Cover not available

In:Building Categories in Interaction: Linguistic resources at work
Edited by Caterina Mauri, Ilaria Fiorentini and Eugenio Goria
[Studies in Language Companion Series 220] 2021
► pp. 155–186

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload Book EPUB
authorization required

Chapter 6
The Camel Humps prosodic pattern

Listing for disaffiliating in spoken Hebrew

 | Hebrew University of Jerusalem
Published online: 6 December 2021
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.220.06mat
Abstract
This chapter presents an analysis of a common prosodic pattern in spoken Hebrew. The pattern is characterized by a repetition of high rise-fall pitch movements, which visualize as successive “humps” in the pitch curve. Based on analysis of naturally occurring conversations, I show that speakers use this pattern to construct open lists of reinforcements for a counter-stance they take. In some cases, the use of the pattern is itself the act of taking a counter-stance, that is, in such cases the disaffiliation between the stance-takers is only prosodically cued. Such cases demonstrate that prosodic list patterns are used not only for the task of enumerating items under one category, but also as a resource for complex interactional activities.
The structure of the chapter is as follows. In Section 1, I introduce the premises underlying this study and describe the data. Section 2 includes a formal analysis of the pattern, followed by a functional analysis in Section 3. Conclusions are drawn in Section 4.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.The form
    • 2.1Prosodic structure
    • 2.2Syntactic structure
  • 3.The function
    • 3.1Reference-stance taken by another participant
    • 3.2Reference-stance attributed to another participant
    • 3.3Reported reference-stance
    • 3.4The Camel Humps pattern as an exclusive cue of disaffiliation
    • 3.5Interim summary
    • 3.6A different open list pattern in spoken Hebrew
  • 4.Conclusions
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
  • Appendix
References (41)
References
Ariel, Mira. 2015. Higher-level category or constructions: When many is one. Studies in Pragmatics 17: 42–60.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Auer, Peter. 1992. Introduction: John Gumperz’ approach to contextualization. In The Contextualization of Language [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 22], Peter Auer & Aldo Di Luzio (eds), 1–38. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bakhtin, Mikhail. 1986. The problem of speech genres, trans. Vern W. McGee. In Speech Genres & Other Late Essays, Caryl Emerson & Michael Holquist (eds), 114–136. Austin TX: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Barsalou, Lawrence W. 1983. Ad hoc categories. Memory and Cognition 11(3): 211–227. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Barth-Weingarten, Dagmar. 2016. Intonation Units Revisited: Cesuras in Talk-in-interaction [Studies in Language and Social Interaction 29]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Boersma, Paul & Weenink, David. 2016. Praat: Doing Phonetics by Computer [Computer program]. Version 6.0.19. Amsterdam: University of Amsterdam.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chafe, Wallace L. 1994. Discourse, Consciousness, and Time: The Flow and Displacement of Conscious Experience in Speaking and Writing. Chicago IL: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Clayman, Steven E. 2013. Turn-constructional units and the transition-relevance place. In The Handbook of Conversation Analysis, Jack Sidnell & Tanya Stivers (eds), 150–166. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth. 1986. An Introduction to English Prosody. Tübingen: Niemeyer and London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2009. Prosody. In The Pragmatics of Interaction [Handbook of Pragmatics Highlights 4], Sigurd D’hondt, Jan-Ola Östman & Jef Verschueren (eds), 174–189. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2015. Intonation and discourse. In The Handbook of Discourse Analysis, 2nd edn, Deborah Tannen, Heidi E. Hamilton & Deborah Schiffrin (eds), 82–104. Malden MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth & Selting, Margret. 1996. Towards an interactional perspective on prosody and a prosodic perspective on interaction. In Prosody in Conversation [Studies in Interactional Sociolinguistics 12], Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen & Margret Selting (eds), 11–56. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2018. Interactional Linguistics: Studying Language in Social Interaction. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dori-Hacohen, Gonen. 2014. More-than-three-part lists and their interactional achievements in radio phone-in shows. The 64th annual ICA Meeting. Seattle, WA.
Du Bois, John W. 2007. The stance triangle. In Englebretson (ed.), 139–182. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Du Bois, John W., Cumming, Susanna, Schuetze-Coburn, Stephan & Paolino, Danae. 1992. Discourse transcription. In Santa Barbara Papers in Linguistics 4. Santa Barbara CA: Department of Linguistics, UCSB.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Englebretson, Robert (ed.). 2007. Stance Taking in Discourse: Subjectivity, Evaluation, Interaction [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 164]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goffman, Erving. 1976. Replies and responses. Language in Society 5(3): 257–313. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gumperz, John. 1982. Discourse Strategies. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Günthner, Susanne. 1996. The prosodic contextualization of moral work: An analysis of reproaches in ‘why’-formats. In Prosody in Conversation [Studies in Interactional Sociolinguistics 12], Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen & Margret Selting (eds), 271–302. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1999. Polyphony and the ‘layering of voices’ in reported dialogues: An analysis of the use of prosodic devices in everyday reported speech. Journal of pragmatics 31(5): 685–708. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Himmelmann, Nikolaus. P., Sandler, Meytal, Strunk, Jan & Unterladstetter, Volker. 2018. On the universality of intonational phrases: A cross-linguistic interrater study. Phonology 35(2): 207–245. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hutchby, Ian & Wooffitt, Robin. 1998. Conversation Analysis: Principles, Practices and Applications. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jefferson, Gail. 1990. List construction as a task and resource. In Interaction Competence, George Psathas (ed.), 63–92. Lanham MD: University Press of America.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Keisanen, Tiina. 2007. Stance taking as an interactional activity: Challenging the prior speaker. In Englebretson (ed.), 253–281.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kendrick, Kobin H. & Drew, Paul. 2016. Recruitment: Offers, requests, and the organization of assistance in interaction. Research on Language and Social Interaction 49(1): 1–19. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lerner, Gene H. 1994. Responsive list construction: A conversational resource for accomplishing multifaceted social action. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 13: 20–33. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lindström, Jan. 2009. Interactional linguistics. In The Pragmatics of Interaction [Handbook of Pragmatics Highlights 4], Sigurd D’hondt, Jan-Ola Östman & Jef Verschueren (eds), 96–103. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Maschler, Yael, Polak-Yitzhaki, Hilla, Fishman, Stav, Miller Shapiro, Carmit, Goretsky, Netanel, Aghion, Gallith & Fofliger, Ophir. 2017. The Haifa Corpus of Spoken Hebrew. <[URL]> (29 March 2021).
Palmer, Harold E. 1922. English Intonation, with Systematic Exercises. Cambridge: W. Heffer and Sons.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sacks, Harvey, Schegloff, Emanuel A. & Jefferson, Gail. 1974. A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language 50: 696–735. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schiffrin, Deborah. 1985. Everyday argument. In Handbook of Discourse Analysis, Vol. 4: Discourse and Dialogue, Teun van Dijk (ed.), 35–46. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1994. Making a list. Discourse Processes 17(3): 377–406. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Selting, Margret. 2004. The ‘upward staircase’ intonation contour in the Berlin vernacular. In Sound Patterns in Interaction. Cross-linguistic Studies from Conversation [Typological Studies in Language 62], Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen & Cecilia E. Ford (eds), 201–231. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2007. Lists as embedded structures and the prosody of list construction as an interactional resource. Journal of Pragmatics 39(3): 483–526. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Silber-Varod, Vered. 2011. The SpeeCHain Perspective: Prosody-Syntax Interface in Spontaneous Spoken Hebrew. PhD dissertation, Tel Aviv University.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Steensig, Jakob & Drew, Paul. 2008. Introduction: Questioning and affiliation/disaffiliation in interaction. Discourse Studies 10: 5–15. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stivers, Tanya. 2008. Stance, alignment, and affiliation during storytelling: When nodding is a token of affiliation. Research on Language and Social Interaction 41(1): 31–57. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tannen, Deborah. 1984. Conversational Style: Analyzing Talk among Friends. Norwood NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1986. Introducing constructed dialogue in Greek and American conversational and literary narrative. In Direct and Indirect Speech, Florian Coulmas (ed.), 311–332. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (4)

Cited by four other publications

Masini, Francesca, Claudia Roberta Combei & Roberta Cicchirillo
2025. The prosody of list constructions. In Multimodal Communication from a Construction Grammar Perspective [Constructional Approaches to Language, 38], ► pp. 116 ff. DOI logo
Matalon, Nadav, Eyal Weinreb, Dominik Freche, Erez Volk, Tirza Biron, Elisha Moses & David Biron
2025. Structure in conversation: Evidence for the vocabulary, semantics, and syntax of prosody. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 122:17 DOI logo
Shor, Leon & Michal Marmorstein
2023. Self-repeat as a multimodal retraction practice. Interactional Linguistics 3:1-2 ► pp. 132 ff. DOI logo
Barotto, Alessandra & Caterina Mauri
2022. Non-exhaustive connectives. STUF - Language Typology and Universals 75:2 ► pp. 317 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 3 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue