Cover not available

In:Substance-based Grammar – The (Ongoing) Work of John Anderson:
Edited by Roger Böhm and Harry van der Hulst
[Studies in Language Companion Series 204] 2018
► pp. 201–224

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
authorization required

The substance of the lexicon in a Generative Lexicon

 | Université Lumière Lyon 2
Published online: 12 December 2018
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.204.04bas
In this chapter, Bassac presents and assesses a theory of the lexicon known as “the Generative Lexicon Theory”. He argues that the substance of such a lexicon can provide a neat explanatory account of the semantic and syntactic properties exhibited by middle verbs in the middle form of the transitive/middle alternation. Bassac then discusses the copredication problem raised by ambiguous deverbal event nouns and shows that this problem can be solved if each lexical entry associated with deverbal event nouns contains a type changing function. Eventually, in both cases, this lexical approach to syntactic and morphological phenomena provides support to Anderson’s basic claim that “the core of syntax is the lexicon.”
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.A classic Generative Lexicon: Its substance as defined in Pustejovsky (1995)
    • 2.1The Argument Structure
    • 2.2The Event Structure
    • 2.3The Qualia Structure
  • 3.Middle verbs
    • 3.1Definition and properties
    • 3.2An explanatory account: the relevance of the Event Structure
      • 3.2.1Event Structure and lexical distribution
      • 3.2.2The Event Structure and projection to syntax
  • 4.Derived complex event nominals
    • 4.1Outline of previous studies
    • 4.2The classic GL analysis
      • 4.2.1GL: Dynamic operations
      • 4.2.2Dotted types in a classic GL
      • 4.2.3Problems: Copredication and formalization
    • 4.3A solution: A GL enriched with functions associated with each lexical entry
  • 5.Final remarks
  • Notes
  • References
References (42)
References
Alexiadou, Artemis & Grimshaw, Jane. 2008. Verbs, nouns and affixation. SinSpeC [Working Papers of the SFB 732] Incremental Specification in Context ) 1: 1–16. Stuttgart: Universität Stuttgart. <[URL]>Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Anderson, John M. 1968. Ergative and nominative in English. Journal of Linguistics 4(1): 1–32.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1992. Linguistic Representation: Structural Analogy and Stratification. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1997. A Notional Theory of Syntactic Categories. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2004. Concepts and consequences of Case Grammar. Lecture, 18 June 2004. Toulouse: Université de Toulouse-Le Mirail. [URL] (26 November 2016).
2006. Modern Grammars of Case. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2011. The Substance of Language, Vol. I: The Domain of Syntax. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2012. Types of complexity in English: Syntactic categories and the lexicon. Studia Anglica Posnaniensia 47(4): 3–51.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Andor, József. this volume. Investigating substance-based grammar: The grammar of semantic and grammatical relations – An interview with John M. Anderson. In Substance-based Grammar – The (Ongoing) Work of John Anderson [Studies in Language Companion Series 204], Roger Böhm & Harry van der Hulst (eds). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Asher, Nicholas. 2011. Lexical Meaning in Context. A Web of Words. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bassac, Christian & Bouillon, Pierrette. 2002. Middle transitive alternations in English: A Generative Lexicon approach. In Many Morphologies, Paul Boucher (ed), 29–47. Sommerville MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bassac, Christian, Méry, Bruno & Rétoré Christian. 2010. Towards a type theoretical account of lexical semantics. Journal of Logic, Language and Information 19: 229–245.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bassac, Christian & Çiçek, Mehmet. 2013. On the derivation of nominals in -(y)Is¸ and -mE in Turkish. Lingua 133: 230–261.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bisetto, Antonietta & Melloni, Chiara. 2007. Result nominals: A lexical-semantic investigation. In On-line Proceedings of the Fifth Mediterranean Morphology Meeting (MMM5) Fréjus, 15–18 September 2005, Geert Booij, Luca Ducceschi, Bernard Fradin, Emiliano Guevara, Angela Ralli & Sergio Scalise (eds), 393–412. <[URL]>Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Böhm, Roger. 1993. Predicate-argument Structure, Relational Typology and (Anti)passives: Towards an Integrated Localist Case Grammar Account [Series A, No. 336]. Duisburg: LAUD.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1994. Deriving derived intransitivity: Structural analogy and mutation vs. mutilation of lexical argument structure. Paper presented on 16/06/1994 at the Institute for Functional Language Research (IFOTT), University of Amsterdam.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Borer, Hagit. 1998. Morphology and syntax. In Handbook of Morphology, Andrew Spencer & Arnold Zwicky (eds), 151–190. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Croft, William & Cruse, Alan. 2004. Cognitive Linguistics. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cruse, Alan. 1999. Meaning in Language: An Introduction to Semantics and Pragmatics. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Culicover, Peter & Jackendoff, Ray. 2005. Simpler Syntax. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Davidson, Donald. 1967. The logical form of action sentences. In The Logic of Decision and Action, Nicholas Rescher (ed), 81–94. Pittsburgh PA: Pittsburgh University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fagan, Sarah. 1992. The Syntax and Semantics of Middle Constructions: A Study with Special Reference to German. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Girard, Jean-Yves, Taylor, Paul, & Lafont, Yves. 1989. Proofs and Types. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goldberg, Adele & Ackerman, Farrel. 2001. The pragmatics of obligatory adjuncts. Language 77(4): 798–814.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Grimshaw, Jane. 1990. Argument Structure. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2004. Why can’t a noun be more like a verb? Paper presented at the International Conference on Deverbal Nouns. Lille. September 2004.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gupta, Kalyan Moy & Aha, David. 2003. Nominal concept représentation in sublanguage ontologies. In Second International Workshop on Generative Approaches to the Lexicon. University of Geneva: Geneva.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2005. Interpreting events using generative sublanguage ontologies. In Proceedings of the Third Workshop on Generative Approaches to the Lexicon, 72–81. University of Geneva: Geneva.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Havasi, Catherine, Rumshiky, Anna & Pustejovsky, James. 2007. An evaluation of the Brandeis semantic ontology. In Fourth International Workshop on Generative Approaches to the Lexicon. Paris.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kamp, Hans & Reyle, Uwe. 1993. From Discourse to Logic. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kahrel, Peter. 1985. Some Aspects of Derived Intransitivity [Working Papers in Functional Grammar 4]. University of Amsterdam: Institute for General Linguistics.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Melloni, Chiara. 2010. Action nominals inside: Lexical-semantic issues. In The Semantics of Nominalizations across Languages and Frameworks [Interface Explorations 22], Monika Rathert & Artemis Alexiadou (eds), 141–168. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nishida, Chiyo. 1991. Superfluous se in Spanish transitive constructions. Ms, University of Texas, Austin.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pustejovsky, James. 1995. The Generative Lexicon. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pustejovsky, James, Bouillon, Pierrette, Hisahara, Hitoshi, Kanzaki, Kyoko & Lee, Chungmin. 2013. Advances in Generative Lexicon Theory. Heidelberg: Springer.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Quine, Willard Van Orman. 1960. Word and Object. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Réal-Coelho, Livy-Maria & Retoré, Christian. 2014. Deverbal semantics and the Montagovian generative lexicon. ΛTyn. Journal of Logic, Language and Information 23(3): 347–366.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stalmaszczyk, Piotr. 1997. Thematic and conceptual semantics of English middle verbs. Folia Linguistica 36: 135–156Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stroik, Thomas. 1992. Middles and movement. Linguistic Inquiry 23(1): 127–137.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
van der Hulst, Harry & van de Weijer, Jeroen. this volume. Degrees of complexity in phonological segments. In Substance-based Grammar – The (Ongoing) Work of John Anderson [Studies in Language Companion Series 204], Roger Böhm & Harry van der Hulst (eds). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Vendler, Zeno. 1967. Linguistics in Philosophy. Ithaca CA: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wierzbicka, Anna. 1996. Semantics: Primes and Universals. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue