Cover not available

In:Reference: From conventions to pragmatics
Edited by Laure Gardelle, Laurence Vincent-Durroux and Hélène Vinckel-Roisin
[Studies in Language Companion Series 228] 2023
► pp. 269–285

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload Book EPUB
authorization required

Who creates reference?

Reference as an interactive procedure in discourse

 | Friedrich-Schiller-Universität Jena
Published online: 2 February 2023
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.228.14con
Abstract
This contribution sketches the role of hearers in the long history of reference research. Canonical approaches from semantics and (early) pragmatics as well as cognitive approaches are discussed with respect to the increasing role that hearers play in these various notions of reference. In the framework of Text-world model theory, reference objects are considered to be mental concepts that can vary as discourse progresses, as a result of a negotiation between speakers and hearers. Examples from German oral conversation corpora show that reference should be described as a collaborative, interactive procedure in order to get a notion of reference that is compatible with and useful for the analysis of conversation phenomena.
Article outline
  • 1.Reference and discourse
  • 2.Notions of reference
    • 2.1From static to discourse orientated notions of reference
    • 2.2Speaker reference and hearer reference
  • 3.Reference as a product of discourse
  • 4.Exemplary analysis of conversation data
    • 4.1Fluent change of concept features
    • 4.2Inconclusive attempts at instantiating a referring expression
    • 4.3Talking overtly about disparate concepts
  • 5.Conclusion
  • Notes
  • References
References (37)
References
Asher, Nicholas. 1993. Reference to Abstract Objects in Discourse. Dordrecht: Kluwer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Auer, Peter. 1981. Zur indexikalitätsmarkierenden Funktion der demonstrativen Artikelform in deutschen Konversationen. In Sprache = Verstehen und Handeln, Götz Hindelang & Werner Zillig (eds), 301–310. Tübingen: Niemeyer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bach, Kent & Strawson, Peter. 2008. On referring and not referring. In Reference: Interdisciplinary Perspectives, Jeanette Gundel & Nancy Hedberg (eds), 13–58. Oxford: OUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Blühdorn, Hardarik. 2009. Referentielle und nicht-referentielle Gebrauchsweisen von Nominalgruppen im Deutschen. Akten der internationalen Linguistenkonferenz Karpacz 10.-12.09.2007 [Beihefte zum Orbis Linguarum 77], 25–41. Dresden: Neisse.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Clark, Herbert & Marshall, Catherine. 1981. Definite reference and mutual knowledge. In Elements of Discourse Understanding, Aravind Joshi, Bonnie Webber & Ivan Sag (eds), 10–63. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Clark, Herbert & Sengul, Carol. 1979. In search of referents for nouns and pronouns. Memory & Cognition 7: 35–41. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Clark, Herbert, Schreuder, Robert & Buttrik, Samuel. 1983. Common ground and the understanding of definite reference. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 22: 245–258. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Clark, Herbert & Wilkes-Gibbs, Deanna. 1986. Referring as a collaborative process. Cognition 22(1): 1–39. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Consten, Manfred. 2003. Towards a unified model of domain-bound reference. In Deictic Conceptualisation of Space, Time and Person, [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 112]. Friedrich Lenz (ed.), 223–248. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2004. Anaphorisch oder Deiktisch? Zu einem Integrativen Modell Domänengebundener Referenz. Tübingen: Niemeyer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Consten, Manfred & Averintseva-Klisch, Maria. 2012. Tentative reference acts? “Recognitional demonstratives” as means of suggesting mutual knowledge – or overriding a lack of it. Research in Language 10(3): 257–277. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Diessel, Holger. 1999. Demonstratives: Form, Function, and Grammaticalization. [Typological Studies in Language 42]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Donnellan, Keith. 1966. Reference and definite descriptions. Philosophical Review 75: 281–304. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1978. Speaker’s reference, description and anaphora. In Syntax and Semantics, Vol 9: Pragmatics, Peter Cole (ed.), 47–68. New York NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Enfield, Nicholas J. & Stivers, Tanya. 2007. Person Reference in Interaction: Linguistic, Cultural, and Social Perspectives. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fox, Barbara A., Thompson, Sandra A., Ford, Cecilia & Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth. 2013. Conversation analysis in linguistics. In Handbook of Conversation Analysis, Jack Sidnell & Tanya Stivers (eds), 726–740. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Frege, Gottlob. 1892. Über Sinn und Bedeutung. Zeitschrift für Philosophie und Philosophische Kritik 100: 25–50.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gutfleisch-Rieck, Ingeborg, Klein, Wolfgang, Speck, Agnes & Spranz-Fogasy, Thomas. 1989. Transkriptionsvereinbarungen für den Sonderforschungsbereich 245 “Sprechen und Sprachverstehen im sozialen Kontext”. Reports des Sonderforschungsbereichs 245. Heidelberg: Universität Heidelberg. <[URL]> (14 August 2022).
Haugh, Michael. 2010. Co-constructing what is said in interaction. In The Role of Data at the Semantics-Pragmatics Interface, Enikö Németh & Karóly Bibok (eds), 349–380. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hawkins, John. 1978. Definiteness and Indefiniteness. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jackendoff, Ray. 1983. Semantics and Cognition. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Johnson-Laird, Philip N. 1983. Mental Models. Towards a Cognitive Science of Language, Inference, and Consciousness. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Linsky, Leonard. 1969. Referring. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lyons, John. 1977. Semantics (Vol. 1–2). Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Molnár, Krisztina. 2010. Anamnestische Verwendung der Demonstrativa im Deutschen und im Ungarischen. Deutsche Sprache 4(10): 326–344. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pafel, Jürgen. 2020. Referenz [Kegli 22]. Heidelberg: Winter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pustejovsky, James. 2005. A Survey of Dot Objects. Technical report, Brandeis University. <[URL]> (14 August 2022).
Russell, Bertrand. 1905. On denoting. Mind 30: 479–493. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sanford, Anthony & Garrod, Simon. 1981. Understanding Written Language. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schwarz, Monika. 2000. Indirekte Anaphern in Texten. Tübingen: Niemeyer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schwarz-Friesel, Monika & Consten, Manfred. 2011. Reference and anaphora. In Foundations of Pragmatics [Handbooks of Pragmatics 1], Wolfram Bublitz & Neal Norrick (eds), 347–372. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Searle, John. 1969. Speech Acts. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Strawson, Peter. 1950. On referring. Mind 59: 320–344. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Szczepek, Beatrice. 2000. Functional aspects of collaborative productions in English conversation. Interaction and Linguistic Structures (InLiSt) 21. <[URL]> (14 August 2022)
van Dijk, Teun & Kintsch, Walter. 1983. Strategies of Discourse Comprehension. New York NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Veldre-Gerner, Georgia. 2007. Demonstrativa im Text. Eine Vergleichende Untersuchung zum Französischen und Italienischen [Beihefte zur Zeitschrift für romanische Philologie] Tübingen: Niemeyer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
von Stutterheim, Christiane. 1997. Einige Prinzipien des Textaufbaus. Tübingen: Niemeyer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue