Cover not available

In:Extravagant Morphology: Studies in rule-bending, pattern-extending and theory-challenging morphology
Edited by Matthias Eitelmann and Dagmar Haumann
[Studies in Language Companion Series 223] 2022
► pp. 181–206

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload Book EPUB
authorization required

do not repeat

Repetition and reduplication in German revisited

 | Goethe-University Frankfurt | Max Planck Institute for Empirical Aesthetics
Published online: 16 March 2022
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.223.08ken
Abstract
This chapter offers a synopsis of repetitive and reduplicative constructions in German, a set of diverse morphophonological types mostly found in substandard registers of the language. A phonological examination of these structures suggests that German strictly prohibits exact adjacent repetition of phonological material within lexical representations. I suggest this generalisation to be a grammatical requirement in the lexicon that holds across all levels of the phonological hierarchy, with only a few well-defined exceptions (abbreviations, loans, onomatopoeias, and ideophones). Reduplicative constructions are situated between the poles of marginal, sub-standard language use, apparent deviance from the concatenative ideal that otherwise pervades German morphology, and strict adherence to the lexical-phonological requirement regarding identity avoidance. In this respect, they are, as I argue, characteristic instances of extravagant morphology.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
    • 1.1Repetition in language
    • 1.2Extravagant repetition in German
    • 1.3do not repeat: A generalisation regarding reduplicative structures
  • 2.Repetition and repetition avoidance at the sub-lexical level
    • 2.1The segmental level
    • 2.2The syllable level
      • 2.2.1Syllable repetition in the non-native stratum
  • 3.Repetition at the lexical level and above
    • 3.1The foot level
      • 3.1.1Exceptions to (1)
    • 3.2Repetition at the p-word level
      • 3.2.1“Self-compounding”
      • 3.2.2Identical constituent compounds (ICC)
      • 3.2.3Unbounded repetition
    • 3.3Repetition at the phrase level
  • 4.Summary and conclusion
    • 4.1Summary
    • 4.2Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
References (45)
References
Barz, Irmhild. 2015. German. In Word-formation: An International Handbook of the Languages of Europe [Vol. 4, Word formation in the individual European languages], Susan Olsen, Peter Müller, Ingeborg Ohnheiser & Franz Rainer (eds), 2387–2410. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Berent, Iris & Shimron, Joseph. 2003. Co-occurrence restrictions on identical consonants in the Hebrew lexicon: are they due to similarity? Journal of Linguistics 39(1): 31–55. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brugmann, Karl. 1917. Gleichklangvermeidung in der lautgesetzlichen Entwicklung und in der Wortbildung. Indogermanische Forschungen 38: 117–128.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brysbaert, Marc, Speybroeck, Sara & Vanderelst, Dieter. 2009. Is there room for the BBC in the mental lexicon? On the recognition of acronyms. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 62(9): 1832–1842. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bzdęga, Andrzej. 1965. Reduplizierte Wortbildung im Deutschen. Poznan: Poznanskie Towarzystwo Przyjaciól Nauk.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Domahs, Ulrike, Wiese, Richard, Bornkessel-Schlesewsky, Ina & Schlesewsky, Matthias. 2008. The processing of German word stress: evidence for the prosodic hierarchy. Phonology 25(1): 1–36. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Drake, Derek. 2013. Variation and Change in Northern Bavarian Quantity. PhD dissertation, The University of Wisconsin-Madison.
Dressler, Wolfgang U. 2000. Extragrammatical vs. marginal morphology. In Extragrammatical and Marginal Morphology, Ursula Doleschal & Anna M. Thornton (eds), 1–10. Munich: Lincom Europa.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Eisenberg, Peter. 1991. Syllabische Struktur und Wortakzent. Prinzipien der Prosodik deutscher Wörter. Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft 10(1): 37–64. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fanselow, Gisbert & Féry, Caroline. 2002. Ineffability in grammar. In Resolving Conflicts in Grammars: Optimality Theory in Syntax, Morphology, and Phonology, Gisbert Fanselow & Caroline Féry (eds), 265–307. Hamburg: Helmut Buske Verlag.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Finkbeiner, Rita. 2012. Naja, normal und normal. Zur Syntax, Semantik und Pragmatik der x-und-x-Konstruktion im Deutschen. Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft 31(1): 1–42. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2014. Identical constituent compounds in German. Word Structure 7(2): 182–213. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fleischer, Jürg & Schmid, Stephan. 2006. Zurich German. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 36(2): 243–253. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ghomeshi, Jila, Jackendoff, Ray, Rosen, Nicole & Russell, Kevin. 2004. Contrastive focus reduplication in English (The salad-salad paper). Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 22(2): 307–357. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Golston, Chris & Wiese, Richard. 1998. The structure of the German root. In Phonology and morphology of the Germanic Languages, Wolfgang Kehrein & Richard Wiese (eds), 165–185. Tübingen: Niemeyer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Görner, Rüdiger. 2015. Ästhetik der Wiederholung: Versuch über ein Literarisches Formprinzip. Göttingen: Wallstein.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Günther, Hartmut. 1981. N+N: Untersuchungen zur Produktivität eines deutschen Wortbildungstyps. In Wortbildung, Leonhard Lipka & Hartmut Günther (eds), 258–280. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hohenhaus, Peter. 2004. Identical constituent compounding–a corpus-based study. Folia Linguistica 38(3–4): 297–331. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Horn, Laurence. 1993. Economy and redundancy in a dualistic model of natural language. In SKY 1993. Yearbook of the Linguistics Association of Finland, Susanna Shore & Maria Vilkuna (eds), 33–72. Helsinki: Suomen kielitieteellinen yhdistys.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2018. The lexical clone: Pragmatics, prototypes, productivity. In Exact Repetition in Grammar and Discourse, Rita Finkbeiner & Ulrike Freywald (eds), 233–264. Berlin: De Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jackendoff, Ray. 2008. ‘Construction after Construction’ and its theoretical challenges. Language 84(1): 8–28. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jakobson, Roman. 1960. Closing statement: Linguistics and poetics. In Style in Language, Thomas Sebeok (ed), 350–377. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kanwisher, Nancy G. 1987. Repetition blindness: Type recognition without token individuation. Cognition 27(2): 117–143. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kentner, Gerrit. 2017. On the emergence of reduplication in German morphophonology. Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft 36(2): 233–277. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kloeke, Wus van Lessen. 1982. Deutsche Phonologie und Morphologie: Merkmale und Markiertheit, Vol. 117. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Knaus, Johannes & Domahs, Ulrike. 2009. Experimental evidence for optimal and minimal metrical structure of German word prosody. Lingua 119(10): 1396–1413. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kotzor, Sandra, Molineaux, Benjamin J., Banks, Elanor & Lahiri, Aditi. 2016. “Fake” gemination in suffixed words and compounds in English and German. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 140(1): 356–367. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kraehenmann, Astrid. 2001. Swiss German stops: geminates all over the word. Phonology 18(1): 109–145. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mattiello, Elisa. 2013. Extra-Grammatical Morphology in English: Abbreviations, Blends, Reduplicatives, and Related Phenomena. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McCarthy, John J. 1986. OCP effects: Gemination and antigemination. Linguistic Inquiry 17(2): 207–263.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Müller, Gereon. 1997. Beschränkungen für Binomialbildung im Deutschen: Ein Beitrag zur Interaktion von Phraseologie und Grammatik. Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft 16(2): 5–51. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2016. Predicate doubling by phonological copying. In Linguistische Arbeitsberichte 93, Katja Barnickel, Matías Guzmán Naranjo, Johannes Hein, Sampson Korsah, Andrew Murphy, Ludger Paschen, Zorica Puškar & Joanna Zaleska (eds), 127–148. Leipzig: Universität Leipzig.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Paschen, Ludger. 2018. The Interaction of Reduplication and Segmental Mutation: A Phonological Account. Doctoral dissertation, Universität Leipzig.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pozdniakov, Konstantin & Segerer, Guillaume. 2007. Similar place avoidance: A statistical universal. Linguistic Typology 11(2): 307–348. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ridouane, Rachid. 2010. Geminates at the junction of phonetics and phonology. Laboratory Phonology 10: 61–90.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Saba Kirchner, Jesse. 2010. Minimal Reduplication. PhD dissertation, University of California Santa Cruz.
Schein, Barry & Steriade, Donca. 1986. On geminates. Linguistic Inquiry 17(4): 691–744.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schindler, Wolfgang. 1991. Reduplizierende Wortbildung im Deutschen. Zeitschrift für Phonetik, Sprachwissenschaft und Kommunikationsforschung 44(5): 597–613. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stolz, Thomas, Stroh, Cornelia & Urdze, Aina. 2011. Total Reduplication: The Areal Linguistics of a Potential Universal. Berlin: Akademie Verlag. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Suzuki, Keiichiro. 1998. A Typological Investigation of Dissimilation. PhD dissertation, University of Arizona.
Walter, Mary Ann. 2007. Repetition Avoidance in Human Language. PhD dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Wiese, Richard. 1990. Über die Interaktion von Morphologie und Phonologie – Reduplikation im Deutschen. Zeitschrift für Phonetik, Sprachwissenschaft und Kommunikationsforschung 43: 603–624. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Yip, Moira. 1988. The obligatory contour principle and phonological rules: A loss of identity. Linguistic Inquiry 19(1): 65–100.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Yu, Alan. 2005. Toward a typology of compensatory reduplication. In: Proceedings of the 24th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics. 397–405.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Hartmann, Stefan & Tobias Ungerer
2025.  295Chaos Theory, Shmaos Theory . In Dynamics at the Lexicon-Syntax Interface, ► pp. 295 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 3 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue