In:Possession in Languages of Europe and North and Central Asia:
Edited by Lars Johanson, Lidia Federica Mazzitelli and Irina Nevskaya
[Studies in Language Companion Series 206] 2019
► pp. 291–312
Grammaticalization of possessive markers in the Beserman dialect of Udmurt
Published online: 5 March 2019
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.206.14ser
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.206.14ser
The paper is focused on the functions of possessive suffixes in the Beserman dialect of Udmurt. Considering the data from the Beserman corpus of oral texts we find the parameters influencing the presence/omission of the possessive suffixes in the contexts of possessive (alienable and inalienable) and non-possessive contexts. We review the claim about the grammaticalization of the Beserman possessives into markers of definiteness, and suggest that they are subject to pragmaticization in terms of Fried (2009).
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Possessive morphemes in Uralic and in Beserman Udmurt
- 3.Distribution of possessive markers with possessive function
- 3.1Forms of possessive markers in Beserman
- 3.2Distribution of alienable and inalienable sets of possessive markers
- 3.3Obligatoriness and frequency of possessive markers
- 4.Distribution of possessive markers with non-possessive function
- 4.1Non-possessive functions of the possessive markers
- 4.2The hypothesis of grammaticalization of possessive markers into articles
- 5.Conclusions
Acknowledgements Abbreviations Notes References
References (40)
Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. & Dixon, R. M. W. 2013. Possession and Ownership: A Cross-linguistic Typology. Oxford: OUP.
Alatyrev, Vasiliy I. 1970. Vydelitelno-ukazatelnaya kategoriya v udmurtskom jazyke (The restrictive demonstrative category in Udmurt). Izhevsk: Udmurt Institute of History, Economics, Literature and Language.
Alatyrev, Vasily I. 1983. Kratkiy grammaticheskiy ocherk udmurtskogo yazyka (A brief grammatical sketch of Udmurt). Udmurt-Russian Dictionary, 561–591. Moscow: Russkiy yazyk.
Chafe, Wallace. 1994. Discourse, Consciousness, and Time: The Flow and Displacement of Conscious Experience in Speaking and Writing. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.
DeLancey, Scott. 1997. Grammaticalization and the gradience of categories. Relator nouns and postpositions in Tibetan and Burmese. In Essays on Language Function and Language Type, Joan L. Bybee, John Haiman & Sandra A. Thompson (eds.), 51–69. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Décsy, Gyula. 1990. The Uralic Protolanguage: A Comprehensive Reconstruction. Bloomington IN: Eurolingua.
Fraurud, Kari. 2001. Possessives with extensive use: A source of definite articles? In Dimensions of Possession [Typological Studies in Language 47], Irène Baron, Michael Herslund & Finn Sørensen (eds), 243–267. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Fried, Mirjam. 2009. Construction Grammar as a tool for diachronic analysis. Constructions and Frames 1 (2): 262–291.
Gerland, Doris. 2014. Definitely not possessed? Possessive suffixes with definiteness marking function. In Frames and Concept Types. Applications in Language and Philosophy [Studies in Linguistics and Philosophy 94], Thomas Gamerschlag, Doris Gerland, Rainer Osswald & Wiebke Petersen (eds), 269–292. Cham: Springer.
Geurts, Bart. 1998. Presuppositions and anaphors in attitude contexts. Linguistics and Philosophy 21: 545–601.
Givón, Talmy (ed.). 1983. Topic Continuity in Discourse: A Quantitative Cross-Language Study [Typological Studies in Language 3]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Hayashi, Makoto & Yoon, Kyung-Eun. 2006. A cross-linguistic exploration of demonstratives in interaction: With particular reference to the context of word-formulation trouble. Studies in Language 30(3): 485–540.
Klumpp, Gerson. 2008. Differentielle Objektmarkierung & Informationsstruktur in Dialekten des Komi. Ms, Munich.
Koptjevskaja-Tamm, Maria. 2002. Adnominal possession in the European languages: Form and function. STUF – Language Typology and Universals 55(2): 141–172.
Künnap, Ago. 2006. Historically Problematic Morphosyntactic Features in Uralic Languages. Munich: Lincom.
Kuznetsova, Ariadna I. 2003. Kumulaciya grammaticheskix znachenij v agglutinativnyx pokazatelax: Deikticheskiye funkcii posessiva v uralskix jazykax (Several grammatical meanings in agglutinative markers: Deictic functions of possessive markers in Uralic). In Finno-ugorskije jazyki: fragmenty grammaticheskogo opisanija, Formalnyj i funkcionalnyj podkhody (Finno-Ugric languages: Fragments of grammatical description. Formal and functional approaches), Ariadna I. Kuznetsova e.a. (eds), 250–262. Moscow: Russkiye slovari.
Lehmann, Christian. 2015. Thoughts on Grammaticalization, 3rd edn [Classics in Linguistics 1]. Berlin: Language Science Press.
Nichols, Johanna & Bickel, Balthasar. 2013. Possessive classification. In The World Atlas of Language Structures Online, Matthew S. Dryer & Martin Haspelmath (eds). Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. <[URL]> (23 February 2016).
Nikolaeva, Irina A. 2003. Possessive affixes as markers of information structuring: Evidence from Uralic. In International Symposium on Deictic Systems and Quantification in Languages Spoken in Europe and North and Central Asia. Collection of papers, Pirkko Suihkonen & Bernard Comrie (eds), 130–145. Izhevsk & Leipzig: Udmurt State University & Max Planck Institute of Evolutionary Anthropology.
Plungian, Vladimir A. 2011. Vvedeniye v grammaticheskuyu semantiku: Grammaticheskiye znacheniya i grammaticheskiye sistemy jazykov mira (Introduction into grammatical semantics: Grammatical meanings and grammatical system of the world’s languages). Moscow: RSUH.
Prince, Ellen F. 1981. Toward a taxonomy of given-new information. In Radical Pragmatics, Peter Cole (ed.), 223–255. New York NY: Academic Press.
Rubin, Aaron D. 2010: The development of the Amharic definite article and an Indonesian parallel. Journal of Semitic Studies 55(1): 103–114.
Serdobolskaya, Natalia V. & Toldova, Svetlana Ju. 2012. Differencirovannoye markirovaniye pryamogo dopolneniya v finno-ugorskix jazykax (Differential object marking in Finno-Ugric languages). In Finno-ugorskiye jazyki: Fragmenty grammaticheskogo opisaniya. Formalnyj i funkcionalnyj podxody (Finno-ugric languages: fragments of grammartical description. Formal and functional approaches), Ariadna I. Kuznetsova e.a. (ed.), 59–142. Moscow: Jazyki slavyanskix kultur.
Siegl, Florian. 2015. The structure of noun phrases with referential Px.2p in Northern Samoyedic. Tomsk Journal of Linguistic and Anthropology 1(7): 21–31.
Starosta, Stan. 1985. Relator nouns as a source of case inflection. In For Gordon H. Fairbanks, Veneeta Z. Acson, & Richard L. Leed (eds), 111–133. Honolulu HI: University Press of Hawaii.
Suihkonen, Pirkko. 2005. On the categories and functions developed from the possessive and deictic suffixes in Udmurt. Lihkkun lehkos! Beiträge zur Finnougristik aus Anlaß des sechzigsten Geburtstages von Hans-Hermann Bartens, Cornelius Hasselblatt, Eino Koponen & Anna Widmer (eds), 401–432. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.
Tauli, Valter. 1966. Structural Tendencies in Uralic Languages [Indiana University Publications; Uralic and Altaic Series 17]. The Hague: Mouton.
Cited by (5)
Cited by five other publications
Etebari, Zahra
Mikhailov, Stepan K.
Usacheva, Maria & Natalia Serdobolskaya
2024. A new converb originating from the locative noun in Beserman. Studies in Language 48:2 ► pp. 472 ff.
Daria O. Zhornik
Serdobolskaya, Natalia & Maria Usacheva
2023. Pseudopartitive constructions are not a subtype of nominal juxtaposition in Beserman. Journal of Uralic Linguistics 2:2 ► pp. 241 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 3 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
