In:Normativity in Language and Linguistics
Edited by Aleksi Mäkilähde, Ville Leppänen and Esa Itkonen
[Studies in Language Companion Series 209] 2019
► pp. 29–68
Concerning the scope of normativity
Published online: 4 December 2019
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.209.02itk
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.209.02itk
Abstract
Wherever a mistake can be made, there is a corresponding norm. Normativity is divided into correctness and rationality. These two dimensions are independent of each other, as shown by the fact that rational actions can be performed by speaking incorrectly, and irrational actions can be performed by speaking correctly. The aim of this chapter is to discuss the scope of both aspects of normativity. The main focus is on the pervasiveness of normativity in linguistics, exemplified here in particular through linguistic semantics and the use of explanations in the field of ‘causal’ linguistics (e.g. psycholinguistics, sociolinguistics, diachronic linguistics). In addition, it is shown that normativity permeates such broader areas as scientific activity in general as well as our everyday lives.
Keywords: philosophy of linguistics, methodology, semantics, truth, belief, reasoning, rationality, causality, explanation, normativity, norms
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Generalities
- 2.1Truth as norm
- 2.2On knowledge and belief
- 2.3The dual nature of beliefs
- 2.4Descriptive vs. prescriptive attitude vis-à-vis norms
- 3.Semantics
- 3.1Necessary truth as the basis of philosophical/linguistic semantics
- 3.2Necessary truth as an exemplification of normativity
- 3.3Normativity prevails over psychology/cognition
- 3.4Linguistic vs. cognitive semantics
- 4.Rational explanation
- 4.1Definition
- 4.2Justification in three different situations
- 4.2.1No laws
- 4.2.2Statistical laws
- 4.2.3Universal (= deterministic) laws
- 4.3Theoretical vs. practical reasoning
- 4.3.1Two inverse types of inference
- 4.3.2Sufficient vs. necessary conclusions of practical reasoning
- 4.4Conclusion
- 5.The implicit normativity of everyday life
- 6.Epilogue
Notes References
References (85)
Anttila, Raimo. 1989. Historical and Comparative Linguistics [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 6]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Berlin, Isaiah. [1960] 1980. The concept of scientific history. In Concepts and Categories. Philosophical Essays, 103–142. Oxford: OUP.
Blomberg, Johan & Zlatev, Jordan. 2014. Actual and non-actual motion: Why experientialist semantics needs phenomenology (and vice versa). Phenomenology and Cognitive Science 13: 395–418.
Bohnemeyer, Jürgen & Pederson, Eric (eds). 2011. Event Representation in Language and Cognition. Cambridge: CUP.
Brennan, Geoffrey, Eriksson, Lina, Goodin, Robert E. & Southwood, Nicholas. 2013. Explaining Norms. Oxford: OUP.
Cohen, L. Jonathan. 1986. The Dialogue of Reason. An Analysis of Analytical Philosophy. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Davidson, Donald. [1963] 1968. Actions, reasons and causes. In The Philosophy of Action, Alan R. White (ed.), 79–94. Oxford: OUP.
Edgley, Roy. 1970. Innate ideas. In Knowledge and Necessity. Royal Institute of Philosophy Lectures, Vol. III, 1–33. London: Macmillan.
Givón, T. 1991. Serial verbs and the mental reality of ‘event’: Grammatical vs. cognitive packaging. In Approaches to Grammaticalization, Vol. 1 [Typological Studies in Language 19], Elizabeth Closs Traugott & Bernd Heine (eds), 181–227. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Greenberg, Joseph H. 1966. Some universals of grammar with particular reference to the order of meaningful elements. In Universals of Language, 2nd edn, Joseph H. Greenberg (ed.), 73–113. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.
1978. Typology and cross-linguistic generalizations. In Universals of Human Language, Vol. I: Method & Theory, Charles A. Ferguson & Edith Moravcsik (eds), 33–60. Stanford CA: Stanford University Press.
Hampshire, Stuart. [1969] 1979. Some difficulties in knowing. In Philosophy As It Is, Ted Honderich (ed.), 281–309. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.
Hintikka, Jaakko. 1962. Knowledge and Belief. An Introduction to the Logic of the Two Notions. Ithaca NY: Cornell University Press.
. 1974. Linguistics and Metascience [Studia Philosophica Turkuensia 2]. Turku: Societas Philosophica et Phaenomenologica Findlandiae.
. 1976. Linguistics and Empiricalness. Answers to Criticisms. [Publications of the General Linguistics Department of the University of Helsinki 4]. Helsinki: University of Helsinki.
. 1978. Grammatical Theory and Metascience. A Critical Investigation into the Methodological and Philosophical Foundations of ‘Autonomous’ Linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
. 1980. Qualitative vs. quantitative analysis in linguistics. In Evidence and Argumentation in Linguistic, Thomas A. Perry (ed.), 334–366. Berlin: De Gruyter.
. 1983. Causality in Linguistic theory. A Critical Investigation into the Philosophical and Methodological Foundations of ‘Non-autonomus’ Linguistics. London: Croom Helm.
. 1991. Universal History of Linguistics. India, China, Arabia, Europe [Studies in the History of the Language Sciences 65]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
. 2003a. Methods of Formalization beside and inside both Autonomous and Non-Autonomous Linguistics [Publications in General Linguistics 6]. Turku: University of Turku.
. 2003b. What is Language? A Study in the Philosophy of Linguistics [Publications in General Linguistics 8]. Turku: University of Turku.
. 2005. Analogy as Structure and Process. Approaches in Linguistics, Cognitive Psychology, and Philosophy of Science [Human Cognitive Processing 14]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
. 2008a. Concerning the role of consciousness in linguistics. Journal of Consciousness Studies 15(6): 15–33.
. 2008b. The central role of normativity in language and linguistics. In The Shared Mind. Perspectives on Intersubjectivity, Jordan Zlatev [Converging Evidence in Language and Communication Research 12], Timothy P. Racine, Chris Sinha & Esa Itkonen (eds), 279–305. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
. 2013. Functional explanation and its uses. In Functional Approaches to Language, Shannon T. Bischoff & Carmen Jany (eds), 31–69. Berlin: De Gruyter.
. 2016b. Pour l’analogie. In Analogie, figement et polysémie, Antonio Pamies, Philippe Monneret & Salah Mejri (eds), 1–11. Special issue of Language Design.
. 2019. Hermeneutics and generative linguistics. In Current Approaches to Syntax. A Comparative Handbook, András Kertész, Edith Moravcsik & Csilla Rákosi (eds), 441–467. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
Katz, Jerrold & Postal, Paul. 1991. Realism and conceptualism in linguistics. Linguistics and Philosophy 14: 515–554.
Keenan, Edward. 1978. Language variation and the logical structure of universal grammar. In Language Universals, Hans-Jakob Seiler (ed.), 89–123. Tübingen: Narr.
Kenny, Anthony. [1975] 1978. Practical reasoning and rational appetite. In Practical Reasoning, Joseph Raz (ed.), 63–80. Oxford: OUP.
Langacker, Ronald. 1987. Foundations of Cognitive Grammar, Vol. I: Theoretical Prerequisites. Stanford CA: Stanford University Press.
. 1997. A dynamic account of grammatical function. In Essays on Language Function and Language Type, Joan Bybee, John Haiman & Sandra A. Thompson (eds), 249–274. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
. 2007. Cognitive Grammar. In The Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics, Dirk Geeraerts & Hubert Cuyckens (eds), 421–462. Oxford: OUP.
Möttönen, Tapani. 2016. Construal in Expression. An Intersubjective Approach to Cognitive Grammar. Helsinki: University of Helsinki.
Pap, Arthur. 1958. Semantics and Necessary Truth. An Inquiry into the Foundations of Analytic Philosophy. New Haven CT: Yale University Press.
Pawley, Andrew. 2011. Event representation in serial verb constructions. In Event Representation in Language and Cognition, Jürgen Bohnemeyer & Eric Pederson (eds), 13–42. Cambridge: CUP.
Pederson, Eric & Bohnemeyer, Jürgen. 2011. On representing events – an introduction. In Event Representation in Language and Cognition, Jürgen Bohnemeyer & Eric Pederson (eds), 1–12. Cambridge: CUP.
Quine, Willard van Orman. [1953] 1963. Two dogmas of empiricism. In From a Logical Point of View 9, Logico-Philosophical Essays, 20–46. New York NY: Harper & Row.
Salmon, Wesley C. 1971. Statistical Explanation and Statistical Relevance. Pittsburgh PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
Samuels, M. L. 1987. The status of the functional approach. In Explanation and Linguistic Change [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 45], Willem Koopman, Frederike van der Lee, Olga Fischer & Roger Eaton (eds), 239–250. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Vennemann, Theo. 1972. Analogy in generative grammar: The origin of word order. Talk given at the World Congress of Linguists, Bologna, September 1972.
Winch, Peter. 1958. The Idea of a Social Science and its Relation to Philosophy. London: Kegan Paul.
von Wright, Georg Henrik. 1963a. Norm and Action. A Logical Enquiry. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
