Cover not available

In:Particles in German, English, and Beyond
Edited by Remus Gergel, Ingo Reich and Augustin Speyer
[Studies in Language Companion Series 224] 2022
► pp. 269296

References (43)
References
Abraham, Werner. 1991. The grammaticization of the German modal particles. In: Approaches to grammaticalization, Volume II. Types of grammatical markers, Elizabeth Closs Tragott & Bernd Heine (eds.), 331–379. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2012. Illocutive force is speaker and information source concern. What types of syntax does the representation of speaker deixis require? Templates vs. derivational structures. In: Modality and Theory of Mind elements across languages, Werner Abraham & Elisabeth Leiss (eds.), 67–108. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2017. Modal particles and Verum focus: New corollaries. In: Pragmatic markers, discourse markers and modal particles: New perspectives, Chiara Fedriani & Andrea Sanso (eds.), 171–202. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bayer, Josef & Hans-Georg Obenauer . 2011. Discourse particles, clause structure, and question types. The Linguistic Review 28. 449–491. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bayer, Josef. 2018. Criterial freezing in the syntax of particles. In: Freezing: Theoretical approaches and empirical domains, Jutta Hartmann, Marion Jäger, Andreas Kehl, Andreas Konietzko & Susanne Winkler (eds.), 225–263. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bayer, Josef & Andreas Trotzke . 2015. The derivation and interpretation of left peripheral discourse particles. In: Discourse-oriented syntax, Josef Bayer, Roland Hinterhölzl & Andreas Trotzke (eds.), 13–40. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Beyssade, Claire. 2006. La structure de l’information dans les questions : quelques remarques sur la diversité des formes interrogatives en français. Linx, 55 (online), URL: [URL] [retrieved June, 9th, 2019]
Buchi, Eva. 2007. Approche diachronique de la (poly)pragmaticalisation de fr.déjà. In: Actes du XXIVe congrès international de linguistique et de philologie romanes (Aberystwyth 2004) III, David Trotter, David (ed.), 251–264. Tübingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cardinaletti, Anna & Michal Starke. 1999. The typology of structural deficiency: A case study of the three classes of pronouns. In Clitics in the Languages of Europe, Henk van Riemsdijk (ed.), 145–234. Berlin: De Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Culioli, Antoine. 1990. Pour une linguistique de l’énonciation 1: Opérations et représentations. Gap: Ophrys.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1999. A propos de la Notion. In: Pour une linguistique de l’énonciation 3, Culioli, Antoine, 17–34. Gap: Ophrys.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Detges, Ulrich & Richard Waltereit. 2009. Diachronic pathways and pragmatic strategies: different types of pragmatic particles from a diachronic point of view. In: Current trends in diachronic semantics and pragmatics, Maj-Britt Mosegaard-Hansen & Jacqueline Visconti (eds.), 43–61. Bingley: Emerald.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Diewald, Gabriele. 2013. Same same but different: modal particles, discourse markers and the art (and purpose) of categorization. In Discourse markers and modal particles: Categorization and description, Liesbeth Degand, Bert Cornillie & Paola Pietrandrea (eds), 19–45. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ducrot, Oswald (ed.). 1980. Les mots du discours. Paris: Les éditions de minuit.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fernandez-Bravo, Nicole. 1993. Les énoncés interrogatifs en allemand contemporain. Tübingen: Niemeyer (=Linguistische Arbeiten, 289). Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1995. Rhetorische Fragen. Modalpartikeln und semantische Interpretation. In: Fragen und Fragesätze im Deutschen, Michael Schecker (ed.), 123–139. Tübingen, Stauffenburg Verlag.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fischer, Kerstin. 2007. Grounding and Common Ground: Modal particles and their translation equivalents. In: Lexical markers of Common Grounds, Anita Fetzer & Kerstin Fischer (eds.), 47–66. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gast, Volker. 2008. Modal particles and context updating – the functions of German ja, doch, wohl and etwa. In: Modalverben und Grammatikalisierung, Heinz Vater & Ole Letnes (eds.), 153–177. Trier: Wissenschaftlicher Verlag.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gutzmann, Daniel. 2011. Ob einer wohl Recht hat? Zwei Satzmodustheorien für das Deutsche im Vergleich. Deutsche Sprache 39.1. 65–84. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jacobs, Joachim. 1991. On the semantics of modal particles. In: Discourse particles: Descriptive and theoretical investigations on the logical, syntactic and pragmatic properties of discourse particles in German, Abraham, Werner (ed.), 141–162. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
König, Ekkehard. 1977. Temporal and non-temporal uses of ‘Noch’ and ‘Schon’ in German. Linguistics and Philosophy 1.2. 173–198.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1991. The meaning of focus particles. A comparative perspective. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1997. Zur Bedeutung von Modalpartikeln im Deutschen: Ein Neuansatz im Rahmen der Relevanztheorie. Germanistische Linguistik 136, 57–75.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kwon, Min-Jae. 2005. Modalpartikeln und Satzmodus: Untersuchungen zur Syntax, Semantik und Pragmatik der deutschen Modalpartikeln. PhD Thesis, LMU München.
Manzini, Rita M. 2015. Italian adverbs and discourse particles: between recategorization and ambiguity. In: Discourse-oriented syntax, Josef Bayer, Roland Hinterhölzl & Andreas Trotzke (eds.), 93–120. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Métrich, René, Eugène Faucher & Gilbert Coudier (eds.). 1992–2001: Les Invariables difficiles. dictionnaire allemand-français des particules, connecteurs, interjections et autres mots de la communication. Nancy: Nouveaux Cahiers d’allemand (4 vol.).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Modicom, Pierre-Yves. 2017. L’allemand wohl et ses équivalents en français. Langages 207, 13–24. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Modicom, Pierre-Yves & Olivier Duplâtre . 2018. Nicht nur Fokuspartikel: Geschichte und Varianz von nur im Deutschen. In: Diskursive Verfestigungen. Schnittstellen zwischen Morphosyntax, Phraseologie und Pragmatik im Deutschen und im Sprachvergleich, Laurent Gautier, Pierre-Yves Modicom & Hélène Vinckel-Roisin (eds.), 73–92. Berlin: De Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mosegaard-Hansen, Maj-Britt. 1998. La grammaticalisation de l’interaction, ou, Pour une approche polysémique de l’adverbe ‘bien’. Revue de Sémantique et de Pragmatique 4, 111–138.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2000. La polysémie de l’adverbe Déjà. In: Le français parlé, corpus et résultats: actes du colloque international, Université de Copenhague du 29 au 30 octobre 1998, Hanne Leth Andersen & Anita Berit Hansen (eds.), 155–177. Copenhague: Museum Tusculanum Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Obenauer, Hans-Georg. 1994. Aspects de la syntaxe A-barre – Effets d’intervention et mouvements des quantifieurs. Thèse d’Etat, Université de Paris VIII.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2004. Nonstandard wh-questions and alternative checkers in Pagotto. In: The syntax and semantics of the Left Periphery, Horst Lohnstein & Susanne Trissler (eds.), 343–383. Berlin: De Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Paillard, Denis (ed.). 2017. Comparaison des marqueurs discursifs. Thematic issue of Langages, 207.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2017. Scène énonciative et types de marqueurs discursifs. Langages 207: 17–32. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Péroz, Pierre. 1992. Systématique des valeurs de bien en français contemporain, Paris / Genève: Droz.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Roussarie, Laurent. 2009. What might be known: Epistemic modality and uncertain contexts. In: Proceedings of SALT 19, Ed Cormany, Ito Satoshi & David Lutz (eds.), 379–394. Online: [URL].
Sauerwein-Spinola, Sibylle. 2002. Interrogativité, rhétoricité, argumentation, persuasion: les particules modales dans l’interrogation partielle en allemand. Nouveaux Cahiers de Linguistique Française 24. 231–242.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schoonjans, Steven. 2013. Zur französischen Übersetzung der deutschen Modalpartikel doch: eine satztypübergreifende Analyse. Studii de gramatica contrastiva 19. 85–110.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2014. Oui, il y a des particules de démodulation en français. CogniTextes 11. Online: [URL];
Waltereit, Richard. 2006. Abtönung. Zur Pragmatik und historischen Semantik von Modalpartikeln und ihren funktionalen Äquivalententen in romanischen Sprachen. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Waltereit, Richard & Ulrich Detges. 2007. Different functions, different histories. Modal particles and discourse markers from a diachronic point of view. Catalan Journal of Linguistics 6, 61–80. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Weydt, Harald. 1969. Abtönungspartikel: Die deutschen Modalwörter und ihre französischen Entsprechungen. Bad Homburg: Gehlen.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zimmermann, Malte. 2018. Wird schon stimmen! A degree operator analysis of Schon. Journal of Semantics, 35.4. 687–739. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue