In:Re-Assessing Modalising Expressions: Categories, co-text, and context
Edited by Pascal Hohaus and Rainer Schulze
[Studies in Language Companion Series 216] 2020
► pp. 143–172
Chapter 6
Conditionals, modality, and Schrödinger’s cat
Conditionals as a family of linguistic qubits
Published online: 12 November 2020
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.216.06gab
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.216.06gab
Abstract
An intriguing characteristic of conditionals is that they
are modally dense constructions, without being modal markers themselves. This
chapter will examine the modal nature of conditionals through the lens of
construction grammar. It will be argued that the main utility of conditionals does
not lie in pairing conditions with consequents, nor in establishing the factuality
or actualisation of conditions and consequents, but in leaving issues of factuality
or actualisation unresolved. The chapter proposes that conditional constructions are
better regarded as environments of indeterminacy, in that they modalise what is
communicated through them. More precisely it will be argued that conditionals can be
usefully treated as the linguistic equivalent of quantum bits
(qubits). The chapter will also discuss the characteristics that
define the family of conditional constructions, and those differentiating between
family members.
Keywords: conditionals, modality, corpus linguistics, construction grammar, qubits
Article outline
- 1.Motivation and aims
- 2.The modal nature of conditionals: Considerations
- 3.Conditionals as linguistic qubits
- 4.Conditionals as qubits: Their function in discourse
- 4.1Classification of conditionals
- 4.2DIR-LK inferential conditionals
- 4.3 DIR and IND rhetorical conditionals
- 4.4 DIR-LK polar conditionals
- 4.5DIR-DN
- 4.6DIR-DD
- 4.7IND pretext conditionals
- 4.8 Conditionals without apodosis
- 5.Defining the family of conditional constructions
- 6.Conclusion
Notes References
References (67)
Bergs, Alexander. 2008.
Shall
and shan’t in contemporary
English. In Constructional
Approaches to English Grammar, Graeme Trousdale & Nick Gisborne (eds), 113–144. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Biber, Douglas, Johansson, Stig, Leech, Geoffrey, Conrad, Susan & Edward, Finegan. 1999. Longman
Grammar of Spoken and Written English. Harlow, Essex: Longman.
Boas, Hans C.. 2013 Cognitive Construction Grammar. In The Oxford Handbook of Construction Grammar, Thomas Hoffmann & Graeme Trousdal (eds), 233–253. Oxford: OUP.
Bybee, Joan, Perkins, Revere & Pagliuca, William. 1994. The
Evolution of Grammar: Tense, aspect, and modality in the languages of the
world. Chicago IL: The University of Chicago Press.
Cappelle, Bert. 2015. The syntax-lexicon discontinuum: A blasphemous notion in Construction Grammar? Paper presented at Construction Grammar between Morphology and Syntax
, 22 June 2015, Gent, Belgium.
Comrie, Bernard. 1986. Conditionals:
A typology. In On
Conditionals, Elizabeth Closs Traugott, Alice ter Meulen, Judy Snitzer Reilly &Charles A. Ferguson (eds), 77–99. Cambridge: CUP.
Dancygier, Barbara. 1998. Conditionals
and Prediction: Time, Knowledge and Causation in Conditional Constructions. Cambridge: CUP.
Dancygier, Barbara & Sweetser, Eve. 2005. Mental
Spaces in Grammar: Conditional
constructions. Cambridge: CUP.
Fillmore, Charles J. 1986. Varieties
of conditional
sentences. In Proceedings
of the third Eastern States Conference on
Linguistics, Ann Miller & Zheng-sheng Zhang (eds), 163–182. Columbus OH: Ohio State University, Department of Linguistics.
1990. Epistemic
stance and grammatical form in English conditional
sentences. Papers
from
the Twenty-sixth Regional Meeting of
the Chicago Linguistic Society
, Vol.
1, The Main
Session, 137–162.
Fillmore, Charles J. 1998. The mechanisms of “Construction Grammar”. In General Session and Parasession on Grammaticalization. Proceedings of the Fourteenth Annual Meeting of Berkeley Linguistics Society, February 13-15 1998, Shelley Axmaker, Annie Jaisser & Helen Singmaster (eds), 35–55. Berkeley: Berkeley Linguistics Society.
Fillmore, Charles J., Kay, Paul & O’Connor, Mary Catherine. 1988. Regularity and idiomaticity in grammatical constructions: The case of let alone
. Language 64(3), 501–538.
Fortuin, Egbert & Boogaart, Ronny. 2009. Imperative
as conditional: From constructional to compositional
semantics. Cognitive
Linguistics, 20(4): 641–673.
Fried, Mirjam & Östman, Jan-Ola. 2004. Construction
Grammar: A thumbnail
sketch. In Construction
Grammar in a Cross-language Perspective [Constructional
Approaches to Language 2], Mirjam Fried & Jan-Ola Östman (eds.), 11–86. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Fujii, Seiko. 2004. Lexically
unfilled constructional schemes and construction types: The case of Japanese
modal conditional
constructions. In Construction
Grammar in a Cross-Language Perspective [Constructional
Approaches to Language 2], Mirjam Fried & Jan-Ola Östman (eds), 121–155. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Gabrielatos, Costas. 2003. Conditional
sentences: ELT typology and corpus
evidence. Presented at 36th Annual BAAL
Meeting, University of Leeds,
UK, 4–6 September
2003.
. 2005. Elliptical
and discontinuous if-conditionals: Co-text, context, inference
and intuitions. Presented at Corpus
Linguistics 2005, University of
Birmingham, 15-17 July
2005.
. 2006. Corpus-based
evaluation of pedagogical materials: If-conditionals in ELT
coursebooks and the BNC. Presented at 7th
Teaching and Language Corpora
Conference, University Paris 7 Denis Diderot,
Paris, France, 1–4 July
2006.
. 2007.
If-conditionals
as modal colligations: A corpus-based
investigation. In Proceedings
of the Corpus Linguistics Conference: Corpus Linguistics
2007, Mark Davies, Paul Rayson, Susan Hunston & Pernilla Danielsson (eds). Birmingham: University of Birmingham.
. 2010. A
Corpus-based Examination of English if-conditionals through the
Lens of Modality: Nature and Types. PhD
dissertation, Lancaster University.
. 2011a.
If-conditionals
and modality: A corpus-based
investigation. Presented at Corpus Linguistics
2011, Birmingham,
UK, 20–22 July
2011.
. 2011b. Construction
Grammar vs. Lexical Grammar: A case study of the modal load in
if-conditionals. Presented
at International Symposium on the Sociology of Words: Lexical Meaning,
Combinatorial Potential and Computational
Implementation
, Murcia,
Spain, 1–2 December
2011.
. 2013. Using
corpus analysis to compare the explanatory power of linguistic theories: A case
study of the modal load in
if-conditionals. Presented at
Corpus Linguistics 2013, Lancaster
University, 23–26 July
2013.
. 2019.
If-conditionals
and modality: Frequency patterns and theoretical
explanations. Journal of English
Linguistics 47(4): 301–334.
. forthcoming.
If-conditionals: Corpus-based classification and frequency
distribution. In Digital
Humanities Beyond the Basics, Stefania Maci (ed.). Bern: Peter Lang.
Goldberg, Adele. 1995. Constructions:
A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument
structure. Chicago IL: The University of Chicago Press.
Goldberg, Adelle E. 2013. Constructionist Approaches. In The Oxford Handbook of Construction Grammar, Thomas Hoffmann & Graeme Trousdale (eds), 15–31. Oxford: OUP.
Goldberg, Adele & Jackendoff, Ray. 2004. The
English resultative as a family of
constructions. Language 80(3): 532–568.
Goldberg, Adele & Casenhiser, Devin. 2006. English
constructions. In The Handbook
of English Linguistics, Bas Aarts & April McMahon (eds), 343–355. Oxford: Blackwell.
Hilpert, Martin. 2010. What
can synchronic gradience tell us about reanalysis? Verb-first conditionals in
written German and
Swedish. In Gradience,
Gradualness and Grammaticalization [Typological Studies
in Language 90], Elizabeth Closs Traugott & Graeme Trousdale (eds), 181–202. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Hollmann, Willem & Siewierska, Anna. 2006. Corpora
and the need for other methods in a study of Lancashire
dialect. Zeitschrift für Anglistik und
Amerikanistik 54: 203–216.
Huddleston, Rodney & Pullum, Geoffrey K. 2002. The
Cambridge Grammar of the English
Language. Cambridge: CUP.
Hudson, Rod. 2008. Word
Grammar and Construction
Grammar. In Constructional
Approaches to English Grammar, Graeme Trousdale & Nick Gisborne (eds), 257–302. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Jucker, Andreas H., Smith, Sara W. & Lüdge, Tanja. 2003. Interactive
aspects of vagueness in conversation. Journal of
Pragmatics, 35(12), 1737–1769.
Kratzer, Angelika. 2002. The
notional category of
modality. In Formal
Semantics: The Essential Readings, Paul Portner & Barbara H. Partee (eds), 289–323. Oxford: Blackwell.
Nielsen, Michael A. & Chuang, Isaac L. 2010. Quantum
Computation and Quantum
Information. Cambridge: CUP.
Nuyts, Jan. 2001. Epistemic
Modality. Language, and Conceptualisation: A cognitive-pragmatic perspective
[Human Cognitive Processing
5]. Amsterdam: John Benjamims.
Quirk, Randolph, Greenbaum, Sidney, Leech, Geoffrey & Svartvik, Jan. 1985. A
Comprehensive Grammar of the English
Language. London: Longman.
Schrödinger, Erwin. 1935. Die gegenwärtige Situation in der Quantenmechanik (The present situation in quantum mechanics). Naturwissenschaften 23(48): 807–812.
Shimony, Abner. 1992. Conceptual
foundations of quantum
mechanics. In The New
Physics, Paul Davies (ed.), 373–395. Cambridge: CUP.
Thumm, Markus. 2000. The
contextualization of paratactic
conditionals. Interaction and Linguistic
Structures 20: 1–39.
Tomasello, Michael. 2003. Constructing
a Language: A Usage-based Theory of Language
Acquisition. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.
Trimmer, John D. 1980. The
present situation in Quantum Mechanics: A translation of Schrodinger's "cat
paradox" paper. Proceedings of the American
Philosophical
Society 124: 323–338.
Turner, Ken. 2003. On
neo- and post- Gricean
conditionals. International Journal of
Pragmatics 14: 135–154.
Werth, Paul. 1997. Conditionality
as cognitive
distance. In On
Conditionals Again [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory
143], Angeliki Athanasiadou & Rene Dirven (eds), 97–114. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Cited by (1)
Cited by one other publication
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 3 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
