In:New Trends in Grammaticalization and Language Change
Edited by Sylvie Hancil, Tine Breban and José Vicente Lozano
[Studies in Language Companion Series 202] 2018
► pp. 291–314
(Inter)subjectification and paradigmaticization
The case study of the final particle but
Published online: 6 December 2018
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.202.12han
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.202.12han
This paper proposes a diachronic analysis of final but in a corpus of Northern English, a dialect where final particles represent a characteristic feature of the grammar. Recently, much emphasis was given to the study of but from a synchronic perpective in American and Australian English. This investigation closes the gap and is pursued in Northern English in the DECTE corpus, extending over a 50 years’ span (1960–2010). The various semantico-pragmatic values are studied diachronically. It is shown that final but undergoes the process of paradigmaticization as it enters into the paradigm of final particles by enriching it with lexical and structural persistence. Besides, the subjective values are evaluated on Traugott and Dasher’s (2002) subjectivity cline.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Previous literature
- 3.Presentation of the data
- 4.Diachronic evolution of semantico-pragmatic meanings in the corpus
- 4.1Textual values
- 4.2Attitudinal values
- 4.3Social value
- 5.Lexical, procedural and structural persistence
- 6.(Inter)subjectification and Traugott’s (2010) subjectivity cline
- 7.Paradigmaticization
- 7.1Word order, grammaticalization and paradigms
- 7.2Final but and paradigmaticization
- 8.Conclusion
Notes References
References (37)
Adamson, Sylvia. 2000. A lovely little example: Word order options and category shift in the premodifying string. In Pathways of Change: Grammaticalization in English [Studies in Language Companion Series 53], Olga Fischer, Anette Rosenbach & Dieter Stein (eds), 39–66. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Beal, Joan & Burbano Elizondo, Lourdes & Llamas, Carmen. 2012. Urban North-Eastern English: Tyneside to Teeside. Edinburgh: EUP.
Breban, Tine. 2006. Grammaticalization and subjectification of the English adjectives of general comparison. In Subjectification: Various Paths to Subjectivity, Angeliki Athanasiadou, Costas Canakis & Bert Cornillie (eds), 241–278. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
. 2008. Grammaticalization, subjectification, and leftward movement of English adjectives of difference in the noun phrase. Folia Linguistica 42(3): 259–305.
. 2009. Structural persistence: A case based on the grammaticalization of English adjectives of difference. English Language and Linguistics 13(1): 77–96.
Diewald, Gabriele. 2011. Pragmaticalization (defined) as grammaticalization of discourse functions. Linguistics 49: 365–390.
Fitzmaurice, Susan. 2004. subjectivity, intersubjectivity and the historical construction of interlocutor stance: From stance markers to discourse markers. Discourse Studies 6: 427–448.
Ford, Cecilia & Thompson, Sandra A. 1996. Interactional units in conversation: Syntactic, intonational, and pragmatic resources for the management of turns. In Interaction Grammar, Elinor Ochs, Emanuel A. Schegloff & Sandra A. Thompson (eds), 14–164. Cambridge: CUP.
Ghesquière, Lobke. 2010. On the subjectification and intersubjectification paths followed by the adjeectives of completeness. In Intersubjectification and Grammaticalization [Topics in English Linguistics 66], Kristin Davidse, Lieven Vandelanotte & Hubert Cuyckens (eds), 277–314. Berlin: De Gruyter.
Ghesquière, Lobke, Brems, Liselotte & Van de Velde Freek,. 2012. Intersubjectivity and intersubjectification: Typology and operationalization. English Text Constructioni 5(1): 128–152.
Hancil, Sylvie. 2014. The final particle but in British English: An instance of cooptation and grammaticalization at work. In Grammaticalization – Theory and Data [Studies in Language Companion Series 162], Sylvie Hancil & Ekkehard König (eds), 235–255. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
. 2015. Grammaticalization of final but: From discourse connective to final particle. In Hancil, Haselow & Post (eds), 157–172.
. 2016. Périphérie droite et macro-grammaire. In Modèles Linguistiques, Isabelle Gaudy-Campbell & Héloïse Parent (eds), 133–154. Paris: Éditions des Dauphins.
Haselow, Alexander. 2013. Arguing for a wide conception of grammar: The case of final particles in spoken discourse. Folia Linguistica 47(2): 375–424.
Heine, Bernd & König, Christa. 2010. On the linear order of ditransitive objects. Language Sciences 32: 87–131.
Heltoft, Lars. 2010. Paradigmatic structure in a usage-based theory of grammaticalisation. In Language Usage and Language Structure, Kasper Boye & Elizabeth Engberg-Pedersen (eds), 145–166. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Himmelmann, Nikolaus P. 2004. Lexicalization and grammaticization: Opposite or orthogonal? In What Makes Grammaticalization? A Look from its Fringes and its Components, Walter Bisang, Nikolaus P. Himmelmann & Björn Wiemer (eds), 21–42. Berlin. Mouton de Gruyter.
Hopper, Paul J. 1991. On some principles of grammaticization. In Approaches to Grammaticalization, Vol. 1: Theoretical and Methodological Issues [Typological Studies in Language 19:1], Traugott, Elizabeth Traugott & Bernd Heine (eds), 17–35. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Izutsu, Mitsuko N. & Katsunobu, Izutsu. 2014. Truncation and backshift: Two pathways to sentence-final coordinating conjunctions. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 15: 1, 62–92.
Mulder, J. & Thompson, S. A.. 2008. The grammaticization of but as a final particle in English conversation. In Laury R. Aspects of Grammaticalization. (Inter)subjectification and Directionality. The multifunctionality of conjunctions, 179–204. Amsterdam, Benjamins.
Mulder, J., Thompson, S.A. & Williams, C. P.. 2009. Final but in Australian English conversation. In Peters, P., Collins, P. & Smith, A. (eds.), Comparative Studies in Australian and New Zealand English, 339–359. Amsterdam. Benjamins.
Narrog, Heike. 2016. Three types of subjectivity, three types of intersubjectivity, their dynamicization and a synthesis. In Aspects of Grammaticalization. (Inter)subjectification and Directionality, Hubert Cuyckens, Lobke Ghesquière & Dan Olmen (eds), 19–46. Berlin: De Gruyter.
Nørgård-Sørensen, Jens & Heltoft, Lars. 2015. Grammaticalization as paradigmatisation. In New Directions in Grammaticalization Research [Studies in Language Companion Series 166], Andrew D. M. Smith, Graeme Trousdale & Richard Waltereit (eds), 261–292. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Nørgård-Sørensen, Jens, Helthoft, Lars & Schøsler, Lene. 2011. Connecting Grammaticalization [Studies in Functional and Structural Linguistics 65]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Ochs, Elinor, Schegloff, Emanuel A. & Thompson, Gail (eds). 1996. Interaction and Grammar. Cambridge: CUP.
Pomerantz, Anita. 1984. Agreeing and disagreeing with assessments: Some features found in preferred/dispreferred turn shapes. In Structures of Social Action, J. Maxwell Atkinson & John Heritage (eds), 232–254. Cambridge: CUP.
Sacks, Harvey, Schegloff, Emanuel A. & Jefferson, Gail. 1974. A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language 50: 696–735.
Schegloff, Emanuel A. 1996. Turn organization: One intersection of grammar and interaction. In Ochs, Schegloff & Thompson (eds), 52–133.
Schegloff, Emanuel A., Jefferson, Gail & Harvey Sacks 1977. The preference for self-correction in the organization of repair in conversation. Language 53(2): 361–382.
Sun, Chaofen & Traugott, Elizabeth. 2011. Grammaticalization and word order change. In The Oxford Handbook of Grammaticalization, Heike Narrog & Bernd Heine (eds), 378–388. Oxford: OUP.
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs. 2003. Constructions in grammaticalization. In The Handbook of Historical Linguistics, Brian Joseph & Richard Janda (eds), 624–647.Oxford: Blackwell.
Cited by (1)
Cited by one other publication
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 3 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
