In:English Noun Phrases from a Functional-Cognitive Perspective: Current issues
Edited by Lotte Sommerer and Evelien Keizer
[Studies in Language Companion Series 221] 2022
► pp. 279–310
From an icy hell of a night to a hell of a fine story
The development of the English binominal noun phrase and beyond
Published online: 21 January 2022
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.221.08ten
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.221.08ten
Abstract
English evaluative binominal noun phrases (EBNPs; an icy hell of a night) have been discussed for over 50 years, and a number of different analyses have been presented. This paper argues that one problem shared by previous research is that the of-binominals classified as EBNPs are actually three different constructions: the EBNP and two other of-binominals, evaluative modifiers (EM; one hell of a party) and binominal intensifiers (BI; a hell of a good dog). Using the classification criteria presented in previous studies and corpus data, I argue for distinguishing these two of-binominals from the EBNP. Furthermore, this paper links the development of the EM and the BI to the grammaticalization of premodifiers and other of-binominals.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Evaluative binominal noun phrase
- 2.1Property 1: Of
- 2.2Property 2: Determiner 1
- 2.3Property 3: Determiner 2
- 2.4Property 4: Headedness
- 2.5Property 5: Relation between N1 and N2
- 2.6Property 6: Scope of Determiner 1
- 2.7Property 7: Premodification
- 2.8Property 8: Constituency
- 2.9Property 9: Restrictions on N1
- 2.10Property 10: Restrictions on N2
- 2.11Property 11: Number Agreement
- 3.Evaluative Modifier
- 3.1Property 1: Of
- 3.2Property 2 & 3: Determiner 1 & 2
- 3.3Property 4: Headedness
- 3.4Property 5: Relation between N1 and N2
- 3.5Property 7: Premodification
- 3.6Property 9 & 10: Restrictions on N1 & N2
- 3.7Property 11: Number agreement
- 4.Binominal intensifier
- 4.1Property 1: Of
- 4.2Property 2 & 3: Determiner 1 & determiner 2
- 4.3Property 5 & 7: Relation between N1 and N2 & premodification
- 4.4Property 8: Constituency
- 4.5Property 9 & 10: Restrictions on N1 & N2
- 4.6Property 11: Number agreement
- 5.Two case studies
- 5.1Hell of
- 5.2Beast of
- 6.Relation to other constructions
- 6.1Similarities to adjectives
- 6.2Parallels to other of-binominals
- 7.Conclusion
Notes References Corpora
References (59)
Aarts, Bas. 1998. Binominal noun phrases in English. Transactions of the Philological Society 96(1): 117–158.
Adamson, Sylvia. 2000. A lovely little example: word order options and category shift in the premodifying string. In Pathways of Change: Grammaticalization in English [Studies in Language Companion Series 53], Olga Fischer, Annette Rosenbach & Dieter Stein (eds), 39–66. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Aijmer, Karin. 2002. English Discourse Particles: Evidence from a Corpus [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 10]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Alexiadou, Artemis, Haegeman, Liliane & Stavrou, Melita. 2007. Noun Phrase in the Generative Perspective. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Austin, Fances O. 1980. A crescent-shaped jewel of an island: Appositive nouns in phrases separated by of. English Studies 61: 357–366.
Bennis, Hans, Corver, Norbert & den Dikken, Marcel. 1998. Predication in nominal phrases. The Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 1: 85–117.
Bouchard, Denis. 2002. Adjectives, Number and Interfaces [North-Holland Linguistic Series: Linguistic Variations 61]. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Brems, Lieselotte. 2010. Size noun constructions as collocationally constrained constructions: Lexical and grammaticalized uses. English Language and Linguistics 14(1): 83–109.
Brems, Lieselotte & Davidse, Kristin. 2010. The grammaticalisation of nominal type noun constructions with kind/sort of: Chronology and paths of change. English Studies 91: 180–202.
Bucholtz, Mary, Bermudez, Nancy, Edwards, Lisa, Fung, Victor & Vargas, Rosalva. 2007. Hella Nor Cal or Totally So Cal? The perceptual dialectology of California. Journal of English Linguistics 35: 325–352.
Butler, Christopher S. 2008. Interpersonal meaning in the noun phrase. In The Noun Phrase in Functional Discourse Grammar, Jan Rijkhoff & Daniel García Velasco (eds), 117–152. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
den Dikken, Marcel. 1998. Predicate inversion in the DP. In Possessors, Predicates and Movement in the Determiner Phrase [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 22], Artemis Alexiadou & Chris Wilder (eds), 215–258. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
. 2006. Relators and Linkers: The Syntax of Predication, Predicate Inversion and Copulas. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.
Denison, David. 2002. History of the sort of construction family. Paper presented at ICCG2: Second International Conference on Construction Grammar, Helsinki.
. 2005. The grammaticalisations of sort of, kind of and type of in English. Paper presented at New Reflections on Grammaticalization 3, University of Santiago de Compostela.
Doetjes, Jenny & Rooryck, Johan. 2003. Generalizing over quantitative and qualitative constructions. In From NP to DP, The Syntax and Semantics of Noun Phrases, Vol. 1 [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 55], Martine Coene & Yves D’hulst (eds), 277–296. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Foolen, Ad. 2004. Expressive binominal NPs in Germanic and Romance languages. In Studies in Linguistic Motivation, Günter Radden & Klaus-Uwe Panther (eds), 75–100. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Ghesquière, Lobke. 2014. The Directionality of (Inter)subjectification in the English Noun Phrase. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Givón, Talmy. 1993. English Grammar: A Function-based Introduction, Vol. 1. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Keizer, Evelien. 2005. What to do with those fools of a crew? In Organizing Grammar: Linguistic Studies in Honor of Henk van Riemskijk, Hans Broekhuis, Nobert Corver, Riny Huybregts, Ursula Kleinhenz, & Jan Koster (eds), 300–309. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Kim, Jong-Bok & Sells, Peter. 2015. English binominal NPs: A construction-based perspective. Journal of Linguistics 51: 41–73.
Lorenz, Gunter. 2002. Really worthwhile or not really significant? A corpus-based approach to the delexicalization and grammaticalization of intensifiers in modern English. In New Reflections on Grammaticalization [Typological Studies in Language, 49], Ilse Wischer & Diewald Gabriele (eds), 143–161. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Masini, Francesca. 2016. Binominal constructions in Italian of the N1-di-N2 type: Towards a typology of Light Noun Constructions. Language Sciences 53: 99–113.
McCawley, James D. 1988. The Syntactic Phenomena of English, Vol. 2, Chicago IL: Chicago University Press.
Morzycki, Marcin. 2012. Adjectival extremeness: Degree modification and contextually restricted scales. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 30(2): 567–609.
Paradis, Carita. 1997. Degree Modifiers of Adjectives in Spoken British English. Lund: Lund University Press.
. 2000. Reinforcing adjectives: A cognitive semantic perspective on grammaticalization. In Generative Theory and Corpus Studies, Richard Bermúdez, David Denison, Richard Hogg & Chris McCully (eds), 233–258. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
. 2008. Configurations, construals and change: Expressions of DEGREE. English Language and Linguistics 12(2): 317–343.
Partington, Alan. 1993. Corpus evidence of language change – The case of the intensifier. In Text and Technology. In Honour of John Sinclair, Mona Baker, Francis Tognini-Bonelli & Elena Tognini-Bonelli (eds), 177–192. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Quirk, Randolph, Greenbaum, Sidney, Leech, Geoffrey & Svartvik, Jan. 1985. A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman.
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs. 1989. On the rise of epistemic meanings in English: An example of subjectification in semantic change. Language 65: 31–55.
. 1999. The role of pragmatics in semantic change. In Pragmatics in 1998: Selected Papers from the 6th International Pragmatics Conference, Vol. 2, Jef Verschueren (ed.), 93–102. Antwerp: International Pragmatics Association.
. 2002. From etymology to historical pragmatics, In Studying the History of English Language: Millennial Perspectives, Donka Minkova & Robert P. Stockwell (eds), 19–49. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
. 2007. The concepts of constructional mismatch and type-shifting from the perspective of grammaticalization. Cognitive Linguistics 18(4): 523–557.
. 2008a. Grammaticalization, constructions and the incremental development of language: Suggestions from the development of degree modifiers in English. In Variation, Selection, Development – Probing the Evolutionary Model of Language Change, Regine Eckardt, Gerhard Jäger & Tonjes Veenstra (eds), 219–250. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
. 2008b. The grammaticalization of NP of NP patterns. In Constructions and Language Change [Trends in Linguistics. Studies and Monographs 194], Alexander Bergs & Gabriele Diewald (eds), 23–45. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
. 2016. Do semantic modal maps have a role in a constructionalization approach to modals? Constructions and Frames 8(1): 98–125.
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs & Dasher, Richard B. Richard B. 2002. Regularity in Semantic Change. Cambridge: CUP.
Trousdale, Graeme. 2012. Grammaticalization, constructions, and the grammaticalization of constructions. In Grammaticalization and Language Change: New Reflections [Studies in Language Companion Series 130], Kristin Davidse, Tina Breban, Lieselotte Brems, & Tanja Mortelmans (eds), 167–194. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Villalba, Xavier & Bartra-Kaufmann, Anna. 2010. Predicate focus fronting in the Spanish determiner phrase. Lingua 120(4): 819–849.
ten Wolde, Elnora. 2019. Linear vs hierarchical: Two accounts of premodification in the of-binominal noun phrase. Linguistics 57(2): 283–326.
. Forthcoming. The English Binominal Noun Phrase: A cognitive-functionl approach. Cambridge: CUP.
Davies, Mark. 2008–. The Corpus of Contemporary American English: 450 million words, 1990–2013. (COCA) <[URL]>
. 2010–. The Corpus of Historical American English: 400 million words, 1810–2009. (COHA) <[URL]>
OED Online. Oxford: OUP, June 2015. <[URL]> (27 July 2015).
