Cover not available

In:Possession in Languages of Europe and North and Central Asia:
Edited by Lars Johanson, Lidia Federica Mazzitelli and Irina Nevskaya
[Studies in Language Companion Series 206] 2019
► pp. 205–238

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
authorization required

Superlative readings of possessive constructions in Turkic

A comparative perspective

 | Frankfurt University | Institute of PhilologyNovosibirsk | Tomsk State University
 | Eurasian National UniversityAstana
Published online: 5 March 2019
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.206.11nev
The article describes the superlative, hyperlative and elative use of formally possessive constructions in a number of Turkic languages from a comparative perspective, analyzing their structural and semantic types and pragmatic properties. Similar possessive superlative constructions are found all over Eurasia in languages belonging to various language families: they mostly express abstract (absolute) comparison of referred entities where their quantities are compared with a certain norm. One of the most unclear issues of possessive superlative constructions is their origin. They could have emerged as structural copies of corresponding Semitic Biblical expressions or as effect of language internal developments. The material of corresponding English and German non-canonical possessive constructions allows assuming that both factors have contributed to their emergence.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Structure of superlative constructions
    • 2.1Components of comparative constructions
    • 2.2Turkic comparative constructions
    • 2.3Turkic prototypical superlative constructions
  • 3.Semantics of superlative constructions
    • 3.1The category of quality gradation
    • 3.2Concrete and abstract evaluation of quality gradation
    • 3.3Totality and feature evaluation of entities
    • 3.4Superlative constructions in typological research
  • 4.Structural and semantic types of Turkic non-canonical superlative constructions
    • 4.1Possessive superlative constructions in Kazakh
      • 4.1.1Construction n-(pl)-gen n-(pl)-pos
        • 4.1.1.1Pattern n-pl-gen n-pos
        • 4.1.1.2Pattern n-pl-gen n-pl-pos
        • 4.1.1.3Pattern n-gen n-pl-pos
        • 4.1.1.4Pattern n-gen n-pos
      • 4.1.2Construction adj-(pl)-gen adj-(pl)-pos
        • 4.1.2.1Pattern adj-pl-gen adj-pos
        • 4.1.2.2Pattern adj-pl-gen adj-pl-pos
        • 4.1.2.3Pattern adj-gen adj-pos
        • 4.1.2.4Pattern adj-gen adj-pl-pos
      • 4.1.3Construction n-(pl)-gen adj-(pl)-pos
        • 4.1.3.1Pattern n-pl-gen adj-pos
        • 4.1.3.2Pattern n-gen adj-pos
        • 4.1.3.3Pattern n-pl-gen adj-pl-pos
        • 4.1.3.4Pattern n-gen adj-pl-pos
    • 4.2Syntactic functions of the superlative possessive constructions
    • 4.3Some preliminary conclusions to this paragraph
  • 5.Turkic comparative data
    • 5.1Turkish non-canonical superlative constructions
    • 5.2South Siberian Turkic non-canonical superlative constructions
    • 5.3Preliminary summary of comparative results
  • 6.Non-canonical (possessive) superlative constructions in English
    • 6.1Constructions of the type king of kings in English
    • 6.2Constructions of the type mother of (all) battles in English
    • 6.3Constructions of the type time of one’s life in English
  • 7.Some conclusions and discussion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Abbreviations and symbols in glossing
  • Note
  • References
  • Appendix
References (30)
References
Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. & Dixon, R. M. W. (eds). 2013. Possession and Ownership: A Cross-linguistic Typology. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bresnan, Joan. 1973. Syntax of the comparative clause construction in English. Linguistic Inquiry 35: 275–343.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1976. On the form and functioning of transformations. Linguistic Inquiry 7: 3–40.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Csató, Éva Á. & Abish, Aynur 2015. Relators of comparison in Karaim and in Kazakh as spoken in China. Turkic Languages 19: 40–52.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Čeremisina, Maja I. 1976. Sravnitel'nye konstrucii russkogo jazyka. Novosibirsk: Nauka.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Čumakaev, Aleksej Ė. 2017. Imja suščestvitel’noe. In Grammatika sovremennogo literaturnogo altajskogo jazyka. Morfologija, I. A. Nevskaya (Ed.), 22–47. Gorno-Altajsk: Institut Altaistiki.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dixon, R. M. W. 2012. Basic Linguistic Theory. Vol. 3: Further Grammatical Topics . Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Erdal, Marcel 2004. A Grammar of Old Turkic (Handbook of Oriental Studies). Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Farkas, Donka F. & Kiss, Katalin É. 2000. On the comparative and absolute readings of superlatives. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 18: 417–455. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Heim, Irene. 2000. Degree operators and scope. In Proceedings of the Semantics and Linguistic Theory 10, Brandon Jackson & Tanya Matthews (eds). Ithaca NY: CLC Publications, Cornell University.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Johanson, Lars 1998. The structure of Turkic. In The Turkic Languages, Lars Johanson & Éva A. Csató (eds), 30–67. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kennedy, Christopher. 1999. Projecting the Adjective: The Syntax and Semantics of Gradability and Comparison. New York NY: Garland. (PhD dissertation, University of California, Santa Cruz, 1997).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Konyrov, Turagul 1985. Strukturno-semantičeskaja priroda sravnenija s kazaxskom jazyke (komparativnye konstrukcii). Alma-Ata: Mekteb.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Matushansky, Ora. 2008. On the attributive nature of superlatives. Syntax 11: 26–90. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nevskaya, Irina & Tazhibayeva, Saule. 2015. Genitive-possessive nominal phrase as superlative marking for substantives in Turkic languages. Presented at SLE 2015, Leiden, 2–5 September.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nevskaya, Irina 2016. The Lord of Lords and King of Kings – A superlative construction in Turkic languages. In Eine hundertblättrige Tulpe – Bir Èadbarg lÁla. Festgabe für Claus Schönig [Studien zur Sprache, Geschichte und Kultur der Türkvölker 22], Ingeborg Hauenschild, Matthias Kappler & Barbara Kellner-Heinkele (eds), 332–344. Berlin: Klaus Schwarz.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Novyj Zavet na xakasskom jazyke s parallel’nym russkim Sinodal’nym perevodom. (Naa Molǰaγ xaqas tǐlbestegneŋ orïs Sinod tǐlbestee). 2011. Tilbesčiler: T. N. Borgojakova, G. N. Linvinenko, I. P. Topoev. Moskva: Institut perevoda Biblii.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Plungyan, Vladimir A. 2011. Vvedenie v grammatičeskuju semantiku: Grammatičeskie značenija i grammatičeskie sistemy jazykov mira, 424–425 Moscow: RGGU.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schäfer, Gerd. 1974. „König der Könige“, „Lied der Lieder“: Studien z. paronomastischen Intensitätsgenitiv. Vorgelegt am 17. Januar 1970 von Hildebrecht Hommel, Abhandlungen der Heidelberger Akademie der Wissenschaften, Philosophisch-Historische Klasse; Jg. 1973, Abh. 2. Heidelberg: Carl Winter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sharvit, Yael & Stateva, Penka. 2002. Superlative expressions, context and focus. Linguistics and Philosophy 25: 453–505. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stassen, Leon. 1984. The comparative compared. Journal of Semantics 3: 143–182. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1985. Comparison and Universal Grammar. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stateva, Penka. 2000a. In defense of the movement theory of superlatives. In Proceedings of the Eastern States Conference on Linguistics 1999, Rebecca Daly & Anastasia Riehl (eds), 215–226.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2000b. Towards a superior theory of superlatives. In ConSole VIII Proceedings: Proceedings of the Eighth Conference of the Student Organization of Linguistics in Europe, Christine Czinglar, Katharina Köhler, Erica Thrift, Erik Jan van der Torre & Malte Zimmermann (eds), 313–326. Leiden: Sole.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2003. Superlative more. In Proceedings of Semantics and Linguistic Theory (SALT) 13, Robert B. Young & Yuping Zhou (eds), 276–291. Ithaca NY: CLC Publications.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tenišev, Ėdgem R. (ed.). 1988. Sravnitel’no-istoričeskaja grammatika tjurkskix jazykov. Morfologija. Moskva: Nauka.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tybykova, Larisa N. 1989. Sravnitel’nye konstrukcii altajskogo jazyka: Avtoreferat dissertacii na soiskanie učenoj stepeni candidate filologičeskix nauk. Alma-Ata.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ultan, Russell. 1972. Some features of basic comparative constructions. Working Papers on Language Universals (Stanford) 9: 117–162.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vasil’ev, Jurij I. 1986. Sposoby vyrazhenija sravnenija v jakutskom jazyke. Novosibirsk: Nauka.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Yeskeldiyeva, Bibigul 2016. Sravnitel’nye konstrukcii v kazaxskom i v tjurkskix jazykax Sibiri. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Astana: Eurasian National University.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue