumal. Language 93(2): e66–e96. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Endo, Yoshio. 2015. Two ReasonPs: What are*(n’t) you coming to the United States for? In Beyond Functional Sequence: The Cartography of Syntactic Structures [Oxford Studies in Comparative Syntax 10], Ur Shlonsky (ed.), 220–231. Oxford: OUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Frey, Werner. 2016. About some correlations between formal and interpretative properties of causal clauses. In Co- and Subordination in German and Other Languages [Linguistische Berichte Sonderheft 21], Ingo Reich & Augustin Speyer (eds), 153–179. Hamburg: Buske.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2020. German concessives as TPs, JPs and ActPs. Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics 5(110): 1–31. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. To appear. On the categorical status of different dependent clauses. In Propositionale Argumente im Sprachvergleich: Theorie und Empirie / Propositional Arguments in Cross-Linguistic Research: Theoretical and Empirical Issues [Studien zur deutschen Sprache], Jutta M. Hartmann & Angelika Wöllstein (eds). Tübingen: Narr.
Frey, Werner & Masiero, Federica. 2018. Desintegration versus Parordination bei obwohl und weil-Konstruktionen. In Im Mittelpunkt Deutsch [ZAS Papers in Linguistics 59], André Meinunger (ed.), 57–82. Berlin: Zentrum für Allgemeine Sprachwissenschaft. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
van Gelderen, Elly. 2004. Grammaticalization as Economy [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 71]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Haegeman, Liliane. 1984. Pragmatic conditionals in English. Folia Linguistica 18(3–4): 485–502. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2003. Conditional clauses: External and internal syntax. Mind and Language 18(4): 317–339. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2010. The internal syntax of adverbial clauses. Lingua 120(3): 628–648. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2012. Adverbial Clauses, Main Clause Phenomena, and the Composition of the Left Periphery [The Cartography of Syntactic Structures 8]. Oxford: OUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Higginbotham, James & Ramchand, Gillian. 1997. The stage-level/individual-level distinction and the Mapping Hypothesis. Oxford University Working Papers in Linguistics, Philology and Phonetics 2: 55–83.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Krifka, Manfred. 2018. Semantic types of complement clauses: Propositions, judgements and commitments. Talk delivered at the Conference ‘Ars Grammatica: Theorie und Empirie im Sprachvergleich zum Schwerpunktthema Sachverhalts-/propositionale Argumente’ at the IDS, Mannheim, June.
. To appear. Layers of assertive clauses: Propositions, judgements, commitments, acts. In Propositionale Argumente im Sprachvergleich: Theorie und Empirie / Propositional Arguments in Cross-Linguistic Research: Theoretical and Empirical Issues [Studien zur deutschen Sprache], Jutta Hartmann & Angelika Wöllstein (eds). Tübingen: Narr.
Küper, Christoph. 1991. Geht die Nebensatzstellung im Deutschen verloren? – Zur pragmatischen Funktion der Wortstellung in Haupt- und Nebensätzen. Deutsche Sprache 19(2): 133–158.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kuteva, Tania, Heine, Bernd, Bo Hong, Haiping Long, Narrog, Heiko & Rhee, Seongha (eds). 2019. Word Lexicon of Grammaticalization. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Morreall, John. 1979. The evidential use of because. Papers in Linguistics 12(1–2): 231–238. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pan, Victor Junnan & Paul, Waltraud. 2018. The syntax of complex sentences in Mandarin Chinese: A comprehensive overview with analyses. Linguistic Analysis 42(1–2): 63–162.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pander Maat, Henk & Degand, Liesbeth. 2001. Scaling causal relations and connectives in terms of speaker involvement. Cognitive Linguistics 12(3): 211–246. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pittner, Karin. 2007. Dialog in der Grammatik: Doch in Kausalsätzen mit Verberststellung. In Von der Pragmatik zur Grammatik, Sandra Döring & Jochen Geilfuß-Wolfgang (eds), 39–56. Leipzig: Leipziger Universitätsverlag.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2011. Subsidäre Begründungen. In Konnektoren im Deutschen und im Sprachvergleich: Beschreibung und grammatische Analyse [Studien zur deutschen Sprache 53], Gisella Ferraresi (ed.), 157–182. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rizzi, Luigi. 1997. The fine structure of the left periphery. In Elements of Grammar. Handbook in Generative Syntax [Kluwer International Handbooks of Linguistics 1], Liliane Haegeman (ed.), 281–337. Dordrecht: Kluwer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2001. On the position Int(errogative) in the left periphery of the clause. In Current Studies in Italian Syntax: Essays Offered to Lorenzo Renzi, Guglielmo Cinque & Giampaolo Salvi (eds), 287–296. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2006. On the form of chains: Criterial positions and ECP effects. In Wh-Movement: Moving On [Current Studies in Linguistics 42], Lisa Cheng & Norbert Corver (eds), 97–133. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sanders, Ted J. M., Spooren, Wilbert P. M. S. & Noordman, Leo G. M. 1992. Toward a taxonomy of coherence relations. Discourse Processes 15(1): 1–35. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Scheffler, Tatjana. 2013. Two-dimensional Semantics. Clausal Adjuncts and Complements [Linguistische Arbeiten 549]. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schiffrin, Deborah. 1987. Discourse Markers [Studies in Interactional Sociolinguistics 5]. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Shlonsky, Ur & Soare, Gabriela. 2011. Where’s why? Linguistic Inquiry 42(4): 651–669. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Speyer, Augustin. 2011. Zur Integriertheit kausaler (Neben-)Sätze im Frühneuhochdeutschen. Sprachwissenschaft 36(1): 53–84.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2015. Informationsdichte als Faktor für Einbettung. Eine sprachhistorische Studie an Kausalsätzen. Sprachwissenschaft 40(4): 453–485.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stukker, Ninke, Sanders, Ted J. M. & Verhagen, Arie. 2008. Causality in verbs and in discourse connectives: Converging evidence of cross-level parallels in Dutch linguistic categorization. Journal of Pragmatics 40(7): 1296–1322. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stump, Gregory. 1985. The Semantic Variability of Absolute Constructions [Studies in Linguistics and Philosophy 25]. Dordrecht: Foris. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sweetser, Eve. 1990. From Etymology to Pragmatics. Metaphorical and Cultural Aspects of Semantic Structure [Cambridge Studies in Linguistics 54]. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Szczepaniak, Renata. 2011. Grammatikalisierung im Deutschen. Eine Einführung. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Voigtmann, Sophia & Speyer, Augustin. 2021. Information density and the extraposition of German relative clauses. Frontiers in Psychology 12(650969): 1–18. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Zaika, N. M.
2025. Multiclausal Causal Constructions in Slovak. NSU Vestnik. Series: Linguistics and Intercultural Communication 23:1 ► pp. 110 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 4 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue