In:Lost in Change: Causes and processes in the loss of grammatical elements and constructions
Edited by Svenja Kranich and Tine Breban
[Studies in Language Companion Series 218] 2021
► pp. 21–50
A typological perspective on the loss of inflection
Published online: 16 June 2021
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.218.01sim
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.218.01sim
Abstract
The loss of inflectional morphology is a diachronic process which has played a major role in shaping our linguistic landscape, but has never been the target of focussed research in the same way that the origin of inflectional morphology has been. We offer here a preliminary typology of the operations involved in inflectional loss, distinguishing three change types: the loss of forms, the loss of features, and loss of both at the same time – that is, the loss of entire paradigm cells. These are illustrated with examples from a typologically, genetically and areally diverse set of languages.
Keywords: typology, inflection, analogy, morphology
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Loss of forms
- 2.1Convergence
- 2.1.1Phonological change
- 2.1.2Morphological change
- 2.2Replacement
- 2.2.1Functionally motivated change
- 2.2.2Formally motivated change
- 2.1Convergence
- 3.Loss of features
- 3.1Free variation
- 3.2Lexical redistribution
- 3.3Paradigmatic redistribution
- 3.4Rebranding
- 4.Loss of cells
- 5.Grammaticalisation and the loss of inflection
- 6.Conclusion
Notes References
References (57)
Allen, Cynthia. 2006. Case syncretism and word order change. In The Handbook of the History of English, Ans van Kemenade & Bettelou Los (eds), 201–223. Oxford: Blackwell.
. 1997. Middle English case loss and the ‘creolization’ hypothesis. English Language and Linguistics 1: 63–89.
Bakker, Peter. 2003. Pidgin inflectional morphology and its implications for creole morphology. In Yearbook of Morphology 2002, Geert Booij & Jaap van Marle (eds), 3–33. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Bentz, Christian & Winter, Bodo. 2013. Languages with more second language learners tend to lose nominal case. Language Dynamics and Change, 3 (1): 1–27.
Boeder, Winfried. 1987. Einfachheit und Komplexität in der Geschichte der Kartvelsprachen. Annual of Ibero-Caucasian Linguistics XIV: 23–64.
Bybee, Joan L. & Dahl, Östen. 1989. The creation of tense and aspect systems in the languages of the world. Studies in Language 13 (1): 51–103.
Campbell, Lyle & Muntzel, Martha. 1989. The structural consequences of language death. In Investigating Obsolescence, Nancy C. Dorian (ed.), 181–196. Cambridge: CUP.
Chirikba, Viacheslav. 2008. The problem of the Caucasian Sprachbund. In From Linguistic Areas to Areal Linguistics [Studies in Language Companion Series 90], Pieter Muysken (ed.), 25–93. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Č̣inč̣arauli, A. 1960. Xevsurulis taviseburebani, ṭeksṭebita da indeksit (Features of Khevsuretian, with texts and index). Tbilisi: SMa gam-ba.
Cox, Monica. 1998. Description grammaticale du ncàm, langue Gourma du Togo et du Ghana. PhD dissertation, École Pratique des Hautes Études, Paris.
Daniels, Don. 2015. A Reconstruction of Proto-Sogeram. PhD dissertation, UC Santa Barbara.
Dorian, Nancy C. 1978. The fate of morphological complexity in language death: Evidence from East Sutherland Gaelic. Language 54 (3): 590–609.
. 1980. Language shift in community and individual: The phenomenon of the laggard semi-speaker. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 25: 85–94.
Fischer, Susann. 2010. Word-order Change as a Source of Grammaticalisation [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 157]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Givón, Talmy. 1979On Understanding Grammar. New York NY: Academic Press. Also published as Givón, T.. 2018On Understanding Grammar. Revised Edition. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Heine, Bernd. 2003. On degrammaticalisation. In Historical Linguistics 2001 [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 237], Barry J. Blake & Kate Burridge (eds)163–180. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Heine, Bernd, Claudi, Ulrike & Hünnemeyer, Friederike. 1991. Grammaticalisation: A Conceptual Framework. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.
Heine, Bernd & Reh, Mechthild. 1984. Grammaticalisation and Reanalysis in African Languages. Hamburg: Helmut Buske.
Hewitt, B. George. 1995. Georgian: A Structural Reference Grammar [London Oriental and African Language Library 2]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Holisky, Dee Ann & Gagua, Rusudan. 1994. Tsova-Tush (Batsbi). In North East Caucasian Languages (Part 2), Rieks Smeets(ed.), 147–212. Delmar NY: Caravan Books.
Jendraschek, Gerd. 2003. When old paradigms die, new paradigms are born: On the eternal cycle of morphological change and its importance for language typology. Journal of Universal Language 4(2): 27–59. <>.
Klein, Wolfgang & Perdue, Clive. 1997. The basic variety (or: Couldn't natural languages be much simpler?). Second Language Research 13 (4): 301–347.
Kusters, Walter. 2008. Complexity in linguistic theory, language learning, and language change. In Language Complexity: Typology, Contact, Change [Studies in Language Companion Series 94], Matti Miestamo, Kaius Sinnemäki & Fred Karlsson (eds), 4–22. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
. 2003. Linguistic Complexity: The Influence of Social Change on Verbal Inflection. PhD Dissertation, University of Leiden.
Lass, Roger. 1990. How to do things with junk: Exaptation in language evolution. Journal of linguistics 26 (1): 79–102.
Lehmann, Christian. 2015. Thoughts on Grammaticalisation [Classics in Linguistics 1], 3rd edn. Berlin: Language Science Press.
Lupyan, Gary & Dale, Rick. 2010. Language structure is partly determined by social structure. PloS one 5(1).
Maitz, Peter & Németh, Attila. 2014. Language contact and morphosyntactic complexity: Evidence from German. Journal of Germanic Linguistics 26(1): 1–29.
McWhorter, John. H. 1998. Identifying the creole prototype: Vindicating a typological class. Language 74 (4): 788–818.
Norde, Muriel. 1997. The History of the Genitive in Swedish. A Case Study in Degrammaticalisation. PhD dissertation, University of Amsterdam
. 2000. Deflexion as a counterdirectional factor in grammatical change. Language Sciences 23(2–3): 231–264.
. 2001. The loss of lexical case in Swedish. In Grammatical Relations in Change [Studies in Language Companion Series 56], Jan Terje Faarlund (ed.), 241–272. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
. 2002. The final stages of grammaticalisation: Affixhood and beyond. In New Reflections on Grammaticalization [Typological Studies in Language 49], Ilse Wischer & Gabriela Diewald (eds), 45–66. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
. 2019. Grammaticalization in morphology. In Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Linguistics: Morphology, Rochelle Lieber (ed.). Oxford: OUP. <oxfordre.com/linguistics/page/morphology/the-oxford-encyclopedia-of-morphology> (9 November 2020).
Polinsky, Maria. (1995). Cross-linguistic parallels in language loss. Southwest Journal of Linguistics 14 (1): 87–123.
Ramaswami Ayyar, L. Vishwanatha. 1936. The Evolution of Malayalam Morphology. Cochin: Government Press.
van Reenen, Pieter & Schøsler, Lene. 2000. Declension in Old and Middle French: Two opposing tendencies. In Historical Linguistics 1995, Vol. 1 [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 161], John Charles Smith & Delia Bentley (eds), 327–344. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Sethe, Kurt. 1899. Das aegyptische Verbum im Altaegyptischen, Neuaegyptischen und Koptischen: Formenlehre und Syntax der Verbalformen, Vol. 2. Leipzig: J.C. Hinrichs.
Sims-Williams, Helen, & Enger, Hans-Olav (2021). The loss of inflection as grammar complication: Evidence from Mainland Scandinavian. Diachronica 38
(1):
111–150.
Sornicola, Rosanna. 2011. Romance linguistics and historical linguistics: Reflections on synchrony and diachrony. In The Cambridge History of the Romance Languages, Martin Maiden, John Charles Smith & Adam Ledgeway (eds), 1–49. Cambridge: CUP.
Sumbatova, Nina. 2011. Person hierarchies and the problem of person marker origin in Dargwa: Facts and diachronic problems. In Tense, Aspect, Modality and Finiteness in East Caucasian Languages, Gilles Authier & Timur Maisak, 95–130. Bochum: Brockmeyer.
Sun, Hongkai & Liu, Guangkun. 2009. A Grammar of Anong: Language Death under Intense Contact. Leiden: Brill.
Thornton, Anna M.. 2011. Overabundance (multiple forms realizing the same cell): A non-canonical phenomenon in Italian verb morphology. In Morphological Autonomy, Martin Maiden, John Charles Smith, Maria Goldbach & Marc-Olivier Hinzelin (eds), 358–81. Oxford: OUP..
Trudgill, Peter. 2012. On the sociolinguistic typology of linguistic complexity loss. In Potentials of Language Documentation: Methods, Analyses, and Utilization, Frank Seifart, Geoffrey Haig, Nikolaus P. Himmelmann, Dagmar Jung, Anna Margetts & Paul Trilsbeek (eds), 91–96. Honolulu HI: University of Hawai‘i Press.
Ziegelmann, Katja. 2011. Die Verneinung im Estnischen: Zum Abbau des finiten Verneinungsverbs im älteren Schriftestnischen. PhD dissertation, Göttingen University.
Cited by (4)
Cited by four other publications
Zingler, Tim
García García, Luisa
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 3 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
