In:On Spoken French: An Ashby Reader
William J. Ashby
[Studies in Language Companion Series 226] 2023
► pp. 371–388
Preferred Argument Structure in spoken French and Spanish
Published online: 2 March 2023
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.226.c27
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.226.c27
This article uses the quantitative methodology of GoldVarb to examine the variable distribution of lexical noun phrases representing core arguments of the verb in a corpus of spoken French and a corpus of spoken Spanish. It is shown that this distribution is not random, but instead conforms to a grammatically and pragmatically motivated pattern known as Preferred Argument Structure.
Article outline
- 1.Methodology
- 2.Results
- 2.1The grammatical dimensions of PAS
- 2.2The non-lexical A constraint
- 2.3The one lexical argument constraint
- 2.4The pragmatic dimensions of PAS
- 2.4.1Generalizability
- 2.4.2Animacy
- 2.5The given A constraint
- 3.Conclusion
Notes References Appendix
References (26)
Ashby, William J. 1988. The syntax, pragmatics, and sociolinguistics of left- and right-dislocations in French. Lingua 75:29–46.
Bentivoglio, Paola. 1988. La posición del sujeto en el español de Caracas: Un análisis de los factores lingüísticos y extralingüísticos. In Robert M. Hammond & Melvyn C. Resnick (eds.), Studies in Caribbean Spanish dialectology. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press. 13–23.
. 1989. La posición del sujeto en las cláusulas copulativas en el español de Caracas. Actas del VII Congreso Internacional, Asociación de Lingüistica y Filología de la America Latina [ALFAL], tomo II. Santo Domingo, RD: ALFAL, Filial Dominicana. 173–196.
Chafe, Wallace. 1987. Cognitive constraints on information flow. In Russell Tomlin. (ed.), Coherence and grounding in discourse. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 21–51.
Danlos, Laurence. 1992. Support verb constructions: Linguistic properties, representation, translation. Journal of French Language Studies 2:1–32.
Downing, Pamela. 1985. Classifier constructions and referentiality marking in Japanese. Paper presented at Conference on Japanese Language and Linguistics, University of California, Los Angeles.
Du Bois, John W. 1985. Competing motivations. In John Haiman. (ed.), Iconicity and syntax. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 343–365.
Du Bois, John W., & Thompson, Sandra A. 1991. Dimensions of a theory of information flow. Unpublished manuscript, University of California, Santa Barbara.
Dutra, Rosalia. 1987. The hybrid S category in Brazilian Portuguese: Some implications for word order. Studies in Language 11:163–180.
Giry-Schneider, Jacqueline. 1987. Les prédicais nominaux en français: Les phrases simples á verbe support. Geneva and Paris: Droz.
Hopper, Paul, & Thompson, Sandra A. 1980. Transitivity in grammar and discourse. Language 56:251–299.
Iwasaki, Shoichi. 1985. The “given A constraint” and the Japanese particle ga. In S. Delancy. (ed.), Proceedings of the first Annual Pacific Linguistics Conference. Eugene: Department of Linguistics, University of Oregon. 152–167.
Kumpf, Lorraine. 1992. Preferred argument structure in second language discourse: A preliminary study. Studies in Language 16: 369–403.
Lambrecht, Knud. 1987. On the status of SVO sentences in French discourse. In Russell Tomlin. (ed.), Coherence and grounding in discourse. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 217–261.
. 1988. Presentational cleft constructions in spoken French. In John Haiman & Sandra A. Thompson. (eds.), Clause combining in grammar and discourse. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 135–179.
Lee, Hyo Sang. 1984. The distribution of preferred argument structure. Unpublished manuscript, University of California, Los Angeles.
O’Dowd, Elizabeth. 1990. Discourse pressure, genre and grammatical alignment – After Du Bois. Studies in Language 14:365–403.
Prince, Ellen. 1981. Toward a taxonomy of given-new information. In Peter Cole. (ed.), Radicalpragmatics. New York: Academic. 223–256.
Scancarelli, Janine. 1985. Referential strategies in Chamorro narratives. Studies in Language 9:335–362.