Cover not available

In:Paradigms in Word Formation: Theory and applications
Edited by Alba E. Ruz, Cristina Fernández-Alcaina and Cristina Lara-Clares
[Studies in Language Companion Series 225] 2022
► pp. 155–180

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
authorization required

Chapter 7
Paradigmatic aspects of deverbal noun conversion in English

 | Universität Potsdam
Published online: 19 September 2022
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.225.07ior
Abstract
In this paper, I seek to identify some recurrent and predictable patterns in the formation of deverbal converted nouns in English (to climb > the climb), which crucially differ from denominal conversion verbs (the bottle > to bottle) in showing only limited productivity. I will argue, however, that noun conversion exhibits regularities with respect to the morphological make-up and the semantic class of the base verbs, as well as to the noun’s interpretation in comparison to other competing suffix-based nominalizations, which I will describe as creating relatively stable derivational series within derivational paradigms (Hathout & Namer 2019).
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Database and methodology
  • 3.Morphological patterns
    • 3.1Prefixes
    • 3.2The suffix -ate
    • 3.3Preposed particles
    • 3.4Postposed particles
    • 3.5Summary on morphological patterns
  • 4.Verb classes and interpretation
    • 4.1Verbs of change of state (70 nouns; 11% of the PDE database)
    • 4.2Verbs of motion (74 nouns; 12% of the PDE database)
    • 4.3Verbs of emission, verbs of sounds made by animals, and verbs of communication (56 nouns; 9% of the PDE database)
    • 4.4Psych verbs (15 nouns; 2% of the PDE database)
    • 4.5Summary on verb classes
  • 5.Paradigmatic aspects of converted nouns among deverbal nominalizations
    • 5.1Deverbal nominalization in English
    • 5.2Derivational paradigms for action nominalizations
  • 6.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
References (52)
References
Andreou, Marios & Lieber, Rochelle. 2020. Aspectual and quantificational properties of deverbal conversion and -ing nominalizations: The power of context. English Language and Linguistics 24(2): 333–363. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Asher, Nicholas. 1993. Reference to Abstract Objects in Discourse. Dordrecht: Kluwer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bauer, Laurie, Lieber, Rochelle & Plag, Ingo. 2013. The Oxford Reference Guide to English Morphology. Oxford: OUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bierwisch, Manfred. 2009. Nominalization – lexical and syntactic aspects. In Quantification, Definiteness, and Nominalization, Anastasia Giannakidou & Monika Rathert (eds), 281–320. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bolinger, Dwight. 1961. Ambiguities in pitch accent. Word 17(2): 309–317. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bonami, Olivier & Strnadová, Jana. 2019. Paradigm structure and predictability in derivational morphology. Morphology 29(2): 167–197. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Borer, Hagit. 2013. Structuring Sense, Vol. III: Taking Form. Oxford: OUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bram, Barli. 2011. Major Total Conversion in English: The Question of Directionality. PhD dissertation, Victoria University of Wellington. <[URL]>
Cetnarowska, Bożena. 1993. The Syntax, Semantics and Derivation of Bare Nominalisations in English. Katowice: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Śląskiego. <[URL]>
Clark, Eve V. & Clark, Herbert H. 1979. When nouns surface as verbs. Language 55(4): 767–811. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Davies, Mark. 2016–. Corpus of News on the Web (NOW). <[URL]> (6 December 2021).
Don, Jan. 2005. On conversion, relisting and zero-derivation. SKASE Journal of Theoretical Linguistics 2(2): 2–16. <[URL]>
Eisenheld, Victoria. 2021. What directionality diagnostics can tell us about the formation of zero-nominals in German. Proceedings of ConSOLE XXIX, 26–28 January 2021, 239–263. Leiden University. <[URL]>
Embick, David. 2010. Localism versus Globalism in Morphology and Phonology. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fernández-Alcaina, Cristina. 2021. Competition in the Derivational Paradigm of English Verbs. PhD dissertation, University of Granada. <[URL]>
van Gelderen, Elly. 2014. A History of the English Language. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Grimshaw, Jane. 1990. Argument Structure. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gottfurcht, Carolyn A. 2008. Denominal Verb Formation in English. PhD dissertation, Northwestern University. <[URL]>
Hathout, Nabil & Namer, Fiammetta. 2019. Paradigms in word formation: What are we up to? Morphology 29: 153–165. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hurrell, Esther. 2001. The Morphology and Phonology of English Noun-Verb Stress Doublets: Base-driven Lexical Stratification, Prefixes and Nominalisation. PhD dissertation, University of Edinburgh. <[URL]>
Iordăchioaia, Gianina. 2019. The root derivation of psych nominals: Implications for competing overt and zero nominalizers. Bucharest Working Papers in Linguistics 21(2): 57–79. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2020. Event structure and argument realization in English zero-derived nominals with particles. Nordlyd 44(1): 35–51. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Iordăchioaia, Gianina & Melloni, Chiara. 2022. Zero-derived nouns and deverbal nominalization: Databases for English and Italian (1.0) [Data set]. Zenodo. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. Submitted. The zero suffix in English and Italian deverbal nouns. Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft / Journal of the Linguistic Society of Germany.
Iordăchioaia, Gianina, Schweitzer, Susanne, Svyryda, Yaryna & Buitrago Cabrera, María Camila. 2020. Deverbal zero-nominalization and verb classes in English: Insights from a database. Zeitschrift für Wortbildung / Journal of Word Formation 4(2): 120–142. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Iordăchioaia, Gianina & Werner, Martina. 2019. Categorial shift via aspect and gender change in deverbal nouns. Language Sciences 73: 62–76. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Irmer, Roland. 1972. Die mit Nullmorphem abgeleiteten deverbalen Substantive des heutigen Englisch. PhD dissertation, University of Tübingen.
Kastovsky, Dieter. 1968. Old English Deverbal Substantives Derived by Means of a Zero Morpheme. Esslingen am Neckar: Langer.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1985. Deverbal nouns in Old and in Modern English. From stem- to word-formation. In Historical Semantics – Historical Word Formation, Jacek Fisiak (ed.), 221–261. Berlin: De Gryuter Mouton. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kawaletz, Lea & Plag, Ingo. 2015. Predicting the semantics of English nominalizations: A frame-based analysis of -ment suffixation. In Semantics of Complex Words, Laurie Bauer, Lívia Körtvélyessy & Pavol Štekauer (eds), 289–319. Cham: Springer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kipper Schuler, Karin. 2005. VerbNet: A Broad-Coverage, Comprehensive Verb Lexicon. PhD dissertation, University of Pennsylvania. <[URL]>
Kisselew, Max, Rimell, Laura, Palmer, Alexis & Padó, Sebastian. 2016. Predicting the direction of derivation in English conversion. In Proceedings of the ACL SIG- MORPHON Workshop, Garret Nicolai, Kyle Norman & Ryan Coterrell (eds), 93–98. Berlin.
Lapesa, Gabriella, Kawaletz, Lea, Plag, Ingo, Andreou, Marios, Kisselew, Max & Padó, Sebastian. 2018. Disambiguation of newly derived nominalizations in context: A Distributional Semantics approach. Word Structure 11(3): 277–312. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lara-Clares, Cristina. 2017. Competition in Present Day English nominalization by zero-affixation vs. -ation. In Competing Patterns in English Affixation, Juan Santana-Lario & Salvador Valera (eds), 207–244. Bern: Peter Lang. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Levin, Beth. 1993. English Verb Classes and Alternations. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Levin, Beth & Rappaport Hovav, Malka. 2013. Lexicalized meaning and manner/result complementarity. In Studies in the Composition and Decomposition of Event Predicates, Boban Arsenijević, Berit Gehrke & Rafael Marín (eds), 49–70. Dordrecht: Springer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lieber, Rochelle. 2016. English Nouns: The Ecology of Nominalizations. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lieber, Rochelle & Plag, Ingo. 2021. The semantics of conversion nouns and -ing nominalizations: A quantitative and theoretical perspective. Journal of Linguistics 58(2): 307–343. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Marchand, Hans. 1969. The Categories and Types of Present-Day English Word Formation: A Synchronic-Diachronic Approach, 2nd edn. Munich: Beck.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Melloni, Chiara. 2011. Event and Result Nominals: A Morpho-Semantic Approach. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Melloni, Chiara & Dal Maso, Serena. 2022. For a topology of derivational paradigms. In Paradigms in Word Formation: Theory and Applications [Studies in Language Companion Series 225], Alba E. Ruz, Cristina Fernández-Alcaina & Cristina Lara-Clares (eds). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. (This volume). Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Oxford English Dictionary Online (OED). 2021. OUP. <[URL]> (10 September 2021).
Plag, Ingo. 1999. Morphological Productivity: Structural Constraints in English Derivation. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2003. Word-Formation in English. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pustejovsky, James. 1995. The Generative Lexicon. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rappaport Hovav, Malka & Levin, Beth. 1998. Building verb meanings. In The Projection of Arguments: Lexical and Compositional Factors, Miriam Butt & Wilhelm Geuder (eds), 97–134. Stanford CA: CSLI.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rimell, Laura D. 2012. Nominal Roots as Event Predicates in English Denominal Conversion Verbs. PhD dissertation, University of New York.
Rodrigues, Alexandra Soares. 2009. Portuguese converted deverbal nouns: Constraints on their bases. Word Structure 2(1): 69–107. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Roeper, Thomas. 1999. Leftward movement in morphology. MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 34: 35–66.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Smith, Carlota S. 1972. On causative verbs and derived nominals in English. Linguistic Inquiry 3: 36–38.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Svenonius, Peter. 1996. The verb-particle alternation in the Scandinavian languages. Unpublished manuscript, University of Tromso. <[URL]>
Valera, Salvador. Submitted. The semantics of noun-to-verb zero derivation/conversion in English and in Spanish. Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft / Journal of the Linguistic Society of Germany.
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue