In:Normativity in Language and Linguistics
Edited by Aleksi Mäkilähde, Ville Leppänen and Esa Itkonen
[Studies in Language Companion Series 209] 2019
► pp. 183–212
Linguistic variation and change
A normative approach
Published online: 4 December 2019
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.209.07lep
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.209.07lep
Abstract
This chapter offers a preliminary examination of linguistic variation and change from the normative perspective. Both key aspects of normativity, correctness and rationality, are discussed in the context of theoretical discussion and demonstrated by concrete examples drawn from the existing literature on normativity, sociolinguistics and historical linguistics. The goal is to show, how linguistic variation and change can be understood as empirical phenomena involving norms as constitutive (as opposed to merely evaluative or prescriptive) entities in the ontology of language. Of the three variation types thus identified, only the one involving indeterminable correctness appears central to language change. Finally, language change is conceptualized and discussed as a process of norm change (i.e. as an appearance, disappearance or replacement of norms).
Keywords: variation, change, sociolinguistics, historical linguistics, norms, normativity
Article outline
- 1.Introduction: Normativity, variation, and change
- 2.Metatheoretical foundations of sociolinguistics and historical linguistics
- 2.1Defining linguistic variation
- 2.2Defining language change
- 2.3Rational explanation
- 3.Conceptualizing variation in normative terms
- 3.1Types of linguistic variation
- 3.2Variation and norms
- 3.3Norms and the speech community
- 3.4Statistical description and a methodological note
- 4.Ontology of language change
- 4.1Change of norms, innovation and propagation
- 4.2The “ontological leap” and the role of statistics
- 4.3Phases of norm change: Methodological considerations
- 5.Conclusions
Notes References
References (69)
Alho, Tommi & Leppänen, Ville. 2016. Roman brick stamps: Evidence for the development of Latin case syntax. Glotta 92: 3–15.
Anderson, Stephen R. & Lightfoot, David W. 2006. Biology and language: A response to Everett (2005). Journal of Linguistics 42: 377–383.
Anttila, Raimo. 1989. Historical and Comparative Linguistics [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 6]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Campbell, Lyle. 2013. Historical Linguistics. An Introduction, 3rd edn. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.
Coseriu, Eugenio. 1974. Synchronie, Diachronie und Geschichte. Das Problem des Sprachwandels. München: Fink.
Everett, Daniel L. 2005. Biology and language: A consideration of alternatives. Journal of Linguistics 41: 157–175.
Givón, Talmy. 2002. Bio-linguistics. The Santa Barbara Lectures. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Guy, Gregory R. 2003. Variationist approaches to phonological change. In The Handbook of Historical Linguistics, Brian D. Joseph & Richard D. Janda (eds), 369–400. Malden MA: Blackwell.
Haspelmath, Martin. 1999. Optimality and diachronic adaptation. Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft 18(2): 180–205.
Hoenigswald, Henry M. 1966. Language Change and Linguistic Reconstruction. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.
Horrocks, Geoffrey. 2010. Greek. A History of the Language and its Speakers, 2nd edn. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.
Itkonen, Esa. 1978. Grammatical Theory and Metascience. A Critical Investigation into the Methodological and Philosophical Foundations of ‘Autonomous’ Linguistics [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 5]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
. 1983. Causality in Linguistic Theory. A Critical Investigation into the Philosophical and Methodological Foundations of ‘Non-autonomous’ Linguistics. London: Croom Helm.
. 1984. On the ‘rationalist’ conception of language change. Diachronica 1(2): 203–216.
. 2005. Concerning the synthesis between intuition-based study of norms and observation-based study of corpora. SKY Journal of Linguistics 18: 357–377.
. 2008. The central role of normativity in language and in linguistics. In The Shared Mind. Perspectives on Intersubjectivity, Jordan Zlatev [Converging Evidence in Language and Communication Research 12], Timothy P. Racine, Chris Sinha & Esa Itkonen (eds), 279–305. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Kauhanen, Irina. 2006. Norms and sociolinguistic description. In A Man of Measure. Festschrift in Honour of Fred Karlsson on his 60th Birthday, Mickael Suominen, Antti Arppe, Anu Airola, Orvokki Heinämäki, Matti Miestamo, Urho Määttä, Jussi Niemi, Kari K. Pitkänen and Kaius Sinnemäki (eds). Special supplement to SKY Journal of Linguistics 19: 34–46.
Kauko, Mikko. 2015. Jöns Budde och hans skrifter – yngre fornsvenskt textmaterial och mannen bakom det [Annales Universitatis Turkuensis B 402]. PhD Dissertation, University of Turku. <[URL]> (4 July 2017).
King, Robert D. 1969. Historical Linguistics and Generative Grammar. Englewood Cliffs NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Kluge, Friedrich & Seebold, Elmar. 2011. Etymologisches Wörterbuch der deutschen Sprache, 25th edn. Berlin: De Gryuter.
Kroch, Anthony S. 1989. Reflexes of grammar in patterns of language change. Journal of Language Variation and Change 1(3): 199–244.
Krug, Manfred, Schlüchter, Julia & Rosenbach, Anette. 2013. Introduction: Investigating language variation and change. In Research Methods in Language Variation and Change, Manfred Krug & Julia Schlüchter (eds), 1–13. Cambridge: CUP.
Kuczaj, Stan A. 1977. The acquisition of regular and irregular past tense forms. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 16: 589–600.
. 2008. Quantitative reasoning in linguistics. <[URL]> (16 March 2017).
. 2017. Gothic evidence for Greek historical phonology. In Ancient Greek Linguistics. New Approaches, Insights, Perspectives, Felicia Logozzo & Paolo Poccetti (eds), 35–56. Berlin: De Gruyter.
Martinet, André. 1955. Économie des changements phonétiques. Traité de phonologie diachronique. Berne: Francke.
Meillet, Antoine. 1926. Linguistique historique et linguistique générale, 2nd edition. Paris: Librairie Ancienne Honoré Champion.
Milroy, James. 2006. Language change and the speaker. In Variation and Reconstruction [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 268], Thomas D. Cravens (ed.), 145–163. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Milroy, James & Milroy, Lesley. 1993. Real English. The Grammar of English Dialects in the British Isles. London: Longman.
Opfermann, Andreas. 2018. Gedanken über einen oskischen Graffito: ST Po 79 und das Pronomen osk. pis.pis. In Priscis libentius … et liberius novis. Indogermanistische und sprachwissenschaftliche Studien. Festschrift für Gerhard Meiser zum 65. Geburtstag, Olav Hackstein & Andreas Opfermann (eds), 111–130. Hamburg: Baar Verlag.
Pintzuk, Susan. 2003. Variationist approaches to syntactic change. In The Handbook of Historical Linguistics, Brian D. Joseph & Richard D. Janda (eds), 509–528. Malden MA: Blackwell.
1990. Language change and the Saussurean dichotomy: Diachrony versus synchrony. In Polomé (ed.), 3–10.
Ringe, Don & Eska, Joseph F. 2013. Historical Linguistics. Toward a Twenty-First Century Reintegration. Cambridge: CUP.
Sankoff, Gillian (ed.). 1980. The Social Life of Language. Philadelphia PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Schleicher, August. 1861/1862. Compendium der vergleichenden Grammatik der indogermanischen Sprachen. Weimar: H. Boehlau.
Southworth, Franklin C. 1990. Synchronic manifestations of linguistic change. In Polomé (ed.), 25–36.
Tagliamonte, Sali A. 1998. Was/were variation across the generations: View from the city of York. Language Variation and Change 10(2): 153–191.
2012. Variationist Sociolinguistics. Change, Observation, Interpretation. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.
Weinreich, Uriel, Labov, William & Herzog, Marvin I. 1968. Empirical foundations for a theory of language change. In Directions for Historical Linguistics. A Symposium, Winfred P. Lehmann & Yakov Malkiel (eds), 95–195. Austin TX: University of Texas Press.
Weiss, Michael. 2011. Outline of the Historical and Comparative Grammar of Latin, 2nd corrected printing. Ann Arbor MI: Beech Stave Press.
