In:On Spoken French: An Ashby Reader
William J. Ashby
[Studies in Language Companion Series 226] 2023
► pp. 293–320
When does variation indicate linguistic change in progress
Published online: 2 March 2023
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.226.c23
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.226.c23
It is argued that two variables of Modern French (the negative particle ne ‘old not’ and the consonant l of clitic pronouns such as il ‘(he); 3sg.m.nom-; 3.nom-; iprs-’) are indeed indices of ongoing linguistic change, even though this change appears to be of long duration. This conclusion is based not only on the distribution of the variables in a corpus of natural French discourse, but also on independent linguistic evidence, together with the available historical record. In the absence of adequate ‘real-time’ data, variationist analysis yielding synchronic, ‘apparent-time’ data provides a useful means of charting the drift of the language.
Article outline
- 1.The variationist thesis: Change in apparent time
- 2.Antithesis
- 3.Synthesis
Notes References Appendix
References (48)
Ashby, William J. 1976. The loss of the negative morpheme, ne, in Parisian French. Lingua, 39:119–137.
1981. The loss of the negative particle ne in French: a syntactic change in progress. Language, 57:674–687.
1984. The elision of /l/ in French clitic pronouns and articles. In: Ernst Pulgram (ed.), Romanitas: Studies in Romance Linguistics (Michigan Romance Studies 4). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, pp. 1–16.
Balibar, Renée. 1985. L’Ecole de 1880. Le français national: républicain, scolaire, grammatical, primaire. In: Gérald Antoine and Robert Martin (eds.), Histoire de langue française, 1880–1914. Paris: Editions du CNRS, pp. 255–293.
Blanche-Benveniste, Claire. 1985. Coexistence de deux usages de la syntaxe du français parlé. In: Jean-Claude Bouvier (ed.), Contacts de langues: Discours oral. Aix-en-Provence: Université de Provence, pp. 201–214.
Blanche-Benveniste, Claire and Colette Jeanjean. 1987. Le Français parlé: Transcription et édition. Paris: Didier.
Bossong, Georg. 1981. Séquence et visée. L’Expression positionnelle du thème et du rhème en français parlé. Folia Linguistica, 15:237–252.
Damourette, Jacques and Edouard Pichon. 1911–1940. Des Mots à la pensée. Essai de grammaire de la langue française. Paris: D’Artrey.
Ernst, Gerhard. 1985. Gesprochenes Französich zu Beginn des 17. Jahrhunderts: Direkte Rede in Jean Héroards ‘Histoire particulière de Louis XIII’ (1603–1610) (Beihefte zur Zeitschrift für Romanische Philologie, 204). Tübingen: Niemeyer.
Gueunier, Nicole, Emile Genouvrier, and Abdelhamid Khomsi. 1978. Les Français devant la norme: contribution à une étude de la norme du français parlé. Paris: Champion.
Guy, Gregory R. 1988a. Advanced Varbrul analysis. In: Kathleen Ferrara et al. (eds.), Language Change and Contact (Proceedings of the Sixteenth Annual Conference on New Ways of Analyzing Variation). Austin: University of Texas Press, pp. 124–136.
1988b. Language and social class. In: Frederick J. Newmeyer (ed.), Language: The Socio-Cultural Context (Linguistics: The Cambridge Survey, vol. IV). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 37–63.
Hausmann, Franz Josef. 1979. Wie alt is das gesprochene Französich? Romanische Forschungen, 91:431–444.
Journal français d’ Amérique. 1988. et la négation? San Francisco: France Press, Inc. Vol. 1, no. 5 (26 February-10 March 1988), p. 1.
Juneau, Marcel and Claude Poirier. 1972. Le Livre de comptes d’un meunier québécois (fin XVII-début XVIIIe). Québec: Laval University Press.
Labov, William. 1966. The Social Stratification of English in New York City. Washington: Center for Applied Linguistics.
. 1981. What can be learned about change in progress from synchronic description? In: David Sankoff and Henrietta J. Cedergren (eds.), Variation Omnibus. Carbondale and Edmonton: Linguistic Research, Inc., pp. 177–199.
Laks, Bernard. 1980. Différentiation linguistique et différentiation sociale: quelques problèmes de sociolinguistique française. Thèse de 3éme Cycle de Linguistique, Université de Paris VIII-Vincennes.
Lemieux, Monique and Henrietta J. Cedergren. 1985. Les Tendances dynamiques du français parlé à Montréal, vol. 2. Québec: Government of Québec.
Pope, Mildred K. 1966. From Latin to Modern French, with Especial Consideration of Anglo-Norman. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
Poplack, Shana and Douglas Walker. 1986. Going through (l) in Canadian French. In: David Sankoff (ed.), Diversity and Diachrony. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 173–198.
Posner, Rebecca. 1985. Post-verbal negation in Non-Standard French: a historical and comparative view. Romance Philology, 39:170–197.
Pulgram, Ernst. 1967. Trends and predictions. In: To Honor Roman Jakobson (Janua Linguarum, Series Maior, XXXI, vol. 2). The Hague: Mouton, pp. 1634–1649.
Sankoff, David. 1988. Sociolinguistics and syntactic variation. In: Frederick J. Newmeyer (ed.), Language: The Socio-cultural Context (Linguistics: The Cambridge Survey, IV). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 140–161.
Schlieben-Lange, Brigitte. 1984. La ‘Longue Durée’ en sociolinguistique des langues romanes. In: Jean-Claude Bouvier (ed.), Actes du 17e Congrès Internationale de linguistique et philologie romanes (1983), Vol. 5. Aix-en Provence: Université de Provence, pp. 289–297.
Schwegler, Armin. 1983. Predicate negation and word-order change: a problem of multiple causation. Lingua, 61:297–334.
Sturm, Joachim. 1981. Morpho-syntaktische Untersuchungen zur ‘phrase négative’ im gesprochenen Französich. Die Negation mit und ohne NE. Frankfurt and Bern: Lang.
Valli, André. 1983. Un Exemple d’approche du problème des variantes syntaxiques en linguistique diachronique. Recherches sur le français parlé, 5, 125–146.
Vaugelas, Claude Favre de. 1970. Remarques sur la langue française (1647) (Facsimile Edition of the Original by Jeanne Streicher). Geneva: Slatkine Reprints.
