Cover not available

In:Extravagant Morphology: Studies in rule-bending, pattern-extending and theory-challenging morphology
Edited by Matthias Eitelmann and Dagmar Haumann
[Studies in Language Companion Series 223] 2022
► pp. 73–100

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload Book EPUB
authorization required

Diggers-out, leaf clearer-uppers and stayer-onner-for-nowers

On creativity and extravagance in English -er nominalisations

Published online: 16 March 2022
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.223.04len
Abstract
To this day, the English -er suffix prototypically derives agent nouns from verbs (rideV → rider – ‘someone who Vs’). Over the course of a millennium, the -er suffix construction has consistently extended its range of application, and from the 20th century onwards, it has further gained in variablity in that it allows for multiple attachment of -er, such as in looker-onner or stayer-onner-for-nower. The repetition of -er is accompanied by an increase in expressiveness. Additionally, internet attestations suggest there are several other English suffixes that can be repeated in the same manner as -er, consider -y in runny-outy red felt pen and -ed in kicked-upped. The systematicity of this morphosyntactic phenomenon suggests that some speakers of English occasionally choose to flout some rules to create structurally unusual, expressive, and extravagant complex words.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Creativity and extravagance in morphology
    • 2.1Creativity
      • 2.1.1Intent
      • 2.1.2Prescriptive criticism
    • 2.2Expressiveness
    • 2.3Extravagance
  • 3.Data and methodology
  • 4.Derivatives involving -er suffix repetition
    • 4.1-er doubling in nominalisations of particle verbs and prepositional verbs
    • 4.2Retriplication of -er
    • 4.3-er doubling in nominalisations of verbs and prepositional phrases
    • 4.4Excessive or abundant -er suffixation
  • 5.Suffix repetition beyond -er
  • 6.Conclusion
  • Notes
  • References
References (51)
References
Ackema, Peter & Neeleman, Ad. 2004. Beyond Morphology: Interface Conditions on Word-Formation. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Aronoff, Mark. 1976. Word Formation in Generative Grammar. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Aronoff, Mark & Furhop, Nana. 2002. Restricting suffix combinations in German and English: Closing suffixes and the Monosuffix Constraint. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 20(3): 251–490. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bauer, Laurie. 1983. English Word-Formation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bauer, Laurie, Lieber, Rochelle & Plag, Ingo. 2013. The Oxford Reference Guide to English Morphology. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bergs, Alexander. 2018. Learn the rules like a pro, so you can break them like an artist (Picasso): Linguistic aberrancy from a constructional perspective. Zeitschrift für Anglistik und Amerikanistik 66(3): 277–293. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Booij, Geert. 2010. Construction Morphology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cappelle, Bert. 2010. Doubler-upper nouns. A challenge for usage-based models of language? In Cognitive Perspectives on Word-Formation, Alexander Onysko & Sascha Michel (eds), 335–374. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chapman, Don. 2008. Fixer-uppers and passers-by: Nominalization of verb-particle constructions. In Studies in the History of Language IV: Empirical and Analytical Advances in the Studies of Language Change, Susan M. Fitzmaurice & Sascha Michel (eds), 265–299. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Crystal, David. 2006. Language and the Internet. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Denison, David. 2008. Patterns and productivity. In Studies in the History of the English Language VI: Empirical and Analytical Advances in the Study of English Language Change, Susan M. Fitzmaurice & Donka Minkova (eds), 207–230. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dixon, Richard M. W. 2014. Making New Words. Morphological Derivation in English. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Farrel, Patrick. 2005. English verb-preposition constructions: constituency and order. Language 81(1): 96–137. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fortin, Antonio. 2012. The Morphology and Semantics of Expressive Affixes. Oxford: University of Oxford. [URL].Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goldberg, Adele E. 1995. Constructions. A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goldberg, Adele. 2016. Tuning in to the verb-particle construction in English. In Approaches to Complex Predicates, Léa Nash & Pollet Samvelian (eds), 110–141. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goldberg, Adele E. 2019. Explain Me This: Creativity, Competition, and the Partial Productivity of Constructions. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Good, Jeff. 2016. The Linguistic Typology of Templates. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin. 1999. Why is grammaticalization irreversible? Linguistics 37(7): 1043–1068. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hilpert, Martin. 2013. Constructional Change in English. Developments in Allomorphy, Word Formation, and Syntax. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hoffmann, Thomas. 2018. Creativity and Construction Grammar: Cognitive and psychological issues. Zeitschrift für Anglistik und Amerikanistik 66(3): 259–276. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hoffmann, Thomas. 2020. Construction Grammar and creativity: Evolution, psychology, and cognitive science. Cognitive Semiotics. 1–11. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hundt, Marianne & Mair, Christian. 1999. ’Agile’ and ‘uptight’ genres. The corpus-based approach to language change in progress. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 4(2): 221–242. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jackendoff, Ray. 1973. The base rules for prepositional phrases. In A Festschrift for Morris Halle, Stephen Anderson & Paul Kiparsky (eds), 345–356. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jespersen, Otto. 1942. A Modern English Grammar on Historical Principles. Copenhagen: Ejnar Munsgard.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kim, Jong-Bok & Michaelis, Laura A. (2020) Syntactic Constructions in English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Klégr, Aleš & Čermak, Jan. 2010. Neologisms of the ‘on-the-pattern-of’ type: analogy as a word-formation process? In The Prague Structure and Theories of Structure, Martin Procháska, Markéta Malá & Pavlína Šaldová (eds), Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Leech, Geoffrey. 1969. A Linguistic Guide to English Poetry. London, Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lensch, Anke. 2018. Fixer-uppers: Reduplication in the derivation of phrasal verbs. In Exact Repetition in Grammar and Discourse, Rita Finkbeiner & Ulrike Freywald (eds), 158–181. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Los, Bettelou, Blom, Corrien, Booij, Geert, Elenbaas, Marian & van Kemenade, Ans. 2012. Morphosyntactic Change: A Comparative Study of Particles and Prefixes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lyons, John. 1977. Semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Matinello, Elisa. 2013. Extra-Grammatical Morphology in English. Abbreviations, Blends, Reduplicatives, and Related Phenomena. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McIntyre, Andrew. 2004. Sum: English Affix Reduplication. The Linguist List 15.1929.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Miller, Gary D. 2014. Lexicogenesis. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Panther, Klaus-Uwe & Thornburg, Linda. 2001. A conceptional analysis of English -er nominals. In Applied Coginitive Linguistics in Language Pedagogy, Martin Pütz, Susanne Niemeier & René Driven (eds), 149–200. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Potts, Christopher. 2013. Conventional implicature and expressive content. In Semantics. An international Handbook of natural language meaning, Claudia Maienborn, Klaus von Heusinger & Paul Portner (eds), Volume 3, 598-621 .Berlin; Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Quirk, Randolph, Greenbaum, Sidney, Leech, Geoffrey & Svartvik, Jan. 1985. A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rohdenburg, Günter. 2003. Cognitive complexity and ‘horror aequi’ as factors determining the use of interrogative clause linkers in English. In Determinants of Grammatical Variation in English, Günter Rohdenburg & Britta Mondorf (eds), 205–249. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ryder, Mary Ellen. 1999. Bankers and Blue-chippers. Of -er nominalizations in Present-day English. English Language and Linguistics 3(2): 269–297. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ryder, Mary Ellen. 2000. Complex -er nominals: Where grammaticalization and lexicalization meet? In Between Grammar and Lexicon, Ellen Contini-Morava & Yishai Tobin (eds), 291–332. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sampson, Geoffrey. 2016. Two ideas of creativity. In Evidence, Experiment and Argument in Linguistics and Philosophy of Language, Martin Hinton (ed), 15–26. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Selkirk, Elizabeth. 1984. Phonology and Syntax: The Relation Between Sound and Structure. Cambridge, MA: The MIT-Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
The Times 2017. The Times Style Guide. Glasgow: Harper Collins.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Thim, Stefan. 2012. Phrasal Verbs: The English Verb-Particle Construction and Its History. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs & Trousdale, Graeme. 2013. Constructionalization and Constructional Changes. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Uhrig, Peter. 2020. Creative intentions – The fine line between ‘creative’ and ‘wrong’. Cognitive Semiotics. 1–19.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Walker, James. 2009. Double -er suffixation in English. Morphological, phonological and sociolinguistic reflections. Lexis – Journal in English Lexicology HS 1: 5–13. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wentworth, Harold. 1936. On adding the suffix of agency, -ER, to adverbs. American Speech 11: 245–274. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Williams, Edwin. 1981. On the notions “lexically related” and “head of a word”. Linguistic Inquiry 12(2): 369–370.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zeschel, Arne. 2012. Incipient Productivity: A Construction-Based Approach to Linguistic Creativity. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (9)

Cited by nine other publications

Bielova, Maryna
2025. Machine vs. Human Translation of Stylistic Neologisms in English Language Chick Lit into Ukrainian. Respectus Philologicus :48 (53) ► pp. 109 ff. DOI logo
Bielova, Maryna A.
2025. STYLISTIC NEOLOGISMS IN ENGLISH-LANGUAGE CHICK LIT: MORPHOSEMANTIC ASPECT. Alfred Nobel University Journal of Philology 1:29 ► pp. 78 ff. DOI logo
Ivorra Ordines, Pedro & Belén López Meirama
2025.  Vete a freír cristales . Review of Cognitive Linguistics 23:2 ► pp. 596 ff. DOI logo
Mühleisen, Susanne
2025. 24024114 Patient nouns. In Word-Formation - Semantics and Pragmatics, ► pp. 241 ff. DOI logo
Szymanek, Bogdan
2025. 25515 Place nouns. In Word-Formation - Semantics and Pragmatics, ► pp. 255 ff. DOI logo
Trousdale, Graeme & Muriel Norde
2025. On the relationship between linguistic creativity and change in morphological constructions. English Language and Linguistics 29:2 ► pp. 238 ff. DOI logo
Lensch, Anke
2023. English and German derivation revisited. Constructions and Frames 15:2 ► pp. 234 ff. DOI logo
Ordines, Pedro Ivorra
2023.  Por mí como si te operas. Constructional idioms of rejection from a constructionist approach. Yearbook of Phraseology 14:1 ► pp. 89 ff. DOI logo
Ordines, Pedro Ivorra
2024. Un hambre que da calambre. Creativity and extravagance in the context of a family of consecutive constructional idioms. CogniTextes Volume 25 DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 3 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue