In:Lost in Change: Causes and processes in the loss of grammatical elements and constructions
Edited by Svenja Kranich and Tine Breban
[Studies in Language Companion Series 218] 2021
► pp. 131–158
A constructional account of the loss of the adverse avertive schema in Mandarin Chinese
Published online: 16 June 2021
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.218.05kuo
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.218.05kuo
Abstract
This study defines the kind of loss under investigation as schema loss in diachronic construction grammar and proposes that schema loss may be related to change in prototypicality. Using the adverse avertive schema in Chinese as an example, it is shown that while older prototypical members of the schema motivated its composition, newer members demotivated it, because their semantics and pragmatics were not a good match with the form and meaning of the schema. The analysis emphasises that loss, like gain, is multidimensional in that both schematic and substantive patterns need to be considered.
Keywords: diachronic construction grammar, prototype, schema loss,
chadian
, bleaching
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Constructions and loss characterised
- 2.1Constructions
- 2.2Loss as schema loss
- 3.Prototypicality, construction grammar and diachronic construction grammar
- 3.1Prototypicality in ASCs
- 3.2Extending prototypicality in ASCs
- 3.3Diachronic construction grammar
- 4.The adverse avertive schema in Chinese
- 4.1Data sources
- 4.2Overview of the schema
- 4.3Slots in the schema
- 5.The demise of the adverse avertive schema
- 5.1Qualitative aspects
- 5.2Quantitative aspects
- 5.3The demise of the schema: from ‘danger’ to ‘proximity’
- 5.4A visual summary
- 6.Generalisation as loss
- 7.Conclusion
Acknowledgement Notes References
References (55)
Barðdal, Jóhanna & Gildea, Spike. 2015. Diachronic Construction Grammar: Epistemological context, basic assumptions and historical implications. In Diachronic Construction Grammar, [Constructional Approaches to Language 18], Jóhanna Barðdal, Elena Smirnova, Lotte Sommerer & Spike Gildea (eds), 1–50. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Börjars, Kersti, Vincent, Nigel & Walkden, George. 2015. On constructing a theory of grammatical change. Transactions of the Philological Society 113(3): 363–382.
Breban, Tine. 2015. Refining secondary grammaticalization by looking at subprocesses of change. Language Sciences 47(b): 161–171.
Breban, Tine & Kranich, Svenja. 2015. What happens after grammaticalization? Secondary grammaticalization and other late stage processes. Language Sciences 47(b): 129–228.
Brems, Lieselotte. 2011. Layering of Size and Type Noun Constructions in English. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Casenhiser, Devin & Goldberg, Adele E. 2005. Fast mapping of a phrasal form and meaning. Developmental Science 8(6): 500–508.
Chappel, Hilary. 1986. Formal and colloquial adversity passives in Standard Chinese. Linguistics 24: 1025–1052.
Colleman, Timothy & Noël, Dirk. 2012. The Dutch evidential NCI: A case of constructional attrition. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 13(1): 1–28.
Cornillie, Bert. 2004. The shift from lexical to subjective readings of Spanish prometer 'to promise' and amenazar 'to threaten': A corpus-based account. Pragmatics 14(1): 1–30.
Fischer, Olga. 2018. Analogy: Its role in language learning, categorisation, and in models of language change such as grammaticalisation and constructionalisation. In New Trends in Grammaticalization and Language Change [Studies in Language Companion Series 202], Sylvie Hancil, Tine Breban & José Vicente Lozano (eds), 75–104. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Goldberg, Adele E. 1995. Constructions: A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure. Chicago IL: Chicago University Press.
. 2019. Explain me This: Creativity, Competition and the Partial Productivity of Constructions. Princeton NJ: Princeton University Press.
Goldberg, Adele E., Casenhiser, Devin & Sethuraman, Nitya. 2004. Learning argument structure generalizations. Cognitive Linguistics 14(3): 289–316.
Gries, Stefan T. & Stefanowitsch, Anatol. 2004. Extending collostructional analysis: A corpus-based perspective on 'alternations'. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 9(1): 97–129.
Heine, Bernd & Miyashita, Hiroyuki. 2008. Accounting for a functional category: German drohen ‘to threaten’. Language Sciences 30: 53–101.
Hilpert, Martin. 2015. From hand-carved to computer-based: Noun-participle compounding and the upward strengthening hypothesis. Cognitive Linguistics 26(1): 113–147.
Hundt, Marianne. 2014. The demise of the being to V construction. Transactions of the Philological Society 112(2): 167–187.
Jiang, Lansheng. 2008. Semantic accumulation and constructional integration: An explanation on the asymmetry between affirmation and negation. Zhōngguó Yǔwén 6: 483–497.
Joseph, Brian D. 2014. What counts as (an instance of) grammaticalization? Folia Linguistica 48(2): 1–23.
Kuo, Yueh Hsin. 2016a. A diachronic pragmatic account of chādiǎn’s ambiguity and development. The Proceedings of the 18th Annual Conference of Pragmatics Society of Japan, 155–162.
. 2016b. A Diachronic Constructional Investigation into the Adverse Avertive Schema in Chinese. MSc by Research dissertation, University of Edinburgh.
. 2018. The development of three classifier constructions into degree adverbs in Chinese. In New Trends on Grammaticalization and Language Change [Studies in Language Companion Series 202], Sylvie Hancil, Tine Breban, & José Vicente Lozano (eds), 315–331. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
. 2020. Reinforcement by realignment in diachronic construction grammar: The case of classifier xiē in Mandarin Chinese. Constructions and Frames 12(2): 239-271.
Langacker, Ronald. 1987. Foundations of Cognitive Grammar, Vol. I: Theoretical Prerequisites. Stanford CA: Stanford University Press.
Li, Charles N. 1976. A functional explanation for an unexpected case of ambiguity (S or -S). In Linguistic Studies Offered to Joseph Greenberg on the Occasion of his Sixtieth Birthday, Alphones Juilland (ed.), 527–535. Saratoga CA: Anma Libri.
Li, Charles N. & Thompson, Sandra A. 1981. Mandarin Chinese: A Functional Reference Grammar. Berkeley CA: University of California Press.
Noël, Dirk. 2019. The decline of the Deontic NCI construction in Late Modern English: Towards a radically usage-based perspective on constructional attrition. Cognitive Linguistics Studies 6(1): 22–57.
Norde, Muriel & Trousdale, Graeme. 2016. Exaptation from the perspective of construction morphology. In Exaptation and Language Change [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 336], Muriel Norde & Freek Van de Velde (eds), 163–195. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Petré, Peter. 2010. The functions of weorðan and its loss in the past tense in Old and Middle English. English Language and Linguistics 14(3): 457–484.
Peyraube, Alain. 1979. Les “approximatifs” Chinois: Chàbuduō, jīhū, chàyidiănr. Cahiers de Linguistique Asie Orientale 6: 49–62.
Reinöhl, Uta & Himmelmann, Nikolaus. P. Renewal: A figure of speech or process sui generis? Language 93(2): 381–413.
Rosemeyer, Malte. 2014. Auxiliary Selection in Spanish: Gradience, Gradualness, and Conservation [Studies in Language Companion Series 155]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Shuai, Zhisong. 2014. The evolution of ‘chādiǎn’r mei’ from the perspective of lexical semantic information. Yǔyán kēxué 13(6): 615–631.
Smirnova, E. 2015a. When secondary grammaticalization starts: A look from the constructional perspective. Language Sciences 47(b): 215–228.
Smirnova, Elena. 2015b. Constructionalization and constructional change: The role of context in the development of constructions. In Diachronic Construction Grammar [Constructional Approaches to Language 18], Jóhanna Barðdal, Elena Smirnova, Lotte Sommerer & Spike Gildea (eds), 81–106. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Sweetser, Eve E. 1988. Grammaticalization and semantic bleaching. In The Proceedings of the Fourteenth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, Shelley Axmaker & Helen Singmaster (eds), 389–405. Berkeley CA: BLS.
Torres Cacoullos, Rena. 2015. Gradual loss of analyzability: Diachronic priming effects. In Variation in Language: System-and Usage-based Approaches, Aria Adli, Marco García García & Göz Kaufmann (eds), 265–288. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs. 1993. The conflict promises/threatens to escalate into war. In The Proceedings of the Nineteenth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, Joshua S. Guenter, Barabara A. Kaiser & Cheryll C. Zoll (eds), 348–358. Berkeley CA: BLS.
. 2016. Do semantic modal maps have a role in a constructionalization approach to modals? Constructions and Frames 8(1): 97–124.
. 2018. Modelling language change with constructional networks. In Beyond Grammaticalization and Discourse Markers, Salvador Pons Bordería & Óscar Loureda Lamas (eds), 17–50. Leiden: Brill.
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs & Trousdale, Graeme. 2013. Constructionalization and Constructional Changes. Oxford: OUP.
Trousdale, Graeme. 2008. Words and constructions in grammaticalization: The end of the English impersonal construction. In Studies in the History of the English Language, IV: Empirical and Analytical Advances in the Study of English Language Change, Susan Fitzmaurice & Donka Minkova (eds), 301–326. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Van de Velde, Freek. 2014. Degeneracy: The maintenance of constructional networks. In Extending the Scope of Construction Grammar, Ronny Boogaart, Timothy Colleman & Gijsbert Rutten (eds), 141–179. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Xu, Shi-yi. 2003. On the evolution of the negative mei and meiyou. Journal of Huzhou Teachers College 25: 1–6.
Ziegeler, Debra. 2006. Interfaces with English Aspect: Diachronic and Empirical Studies [Studies in Language Companion Series 82]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
. 2016. Intersubjectivity and the diachronic development of counterfactual almost. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 17(1): 1–25.
Cited by (1)
Cited by one other publication
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 3 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
