Cover not available

In:New Trends in Grammaticalization and Language Change
Edited by Sylvie Hancil, Tine Breban and José Vicente Lozano
[Studies in Language Companion Series 202] 2018
► pp. 185–206

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
authorization required

From time to surprise

The case of será posible in Spanish

 | University of Alicante
Published online: 6 December 2018
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.202.08ros
This paper focuses on the meaning and behavior of será posible in Spanish. The structure may have two interpretations: a compositional one (será posible 1 ), which describes a situation that can hold in the future; and a less transparent one (será posible 2 ), related to a negative assessment. The analysis of the different structures invoked by será posible proves that será posible 2 is no longer interpreted as a copula in future plus and adjective, but has been reanalyzed as a mirative marker. Despite its fixed behavior, the mirative value seems to be motivated by the deictic nature of the future. The paper introduces a wide definition of this verb form, based on the deictic instruction of ‘distance forward’. Productive, mirative interpretations of the future are analyzed from this perspective and confronted with the mirative será posible. More generally, this paper shows that if a wide definition of grammar is assumed, será posible 2 can be considered a case of grammaticalization.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.How to deal with the future
  • 3.The mirative future
  • 4.Analysis: Será posible in contemporary Spanish
  • 5.Conclusions
  • Notes
  • References
References (92)
References
Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. 2004. Evidentiality. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2012. The essence of mirativity. Linguistic Typology 16: 435–485.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Akatsuka, Noriko. 1985. Conditionals and the epistemic scale. Language 61(3): 625–639.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Aksu-Koç, Ayhan & Slobin, Dan. 1986. A psychological account of the development and use of evidentials in Turkish. In Evidentiality: The Linguistic Coding of Epistemology, Wallace Chafe & Johanna Nichols (eds), 159–167. Norwood NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Alarcos, Emillio. 1994. Gramática de la lengua española. Madrid: Espasa-Calpe.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Alonso, Ángel. 1999. Las construcciones exclamativas. In Bosque & Demonte (eds), 3993–4050.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Azorín, Maria Dolores. 2002. ALCORE. Alicante Corpus del Español. Alicante: Universidad de AlicanteGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bello, Andrés. [1847]1970. Gramática de la lengua castellana destinada al uso de los americanos. Buenos Aires: Sopena.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bertinetto, Pier Marco. 1979. Alcune ipotesi sul nostro futuro (con osservazioni su potere e dovere). Rivista di Grammatica Generativa 4 (1–2): 77–138.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bosque, Ignacio. 2017. Spanish exclamatives in perspective: A survey of properties, classes, and current theoretical issues. In Advances in the Analysis of Spanish Exclamatives, Ignacio Bosque (ed.), 1–52. Columbus OH: The Ohio State University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bosque, Ignacio & Demonte, Violeta (eds). 1999. Gramática descriptiva de la lengua española. Madrid: Espasa-Calpe.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brisard, Frank. 1997. The English tense-system as an epistemic category: The case of futurity. In Lexical and Syntactical Constructions and the Construction of Meaning [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 150], Marjolijn Verspoor, Kee Dong Lee & Eve Sweetser (eds), 271–285. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bybee, Joan, Perkins, Revere Dale & Pagliuca, William. 1994. The Evolution of Grammar. Tense, Aspect, and Modality in the Languages of the World. Chicago IL: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Castroviejo, Elena. 2008. Deconstructing exclamations. Catalan Journal of Linguistics 7: 41–90.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2010. An expressive answer. Some considerations on the semantics and pragmatics of wh- exclamatives. Proceedings from the Annual Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society <[URL]>.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chafe, Wallace. 1976. Givenness, contrastiveness, definiteness, subjects, topics, and point of view. In Subject and Topic, Charles N. Li (ed.), 25–55. New York NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1994. Discourse, Consciousness, and Time. The Flow and Displacement of Conscious Experience in Speaking and Writing. Chicago IL: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Clark, Herbert H. 1977. Bridging. In Thinking: Readings in Cognitive Science, Philip N. Johnson-Laird & Peter Cathcart Wason (eds), 411–420. London: CUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1996. Using Language. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Comrie, Bernard. 1985. Tense. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dahl, Östen. 1985. Tense and Aspect Systems. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
De Brabanter, Phillipe, Kissine, Mikhail & Sharifzadeh, Saghie. 2014. Future tense vs. future time: An introduction. In Future Times, Future tenses, Phillipe De Brabanter, Mikhail Kissine & Saghie Sharifzadeh (eds), 1–25. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
De Saussure, Louis. 2013. Perspectival interpretations of tenses. In Time. Language, Cognition and Reality, Kasia Jaszczolt & Louis de Saussure (eds), 46–72. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
De Saussure, Louis & Morency, Paul. 2012. A cognitive-pragmatic view of the French epistemic future. Journal of French Language Studies 22: 207–223.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
DeLancey, Scott. 1997. Mirativity: The grammatical marking of unexpected information. Linguistic Typology 1(1): 33–52.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2001. The mirative and evidentiality. Journal of Pragmatics 33: 369–382.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Diewald, Gabriele. 2002. A model for relevant types of contexts in grammaticalization. In New Reflections on Grammaticalization [Typological Studies in Language 49], Ilse Wischer & Gabriele Diewald (eds), 103–120. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dik, Simon. 1997. The Theory of Functional Grammar. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dryer, Matthew. 1996. Forms, pragmatic presupposition, and activated propositions. Journal of Pragmatics 26: 475–523.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Escandell, Maria Victoria. 1999. Los enunciados interrogativos. Aspectos semánticos y pragmáticos. In Bosque & Demonte (eds), 3929–3991.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2010. Futuro y evidencialidad. Anuario de Lingüística Hispánica 26: 9–34.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2014. Evidential futures: The case of Spanish. In Future Times, Future Tenses, Phillipe De Brabanter, Mikhail Kissine & Saghie Sharifzadeh (eds), 219–246. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Evans, Vyvyan. 2003. The Structure of Time. Language, Meaning and Temporal Cognition [Human Cognitive Processing 12]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fernández Leborans, Maria Jesús. 1999. La predicación. Las oraciones copulativas. In Bosque & Demonte (eds), 2357–2461.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fleischman, Suzanne. 1989. Temporal distance: A basic linguistic metaphor. Studies in Language 13(1): 1–50.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Giannakidou, Anastasia & Mari, Alda. 2012. The future of Greek and Italian: An epistemic analysis. Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung 17: 255–270. <[URL]>Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ginzburg, Jonathan. 2015. The Interactive Stance. Meaning for Conversation. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
González Calvo, José Manuel. 1997. Estructuras exclamativas en español. In IV Jornadas de Metodología y Didáctica de la Lengua Española: Sintaxis, José Manuel González Calvo & Jesús Terrón González (eds), 143–177. Cáceres: Universidad de Extremadura.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gutiérrez Ordóñez, Salvador. 1997. Temas, remas, focos, tópicos y comentarios. Madrid: Arco Libros.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Heim, Irene. 1983. On the projection problem for presuppositions. WCCFL 2: 114–125.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Heine, Bernd. 2002. On the role of context in grammaticalization. In New Reflections on Grammaticalization [Typological Studies in Language 49], Ilse Wischer & Gabriele Diewald (eds), 83–101. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Heine, Bernd, Kaltenböck, Gunther, Kuteva, Tania & Long, Haiping. 2013. An outline of discourse grammar. In Reflections on Functionalism in Linguistics, Shannon Bishoff & Carmen Jeny (eds), 155–206. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hengeveld, Kees & Olbertz, Hella. 2012. Didn’t you know? Mirativity does exist! Linguistic Typology 16(3): 487–503.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hernanz, Maria Llouisa. 2012. Sobre la periferia izquierda y el movimiento: El complementante si en español. In El movimiento de constituyentes, José M. Brucart & Ángel Gallego (eds), 151–171. Madrid: Visor.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hill, Nathan. 2012. Mirativity does not exist: ḥdug in “Lhasa” Tibetan and other suspects. Linguistic Typology 16 (13): 389–434.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hopper, Paul. 1991. On some principles of grammaticization. In Approaches to Grammaticalization, Vol. 1: Theoretical and Methodological Issues [Typological Studies in Language 19:1], Paul Hopper & Elizabeth Closs Traugott (eds), 17–35. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Iglesias Recuero, Silvia. 2000. Propiedades interpretativas y discursivas de la estructura ¡(Si) será bobo! In Cien años de investigación semántica: De Michel Bréal a la actualidad, Marcos Martínez Hernández et al.. (eds), 529–542. Madrid: Ediciones Clásicas.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jaszczolt, Kasia. 2009. Representing Time: An Essay on Temporality as Modality. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kaltenböck, Gunther, Heine, Bernd & Kuteva, Tania. 2011. On thetical grammar. Studies in Language 35(4): 852–897.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lambrecht, Knud. 1994. Information Structure and Sentence Form. Topic, Focus and the Mental Representations of Discourse Referents. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Langacker, Ronald W. 1991. Foundations of Cognitive Grammar, Vol 2. Stanford CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2011. The English present: Temporal coincidence vs. epistemic immediacy. In Cognitive Approaches to Tense, Aspect and Epistemic Modality [Human Cognitive Processing 29], Adeline Patard & Frank Brisard (eds), 45–86. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lazard, Gilbert. 1999. Mirativity, evidentiality, mediativity, or other. Linguistic Typology 3: 91–109.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lewis, David. 1979. Scorekeeping in a language game. Journal of Philosophical Logic 8: 339–359.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lunn, Patricia. 1989. Spanish mood and the prototype of assertability. Linguistics 27: 687–702.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Martines, Josep. 2017. L’émergence des futurs épistémiques romans. L’exemple du catalan médiéval du XIIIème siècle. In Le futur dans les langues romanes, Laura Baranzini (ed.). Berne: Peter Lang.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Michaelis, Laura. 2001. Exclamative constructions. In Language Typology and Language Universal: An International Handbook, Martin Haspelmath (ed.), 1038–1050. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nuyts, Jan. 2001. Subjectivity as an evidential dimension in epistemic modal expressions. Journal of Pragmatics 33: 383–400.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2012. Notions of (inter)subjectivity. English Text Construction 5(1): 53–76.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pérez Saldanya, Manuel. 2002. Les relacions temporals i aspectuals. In Gramàtica del català contemporani, Joan Solà, Maria Rosa Lloret, Joan Mascaró & Manuel Pérez Saldanya (eds), 2567–2662. Barcelona: Empúries.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Peterson, Tyler. 2013. Rethinking mirativity: The expression and implication of surprise. Ms, University of Toronto. <[URL]>Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Portolés, José. 1993. Atributos con un enfático. Revue Romane 28(2): 218–236.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Potts, Christopher. 2007. Into the Conventional-Implicature dimension. Philosophy Compass 4(2): 665–679.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Prince, Ellen. 1992. The ZPG letter: Subjects, definiteness, and information status. In Discourse Description: Discourse Analyses of a Fundraising Text [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 16], William C. Mann & Sandra A. Thompson (eds), 295–325. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Real Academia Española [RAE]. 2009. Nueva gramática de la lengua española. Madrid: Espasa-Calpe.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. Banco de datos (CREA). Corpus de Referencia del Español Actual. <[URL]>
. Banco de datos (CORPES XXI. Corpus del Español del siglo XXI. <[URL]>
Rett, Jessica. 2012. Expressing exceeded expectations in exclamatives and other constructions. Second Cornell Workshop in Linguistics and Philosophy.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rivero, Maria Luisa. 2014. Spanish inferential and mirative futures and conditionals: An evidential gradable modal proposal. Lingua 151: 197–215.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rodríguez Rosique, Susana. 2011. Valores epistémicos de las categorías verbales. Cuando la pragmática se integra en la gramática. Verba. Anuario Galego de Filoloxia 38: 243–269.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2015a. Distance, evidentiality and counter-argumentation: Concessive future in Spanish. Journal of Pragmatics 85: 181–199 Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2015b. Spanish future in evaluative contexts. E-Humanista/IVITRA 8: 500–516.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2017. The future of necessity in Spanish: Modality, evidentiality and deictic projection at the crossroads. In Evidentiality and Modality in European Languages: Discourse-pragmatic Perspectives, Juana I. Marín-Arrese, Julia Lavid, Marta Carretero, Elena Domínguez Romero, Maria Victoria Martín de la Rosa & Maria Pérez Blanco (eds), 57–86. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2018. Tenses in interaction: Beyond evidentiality. In Perspectives on Evidentiality in Spanish: Evidentiality and Genre [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 290], Adrián Cabedo Nebot & Carolina Figueres Bates (eds). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rojo, Guillermo & Veiga, Alexandre 1999. El tiempo verbal. Los tiempos simples. In Bosque & Demonte (eds), 2867–2934.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sánchez López, Cristina. 2015. Dos tipos de oraciones exclamativas totales en español. In Studium grammaticae. Homenaje al profesor José A. Martínez, Alfredo I. Álvarez, Ramón de Andrés, Álvaro Arias, Félix Fernández de Castro, Teresa Fernández, Serafuba García, Hortensia Martínez, Antonio J. Meilán, Ana I. Ojea, Javier San Julián & Juan Carlos Villaverde (eds), 711–730. Oviedo: Universidad de Oviedo.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar<[URL]> (30 April 2018).
Schwenter, Scott. 1999. Pragmatics of Conditional Marking. New York NY: Garland.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Smirnova, Elena. 2015. Constructionalization and constructional changes. The role of context in the development of constructions. In Diachronic Construction Grammar [Constructional Approaches to Language 18], Jóhanna Barðdal, Elena Smirnova, Lotte Sommerer & Spike Gildea (eds), 81–106. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Squartini, Mario. 2008. Lexical vs. grammatical evidentiality in French and Italian. Linguistics 46(5): 917–947.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2012. Evidentiality in interaction: The concessive use of the Italian future between grammar and discourse. Journal of Pragmatics 44: 2116–2128.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stalnaker, Robert C. 1978. Assertion. In Syntax and Semantics, 9: Pragmatics, Peter Cole (ed.), 315–332. New York NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sthioul, Bertrand. 1998. Temps verbaux et point de vue. In Le temps des événements, Jacques Moeschler (ed.), 197–220. París: Kimé.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Suñer, Avelina. 1999. La aposición y otras relaciones de predicación en el sintagma nominal. In Bosque & Demonte (eds), 523–564. Madrid: Espasa-Calpe.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sweetser, Eve. 1990. From Etymology to Pragmatics: Metaphorical and Cultural Aspects of Semantic Structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs. 1989. On the rise of epistemic meanings in English: An example of subjectification in semantic change. Language 65(1): 31–55.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2010. (Inter)subjectivity and (inter)subjectification: A reassessment. In Subjectification, Intersubjectification and Grammaticalization, Kristin Davidse, Lieven Vandelanotte & Hubert Cuyckens (eds), 29–71. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs & Dasher, Richard B. 2002. Regularity in Semantic Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs & Trousdale, Graeme. 2013. Constructionalization and Constructional Changes. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Weinrich, Herald. [1964]1974. Estructura y función de los tiempos en el lenguaje. Madrid: Gredos.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Rodríguez Rosique, Susana
2023. Time after time. In Verb and Context [IVITRA Research in Linguistics and Literature, 34], ► pp. 263 ff. DOI logo
Rodríguez Rosique, Susana
2024. What is a morphological future doing in a si-clause? Traces of mirativity in Spanish. Lingua 304 ► pp. 103710 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 3 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue