Cover not available

In:Reorganising Grammatical Variation: Diachronic studies in the retention, redistribution and refunctionalisation of linguistic variants
Edited by Antje Dammel, Matthias Eitelmann and Mirjam Schmuck
[Studies in Language Companion Series 203] 2018
► pp. 269–296

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
authorization required

Active and passive tough-infinitives

A case of long-term grammatical variation

 | University of Bergen
Published online: 24 October 2018
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.203.10hau
Abstract
This paper probes into the determinants of the long-term grammatical variation of active and passive tough-infinitives, as well as into the factors that ultimately led to the decline of passive tough-infinitives. It is argued that, throughout their coexistence, the active and the passive tough-infinitive are functionally equivalent and that the demise of the passive tough-infinitive is a concomitant of the extensive and rapid spread of the passive infinitive governed by be expressing deontic modality. It is further argued that, due to the surface similarity of the passive infinitive governed by be and the passive tough-infinitive, deontic modality percolates into the passive tough-infinitive, which expresses dispositional modality. Thus, the obsolescence of the passive tough-infinitive is driven by a clash in modality.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.A brief history of the emergence and development of active and passive tough-infinitives
  • 3.The diachronic trajectories of active and passive tough-infinitives
  • 4.Functional equivalence or functional specialisation?
  • 5.A long flirt turning sour
    • 5.1 Tough-adverbialisation and concomitant reanalysis of the to-infinitive
      • 5.1.1Adverbial adjectives and ‑ly adverbs as a putative, but unlikely catalyst
    • 5.2Modal specialisation of the passive to-infinitive governed by be
    • 5.3Till modality do us part
  • 6.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • Data sources
  • References
References (52)
Data sources
[BNC] Davies, Mark. (2004–) BYU-BNC. (Based on the British National Corpus from OUP). <[URL]>Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
[COCA] Davies, Mark. (2008–) The Corpus of Contemporary American English: 520 million words, 1990–present. <[URL]>Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
[DOE] Dictionary of Old English Corpus. 2000. Centre for Medieval Studies, University of Toronto.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
[ECF] Eighteenth-Century Fiction. 1996. Cambridge: Chadwyck-Healey.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
[EEPF] Early English Prose Fiction. 1997. Cambridge: Chadwyck-Healey.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
[MED] Middle English Dictionary. 2001. 2001. The Regents of the University of Michigan. <[URL]>Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
[NCF] Nineteenth-Century Fiction. 1999–2000. Cambridge: Chadwyck-Healey.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
References
Anderson, Deborah L. 2002. Structural ambiguity in early English tough constructions: Are child grammars deficient or simply different from adult grammars? Working Papers in English and Applied Linguistics 8: 1–24.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2005. The Acquisition of tough-Movement in English. PhD dissertation, University of Cambridge. <[URL]> (15 April 2018).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Becker, Misha, Estigarribia, Bruno & Gylfadottir, Duna. 2012. Tough-adjectives are easy to learn. Supplemental Proceedings of BUCLD 36, <[URL]> (15 April 2018).
Bongaerts, Theo. 1983. The comprehension of three complex English structures by Dutch learners. Language Learning 33: 159–182.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Burzio, Luigi. 1986. Italian Syntax. Dordrecht: Reidel.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Callaway, Morgan. 1913. The Infinitive in Anglo-Saxon. Washington DC: Carnegie Institution.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Callies, Marcus. 2008. Easy to understand but difficult to use? Raising constructions and information packaging in the advanced learner variety. In Linking Contrastive and Learner Corpus Research, Gaëtanelle Gilqui, María Belén Diez-Bedmar & Szilvia Papp (eds), 201–226. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Campbell, Alistair. 1959. Old English Grammar. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chomsky, Carol. 1969. The Acquisition of Syntax in Children from 5 to 10. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1981. Lectures on Government and Binding. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cook, Vivian. 1973. The comparison of language development in native children and foreign adults. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 11: 13–28.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Croft, William. 2000. Explaining Language Change. An Evolutionary Approach. London: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cromer, Richard. 1970. Children are nice to understand: Surface structure clues for the recovery of a deep structure. British Journal of Psychology 61: 397–408.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
d’Anglejan, Alison & Tucker, G. Richard. 1975. The acquisition of complex English structures by adult learners. Language Learning 25: 281–296.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Demske-Neumann, Ulrike. 1994. Modales Passiv und Tough Movement. Zur strukturellen Kausalität eines syntaktischen Wandels im Deutschen und Englischen. Tübingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fischer, Olga, van Kemenade, Ans, Koopman, Willem & van der Wurff, Wim. 2000. The Syntax of Early English. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fischer, Olga. 1991. The rise of the passive infinitive in English. In Historical English Syntax, Dieter Kastovsky (ed.), 141–188. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1992. Syntax. In The Cambridge history of the English language, Vol. 2: 1066–1476, Norman Blake (ed.), 207–408. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fukushima, Kazuhiko. 2004. Conspiracy of form and function for optimization of language change. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 13: 181–196.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
van der Gaaf, Willem. 1928a. The post-adjectival passive infinitive. English Studies 10: 129–138.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1928b. The predicative passive infinitive. English Studies 10: 107–114.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
van Gelderen, Elly. 1998. For to in the history of English. American Journal of Germanic Language and Literature 10: 45–72.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Haumann. Dagmar. 2014. On the ascent and decline of the passive tough-infinitive. In ‘Ye Whom the Charms of Grammar Please’: Studies in English Historical Linguistics in Honour of Leiv Egil Breivik, Kari E. Haugland, Kevin McCafferty & Kristian A. Rusten (eds), 167–196. Oxford: Peter Lang.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jaeggli, Osvaldo. 1986. Passive. Linguistic Inquiry 17: 587–622.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Killie, Kristin. 2014. Secondary grammaticalization and the English adverbial -ly suffix. Language Sciences 47: 199–214.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Klingvall, Eva. 2011. On non-copula tough constructions in Swedish. Working Papers in Scandinavian Syntax 88: 131–167. <[URL]> (15 November 2015).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kroch, Anthony. 1989. Reflexes of grammar in patterns of language change. Journal of Language Variation and Change 1: 199–244.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2005. Modeling Language Change and Language Acquisition. Ms. University of Pennsylvania. <[URL]> (15 April 2018).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lightfoot, David. 1999. The Development of Language: Acquisition, Change and Evolution. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2006. How New Languages Emerge. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Los, Bettelou. 1999. Infinitival Complementation in Old and Middle English. The Hague: HAG.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2005. The Rise of the to-Infinitive. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Miller, D. Gary. 2001. Subject and object in Old English and Latin copular deontics. In Grammatical Relations in Change [Studies in Language Companion Series 56], Jan Terje Faarlund (ed.), 224–239. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2002. Nonfinite Structures in Theory and Change. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Narrog, Heiko 2012. Modality, Subjectivity, and Semantic Change. A Cross-Linguistic Perspective. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Newmeyer, Fredrick J. 2002. Optimality and functionality: A critique of functionally based Optimality-theoretic syntax. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 20: 43–80.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pinker, Steven, Lebeaux, David & Frost, Loren. 1987. Productivity and constraints in the acquisition of the passive. Cognition 26: 195–267.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rissanen, Matti. 1999. Syntax. In The Cambridge history of the English language, Vol. 3: 1476–1776, Roger Lass (ed.), 187–331. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Trosborg, Anna. 1982. The acquisition of some complex syntactic structures in L1 and L2 learners (Easy to see, promise, ask/tell). Paper presented at the Conference on First and Second Language Learning: Similarities and Differences (Milan, Italy, November 1–3, 1982). Microfiche. Washington DC: ERIC Clearinghouse.
. 1983. The acquisition of some complex syntactic structures in L1 and L2 learners. Rassegna Italiana da Linguistica Applicata 2: 261–283.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Visser, Fredericus Theodorus. 31984. An Historical Syntax of the English Language. Part III. First half. Leiden: E.J. Brill.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wexler, Ken 2013. Tough-movement developmental delay: Another effect of phrasal computation. In Rich Languages from Poor Inputs, Massimo Piattelli-Palmarini & Robert C. Berwick (eds), 146–167. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
van der Wurff, Wim. 1990. The easy to please construction in Old and Middle English. In Papers from the 5th International Conference on English Historical Linguistics [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 65], Sylvia M. Adamson, Vivien A. Law, Nigel Vincent & Susan Wright (eds), 519–536. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Yip, Virginia. 1995. Interlanguage and Learnability: From Chinese to English [Language Acquisition and Language Disorders 11]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue