Cover not available

In:Particles in German, English, and Beyond
Edited by Remus Gergel, Ingo Reich and Augustin Speyer
[Studies in Language Companion Series 224] 2022
► pp. 117146

References (49)
References
Abraham, Werner & Elisabeth Leiss . 2012. Modality and Theory of Mind Elements across Languages. Berlin & Boston: De Gruyter Mouton. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bublitz, Wolfram. 1979. Ausdrucksweisen der Sprechereinstellung im Deutschen und im Englischen. Untersuchungen zur Syntax, Semantik und Pragmatik der deutschen Modalpartikeln und Vergewisserungsfragen. Tübingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cardinaletti, Anna. 2011. German and Italian modal particles and clause structure. The Linguistic Review 28: 493–531. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cartoni, Bruno & Thomas Meyer . 2012. Extracting directional and comparable corpora from a multilingual corpus for translation studies. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC). Istanbul.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Clark, Herbert H. 1996. Using Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Doherty, Monika. 1985. Epistemische Bedeutung. Berlin: Akademie Verlag. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Döring, Sophia. 2016. Modal particles, discourse structure and Common Ground management. Theoretical and empirical aspects. Ph.D. thesis, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin.
Farkas, Donka & Kim B. Bruce 2010. On reacting to assertions and polar questions. Journal of Semantics 27(1): 81–118. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fetzer, Anita & Kerstin Fischer . 2007. Introduction. In Lexical Markers of Common Grounds, Anita Fetzer & Kerstin Fischer (eds), 1–12. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fillmore, Charles. 1984. Remarks on contrastive pragmatics. In Contrastive Linguistics: Prospects and Problems, Jacek Fisiak (ed), 119–141. de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fischer, Kerstin. 2007. Grounding and Common Ground: Modal particles and their translation equivalents. In Lexical markers of Common Grounds, Anita Fetzer & Kerstin Fischer (eds), 47–66. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fischer, Kerstin & Maiken Heide . 2018. Inferential processes in English and the question whether English has modal particles. Open Linguistics 4(1): 509–535. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Frege, Gottlob. 1879. Begriffsschrift. Eine der arithmetischen nachgebildete Formelsprache des reinen Denkens. Halle: Verlag von Louis Nebert.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Frith, Uta & Sarah-Jayne Blakemore . 2006. Social cognition. In Cognitive Systems. Information Processing Meets Brain Science, Richard Morris, Lionel Tarassenko & Michael Kenward (eds), 138–188. Amsterdam: Elsevier. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gast, Volker. 2008. Modal particles and context updating – the functions of german ja, doch, wohl and etwa. In Modalverben und Gram-matikalisierung, Heinz Vater, Ole Letnes & Eva Maagerø (eds), 153–177. Trier: Wissenschaftlicher Verlag.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2022. Comparing annotation types and n-gram sizes: A case study of the German modal particles ja and doch and their English reflexes in the Europarl-corpus, based on n-gram distributions. In Data and Methods in Corpus Linguistics: Comparative Approaches, Ole Schutzler & Julia Schlüter (eds), 323–352. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Grosz, Patrick Georg. 2020. Discourse particles. In The Wiley Blackwell Companion to Semantics. Part F. Meaning, Use, and Cognition, Daniel Gutzmann, Lisa Matthewson, Cécile Meier, Hotze Rullmann & Thomas Zimmermann (eds). John Wiley & Sons. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gunlogson, Christine. 2008. A question of commitment. Belgian Journal of Linguistics 22: 101–136. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gutzmann, Daniel. 2015. Use-Conditional Meaning. Studies in Semantics and Pragmatics. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hamblin, Charles Leonard. 1971. Mathematical models of dialogue. Theoria 37: 130–155. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Heim, Irene. 1983. File change semantics and the familiarity theory of def-initeness. In Meaning, Use and the Interpretation of Language, Rainer Bauerle, Christoph Schwarze & Arnim von Stechow (eds), 164–190. Berlin: de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hentschel, Elke. 1986. Funktion und Geschichte deutscher Partikeln. Ja, doch, halt und eben, RGL, volume 63. Berlin, New York: De Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hogan, Aidan, Eva Blomqvist, Michael Cochez, Claudia d’Amato, Gerard de Melo, Claudio Gutierrez, José Emilio Labra Gayo, Sabrina Kirrane, Sebastian Neumaier, Axel Polleres, Roberto Navigli, Axel-Cyrille Ngonga Ngomo, Sabbir M. Rashid, Anisa Rula, Lukas Schmelzeisen, Juan Sequeda, Steffen Staab & Antoine Zimmermann. 2021. Knowledge graphs. arXiv:2003.02320. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Holmes, Janet. 1988. Of course: A pragmatic particle in New Zealand women’s and men’s speech. Australian Journal of Linguistics 2: 49–74. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kamp, Hans & Uwe Reyle. 1993. From Discourse to Logic: An Introduction to Model-Theoretic Semantics of Natural Language. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Karttunen, Lauri. 1976. Discourse referents. In Syntax and Semantics, Vol. 7, James McCawley (ed), 363–386. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Koehn, Philipp. 2005. Europarl: A parallel corpus for statistical machine translation. Phuket. MT Summit X.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
König, Ekkehard & Volker Gast. 2018. Understanding English-German Contrasts. Berlin: Erich-Schmidt Verlag, 4th edition.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
König, Ekkehard, Detlef Stark & Susanne Requardt. 1990. Adverbien und Partikeln. Ein deutsch-englisches Wörterbuch. Heidelberg: Julius Groos.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Krifka, Manfred. 2015. Bias in commitment space semantics: Declarative questions, negated quetions, and question tags. Proceedings of SALT (Semantics and Linguistic Theory) 25: 328–345. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lewis, Diana. 2007. From temporal to contrastive and causal: The emergence of connective after all. In Connectives as Discourse Landmarks, Agnes Celle & Ruth Huart (eds), 89–99. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2018. Grammaticalizing connectives in English and discourse information structure. In New Trends in Grammaticalization and Language Change, Sylvie Hancil, Tine Breban & José Vicente Lozano (eds), 135–157. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mann, William C. & Sandra A. Thompson 1987. Rhetorical Structure Theory. A theory of text organization. Technical report, Information Sciences Institute, University of Southern California., Marina del Rey, CA.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Müller, Sonja. 2018. Distribution und Interpretation von Modalpartikel-Kombinationen. Language Science Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Peirce, Charles Sanders. 1880. On the algebra of logic. American Journal of Mathematics 3: 15–57. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1885. On the algebra of logic. American Journal of Mathematics 7: 180–202. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Peixoto, Tiago P. 2014. The graph-tool python library. figshare Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Potts, Christopher. 2002. The syntax and semantics of As-parentheticals. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 20: 623–689. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Roberts, Craige. 1996. Information structure in discourse: Towards an integrated formal theory of pragmatics. In OSU Working Papers in Linguistics (Papers in semantics), 91–136.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2012. Information structure in discourse: Towards an integrated formal theory of pragmatics. Semantics and Pragmatics 5(6): 1–69. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sacks, Harvey, Emanuel A. Schegloff & Gail Jefferson. 1974. A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language 50(4): 696–735. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sowa, John F. 1987. Semantic networks. In Encyclopaedia of Artificial Intelligence, volume 2, Stuart C. Shapiro (ed), 1011–1024. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stalnaker, Robert. 2002. Common ground. Linguistics and Philosophy 25(5): 701–712. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Thurmair, Maria. 1989. Modalpartikeln und ihre Kombinationen. Berlin, New York: De Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tomasello, Michael. 2008. Origins of Human Communication. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Westra, Evan & Peter Carruthers. 2018. Theory of mind. In Encyclopedia of evolutionary psychological science, Todd K. Shackelford & Viviana A. Weekes-Shackelford (eds), 1–7. Cham: Springer International Publishing. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Weydt, Harald. 1969. Abbtönungspartikel. Die deutschen Modalwörter und ihre französischen Entsprechungen. Bad Homburg: Gehlen.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wichmann, Anne, Anne-Marie Simon-Vandenbergen & Karin Aijmer. 2010. How prosody reflects semantic change: A synchronic case study of ‘of course’. In Subjectification, Intersubjectification and Grammaticalization, K. Davidse, L. Vandelanotte & H. Cuyckens (eds), 103–154. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zipes, Jack. 2015. Grimm Legacies. The Magic Spell of the Grimms’ Folk and Fairy Tales. Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue