In:Normativity in Language and Linguistics
Edited by Aleksi Mäkilähde, Ville Leppänen and Esa Itkonen
[Studies in Language Companion Series 209] 2019
► pp. 151–182
Language as a system of norms and the Voloshinovian critique of abstract objectivism
Published online: 4 December 2019
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.209.06laa
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.209.06laa
Abstract
Valentin Voloshinov’s philosophy of linguistics is sometimes presented as an alternative to the Saussurean doctrine, especially in the dialogical approach to language. The purpose of this study is to review Voloshinov’s philosophy of linguistics and to critically examine his critique of the Saussurean position, which he calls abstract objectivism, in order to determine whether his critique is accurate, and to ascertain whether his concept of linguistics offers a viable alternative to the Saussurean position. The analysis of Voloshinov’s critique is based on the key Saussurean concepts of langue, parole and synchrony. In addition, the study also discusses Voloshinov’s theory of meaning, the role of written language in linguistic study and the normativity of language. Based on the results of the study, Voloshinov’s philosophy of linguistics does not offer a viable alternative to the Saussurean position, as it presupposes it.
Keywords: Voloshinov, Saussure, langue, parole, norms, normativity
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.On the dialogical approach and Voloshinov’s theory of language
- 3.Voloshinov on the philosophy of language
- 3.1Voloshinov’s theory of signs
- 3.2Two trends of thought
- 3.3The mistakes of abstract objectivism
- 3.4The roots of abstract objectivism
- 3.5Voloshinov on meaning
- 3.6Voloshinov’s theory of the utterance
- 4.On Voloshinov’s critique of abstract objectivism
- 4.1General remarks
- 4.2On the concept of langue
- 4.3On the concept of parole
- 4.4On synchrony
- 4.5On Voloshinov’s theory of meaning
- 4.6On “written language bias”
- 4.7On normativity
- 5.Conclusion: Language as a system of norms
Acknowledgements Notes References
References (87)
Alpatov, Vladimir. 2004. The Bakhtin Circle and problems in linguistic. In The Bakhtin Circle. In the Master’s Absence, Craig Brandist, David Shephard & Galin Tihanov (eds), 70–96. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
. 2010. Soviet linguistics of the 1920s and 1930s and the scholarly heritage. In Politics and the Theory of Language in the USSR 1917–1938. The Birth of Sociological Linguistics, Craig Brandist & Katya Chown (eds), 17–34. London: Anthem Press.
Anttila, Raimo. 1977. Analogy. The Hague: Mouton de Gruyter.
Bakhtin, Mikhail M. 1986. Speech Genres and Other Late Essays, translated by Vern Mcgee. Austin TX: University of Texas Press.
Bailey, Guy, Wikle, Tom, Tillery, Jan & Sand, Lori. 1991. The apparent time construct. Language Variation and Change 3: 241–264.
Bailey, Guy. 2002. Real and apparent time. In The Handbook of Language Variation and Change, Jack K. Chambers, Peter Trudgill & Natalie Schilling-Estes (eds), 312–332. Malden MA: Blackwell.
Bloomfield, Leonard. [1929] 1970. Review of Liebich. In A Leonard Bloomfield Anthology, Charles F. Hockett (ed.), 219–226. Bloomington IN: Indiana University Press.
Boas, Franz. [1911] 1964. On grammatical categories. In Language in Culture and Society, Dell Hymes (ed.), 121–123. New York NY: Harper & Row.
Bowie, David & Yaeger-Dror, Malcah. 2014. Phonological change in real time. In The Oxford Handbook of Historical Phonology, Patrick Honeybone & Joseph Salmons (eds). Oxford: OUP.
. 2004. Voloshinov’s dilemma: On the philosophical roots of the dialogic theory of the utterance. In The Bakhtin Circle. In the Master’s Absence, Craig Brandist, David Shephard & Galin Tihanov (eds), 97–124. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
. 2015. The Dimensions of Hegemony. Language, Culture and Politics in Revolutionary Russia. Leiden: Brill.
Chambers, Jack K. 1995. Sociolinguistic Theory. Linguistic Variation and its Social Significance. Oxford: Blackwell.
Givón, T. 1995. Functionalism and Grammar. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
. 1990. On redefining linguistics. In Redefining Linguistics, Hayley G. Davis & Talbot J. Taylor (eds), 18–52. London: Routledge.
Hjelmslev, Louis. [1953] 1969. Prolegomena to a Theory of Languag, rev. edn, translated by Francis J. Whitfield. Madison WI: The University of Wisconsin Press.
von Humboldt, Wilhelm. 1836. Über die Verschiedenheit des menschlichen Sprachbaues und ihren Einfluß auf die geistige Entwickelung des Menschengeschlechts. The Internet Archive, 28 August 2008, <[URL]> (5 May 2019).
Itkonen, Esa. 1978. Grammatical Theory and Metascience. A Critical Investigation into the Methodological and Philosophical Foundations of ‘Autonomous’ Linguistics [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 5]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
. 1980. Qualitative vs. quantitative analysis in linguistics. In Evidence and Argumentation in Linguistics, Thomas A. Perry (ed.), 334–366. Berlin: de Guyter.
. 1983. Causality in Linguistic Theory. A Critical Investigation into the Philosophical and Methodological Foundations of ’Non-Autonomous’ Linguistics. London: Croom Helm.
. 1984. On the ‘rationalist’ conception of linguistic change. Diachronica 1(2): 203–216.
. 1991. Universal History of Linguistics. India, China, Arabia, Europe [Studies in the History of the Language Sciences 65]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
. 2003. What is Language? A Study in the Philosophy of Language [Publications in General Linguistics 8]. Turku: University of Turku.
. 2005a. Concerning the synthesis between intuition-based study of norms and observation-based study of corpora. SKY Journal of Linguistics 18: 357–377.
. 2005b. Ten Non-European Languages. An Aid to the Typologist [Publications in General Linguistics 9]. Turku: University of Turku.
. 2005c. Analogy as Structure and Process. Approaches in Linguistics, Cognitive Psychology and Philosophy of Science [Human Cognitive Processing 14]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
. 2008. The central role of normativity in language and in linguistics. In The Shared Mind. Perspectives on Intersubjectivity [Converging Evidence in Language and Communication Research 12], Jordan Zlatev, Timothy P. Racine, Chris Sinha & Esa Itkonen (eds), 279–306. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
. 2010a. Maailman kielten erilaisuus ja samuus. Osa III (The Difference and Sameness of World’s Languages. Part III). Turku: University of Turku.
. 2010b. Synchrony and diachrony. In The Cambridge Encyclopedia of the Language Sciences, P. Hogan (ed.), 821. Cambridge: CUP.
Joseph, John E. 1997. The “language myth” myth: Or, Roy Harris’s red herrings. In Linguistics Inside Out. Roy Harris and His Critics [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 148], George Wolf & Nigel Love (eds), 9–41. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Kiparsky, Paul. 1994. Pāṇinian linguistics. In The Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics, Ronald E. Asher & James M. Y. Simpson (eds), 2918–2923. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
Laasanen, Mikko. 2016. Näennäisaikametodin taustaoletusten teoreettista tarkastelua (On the background hypotheses of the apparent time method: A theoretical study). Virittäjä 120(1): 57–83.
. 2002. Vološinov and Cassirer: A case of plagiarism? Historiagraphia Linguistica 29(1–2): 121–144.
. 2004. Between relativism and absolutism: Towards an emergentist definition of meaning potential. In Bakhtinian Perspectives on Language and Culture. Meaning in Language, Art and New Media, Finn Bostad, Craig Brandist, Lars Sigfred Evensen & Hege Charlotte Faber (eds), 91–113. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.
Linell, Per. 1982. The Written Language Bias in Linguistics. Linköping: The University of Linköping.
. 1988. The impact of literacy on the conception of language: The case of linguistics. In The Written World. Studies in Literate Thought and Action, Roger Säljö (ed.), 41–58. Berlin: Springer.
. 1998. Approaching Dialogue. Talk, Interaction and Contexts in Dialogical Perspectives [Impact: Studies in Language and Society 3]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
. 2005. The Written Language Bias in Linguistics. Its Nature, Origins and Transformations. London: Routledge.
. 2006. Towards a dialogical linguistics. In Proceedings of the XII International Bakhtin Conference. Jyväskylä, Finland, 18–22 July, 2005, Mika Lähteenmäki, Hannele Dufva, Sirpa Leppänen & Piia Varis (eds), 157–172. Jyväskylä: University of Jyväskylä.
Love, Nigel. 1990. The locus of languages in a redefined linguistics. In Redefining Linguistics, Hayley G. Davis & Talbot J. Taylor (eds), 53–117. London: Routledge.
Marková, Ivana. 1990. Introduction. In The Dynamics of Dialogue, Ivana Marková & Klaus Foppa (eds), 1–22. New York NY: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
Marková, Ivana & Foppa, Klaus (eds). 1990. The Dynamics of Dialogue. New York NY: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
Mustanoja, Liisa. 2011. Idiolekti ja sen muuttuminen. Reaaliaikatutkimus Tampereen puhekielestä (Idiolect and its Change. A Real Time Study of the Tampere Spoken Language). Tampere: University of Tampere.
Nevalainen, Terttu & Raumolin-Brunberg, Helena. 2012. Historical sociolinguistics: Origins, motivations, and paradigms. In The Handbook of Historical Sociolinguistics, Juan Manuel Hernández-Campoy & Juan Camilo Conde-Silvestre (eds), 22–40. Malden MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
Olson, David. 1994. The World on Paper. The Conceptual and Cognitive Implications of Writing and Reading. Cambridge: CUP.
Poole, Brian. 2001. From phenomenology to dialogue: Max Scheler’s phenomonological tradition and Mikhail Bakhtin’s development from ‘Towards the philosophy of the act’ to his study of Dostoevsky. In Bakhtin and Cultural Theory, revised and expanded 2nd edn. Ken Hirschkop & David Shepherd (eds), 109–135. Manchester: Manchester Univeristy Press.
Popper, Karl R. [1972] 1975. Objective Knowledge. An Evolutionary Approach. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Rommetveit, Ragnar. 1988. On literacy and the myth of literal meaning. In The Written World. Studies in Literate Thought and Action, Roger Säljö (ed.), 13–40. Berlin: Springer.
. 1990. On axiomatic features of a dialogical approach to language and mind. In The Dynamics of Dialogue, Ivana Marková & Klaus Foppa (eds), 83–104. New York NY: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
. 1992. Outlines of a dialogically based social-cognitive approach to human cognition and communication. In The Dialogical Alternative. Towards a Theory of Language and Mind, Astri Heen Wold (ed.), 19–44. Oslo: Scandinavian University Press.
Sanders, Carol. 2006. Introduction. In Writings in General Linguistics, Simon Bouquet, Rudolf Engler, Carol Sanders & Matthew Pires (eds), xviii–xxx. Oxford: OUP.
Sankoff, Gillian. 2005. Cross-sectional and longitudinal studies. In Sociolinguistics. An International Handbook of the Science of Language and Society, Norbert Dittmar, Klaus J. Mattheier & Ammon Ulrich (eds), 1003–1013. Berlin: De Gruyter.
. 1968. Cours de linguistique générale. Édition critique par Rudolf Engler, Tome 1. Wiesbaden: Otto Harrassowitz.
. 1974. Cours de linguistique générale. Édition critique par Rudolf Engler, Tome 2: Appendice. Wiesbaden: Otto Harrassowitz.
. 2006. Writings in General Linguistics, edited by Simon Bouquet, Rudolf Engler, Carol Sanders & Matthew Pires, translated by Carol Sanders & Matthe Pires. Oxford: OUP.
Sinha, Chris & Rodríguez, Cintia. 2008. Language and the signifying object: From convention to imagination. In The Shared Mind: Perspectives on Intersubjectivity [Converging Evidence in Language and Communication Research, 12], Jordan Zlatev, Timothy P. Racine, Chris Sinha & Esa Itkonen (eds), 357–378. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Thibault, Paul J. 1997. Re-reading Saussure. The Dynamics of Signs in Social Life. London: Routledge.
Tihanov, Galin. 1998. Vološinov, ideology, and language: The birth of Marxist sociology from the spirit of Lebensphilosophie. The South Atlantic Quarterly 97(3–4): 599–621.
. 2000. The Master and the Slave. Lukács, Bakhtin, and the Ideas of Their Time. Oxford: Calendon Press.
