References (73)
References
Aijmer, Karin. 2002. English Discourse Particles. Evidence from a Corpus [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 10]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Alcázar, Asler. 2017. A syntactic analysis of rhetorical questions. In Proceedings of the 34th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, Aaron Kaplan, Abby Kaplan, Miranda K. McCarvel & Edward J. Rubin (eds), 32–41. Somerville MA: Cascadilla.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Álvarez González, Albert. 2019. From discourse to syntax: The use of the discourse marker bwe in the creation of interclausal connectives in Yaqui. In Diverse Scenarios of Syntactic Complexity [Typological Studies in Language 126], Albert Álvarez González, Zarina Estrada-Fernández & Claudine Chamoreau (eds), 217–247. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ariel, Mira. 2008. Pragmatics and Grammar. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2009. Discourse, grammar, discourse. Discourse Studies 1(1):5–36. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Beal, Joan, Burbano Elizondo, Lourdes & Llamas, Carmen. 2012. Urban North-Eastern English: Tyneside to Teeside. Edinburgh: EUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Beeching, Kate & Detges, Ulrich (eds). 2014. Functions at the Left and Right Periphery: Crosslinguistic Investigations of Language Use and Language Change. Leiden: Brill. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Blakemore, Diane. 2002. Relevance and Linguistic Meaning: The Semantics and Pragmatics of Discourse Markers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Boeckx, Cedric, Hornstein, Norbert & Nunes, Jairo. 2010. Control as Movement. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brandt, Patrick, Trawiński, Beata & Wollstein, Angelika. 2016. (Anti-)Control in German: Evidence from comparative, corpus- and psycholinguistic studies. In Co- and Subordination in German and other Languages, Ingo Reich & Augustin Speyer (eds), 77–98. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brinton, Laurel. 2017. The Development of Pragmatic Markers in English: Pathways of Change. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brown, Penelope & Levinson, Stephen C. 1987. Politeness. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bybee, Joan L. 2006. From usage to grammar: The mind’s response to repetition. Language 82: 711–733. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Degand, Liesbeth, Cornillie, Bert & Pietrandrea, Paola (eds). 2013. Discourse Markers and Modal Particles. Categorization and Description [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 234] Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Degand, Liesbeth & Evers-Vermeul, Jacqueline. 2015. Grammaticalization or pragmaticalization of discourse markers? More than a terminological issue. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 16(1): 59–85. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dik, Simon C. 1997. The Theory of Functional Grammar, Part 2. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Du Bois, John W. 1987. The discourse basis of ergativity. Language 63: 805–855. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2003. Discourse and grammar. In The New Psychology of Language: Cognitive and Functional Approaches to Language Structure, Vol. 2, Michael Tomasello (ed.), 47–87. Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Etxepare, Ricardo. 2010. Omen bariazioan. In Euskara eta euskarak: Aldakortasun sintaktikoa aztergai, Beatriz Fernández, Pablo Albizu & Ricardo Etxepare (eds). Vitoria-Gasteiz: University of the Basque Country.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Etxepare, Ricardo & Uria, Larraitz. 2016. Microsyntactic variation in the Basque hearsay evidential. In Microparameters in the Grammar of Basque [Language Faculty and Beyond 13], Beatriz Fernández & Jon Ortiz de Urbina (eds), 265–288. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Farkas, Donka F. 2017. Going beyond the prototypical: Special interrogatives and special declaratives. Paper presented at the Stanford Colloquium, 8 December 2017.
Fischer, Kerstin (ed.). 2006. Approaches to Discourse Particles. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Foolen, Ad. 2015. Expressives. In The Routledge Handbook of Semantics, Nick Riemer (ed.), 473–490. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fraser, Bruce. 1999. What are discourse markers? Journal of Pragmatics 3(7): 931–952. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2015. The combining of discourse markers – A beginning. Journal of Pragmatics 86: 48–53. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Garmendia, Joana. 2014. A pragmatic analysis of the Basque particle ote . In Cognitive and Pragmatic Aspects of Speech Actions, Iwona Witczak Plisiecka (ed.), 97–166. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Grodzinsky, Yosef. 2000. The neurology of syntax: Language use without Broca’s area. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23: 1–21. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hancil, Sylvie, Haselow, Alexander & Post, Margje (eds). 2015. Final Particles. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Haselow, Alexander. 2013. Arguing for a wide conception of grammar: The case of final particles in spoken discourse. Folia Linguistica 47(2): 375–424. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2016. A processual view on grammar: Macrogrammar and the final field in spoken syntax. Language Sciences 54: 77–101. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2017. Spontaneous Spoken English. An Integrated Approach to the Emergent Grammar of Speech. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2019. Discourse marker sequences: Insights into the serial order of communicative tasks in real-time turn production. Journal of Pragmatics 146: 1–18. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Haselow, Alexander & Kaltenböck, Gunther (eds). 2020. Grammar and Cognition: Dualistic Models of Language Structure and Language Processing [Human Cognitive Processing 70]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Heine, Bernd. 2013. On discourse markers: Grammaticalization, pragmaticalization, or something else? Linguistics 51(6): 1205–1247. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Heine, Bernd & Kuteva, Tania. 2007. The Genesis of Grammar. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Heine, B. 2019. Some observations on the dualistic nature of discourse processing. Folia Linguistica 53(2): 411–442. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Heine, Bernd, Kuteva, Tania, Kaltenböck, Gunther & Long, Haiping. 2017. Cooptation as a discourse strategy. Linguistics 55(4): 813–855. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Heine, Bernd, Kuteva, Tania, & Long, Haiping. 2020. Dual process frameworks on reasoning and linguistic discourse. A comparison. In Haselow & Kaltenböck (eds), 59–89.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Huddleston, Rodney & Pullum, Geoffrey. 2002. Language Description: The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jucker, Andreas H. & Smith, Sara W. 1998. And people just you know like ‘wow’ – Discourse markers as negotiating strategies. In Discourse Markers. Theory and Descriptions [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 57], Andreas Jucker & Yael Ziv (eds), 171–201. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kaltenböck, Gunther, Heine, Bernd & Kuteva, Tania. 2011. On thetical grammar. Studies in Language 35(4): 848–893. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Korta Carrión, Kepa & Zubeldia Arruabarrena, Larraiz. 2016. Bide partikula: Eduki doxastikoa eta ebidentziala. Gogoa 15: 11–29.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Koyanagi, Tomokazu. 2018. Research on Grammatical Change Tokyo: Kuroshio. (In Japanese).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Landau, Idan. 2000. Elements of Control. Structure and Meaning in Infinitival Constructions. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2003. Movement out of control. Linguistic Inquiry 34: 471–498. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2004. The scale of finiteness and the calculus of control. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 22: 811–877. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lehmann, Christian. 2015. Thoughts on Grammaticalization, 3rd edn [Classics in Linguistics 1]. Berlin: Language Science Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lehman Blake, Margaret. 2006. Clinical relevance of discourse characteristics after right hemisphere brain damage. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology 15(3): 255–267. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lenk, Uta. 1998. Marking Discourse Coherence: Functions of Discourse Markers in Spoken English. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mann, William C. & Thompson, Sandra A. 1988. Rhetorical structure theory: Toward a functional theory of text organization. Text 8(3): 243–281. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Marini, Andrea. 2012. Characteristics of narrative discourse processing after damage to the right hemisphere. Seminars in Speech and Language 33(1): 68–78. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Marini, Andrea, Carlomagno, Sergio, Caltagirone, Carlo & Nocentini, Ugo. 2005. The role played by the right hemisphere in the organization of complex textual structures. Brain and Language 93: 46–54. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Monforte, Sergio. 2018a. About the particle al in basque. In Novas Perspectivas na Lingüística Aplicada, Marta Díaz Ferro, Jorge Diz Ferreira, Ania Pérez Pérez & Ana Varela Suárez (eds), 19–31. Lugo: Editorial Axac.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2018b. Question particles in basque. Isogloss. A Journal on Variation of Romance and Iberian Languages 4(1): 29–53. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Myers, Penelope S. 1999. Right Hemisphere Damage: Disorders of Communication and Cognition. San Diego CA: Singular.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Prat, Chantel S., Long, Debra L. & Baynes, Kathleen. 2007. The representation of discourse in the two hemispheres: An individual differences investigation. Brain and Language 100(3): 283–294. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rhee, Seongha. 2012. Context-induced reinterpretation and (inter)subjectification: The case of grammaticalization of sentence-final particles. Language Sciences 34(3): 284–300. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2016. From quoting to reporting to stance-marking: Rhetorical strategies and intersubjectification of reportative. Language Sciences 55: 36–54. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schourup, Lawrence. 1985. Common Discourse Particles in English Conversation. New York NY: Garland.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schiffrin, Deborah. 1987. Discourse Markers. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sherratt, Sue & Bryan, Karen. 2012. Discourse production after right brain damage: Gaining a comprehensive picture using a multi-level processing model. Journal of Neurolinguistics 25(4): 213–239. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Shibasaki, Reijirou. 2018. From the inside to the outside of the sentence: Forming a larger discourse unit with jijitsu ‘fact’ in Japanese. In New Trends in Grammaticalization and Language Change [Studies in Language Companion Series 202], Sylvie Hancil, Tine Breban & José V. Lozano (eds), 333–360. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Strauss, Susan. 2005. Cognitive realization markers in Korean: A discourse-pragmatic study of the sentence-ending particles -kwun, -ney and -tela . Language Sciences 27(4): 437–480. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Thompson, Sandra A. & Suzuki, Ryoko. 2011. The grammaticalization of final particles. In The Oxford Handbook of Grammaticalization, Bernd Heine & Heiko Narrog (eds), Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs. 1997. The role of the development of discourse markers in a theory of grammaticalization. Paper presented at the ICHL XII, Manchester, UK.
. 2015. Investigating “periphery” from a functionalist perspective. Linguistics Vanguard 1. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2016. On the rise of types of clause-final pragmatic markers in English. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 17(1): 26–54. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Trotzke, Andreas & Monforte, Sergio. 2019. Basque question particles: Implications for a syntax of discourse particles. Linguistic Variation 19(2): 352–385. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
van Dijk, Teun A. 1972. Some Aspects of Text Grammars. The Hague: Mouton. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1977. Text and Context: Explorations in the Semantics and Pragmatics of Discourse. London: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wales, Katie. 2006. Northern English. A Social and Cultural History. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Watanabe, Fumio, Muraishi, Shōzō & Kabe, Sasuke. 1993. Nihongo kaishaku katuyo jiten (A dictionary of reading and application of Japanese). Tokyo: Gyosei.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Bernander, Rasmus
2025. Epistemic possibility adverbs in East African Bantu – a typological-comparative overview. Journal of African Languages and Linguistics 46:1  pp. 71 ff. DOI logo
Salazar García, Ventura & Abigail Carretero
2025. La cohesión en la Gramática Discursivo-Funcional: indagaciones a partir de la negación aditiva del español. Círculo de Lingüística Aplicada a la Comunicación 101  pp. 257 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 3 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue