In:Chapters of Dependency Grammar: A historical survey from Antiquity to Tesnière
Edited by András Imrényi and Nicolas Mazziotta
[Studies in Language Companion Series 212] 2020
► pp. 189–214
Chapter 6Franz Kern
An early dependency grammarian
Published online: 6 February 2020
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.212.07osb
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.212.07osb
An examination of Franz Kern’s main works (1883a, 1883b, 1884, 1886, 1888) quickly reveals that his concept of
sentence structure is closely similar to many modern analyses in the
tradition of dependency grammar (DG). Kern took the finite
verb as the sentence root and positioned the subject and object phrases as
equi-level dependents of the verb in a like manner. In so doing, he was
rejecting the binary subject-predicate division associated with the works of
some of his contemporaries, most notably, Reed and Kellogg (1876). The aspect of Kern’s understanding of
sentence structure that is particularly valuable in tracing the development
of dependency syntax was his use of sentence diagrams. Kern produced
numerous diagrams that are similar to the stemmas Tesnière used
approximately 60 years later. Thus, Kern’s works on sentence structure stand
as a particularly clear manifestation of dependency syntax long before
dependency grammar became associated primarily with Tesnière’s efforts
(1953, 1959). Interestingly, Tesnière did not cite Kern.
This situation raises a basic question about whether Tesnière knew about
Kern’s works at all, or whether he was indirectly influenced by Kern through
the ideas of other German grammarians following in a tradition that Kern had
helped establish many decades earlier.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Aspects of Kern’s DG
- 2.1Finite verbs and complex predicates
- 2.2Prepositions and subordinators
- 2.3Secondary predicates
- 2.4Coordination
- 3.Kern’s impact
- 4.Who influenced Kern?
- 5.Kern vs. Tesnière
- 6.Summary and concluding comments
Notes References
References (29)
A. Primary sources
Brassai, S. (1873). Paraleipomena kai diorthoumena. A mit nem
mondtak s a mit roszul mondtak a commentatorok Virg. Aeneise II.
könyvére [What the commentators did not say or
wrongly said about Book II of Virgil’s Aeneid]. Budapest: MTA.
Clark, S. W. (1847). Science of English language. A practical grammar: In which
words, phrases, and sentences are classified according to their
offices, and their relations to each other. Illustrated by a
complete system of diagrams. New York, NY: A. S. Barnes.
Green, H. R. (1873). A drillbook in the etymology and syntax of the English
language. New York, NY: Woolworth, Ainsworth.
Kern, F. (1883a). Die Deutsche Satzlehre: Eine Untersuchung
ihrer Grundlagen. Berlin: Nicolaische Verlags-Buchhandlung.
(1886). Betrachtungen über den Anfangsunterricht in
der deutschen Satzlehre. Berlin: Nicolaische Verlags-Buchhandlung.
(1888). Leitfaden für den Anfangsunterricht in der
Deutschen Grammatik. Berlin: Nicolaische Verlags-Buchhandlung.
Reed, A., & Kellogg, B. 1909. Graded lessons in English: An elementary English grammar:
Consisting of one hundred practical lessons carefully graded and
adapted to the class-room. New York, NY: Charles E. Merrill. (Original work published 1876)
(2015). Elements of structural syntax (Trans. by T. Osborne & S. Kahane). Amsterdam: John Benjamins (Trans. of Éléments de syntaxe structurale.
Paris: Klincksieck, 1966, 2nd ed.; 1st ed., 1959).
B. Critical sources
Baum, R. (1976). Dependenzgrammatik: Tesnière’s Modell der
Sprachbeschreibung in wissenschaftsgeschichtlicher und
kritischer Sicht. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer Verlag.
Coseriu, E. (1980). Un précurseur méconnu de la syntaxe
structurale: H. Tiktin. In Recherches linguistique: Hommages à Maurice
Leroy (pp. 48–62). Bruxelles: Université de Bruxelles.
Engel, U. (1980). Einführung des
Herausgebers. In L. Tesnière (Au.), Grundzüge der strukturalen Syntax (Ed. and Trans. U. Engel). Stuttgart: Klett-Cotta.
Happ, H. (1976). Grundfragen einer Dependenz-Grammatik des
Lateinischen. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.
Helbig, G., & Buscha, J. (1998). Deutsche Grammatik: Ein Handbuch für den
Ausländerunterricht (18th ed.). Leipzig: Langenscheidt.
Homberger, D. (1993). Das Prädikat im Deutschen: Linguistische
Terminologie in Sprachwissenschaft und Sprachdidaktik. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.
Keinästö, K. (2001). “Unberechtigtes Altes umstoßen und
berechtigtes Neues einführen”: Franz Kern als Vorläufer der
deutschen Dependenzgrammatik. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.
Mel’čuk, I. (1988). Dependency syntax: Theory and practice. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
Cited by (5)
Cited by five other publications
Imrényi, András
Cigana, Lorenzo
2020. Some aspects of dependency in Otto Jespersen’s structural syntax. In Chapters of Dependency Grammar [Studies in Language Companion Series, 212], ► pp. 215 ff.
Imrényi, András & Zsuzsa Vladár
2020. Sámuel Brassai in the history of dependency grammar. In Chapters of Dependency Grammar [Studies in Language Companion Series, 212], ► pp. 163 ff.
Mazziotta, Nicolas
2020. Dependency in early sentence diagrams. In Chapters of Dependency Grammar [Studies in Language Companion Series, 212], ► pp. 133 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 3 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
