Cover not available

In:Possession in Languages of Europe and North and Central Asia:
Edited by Lars Johanson, Lidia Federica Mazzitelli and Irina Nevskaya
[Studies in Language Companion Series 206] 2019
► pp. 291312

Get fulltext from our e-platform
References (40)
References
Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. & Dixon, R. M. W. 2013. Possession and Ownership: A Cross-linguistic Typology. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Alatyrev, Vasiliy I. 1970. Vydelitelno-ukazatelnaya kategoriya v udmurtskom jazyke (The restrictive demonstrative category in Udmurt). Izhevsk: Udmurt Institute of History, Economics, Literature and Language.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Alatyrev, Vasily I. 1983. Kratkiy grammaticheskiy ocherk udmurtskogo yazyka (A brief grammatical sketch of Udmurt). Udmurt-Russian Dictionary, 561–591. Moscow: Russkiy yazyk.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chafe, Wallace. 1994. Discourse, Consciousness, and Time: The Flow and Displacement of Conscious Experience in Speaking and Writing. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Collinder, Björn. 1960. Comparative Grammar of the Uralic Languages. Stockholm: Almquist & Wiksell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1957. Survey of the Uralic Languages. Stockholm: Almkvist & Wiksell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
DeLancey, Scott. 1997. Grammaticalization and the gradience of categories. Relator nouns and postpositions in Tibetan and Burmese. In Essays on Language Function and Language Type, Joan L. Bybee, John Haiman & Sandra A. Thompson (eds.), 51–69. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Décsy, Gyula. 1990. The Uralic Protolanguage: A Comprehensive Reconstruction. Bloomington IN: Eurolingua.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fraurud, Kari. 2001. Possessives with extensive use: A source of definite articles? In Dimensions of Possession [Typological Studies in Language 47], Irène Baron, Michael Herslund & Finn Sørensen (eds), 243–267. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gerland, Doris. 2014. Definitely not possessed? Possessive suffixes with definiteness marking function. In Frames and Concept Types. Applications in Language and Philosophy [Studies in Linguistics and Philosophy 94], Thomas Gamerschlag, Doris Gerland, Rainer Osswald & Wiebke Petersen (eds), 269–292. Cham: Springer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Geurts, Bart. 1998. Presuppositions and anaphors in attitude contexts. Linguistics and Philosophy 21: 545–601. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Givón, Talmy (ed.). 1983. Topic Continuity in Discourse: A Quantitative Cross-Language Study [Typological Studies in Language 3]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hawkins, John. 1978. Definiteness and Indefiniteness. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Heine, Bernard. 1997. Possession: Cognitive Sources, Forces and Grammaticalization. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hopper Paul J. & Traugott, Elizabeth Closs. 2003. Grammaticalization. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Johanson, Lars & Csató, Éva Á. 1998. The Turkic. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kibrik, Andrey A. 2011. Reference in Discourse. Oxford: OUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Klumpp, Gerson. 2008. Differentielle Objektmarkierung & Informationsstruktur in Dialekten des Komi. Ms, Munich.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Koptjevskaja-Tamm, Maria. 2002. Adnominal possession in the European languages: Form and function. STUF – Language Typology and Universals 55(2): 141–172.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Künnap, Ago. 2006. Historically Problematic Morphosyntactic Features in Uralic Languages. Munich: Lincom.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kuznetsova, Ariadna I. 2003. Kumulaciya grammaticheskix znachenij v agglutinativnyx pokazatelax: Deikticheskiye funkcii posessiva v uralskix jazykax (Several grammatical meanings in agglutinative markers: Deictic functions of possessive markers in Uralic). In Finno-ugorskije jazyki: fragmenty grammaticheskogo opisanija, Formalnyj i funkcionalnyj podkhody (Finno-Ugric languages: Fragments of grammatical description. Formal and functional approaches), Ariadna I. Kuznetsova e.a. (eds), 250–262. Moscow: Russkiye slovari.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lehmann, Christian. 2015. Thoughts on Grammaticalization, 3rd edn [Classics in Linguistics 1]. Berlin: Language Science Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mithun, Marianne. 1999. The Languages of Native North America. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nichols, Johanna & Bickel, Balthasar. 2013. Possessive classification. In The World Atlas of Language Structures Online, Matthew S. Dryer & Martin Haspelmath (eds). Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. <[URL]> (23 February 2016).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nikolaeva, Irina A. 2003. Possessive affixes as markers of information structuring: Evidence from Uralic. In International Symposium on Deictic Systems and Quantification in Languages Spoken in Europe and North and Central Asia. Collection of papers, Pirkko Suihkonen & Bernard Comrie (eds), 130–145. Izhevsk & Leipzig: Udmurt State University & Max Planck Institute of Evolutionary Anthropology.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Plungian, Vladimir A. 2011. Vvedeniye v grammaticheskuyu semantiku: Grammaticheskiye znacheniya i grammaticheskiye sistemy jazykov mira (Introduction into grammatical semantics: Grammatical meanings and grammatical system of the world’s languages). Moscow: RSUH.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Prince, Ellen F. 1981. Toward a taxonomy of given-new information. In Radical Pragmatics, Peter Cole (ed.), 223–255. New York NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rubin, Aaron D. 2010: The development of the Amharic definite article and an Indonesian parallel. Journal of Semitic Studies 55(1): 103–114. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schlachter, Wolfgang. 1960. Studien zum Possessivsuffix des Syrjänischen. Berlin: Akademie Verlag.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Serdobolskaya, Natalia V. & Toldova, Svetlana Ju. 2012. Differencirovannoye markirovaniye pryamogo dopolneniya v finno-ugorskix jazykax (Differential object marking in Finno-Ugric languages). In Finno-ugorskiye jazyki: Fragmenty grammaticheskogo opisaniya. Formalnyj i funkcionalnyj podxody (Finno-ugric languages: fragments of grammartical description. Formal and functional approaches), Ariadna I. Kuznetsova e.a. (ed.), 59–142. Moscow: Jazyki slavyanskix kultur.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Siegl, Florian. 2015. The structure of noun phrases with referential Px.2p in Northern Samoyedic. Tomsk Journal of Linguistic and Anthropology 1(7): 21–31.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Spencer, Andrew & Luís, Ana R. 2012. Clitics: An Introduction. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Starosta, Stan. 1985. Relator nouns as a source of case inflection. In For Gordon H. Fairbanks, Veneeta Z. Acson, & Richard L. Leed (eds), 111–133. Honolulu HI: University Press of Hawaii.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Suihkonen, Pirkko. 2005. On the categories and functions developed from the possessive and deictic suffixes in Udmurt. Lihkkun lehkos! Beiträge zur Finnougristik aus Anlaß des sechzigsten Geburtstages von Hans-Hermann Bartens, Cornelius Hasselblatt, Eino Koponen & Anna Widmer (eds), 401–432. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tauli, Valter. 1966. Structural Tendencies in Uralic Languages [Indiana University Publications; Uralic and Altaic Series 17]. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
von Heusinger, Klaus & Kornfilt, Jaklin. 2005. The case of the direct object in Turkish: Semantics, syntax and morphology. Turkic Languages 9: 3–44.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Winkler, Eberhard. 2011. Udmurtische Grammatik. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Yedygarova, Svetlana. 2010. Kategoriya posessivnosti v udmurtskom yazyke (The category of possession in Udmurt). PhD dissertation. Tartu Ülikooli Kirjastus.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (5)

Cited by five other publications

Etebari, Zahra
2025. Possessives as source of definite articles? Diachronic evidence from Persian. Folia Linguistica 59:s46-s1  pp. 43 ff. DOI logo
Mikhailov, Stepan K.
2024. Semantics of the northern khanty salient article: definiteness, salience, and obviation. Voprosy Jazykoznanija :1  pp. 7 ff. DOI logo
Usacheva, Maria & Natalia Serdobolskaya
2024. A new converb originating from the locative noun in Beserman. Studies in Language 48:2  pp. 472 ff. DOI logo
Daria O. Zhornik
2024. Interaction between grammatical phenomena and information structure in Northern Mansi. Voprosy Jazykoznanija :5  pp. 80 ff. DOI logo
Serdobolskaya, Natalia & Maria Usacheva
2023. Pseudopartitive constructions are not a subtype of nominal juxtaposition in Beserman. Journal of Uralic Linguistics 2:2  pp. 241 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 3 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue