Cover not available

In:The Perfect Volume: Papers on the perfect
Edited by Kristin Melum Eide and Marc Fryd
[Studies in Language Companion Series 217] 2021
► pp. 137162

References (71)
Sources
AAM – Araneum Anglicum Maius, <[URL]>
ABM – Araneum Bulgaricum Maius, <[URL]>
AHM – Araneum Hispanicum Maius, <[URL]>
AIM – Araneum Italicum Maius, <[URL]>
BNC – British National Corpus, <[URL]>
LKT – Dabartinės lietuvių kalbos tekstynas (Corpus of Modern Lithuanian), <[URL]>
LRPC – Latvian-Russian Parallel Corpus, <[URL]>
References
Adomavičiūtė, Irena & Čekmonas, Valerijus. 1991. Paradigma kvaziperfektnyx form na -(f)šy v “polščizne vilenskoj” (The paradigm of quasi-perfect forms in -(f)šy in “polszczyzna wileńska”). In Studia nad polszczyzną kresową. T. 6. (Studies in Polish Peripheral Dialects, Vol. 6), Janusz Rieger & Vjačeslav Verenič (eds), 95–105. Wrocław: Zakład Narodowy im. Ossolińskich.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Alpatov, Vladimir M., Arkad’ev, Petr M. & Podlesskaja, Vera I. 2008. Teoretičeskaja grammatika japonskogo jazyka, T. 1. (Theoretical Grammar of Japanese, Vol. 1). Moscow: Natalis.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Arkadiev, Peter. 2010. Notes on the Lithuanian restrictive. Baltic Linguistics 1: 9–49. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2011. On the aspectual uses of the prefix be- in Lithuanian. Baltic Linguistics 2: 37–78. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2015. Negative events: Evidence from Lithuanian. In Donum semanticum: Opera linguistica et logica in honorem Barbarae Partee a discipulis amicisque Rossicis oblata, Peter Arkadiev, Ivan Kapitonov, Yury Lander, Ekaterina Rakhilina & Sergei Tatevosov (eds), 7–20. Moscow: LRC Publishing.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2016. Long-distance genitive of negation in Lithuanian. In Argument Realization in Baltic [Valency, Argument Realization and Grammatical Relations in Baltic 3], Axel Holvoet & Nicole Nau (eds), 37–81. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Arkadiev, Peter & Daugavet, Anna. 2016. The perfect in Lithuanian and Latvian: A contrastive and comparative study. Talk at Chronos 12, Caen, 15–17 June.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Arkadiev, Peter & Wiemer, Björn. 2020. Perfects in Baltic and Slavic. In Perfects in Indo-European languages and Beyond [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 352], Robert Crellin & Thomas Jügel (eds), 123–214. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Binnick, Robert I. (ed.). 2012. The Oxford Handbook of Tense and Aspect. Oxford: OUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bohnemeyer, Jürgen, Enfield, Nicholas J., Essegbey, James, Ibarretxe-Antuñano, Iraide, Kita, Sotaro, Lüpke, Friederike & Ameka, Felix K. 2007. Principles of event segmentation in language: The case of motion events. Language 83(3): 495–532. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Borsley, Robert D. & Jones, Bob M. 2005. Welsh Negation and Grammatical Theory. Cardiff: University of Wells Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Carrasco, Ángeles. 2015. Perfect states. Borealis 4(1): 1–30. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Declerck, Renaat. 2006. The Grammar of the English Verb Phrase, Vol. 1: The Grammar of the English Tense System. A Comprehensive Analysis. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Depraetere, Ilse. 1998. On the resultative character of present perfect sentences. Journal of Pragmatics 29(5): 597–613. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
van Driem, George. 1987. A Grammar of Limbu. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1993. A Grammar of Dumi. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fábregas, Antonio & González Rodríguez, Raquel. 2020. On inhibited eventualities. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 38: 729–773. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. To appear. Negation with participles and inhibited events. To appear in Linguistic Analysis.
Fedotov, Maksim, Sofia Oskolskaya & Natalia Zaika. 2020. Caritive as a negative marker. Presentation at the 53rd Annual Meeting of the Societas Linguistica Europaea (online, 26 August – 1 September).
Filppula, Markku. 1999. The Grammar of Irish English. Language in Hibernian Style. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gehrke, Berit. 2012. Passive states. In Telicity, Change, and State. A Cross-Categorial View of Event Structure, Violeta Demonte & Louise McNally (eds), 185–211. Oxford: OUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Geniušienė, Emma. 1989. O vzaimodejstvii perfekta i vida v litovskom jazyke (On the interactions of perfect and aspect in Lithuanian). Baltistica 3(2): 285–291.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1990. Perfekt i vid v litovskom jazyke (Perfect and aspect in Lithuanian). In Tipologija i grammatika (Typology and Grammar), Viktor S. Xrakovskij (ed.), 135–140. Leningrad: Nauka.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Geniušienė, Emma & Nedjalkov, Vladimir. 1988. Resultative, passive, and perfect in Lithuanian. In Typology of Resultative Constructions [Typological Studies in Language 12], Vladimir Nedjalkov (ed.), 369–386. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
González Rodríguez, Raquel. 2015. Negation of resultative and progressive periphrases. Borealis 4(1): 31–56. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Harris, John. 1984. Syntactic variation and dialect divergence. Journal of Linguistics 20(2): 303–327. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Higginbotham, James. 2000. On events in linguistic semantics. In Speaking of Events, James Higginbotham, Fabio Pianesi & Achille C. Varzi (eds), 49–80. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Horn, Lawrence. 1989. A Natural History of Negation. Stanford CA: CSLI.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Iatridou, Sabine, Anagnostopoulou, Elena & Izvorski, Roumyana. 2001. Observations about the form and meaning of the perfect. In Ken Hale: A Life in Language, Michael Kenstowicz (ed.), 189–238. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Janssen, Theo M. V. 1983. Scope ambiguities of tense, aspect and negation. In Linguistic Categories: Auxiliaries and Related Puzzles, Frank Heny & Barry Richards (eds), 55–99. Dordrecht: Reidel. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Katz, Graham. 2003. On the stativity of the English perfect. In Perfect Explorations [Interface Explorations 2], Artemis Alexiadou, Monika Rathert & Arnim von Stechow (eds), 205–234. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Khalilova, Zaira. 2009. A Grammar of Khwarshi. Utrecht: LOT Publications.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kibrik, Alexander E. (ed.). 1996. Godoberi. Munich: Lincom.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kibrik, Aleksandr E. (ed.). 2001. Bagvalinskij jazyk. Grammatika. Teksty. Slovarʹ (Bagwalal. Grammar, texts, dictionary). Moscow: Nasledie.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kibrik, E. & Testelec, Jakov G. (eds). 1999. Èlementy caxurskogo jazyka v tipologičeskom osveščenii (Elements of Tsakhur in a typological perspective). Moscow: Nasledie.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kishimoto, Hideki. 2008. On the variability of negative scope in Japanese. Journal of Linguistics 44(2): 379–435. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2013. Verbal complex formation and negation in Japanese. Lingua 135: 132–154. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kuz’mina, Irina B. & Nemčenko, Elena V. 1971. Sintaksis pričastnyx form v russkix govorax (The syntax of participles in Russian dialects). Moscow: Nauka.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Larsson, Ida. 2009. Participles in Time. The Development of the Perfect Tenses in Swedish. (Nordistica Gothoburgensia 29) Göteborg: Göteborgs Universitet.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lundquist, Björn. 2014. Prefixed negation. Nordic Atlas of Language Structures Journal 1: 149–153.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mackevič, Juzefa F. & Grinaveckienė, Elena. 1993. Dzejeprysloŭi na -(ŭ)šy ŭ belaruskix narodnyx gavorkax (Gerunds in -(ŭ)šy in Belorussian dialects). Lietuvių kalbotyros klausimai 30: 105–108.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McCawley, James D. 1999. Some interactions between tense and negation in English. In The Clause in English: In Honour of Rodney D. Huddleston [Studies in Language Companion Series 45], Peter C. Collins & David A. Lee (eds), 177–185. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Miestamo, Matti & Koponen, Eino. 2015. Negation in Skolt Saami. In Miestamo, Tamm & Wagner-Nagy (eds), 353–375. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Miestamo, Matti, Tamm, Anne & Wagner-Nagy, Beáta (eds). 2015. Negation in Uralic Languages [Typological Studies in Language 108]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Miestamo, Matti & van der Auwera, Johan. 2011. Negation and perfective vs. imperfective aspect. Chronos 22: 65–84.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nishiyama, Atsuko & Koenig, Jean-Pierre. 2010. What is a perfect state? Language 86(3): 611–646. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Parsons, Terrence. 1990. Events in the Semantics of English. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2010. What has changed in Hiberno-English: constructions and their role in contact-induced change. Sprachtypologie und Universalienforschung 63(2): 118–145.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ramchand, Gillian. 2004. Two types of negation in Bengali. In Clause Structure in South Asian Languages, Veneeta Dayal & Anoop Mahajan (eds), 39–66. Dordrecht: Kluwer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ramchand, Gillian & Svenonius, Peter. 2014. Deriving the functional hierarchy. Language Sciences 46(B): 152–174. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Servaitė, Laimutė. 1988. Subjektinis rezultatyvas lietuvių kalboje (Perfekto formos su rezultatinės būsenos reikšme) (Subjective resultative in Lithuanian [Perfect forms denoting resulting state]). Kalbotyra 39(1): 81–89.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sližienė, Nijolė. 1964. Apie sudurtines atliktines veiksmažodžio laikų ir nuosakų formas lietuvių literatūrinėje kalboje (On the compound perfect tenses and moods of verbs in Lithuanian standard language). Lietuvių kalbotyros klausimai 7: 81–95.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1967. Lietuvių literatūrinės kalbos sudurtinių veiksmažodžio formų struktūra (The structure of compound verbal forms in Lithuanian standard language). Lietuvių kalbotyros klausimai 9: 63–84.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1969. Sudurtinių atliktinių veiksmažodžio laikų reikšmės ir vartojimas (Meaning and use of the compound perfect tenses). Lietuvių kalbotyros klausimai 11: 17–40.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1995. The tense system of Lithuanian. In The Tense Systems in European Languages, Vol. II, Rolf Thieroff (ed.), 215–232. Tübingen: Niemeyer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Slomanson, Peter. 2009. Morphosyntactic finiteness as increased complexity in a mixed negation system. In Complex Processes in New Languages [Typological Studies in Language 108], Enoch O. Aboh & Norval Smith (eds), 234–264. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stockwell, Robert P., Schachter, Paul & Partee, Barbara H. 1973. The Major Syntactic Structures of English. New York NY: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
de Swart, Henriёtte. 2012. Verbal aspect. In The Oxford Handbook of Tense and Aspect, Robert I. Binnick (ed.), 752–780. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
de Swart, Henriёtte & Molendijk, Arie. 1999. Negation and the temporal structure of narrative discourse. Journal of Semantics 16(1): 1–42. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tamm, Anne. 2011. Cross-categorial spatial case in the Finnic nonfinite system: focus on the absentive TAM semantics and pragmatics of the Estonian inessive m-formative nonfinites. Linguistics 49(4): 835–944. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Trubinskij, Valentin I. 1984. Očerki russkogo dialektnogo sintaksisa [Studies in the syntax of Russian dialects]. Leningrad: Leningrad University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Veselinova, Ljuba. 2015. Not-yet expressions in the languages of the world: A special negator or a separate cross-linguistic category? Presentation at the international conference “Diversity Linguistics: Retrospect and Prospect”, Leipzig, 1–3 May.
Zanuttini, Rafaela. 1996. On the relevance of tense for sentential negation. In Parameters and Functional Heads. Essays in Comparative Syntax, Adriana Belletti & Luigi Rizzi (eds), 181–207. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Klimek-Jankowska, Dorota, Alberto Frasson & Piotr Gulgowski
2025. Aspectual Variation in Negated Past Tense Contexts Across Slavic. Languages 10:4  pp. 78 ff. DOI logo
Arkadiev, Peter & Björn Wiemer
2020. Perfects in Baltic and Slavic. In Perfects in Indo-European languages and beyond [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory, 352],  pp. 123 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 3 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue