Cover not available

In:Information-Structural Perspectives on Discourse Particles
Edited by Pierre-Yves Modicom and Olivier Duplâtre
[Studies in Language Companion Series 213] 2020
► pp. 177192

References (21)
References
Altmann, Hans. 2010. Fokus-Hintergrund-Gliederung und Satzmodus. In Wortstellung und Informationsstruktur, Marga Reis (ed.), 1–38. Tübingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Beeching, Kate. 2005. Politeness-induced semantic change: The case of quand même. Language Variation and Change 17(2): 155–180. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Detges, Ulrich & Waltereit, Richard. 2009. Diachronic pathways and pragmatic strategies: Different types of pragmatic particles from a diachronic point of view. In Current Trends in Diachronic Semantics and Pragmatics, Maj-Britt Mosegaard Hansen & Jacqueline Visconti (eds), 43–61. Leiden: Brill. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dufter, Andreas. 2009. Clefting and discourse organization: Comparing Germanic and Romance. In Focus and Background in Romance Languages [Studies in Language Companion Series 112], Andreas Dufter & Daniel Jacob (eds), 83–121. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fedriani, Chiara & Sansò, Andrea. 2017. Pragmatic markers, discourse markers and modal particles. What do we know and where do we go from here? In Pragmatic Markers, Discourse Markers and Modal Particles: New Perspectives [Studies in Language Companion Series 186], Chiara Fedriani & Andrea Sansò (eds), 1–33. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
FRANTEXT = Base textuelle Frantext. Paris: ATILF.
Fraser, Bruce. 1999. What are discourse markers? Journal of Pragmatics 31(7): 931–952. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hansen, Maj-Britt Mosegaard. 1998a. The Function of Discourse Particles [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 53]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1998b. La grammaticalisation de l’interaction ou Pour une approche polysémique de l’adverbe ‘bien’. Revue de Sémantique et Pragmatique 4: 111–138.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hentschel, Elke. 1986. Funktion und Geschichte deutscher Partikeln: Ja, doch, halt und eben [Reihe Germanistische Linguistik 63]. Berlin: De Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kiss, Katalin E. 1998. Identificational focus versus information focus. Language 74(2): 245–273. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Krivonosov, Aleksej. 1965. Die Wechselbeziehung zwischen den modalen Partikeln und der Satzintonation im Deutschen. Zeitschrift für Phonetik, Sprachwissenschaft und Kommunikationsforschung 18(6): 573–589.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mayol, Laia. 2010. Contrastive pronouns in null-subject Romance languages. Lingua 120(10): 2497–2514. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Moroni, Manuela Caterina. 2010. Modalpartikeln zwischen Syntax, Prosodie und Informationsstruktur. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schoonjans, Steven. 2014. Oui, il y a des particules de démodulation en français. CogniTextes (11). <[URL]>
Thurmair, Maria. 1989. Modalpartikeln und ihre Kombinationen [Linguistische Arbeiten 223]. Berlin: De Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Waltereit, Richard. 2001. Modal particles and their functional equivalents: A speech-act theoretic approach. Journal of Pragmatics 33: 1391–1417. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2004. Metonymischer Bedeutungswandel und pragmatische Strategien: Zur Geschichte von frz. quand même. metaphorik.de 6: 117–133.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2006. Abtönung: Zur Pragmatik und historischen Semantik von Modalpartikeln und ihren funktionalen Äquivalenten in romanischen Sprachen [Beihefte zur Zeitschrift für romanische Philologie 338]. Berlin: De Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Waltereit, Richard & Detges, Ulrich. 2007. Different functions, different histories. Modal particles and discourse markers from a diachronic point of view. Catalan Journal of Linguistics 6(1): 61–80. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Modicom, Pierre-Yves
2024. Adverbes concessifs et adverbes adversatifs : questions d’incidence. Cahiers de praxématique 82 DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 3 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue