Cover not available

In:Lost in Change: Causes and processes in the loss of grammatical elements and constructions
Edited by Svenja Kranich and Tine Breban
[Studies in Language Companion Series 218] 2021
► pp. 235–260

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
authorization required

On the waning of forms – A corpus-based analysis of decline and loss in adjective amplification

Editor
 | The University of Queensland
Published online: 16 June 2021
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.218.08sch
Abstract
This study takes a corpus-based approach to investigating the decline and near-loss of very as an adjective amplifier in spoken New Zealand English (NZE) based on The Wellington Corpus of Spoken New Zealand English. The paper analyzes the replacement of very as the dominant adjective amplifier across apparent time to provide insights into what factors correlate with and trigger the loss of formerly dominant variants from a variable context. While a wealth of studies has analyzed what causes innovative variants to become dominant, only relatively little attention has been placed on the process of waning. As a consequence, the expansion of innovative variants, e.g. the processes that underlie the expansion in use of really, is well understood; showing that the trajectory of change accompanying the increase of really follows a highly systematic and layered expansion in use. In contrast, questions as to whether the loss of very as a variant in spoken data is equally systematic remain unclear. The results of binomial mixed-effects regression models show that the decrease of very is remarkably uniform and does not parallel the highly systematic and step-wise trajectory of innovative incoming variants. This lack of an ordered heterogeneity that accompanies the retreat of very raises questions about the systematicity of loss as a linguistic phenomenon more broadly.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Previous research
  • 3.Data and methodology
    • 3.1Data sources and processing
    • 3.2Classification and coding of variables
      • very (dependent variable)
      • Adjective (random effect)
      • Age
      • Gender
      • Education
      • Function
      • Gradability
      • Emotionality
      • SemanticCategory
      • Frequency
      • Priming
      • Statistical procedures
  • 4.Results
    • 4.1Boruta
    • 4.2Mixed-effects binomial logistic regression model
  • 5.Discussion
  • Notes
  • References
  • Corpora
  • Software
References (75)
References
Adamson, Sylvia & González-Díaz, Victorina. 2004. Back to the very beginning: The development of intensifiers in Early Modern English. Paper presented at the Thirteenth International Conference on English Historical Linguistics (ICEHL XIII), Vienna.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Aijmer, Karin. 2011. Are you totally spy? A new intensifier in present-day American English. In Marqueurs discursifs et subjectivité, Sylvie Hancil (ed.), 155–172. Rouen: Universités de Rouen and Havre.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2018a. That’s well bad. Some new intensifiers in spoken British English. In Corpus Approaches to Contemporary British English, Vaclav Brezina, Robbie Love & Karin Aijmer (eds), 60–95. London: Routledge.
. 2018b. Intensification with ‘very’, ‘really’ and ‘so’ in selected varieties of English. In Corpora and Lexis, Sebastian Hoffmann, Andrea Sand, Sabine Arndt-Lappe & Lisa Marie Dillmann (eds.), 106–139. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Althaus, Scott L. & Kim, Young Mie. 2006. Priming effects in complex information environments: Reassessing the impact of news discourse on presidential approval. Journal of Politics 68 (4): 960–976. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Baayen, R. Harald. 2008. Analyzing Linguistic Data. A Practical Introduction to Statistics using R. Cambridge: CUP.
Barnfield, Katie & Buchstaller, Isabelle. 2010. Intensifiers on Tyneside: Longitudinal developments and new trends. English World-Wide 31 (3): 252–287. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bauer, Laurie & Bauer, Winifred. 2002. Adjective boosters in the English of young New Zealanders. Journal of English Linguistics 30 (3): 244–257. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas, Johansson, Stig, Leech, Geoffrey, Conrad, Susan & Finegan, Edward. 2007. Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. London: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Blythe, Richard A. 2016. Symmetry and universality in language change. In Creativity and Universality in Language, Mirko Degli Esposti, Eduardo G. Altmann & François-David Pachet (eds), 43–57. Cham: Springer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bolinger, Dwight. 1972. Degree Words. The Hague: Mouton. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Breban, Tine & Davidse, Kristin. 2016. The history of very: The directionality of functional shift and (inter)subjectification. English Language and Linguistics 20 (2): 221–249. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Calle-Martín, Javier. 2014. On the history of the intensifier wonder in English. Australian Journal of Linguistics 34 (3): 399–419. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chen, Henian, Cohen, Patricia, & Chen, Sophie. 2010. How big is a big odds ratio? Interpreting the magnitudes of odds ratios in epidemiological studies. Communications in Statistics-Simulation and Computation 39 (4): 860–864. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dixon, Robert M.W. 1977. Where have all the adjectives gone? Studies in Language 1: 19–80. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dixon, Robert M. W. 2004. Adjective classes in typological perspective. In Adjective Classes. A Cross-linguistic Typology, Robert M. W. Dixon & Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald (eds), 1–49. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Field, Andy, Miles, Jeremy & Field, Zoë. 2012. Discovering Statistics Using R. London: Sage.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gordon, Elizabeth, Hay, Jennifer & Maclagan, Margaret. 2007. The ONZE Corpus. In Creating and Digitizing Language Corpora, Vol. 2: Diachronic Databases, Joan C. Beal, Karen P. Corrigan & Hermann L. Moisl (eds.), 82–104. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gries, Stefan T. 2005. Syntactic priming: A corpus-based approach. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 34 (4): 365–399. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2009. Statistics for Linguists with R. A Practical Introduction. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Gries, Stefan T. & Hilpert, Martin. 2010. Modeling diachronic change in the third person singular: A multifactorial, verb-and author-specific exploratory approach. English Language and Linguistics 14 (3): 293–320. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hilpert, Martin. 2013. Constructional Change in English: Developments in Allomorphy, Word Formation, and Syntax. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ito, Rika & Tagliamonte, Sali. 2003. Well weird, right dodgy, very strange, really cool: Layering and recycling in English intensifiers. Language in Society 32: 257–279. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kursa, Miron B. & Rudnicki, Witold R. 2010. Feature selection with the Boruta package. Journal of Statistical Software 36 (11): 1–13. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Labov, William. 1966. The Social Stratification of English in New York City. Washington DC: Center for Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1985. Intensity. In Meaning, Form and Use in Context: Linguistic Applications, Deborah Schiffrin (ed.), 43–70. Washington DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1994. Principles of Linguistic Change, Vol. 1: Internal Factors. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2001. Principles of Linguistic Change, Vol. 2: Social Factors. Malden MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2010. Principles of Linguistic Change, Vol. 3: Cognitive and Cultural Factors. Malden MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
Lorenz, Gunter R. 2002. Really worthwhile or not really significant: A Corpus-based approach to the delexicalisation and grammaticalisation of adverbial intensifiers in Modern English. In New Reflections on Grammaticalization [Typological Studies in Language 49], Ilse Wischer & Gabriele Diewald (eds), 143–161. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Macaulay, Ronald. 2002. Extremely interesting, very interesting, or only quite interesting: Adverbs and social class. Journal of Sociolinguistics 6 (3): 398–417. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2006. Pure grammaticalization: The development of a teenage intensifier. Language Variation and Change 18 (3): 267–283. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Méndez-Naya, Belén. 2003. On intensifiers and grammaticalization: The case of SWIÞE. English Studies 84 (4): 372–391. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2008. On the history of downright. English Language and Linguistics 12 (2): 267–287. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Méndez-Naya, Belén & Pahta, Päivi. 2010. Intensifiers in competition: The picture from early English medical writing. In Early Modern English Medical Texts: Corpus Description and Studies, Irma Taavitsainen & Päivi Pahta (eds), 191–214. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mohammad, Saif M. & Turney, Peter D. 2013. Crowd sourcing a word-emotion association lexicon. Computational Intelligence 29 (3): 436–465. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Murphy, Bróna. 2010. Corpus and Sociolinguistics: Investigating Age and Gender in Female Talk [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 38]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mustanoja, Tauno F. 1960. A Middle English syntax, Part 1: Parts of speech. Helsinki: Société Néophilologique.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nevalainen, Terttu. 2008. Social variation in intensifier use: Constraint on - ly adverbialization in the past? English Language and Linguistics 12(2): 289–315.
Nevalainen, Terttu & Rissanen,Matti. 2002. Fairly pretty or pretty fair? On the development and grammaticalization of English downtoners. Language Sciences 24: 359–380. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Palacios Martínez, Ignacio & Núñez-Pertejo, Paloma. 2012. He’s absolutely massive. It’s a super day. Madonna, she is a wicked singer. Youth language and intensification: A corpus-based study. Text and Talk 32(6): 773–796. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Paradis, Carita. 1997. Degree Modifiers of Adjectives in Spoken British English. Lund: Lund University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2008. Configurations, construals and change: Expressions of degree. English Language and Linguistics 12 (2): 317–343. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Partington, Alan. 1993. Corpus evidence of language change: The case of intensifiers. In Text and Technology: In Honour of John Sinclair, Mona Baker, Gill Francis & Elena Tognini-Bonelli (eds), 177–192. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Peters, Hans. 1992. English boosters: Some synchronic and diachronic aspects. In Diachrony within Synchrony: Language History and Cognition, Günter Kellermann & Michael D. Morrissey (eds), 529–545. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1993. Die englischen Gradadverbien der Kategorie booster. Tübingen: Gunter Narr.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1994. Degree adverbs in Early Modern English. In Studies in Early Modern English, Dieter Kastovsky (ed.), 269–288. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Plutchik, Robert. 1980. A general psychoevolutionary theory of emotion. Emotion: Theory, Research, and Experience 1 (3): 3–33. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1994. The Psychology and Biology of Emotion. New York NY: Harper Collins.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Quirk, Randolph, Greenbaum, Sydney, Leech, Geoffrey & Svartvik, Jan. 1985. A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rickford, John, Wasow, Thomas, Zwicky, Arnold & Buchstaller, Isabelle. 2007. Intensive and quotative all: Something old, something new. American Speech 82 (1): 3–31. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rissanen, Matti. 2008. From ‘quickly’ to ‘fairly’: On the history of rather. English Language and Linguistics 12 (2): 345–359. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schweinberger, Martin. 2018. The discourse particle eh in New Zealand English. Australian Journal of Linguistics 38 (3): 395–420. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stenström, Anna-Brita. 1999. He was really gormless - she’s bloody crap: Girls, boys and intensifiers. In Out of Corpora: Studies in Honour of Stig Johansson, Hilde Hasselgård & Signe Oksefjell (eds), 69–78. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Szmrecsanyi, Benedikt. 2005. Language users as creatures of habit: A corpus-based analysis of persistence in spoken English. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 1 (1): 113–150. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2006. Morphosyntactic Persistence in Spoken English: A Corpus Study at the Intersection of Variationist Sociolinguistics, Psycholinguistics, and Discourse Analysis. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tagliamonte, Sali A. 2008. So different and pretty cool! Recycling intensifiers in Toronto, Canada. English Language & Linguistics 12 (2): 361–394. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tagliamonte, Sali. 2012. Variationist Sociolinguistics: Change, Observation, Interpretation. Malden MA: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tagliamonte, Sali A. & D’Arcy, Alexandra. 2009. Peaks beyond phonology: Adolescence, incrementation, and language change. Language 85(1): 58–108. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tagliamonte, Sali A. & Denis, Derek. 2014. Expanding the transmission/diffusion dichotomy: Evidence from Canada. Language 90 (1): 90–136. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tagliamonte, Sali & Roberts, Chris. 2005. So weird; so cool; so innovative: The use of intensifiers in the television series Friends. American Speech 80 (3): 280–300. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tao, Hongyin. 2007. A corpus-based investigation of absolutely and related phenomena in spoken American English. Journal of English Linguistics 35 (1): 5–29. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tulving, Endel & Schacter, Daniel L. 1990. Priming and human memory systems. Science 247 (4940): 301–306. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Xiao, Richard & Tao, Hongyn. 2007. A corpus-based sociolinguistic study of amplifiers in British English. Sociolinguistic Studies 1 (2): 241–273. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zuur, Alain F., Ieno, Elena N. & Elphick, Chris S. 2010. A protocol for data exploration to avoid common statistical problems. Methods in Ecology and Evolution 1 (1): 3–14. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Corpora
Davies, Mark. 2010. The Corpus of Historical American English: 400 million words, 1810–2009. <[URL]> (30 November 2019).
Holmes, Janet, Vine, Bernadette & Johnson, Gary. 1998. The Wellington Corpus of Spoken New Zealand English. Wellington: School of Linguistics and Applied Language Studies, Victoria University of Wellington.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Software
Hornik, Kurt. 2016. Package “OpenNLP” – Apache OpenNLP Tools Interface. <[URL]> (4 November 2019).
Green, Peter & MacLeod, Catriona J. 2016. SIMR: An R package for power analysis of generalized linear mixed models by simulation. Methods in Ecology and Evolution 7: 493–498. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jockers, Matthew. 2017. syuzhet: Extracts Sentiment and Sentiment-Derived Plot Arcs from Text. Version 1.0.1. < [URL]> (4 November 2019).
R Development Core Team. 2019. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. <[URL]> (4 November 2019).
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Hundt, Marianne, Simone E. Pfenninger & Sandra Mollin
2025. Psycholinguistic Perspectives on Language Change. In The New Cambridge History of the English Language, ► pp. 820 ff. DOI logo
Hartmann, Stefan & Olaf Mikkelsen
2024. Future constructions in English and Norwegian. Languages in Contrast 24:2 ► pp. 170 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 3 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue