Cover not available

In:Paradigms in Word Formation: Theory and applications
Edited by Alba E. Ruz, Cristina Fernández-Alcaina and Cristina Lara-Clares
[Studies in Language Companion Series 225] 2022
► pp. 99–128

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
authorization required

Chapter 5
Paradigm families in compounding

The case of English compound nouns headed by -er deverbal nouns

 | University of Silesia in Katowice
Published online: 19 September 2022
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.225.05cet
Abstract
This chapter demonstrates the applicability of the notion of derivational paradigms and word-formation families to the study of compounds. Three families of English compounds are investigated which are headed by deverbal -er nominals. The semantic homogeneity of each of those compound families is assessed by analysing data from the Corpus of Contemporary American English (COCA), supplemented by some lexicographic searches and web searches. This involves the examination of the polysemy of the head nouns, the implicit semantic relation between compound elements and the transparency (or opacity) of the compounds which belong to the selected compound families. Comments are provided on the use of construction schemas to generalize over the internal structure and semantic interpretation of compound families (or subfamilies).
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Polysemy of deverbal -er nouns
  • 3.Semantic relationships between constituents of NN compounds
  • 4.NN compounds headed by puller
    • 4.1The range of meanings of the head noun puller
    • 4.2Semantic relationships between compound constituents: Transparency/opacity of N+puller compounds
  • 5.NN compounds headed by the noun eater
    • 5.1The range of meanings of the head noun eater
    • 5.2Semantic relationships between compound constituents: Transparency/opacity of N+eater compounds
  • 6.NN compounds headed by charmer
    • 6.1The range of meanings of the head noun charmer
    • 6.2Semantic relationships between compound constituents: Transparency/opacity of N+charmer compounds
  • 7.[N V-er] compounds and construction schemas
  • 8.Conclusions
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • Abbreviations
  • References
References (54)
References
Adams, Valerie. 1973. An Introduction to Modern English Word-Formation. London: Longman. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Arcodia, Giorgio F. 2012. Construction and headedness in derivation and compounding. Morphology 22: 365–397. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Baayen, Harald. 1993. On frequency, transparency and productivity. In Yearbook of Morphology 1992, Geert Booij & Jaap van Marle (eds), 181–208. Dordrecht: Kluwer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bagasheva, Alexandra. 2020. Paradigmaticity in compounding. In Paradigmatic Relations in Word Formation, Jesús Fernández-Domínguez, Alexandra Bagasheva & Cristina Lara-Clares (eds), 21–48. Leiden: Brill. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bauer, Laurie. 1997. Derivational paradigms. In Yearbook of Morphology 1996, Geert Booij & Jaap van Marle (eds), 243–256. Dordrecht: Kluwer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2019. Notions of paradigm and their value in word-formation. Word Structure 12(2): 153–175. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bauer, Laurie, Lieber, Rochelle & Plag, Ingo. 2013. The Oxford Reference Guide to English Morphology. Oxford: OUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bauer, Laurie & Tarasova, Elizaveta. 2013. The meaning link in nominal compounds. SKASE Journal of Theoretical Linguistics 10(3): 2–18. <[URL]>
Booij, Geert. 1986. Form and meaning in morphology: The case of Dutch ‘agent nouns’. Linguistics 24(3): 503–517. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2007. Construction morphology and the lexicon. In Selected Proceedings of the 5th Décembrettes: Morphology in Toulouse, Fabio Montermini, Gilles Boyé & Nabil Hathout (eds), 34–44. Somerville MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project. <[URL]>
. 2010a. Construction Morphology. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2010b. Construction Morphology. Language and Linguistic Compass 4(7): 543–555. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2013. Morphology in Construction Grammar. In The Oxford Handbook of Construction Grammar, Thomas Hoffmann & Graeme Trousdale (eds), 255–273. Oxford: OUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Booij, Geert & Lieber, Rochelle. 2004. On the paradigmatic nature of affixal semantics in English and Dutch. Linguistics 42(2): 327–357. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bourque, Yves. 2014. Towards a Typology of Semantic Transparency: The Case of French Compounds. PhD dissertation, University of Toronto. <[URL]>
Bundgaard, Peer F., Ostergaard, Sven & Stjernfelt, Frederik. 2006. Waterproof fire stations? Conceptual schemata and cognitive operations involved in compound constructions. Semiotica 161(1–4): 363–393. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bybee, Joan L. 2013. Usage-based theory and exemplar representations of constructions. In The Oxford Handbook of Construction Grammar, Thomas Hoffmann & Graeme Trousdale (eds), 49–69. Oxford: OUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cambridge Dictionary. 2021. <[URL]> (30 March 2021).
Cetnarowska, Bożena. 1993. The Syntax, Semantics and Derivations of Bare Nominalisations in English. Katowice: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Śląskiego. <[URL]>
Collins Dictionary. 2021. <[URL]> (30 March 2021).
Davies, Mark. 2008–. The Corpus of Contemporary American English (COCA). <[URL]> (30 March 2021).
Dictionary. 2021. <[URL]> (30 March 2021).
Downing, Pamela. 1977. On the creation and use of English compound nouns. Language 53(4): 810–842. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Educalingo. The Dictionary for Curious People. 2021. <[URL]> (30 March 2021).
Fernández-Domínguez, Jesús. 2016. The semantics of primary nn compounds: From form to meaning, and from meaning to form. In The Semantics of Compounding, Pius ten Hacken (ed), 129–150. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Furdík, Juraj. 2004. Slovenská slovotvorba (teória, opis, cvičenia). Prešov: Náuka.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gaeta, Livio & Angster, Marco. 2019. Stripping paradigmatic relations out of the syntax. Morphology 29: 249–270. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hatcher, Anna Granville. 1960. An introduction to the analysis of English noun compounds. Word 16: 356–373. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jackendoff, Ray. 2010. Meaning and the Lexicon. The Parallel Architecture, 1975–2010. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2016. English noun-noun compounds in Conceptual Semantics. In The Semantics of Compounding, Pius ten Hacken (ed), 15–37. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lakoff, George & Kövecses, Zoltán. 1987. The cognitive model of anger inherent in American English. In Cultural Models in Language and Thought, Dorothy C. Holland & Naomi Quinn (eds), 195–221. Chicago IL: Chicago University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Levi, Judith N. 1978. The Syntax and Semantics of Complex Nominals. New York NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lieber, Rochelle. 1992. Deconstructing Morphology: Word Formation in Syntactic Theory. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2004. Morphology and Lexical Semantics. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2010. On the lexical semantics of compounds: Non-affixal (de)verbal compounds. In Cross Disciplinary Issues in Compounding [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 311], Sergio Scalise & Irene Vogel (eds), 127–144. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Masini, Francesca & Audring, Jenny. 2019. Construction Morphology. In The Oxford Handbook of Morphological Theory, Jenny Audring & Francesca Masini (eds), 365–389. Oxford: OUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mattiello, Elisa & Dressler, Wolfgang U. 2018. The morphosemantic transparency/opacity of novel English analogical compounds and compound families. Studia Anglica Posnaniensia 53: 67–114. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Melloni, Chiara. 2010. Action nominals inside: Lexical-semantic issues. In The Semantics of Nominalizations across Languages and Frameworks, Monika Rathert & Artemis Alexiadou (eds), 141–168. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Merriam-Webster Dictionary. 2021. <[URL]> (30 March 2021).
Nunberg, Geoffrey, Sag, Ivan A. & Wasow, Thomas. 1994. Idioms. Language 70(3): 491–538. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Panther, Klaus-Uwe & Thornburg, Linda. 2001. A conceptual analysis of -er nominals. In Applied Cognitive Linguistics II: Language Pedagogy, Martin Pütz, Susanne Niemeier & René Dirven (eds), 149–200. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pepper, Steve. 2020. The Typology and Semantics of Binominal Lexemes: Noun Noun Compounds and their Functional Equivalents. PhD dissertation, University of Oslo. <[URL]>
Radden, Günter & Dirven, René. 2007. Cognitive English Grammar [Cognitive Linguistics in Practice 2]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Radimský, Jan. 2020. A paradigmatic approach to compounding. In Paradigmatic Relations in Word Formation, Jesús Fernández-Domínguez, Alexandra Bagasheva & Cristina Lara-Clares (eds), 164–185. Leiden: Brill. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rappaport Hovav, Malka & Levin, Beth. 1992. -er nominals: Implications for the theory of argument structure. In Syntax and the Lexicon, Tim Stowell & Eric Wehrli (eds), 127–153. Leiden: Brill. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Scalise, Sergio & Bisetto, Antonietta. 2009. The classification of compounds. In The Oxford Handbook of Compounding, Rochelle Lieber & Pavol Štekauer (eds), 49–82. Oxford: OUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schmid, Hans-Jörg. 2011. English Morphology and Word-Formation, 2nd edn. Berlin: Erich Schmidt.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Selkirk, Elisabeth. 1982. The Syntax of Words. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Štekauer, Pavol. 2014. Derivational paradigms. In The Oxford Handbook of Derivational Morphology, Rochelle Lieber & Pavol Štekauer (eds), 354–369. Oxford: OUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tarasova, Elizaveta. 2013. Some New Insights into the Semantics of English N+N Compounds. PhD dissertation, Victoria University of Wellington. <[URL]>
ten Hacken, Pius. 2009. Early generative approaches. In The Oxford Handbook of Compounding, Rochelle Lieber & Pavol Štekauer (eds), 54–77. Oxford: OUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
The Free Dictionary. 2021. <[URL]> (30 March 2021).
Urban Dictionary. 2021. <[URL]> (30 March 2021).
Warren, Beatrice. 1978. Semantic Patterns of Noun-Noun Compounds. Göteborg: Acta Universitatis Göthoburgensis.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Fábregas, Antonio
2022. Structural and lexical aspects of the morphology of English participles. In Paradigms in Word Formation [Studies in Language Companion Series, 225], ► pp. 285 ff. DOI logo
Mattiello, Elisa
2022. Derivational paradigms. In Paradigms in Word Formation [Studies in Language Companion Series, 225], ► pp. 129 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 3 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue