Cover not available

In:Extravagant Morphology: Studies in rule-bending, pattern-extending and theory-challenging morphology
Edited by Matthias Eitelmann and Dagmar Haumann
[Studies in Language Companion Series 223] 2022
► pp. 51–72

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload Book EPUB
authorization required

Extravagance, productivity and the development of -ingly adverbs

Published online: 16 March 2022
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.223.03kil
Abstract
The paper claims that the process of deriving -ly adverbs from present participles has become increasingly productive over the last 500 years. It is argued that many ‘-ingly adverbs’ are extravagant, in the sense of Haspelmath (1999). This claim is supported by the fact that such adverbs are very common in prose fiction, which is a genre that admits of extravagant language. It is hypothesised that the category of -ingly adverbs has evolved around a few frequent types but that extravagant -ingly uses have caused the category to expand by pushing at the boundaries of what is considered acceptable. The change is explained within an exemplar-based model of morphological change and against the backdrop of ‘adverbialisation’.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction: Aims and organization
  • 2.Theoretical preliminaries: Extravagance, creativity and productivity
    • 2.1Extravagance and creativity
    • 2.2Productivity
  • 3.The development of -ingly adverbs: relevant research
  • 4.Data sources and methodology
  • 5.The quantitative development of -ingly adverbs
    • 5.1The overall productivity of -ingly derivation: data from the four fiction corpora
    • 5.2The development of the various adverbial categories: An overview
    • 5.3Some innovative users – and uses – of -ingly adverbs and the question of extravagance
  • 6.Discussion
    • 6.1Research question 1: The productivity of -ingly derivation in the last 500 years
    • 6.2Research question 2: Factors triggering the development of -ingly adverbs and the role of extravagance
    • 6.3Adverbialisation, analogues, and the role of frequent users
  • 7.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • Data sources
  • References
References (38)
Data sources
Davies, Mark[BNC] Davies, Mark. (2004-) BYU-BNC. (Based on the British National Corpus from Oxford University Press). Available online at [URL]
[ECF] Eighteenth-Century Fiction. 1996. Cambridge: Chadwyck-Healey.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
[EEPF] Early English Prose Fiction. 1997. Cambridge: Chadwyck-Healey.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
[NCF] Nineteenth-Century Fiction. 1999–2000. Cambridge: Chadwyck-Healey.
References
Baayen, R. Harald. 1994. Derivational productivity and text typology. Journal of Quantitative Linguistics 1: 16–34. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Baayen, Harald & Renouf, Antoinette. 1996. Chronicling the Times: Productive lexical innovations in an English newspaper. Language 72(1): 69–96. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bauer, Laurie. 2001. Morphological Productivity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bauer, Laurie, Lieber, Rochelle & Plag, Ingo. 2013. The Oxford Reference Guide to English Morphology. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas. 1989. A typology of English texts. Linguistics 27: 3–43. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Blevins, James P. & Blevins, Juliette. 2009. Introduction: Analogy in grammar. In Analogy in Grammar: Form and Acquisition, James P. Blevins & Juliette Blevins (eds), 1–13. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bolinger, Dwight. 1972. Degree Words. Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Broccias, Cristiano. 2012. Oriented -ingly adjuncts in Late Modern English. In English Historical Linguistics 2008: Selected Papers from the Fifteenth International Conference on English Historical Linguistics (ICEHL 15), Munich, 24–30 August 2008. Volume II: Words, Texts and Genres, Hans Sauer & Gaby Waxenberger (eds), 147–164. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bybee, Joan & Beckner, Clay. 2015. Usage-based theory. In The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Analysis, Bernd Heine & Heiko Narrog (eds), 953–980. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cowie, Claire. 2000. The Discourse Motivations for Neologising: Action Nominalization in the History of English. In Lexicology, Semantics and Lexicography in English Historical Linguistic: Papers from the Fourth G.L. Brook Symposium, Manchester, August 1998, Julie Coleman & Christian J. Kay (eds), 179–208. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cowie, Claire & Dalton-Puffer, Christiane. 2002. Diachronic word-formation: changes in productivity. In A changing world of words: studies in English historical lexicography, lexicology and semantics, Javier E. Díaz Vera (ed), 410–436. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Donovan, Melissa. 2019. Writing tips: Abolish the adverbs. Writing Forward, 30 July 2019, [URL]Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gahl, Susanne & Yu, Alan C. L. 2006. Introduction to the special issue on exemplar-based models in linguistics. The Linguistics Review 23(3): 213–216. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Harris, Alice & Campbell, Lyle. 1995. Historical syntax in cross-linguistic perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin. 1999. Why is grammaticalization irreversible? Linguistics 37(6): 1043–1068. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Killie, Kristin. 1998. The spread of -ly to present participles. In Advances in English Historical Linguistics, Jacek Fisiak & Marcin Krygier (eds), 119–134. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Killie, Kristin. 2000. Stative Adverbs in English: A Study of Adverbial Productivity and Orientation. PhD dissertation, University of Tromsø.
Killie, Kristin. 2015. Secondary grammaticalization and the English adverbial -ly suffix. Language Sciences 47(B): 199–214. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kjellmer, Göran. 1984. Why great: greatly but not big: *bigly? Studia Linguistica 38: 1–19. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lehmann, Christian. 1995. Synsemantika. In Syntax: Ein internationales Handbuchzeitgenössischer Forschung, Joachim Jacobs, Arnim von Stechow, Wolfgang Sternefeld & Theo Vennemann (eds), 1251–1266. Berlin: de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Menn, Lise & Macwhinney, Brian. 1984. The repeated morph constraint: toward an explanation. Language 60(3): 519–541. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nevalainen, Terttu. 1994. Aspects of adverbial change in Early modern English. In Studies in Early Modern English, Dieter Kastovsky (ed), 243–259. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Noble, William. 2008. Don’t Use Adverbs and Adjectives to Prettify Your Prose. Writer’s Digest: Write Better, Get Published, 21 August 2008, [URL].Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
[OED] Oxford English Dictionary, 3rd edn. 1989. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Plag, Ingo. 1999. Morphological productivity: structural constraints in English derivation. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pratt, Lynda & Denison, David. 2000. The language of the Southey-Coleridge Circle. Language Sciences 22(3): 401–422. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Reed, Shannon. 2014. The case against adverbs. Teachers at work: a column about teaching, 18 July 2014, [URL]Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schultink, Henk. 1961. Produktiviteit als morfologisch fenomeen. Forum der Letteren 2: 110–125.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Skinner, John. 2001. An Introduction to Eighteenth-Century Fiction: Raising the Novel. London: Macmillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Swan, Toril. 1990. Subject-oriented adverbs in 20th century English. Nordlyd 16: 14–58.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Swan, Toril. 1997. From manner to subject modification: adverbialization in English. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 20(2): 179–195. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Swan, Toril. 1998. Adverbialization and subject-modification in Old English. In Advances in English historical linguistics, Jacek Fisiak & Marcin Krygier (eds), 443–456. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Van Marle, Jaap. 1985. On the Paradigmatic Dimension of Morphological Creativity. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Bielova, Maryna A.
2025. STYLISTIC NEOLOGISMS IN ENGLISH-LANGUAGE CHICK LIT: MORPHOSEMANTIC ASPECT. Alfred Nobel University Journal of Philology 1:29 ► pp. 78 ff. DOI logo
Schillová, Aksana
2023. Adverbs Derived from Adjectival Present Participles in Polish, Slovak and Czech: A Comparative Corpus-Based Study. Journal of Linguistics/Jazykovedný casopis 74:1 ► pp. 119 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 3 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue