Cover not available

In:Building Categories in Interaction: Linguistic resources at work
Edited by Caterina Mauri, Ilaria Fiorentini and Eugenio Goria
[Studies in Language Companion Series 220] 2021
► pp. 187–210

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload Book EPUB
authorization required

Chapter 7
Making the implicit explicit

Free enrichment in interaction

 | Free University Berlin
Published online: 6 December 2021
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.220.07pau
Abstract
Semantic underdeterminacy in the form of unformulated syntactic slots is a widely-discussed research theme, even though opinions differ about whether the interpretation is a result of pragmatic processes of free enrichment (e.g., Carston 2004; Recanati 2002, 2004; Sperber & Wilson 1986/1995) or of obligatory processes of the linguistic structure (Stanley 2007). Using a conversation analytic approach, a corpus of narrative interviews can show that interlocutors use a wide range of turns to deal with these forms of semantic underdeterminacy. In narrative interviews, prototypically the communicative functions of these turns (e.g. repair, gaining time or developing the topic) are in relation to the accessibility of possible candidates within the given context. The empirical findings support the relevance theory account of free enrichment.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.The Relevance theoretical perspective
    • 2.1The conversational analytic perspective: Other-initiated repair
  • 3.Method and data
    • 3.1Narrative interviews: The corpus of the fall of the wall
    • 3.2Data
  • 4.Empirical analysis
    • 4.1The implicit source term linguistically
    • 4.2Possible meanings: Candidates and utterance formats
    • 4.3The communicative function of elaborating implicit syntactic slots
      • 4.3.1Presenting accessible candidates with strategic function
      • 4.3.2Realizing repair in the case of two or a restricted set of possible candidates
      • 4.3.3Endless possible candidates or no candidate accessible
  • 5.Summary
  • 6.Transcript conventions GAT II(Selting et al. 2009, selection)
  • Notes
  • References
References (44)
References
Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. 2004. Evidentiality. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Antaki, Charles. 2012. Affiliative and disaffiliative candidate understandings. Discourse Studies 14: 531–547. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Auer, Peter. 2006. Increments and more. Anmerkungen zur augenblicklichen Diskussion über die Erweiterbarkeit von Turnkonstruktionseinheiten. In Grammatik und Interaktion, Arnulf Deppermann, Reinhard Fiehler & Thomas Spranz-Fogasy (eds), 279–294. Radolfzell: Verlag für Gesprächsforschung.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brinker, Klaus & Hagemann, Jörg. 2001. Themenstruktur und Themenentfaltung in Gesprächen. In Text- und Gesprächslinguistik. Ein internationales Handbuch zeitgenössischer Forschung, Vol. 2 [Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft 16.2]), Klaus Brinker, Gerd Antos, Wolfgang Heinemann & Sven F. Sager (eds), 1252–1263. Berlin: De Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Carston, Robyn. 2004. Relevance theory and the saying/implicating distinction. In Handbook of Pragmatics, Laurence Horn & Gergory Ward (eds), 633–656. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Carston, Robyn & Hall, Alison. 2017. Contextual effects on explicature: Optional pragmatics or optional syntax? International Review of Pragmatics 9(1): 51–81. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Clark, Herbert. 1996. Using Language. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Deppermann, Arnulf. 2015. Retrospection and understanding in interaction. In Temporality in Interaction [Studies in Language and Social Interaction 27], Arnulf Deppermann & Susanne Günthner (eds), 57–94. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Norbert, Dittmar & Paul, Christine. 2019. Sprechen im Umbruch. Zeitzeugen erzählen und argumentieren rund um den Fall der Mauer im Wendekorpus. Mannheim: Leibnitz-Institut für Deutsche Sprache.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Drew, Paul. 1997. ‚Open‘ class repair initiators in response to sequential sources of troubles in conversation. Journal of Pragmatics 28(1): 69–101. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Egbert, Maria. 2009. Der Reparaturmechanismus in deutschen Gesprächen. Mannheim. <[URL]> (5 March 2020).
Enfield, Nicholas J., Mark Dingemanse, Julija Baranova, Joe Blythe, Penelope Brown, Tyko Dirksmeyer, Paul Drew, Simeon Floyd, Sonja Gipper, Rósa Gísladóttir, Gertie Hoymann, Kobin H. Kendrick, Stephen C. Levinson, Lilla Magyari, Elizabeth Manrique, Giovanni Rossi, Lila San Roque & Francisco Torreira. 2013. Huh? What? – A first survey in 21 languages. In Conversational Repair and Human Understanding, Makoto Hayashi, Geoffrey Raymond & Jack Sidnell (eds), 343–380. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ferrara, Kathleen. 1992. The interactive achievement of a sentence: Joint productions in therapeutic discourse. Discourse Processes 15(2): 207–229. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hayashi, Makoto, Raymond, Geoffrey & Sidnell, Jack. 2013. Conversational repair and human understanding. An introduction. In Conversational Repair and Human Understanding, Makoto Hayashi, Geoffrey Raymond & Jack Sidnell (eds), 1–40. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Heritage, John. 2009. Conversation analysis and instituional talk: Analysing data. In Conversation Analysis [Sage Benchmarks in Social Research Methods 1], Paul Drew & John Heritage (eds), 1–26. London: Sage.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Heritage, John & Claymann, Steven. 2010. Talk in Action. Interactions, Identities and Institutions. Malden MA: Wiley-Blackwell. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Heritage, John & Raymond, Geoffrey. 2012. Navigating epistemic landscapes: Acquiescence, agency and resistance in responses to polar questions. In Questions: Formal, Functional and Interactional Perspectives, Jan P. de Ruiter (ed.), 179–192. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Labov, William & Fanshel, David. 1977. Therapeutic Discourse: Psychotherapy as Conversation. New York NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lerner, Gene. 2004. On the place of linguistic resources in the organization of talk-in-interaction: Grammar as action in prompting a speaker to elaborate. Research on Language and Social Interaction 37(2): 151–184. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lucius-Hoene, Gabriele & Deppermann, Arnulf. 2004. Rekonstruktion narrativer Identität: Ein Arbeitsbuch zur Analyse narrativer Interviews. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mazeland, Harrie & Benjamin, Trevor. 2013. Conversation analysis and other-initiated repair. In The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics, Carol A. Chapelle (ed.), 1068–1075. Malden MA: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Muylaert, Camila, Sarubbi Jr, Vicente, Rogério Gallo, Paulo, Rolim Neto, Modesto Leite & Advincula Reis, Alberto Olavo. 2014. Narrative interviews: An important resource in qualitative research. Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da U S P 48(2): 184–189. <[URL]> (5 March 2020).
Murray, Michael. 2018. Narrative data. In Sage Handbook of Qualitative Data Collection, Uwe Flick (ed.), 264–279. London: Sage. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Paul, Christine. 2019. Retrospektive Äußerungen. Nachfragen und Erweiterungen in narrativen Interviews am Beispiel des Berliner Wendekorpus. Mannheim: IDS.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2014. The epistemic side of retrospective utterances. Language and Dialogue 4(1): 24–42. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Paulson, Susan. 2011. The use of ethnography and narrative interviews in a study of ‘cultures of dance’. Journal of Health Psychology 16(1): 148–157. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Recanati, François. 2004. Literal Meaning. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2002. Unarticulated constituents. Linguistics and Philosophy 25: 299–345. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rost-Roth, Martina. 2006. Nachfragen. Formen und Funktionen äußerungsbezogener Interrogationen. Berlin: De Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sacks, Harvey. 1998. Lectures on Conversation, Vol. I. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schegloff, Emanuel A. 2007. Sequence Organization in Interaction. A Primer in Conversation Analysis, Vol. 1. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2000. When others initiate repair. Applied Linguistics 2(2): 205–243. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1996. Confirming allusions: Toward an empirical account of action. The American Journal of Sociology 102(1): 161–216. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schegloff, Emanuel A., Jefferson, Gail & Sacks, Harvey. 1977. The preference for self-correction in the organization of repair in conversation. Language 53: 361–382. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Selting, Margret, Auer, Peter, Barth-Weingarten, Dagmar et al. 2009. Gesprächsanalytisches Transkriptionssystem 2 (GAT 2). Gesprächsforschung – Online-Zeitschrift zur verbalen Interaktion 10: 353–402. <[URL]> (5 March 2020).
Selting, Margret. 1995. Prosodie im Gespräch. Aspekte einer interaktionalen Phonologie der Konversation. Tübingen: Niemeyer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sidnell, Jack. 2012. Turn continuation by self and by other. Discourse Processes 49(3–4): 314–337. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sperber, Dan & Wilson, Deidre. 1986 [1995]. Relevance. Communication and Cognition. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sperber, Dan & Wilson, Deirdre. 2005. Pragmatics. In The Oxford Handbook of Contemporary Philosophy, Frank Jackson & Michael Smith (eds), 468–501. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stanley, Jason. 2007. Language in Context. Selected Essays. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2002. Context and logical form. Linguistics and Philosophy 23: 391–434. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Svennevig, Jan. 2008. Trying the easiest solution first in other-initiation of repair. Journal of Pragmatics 40(2): 333–348. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Szczepek, Beatrice. 2000a. Formal aspects of collaborative productions in English conversation. InLiSt – Interaction and Linguistic Structures 17, June 2000. <[URL]> (5 March 2021).
. 2000b. Functional aspects of collaborative productions in English conversation. InLiSt – Interaction and Linguistic Structures 21, December 2000. <[URL]> (31 May 2018).
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue