Cover not available

In:New Trends in Grammaticalization and Language Change
Edited by Sylvie Hancil, Tine Breban and José Vicente Lozano
[Studies in Language Companion Series 202] 2018
► pp. 135–157

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
authorization required

Grammaticalizing connectives in English and discourse information structure

 | Aix Marseille University | Laboratoire Parole et Langage
Published online: 6 December 2018
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.202.06lew
The development of lexical expressions such as VP adverbs, matrix clauses and prepositional phrases into discourse markers and connectives expressing coherence relations has been well explored in the grammaticalization literature, under a broad view of grammaticalization, but there has been less emphasis on how the discourse information structuring functions of markers evolve during these developments. This paper investigates the relationship between discourse coherence marking and information structure by examining two developing discourse connectives: it suggests that the grammaticalization of a lexeme in its construction into a discourse marker may involve acquiring or strengthening discourse-level information structuring functions – indicating relative informational salience – and that (further) grammaticalization of markers may be at least partly directed by information structure.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Discourse connectives
    • 2.1Grammaticalization and discourse connectives
    • 2.2Positions of discourse connectives
    • 2.3Coherence relations and information structure
  • 3.Grammaticalizing discourse connectives and position
    • 3.1Two recent Engish connectives
    • 3.2In fact
      • 3.2.1Evolution of ‘in fact’
      • 3.1.2Position of in fact
    • 3.3After all
      • 3.3.1Evolution of after all
      • 3.3.2Position of ‘after all’
    • 3.4Findings for ‘in fact’ and ‘after all’
  • 4.Grammaticalization and information structure beyond the sentence
  • 5.Conclusion
  • Notes
  • Appendix
  • References
References (49)
References
Aijmer, Karin. 1997. ‘I think’ – An English modal particle. In Modality in Germanic Languages. Historical and Comparative Perspectives, Toril Swan & Olaf Jansen Westvik (eds), 1– 47. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2002. English Discourse Particles: Evidence from a Corpus [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 10]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2016. Pragmatic markers as constructions. The case of anyway . In Outside the Clause: Form and Function of Extra-Clausal Constituents [Studies in Language Companion Series 178], Gunther Kaltenböck, Evelien Kreizer & Arne Lohmann (eds), 29–58. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Barth-Weingarten, Dagmar & Couper-Kuhlen, Elisabeth. 2002. On the development of final ‘though’: A case of grammaticalization? In New Reflections on Grammaticalization [Typological Studies in Language 49], Ilse Wischer & Gabriele Diewald (eds), 345–361. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Beeching, Kate & Detges, Ulrich. 2014. Introduction. In Discourse Functions at the Left and Right Periphery, Kate Beeching & Ulrich Detges (eds), 1–23. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas, Johansson, Stig, Leech, Geoffrey, Conrad, Susan & Finegan, Edward. 1999. The Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Blakemore, Diane. 1996. Are apposition markers discourse markers? Journal of Linguistics 32(2): 325–347.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brinton, Laurel J. & Traugott, Elizabeth Closs. 2005. Lexicalization and Language Change. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bybee, Joan L. 1985. Morphology. A Study of the Relation between Meaning and Form [Typological Studies in Language 9]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Carlson, Lynn & Marcu, Daniel. 2001. Discourse Tagging Reference Manual. ISI Tech Report ISI-TR-545, July 2001. [URL]Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Diessel, Holger. 2005. Competing motivations for the ordering of main and adverbial clauses. Linguistics 43(3): 449–470.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dowty, David. 2003. The dual analysis of adjuncts/complements in Categorial Grammar. In Modifying Adjuncts, Ewald Lang, Claudia Maienborn & Cathrine Fabricius-Hansen (eds), 33–66. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Erman, Britt & Kotsinas, Ulla-Britt. 1993. Pragmaticalization: The case of ba’ and you know . Studier i Modern Språkvetenskap 10: 76–93.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fischer, Olga. 2007. Morphosytactic Change. Functional and Formal Perspectives. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gentens, Caroline, Kimps, Ditte, Davidse, Kristin, Jacobs, Gilles, Van linden, An & Brems, Lieselotte. 2016. Mirativity and rhetorical structure. The development and prosody of disjunct and anaphoric adverbials with no wonder . In Outside the Clause: Form and Function of Extra-Clausal Constituents [Studies in Language Companion Series 178], Gunther Kaltenböck, Evelien Keizer & Arne Lohmann (eds), 125–156. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hancil, Sylvie. 2014. The final particle ‘but’ in British English. In Grammaticalization – Theory and Data [Studies in Language Companion Series 162], Sylvie Hancil & Ekkehard König (eds), 235–256. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hancil, Sylvie, Haselow, Alexander & Post, Margje (eds). 2015. Final Particles. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hankamer, Jorge. 1977. Multiple analyses. In Mechanisms of Syntactic Change, Charles N. Li (ed.), 583–607. Austin TX: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Harris, Alice C. & Campbell, Lyle. 1995. Historical Syntax in Cross-Linguistic Perspective. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Haselow, Alexander. 2012. Discourse organization and the rise of final then in the history of English. In English Historical Linguistics 2010 [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 325], Irén Hegedüs & Alexandra Fodor (eds), 153–175. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2013. Arguing for a wide conception of grammar. The case of final particles in spoken discourse. Folia Linguistica 47(2): 375–424.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2015. Left vs. right periphery in grammaticalization. The case of anyway . In New Directions in Grammaticalization Research [Studies in Language Companion Series 166], Andrew D. M. Smith, Graeme Trousdale & Richard Waltereit (eds), 157–186. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Heine, Bernd. 2013. On discourse markers: Grammaticalization, pragmaticalization, or something else? Linguistics 51(6): 1205–1247.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Heine, Bernd, Kaltenböck, Gunther & Kuteva, Tania. 2015. Some observations on the evolution of final particles. In Final Particles, Sylvie Hancil, Alexander Haselow & Margje Post (eds), 111–140. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hopper, Paul J. & Traugott, Elizabeth Closs. 2003. Grammaticalization, 2nd edn. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Huddleston, Rodney & Pullum, Geoffrey K. 2002. The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Izutsu, Katsunobu & Izutsu, Mitsuko Narita. 2013. From discourse markers to modal/final particles. What the position reveals about the continuum. In Discourse Markers and Modal Particles: Categorization and Description [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 234], Liesbeth Degand, Bert Cornillie & Paola Pietrandrea (eds), 217–235. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kim, Min-Jo & Jahnke, Nathan. 2011. The meaning of utterance-final even . Journal of English Linguistics 39(1): 36–64.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lehmann, Christian. 2002. New reflections on grammaticalization and lexicalization. In New Reflections on Grammaticalization [Typological Studies in Language 49], Ilse Wischer & Gabriele Diewald (eds), 1–18. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2008. Information structure and grammaticalization. In Theoretical and Empirical Issues in Grammaticalization [Typological Studies in Language 77], Elena Seoane & Marie-José López Couso (eds), 207–229. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lenker, Ursula. 2010. Argument and Rhetoric. Adverbial Connectors in the History of English. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lewis, Diana M. 1998. From modal adverbial to discourse connective: Some rhetorical effects in present-day English. In Pragmatics in 1998: Selected Papers from the 6th International Pragmatics Conference, Vol. 2, Jef Verschueren (ed.), 363–375. Antwerp: International Pragmatics Association.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2007. From temporal to contrastive and causal: The emergence of connective after all . In Connectives as Discourse Landmarks [Benjamins Current Topics 92], Agnès Celle & Ruth Huart (eds), 89–99. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2011. A discourse-constructional approach to the emergence of discourse connectives in English. Linguistics 49(2): 415–443.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mann, William C. & Thompson, Sandra A. 1987. Rhetorical Structure Theory: A Theory of Text Organization [ISI Report RS-87–190]. Marina del Rey, CA: Information Sciences Institute, University of Southern California.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mithun, Marianne. 2005. On the assumption of the sentence as the basic unit of syntactic structure. In Linguistic Diversity and Language Theories [Studies in Language Companion Series 72], Zygmunt Frajzyngier, Adam Hodges & David S. Rood (eds), 169–184. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2016. Discourse and grammar. In Handbook of Discourse Analysis, 2nd edn, Heidi Hamilton, Deborah Schiffrin & Deborah Tannen (eds), 9–41. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mulder, Jean & Thompson, Sandra A. 2008. The grammaticalization of but as a final particle in English conversation. In Crosslinguistic Studies of Clause Combining: The Multifunctionality of Conjunctions [Typological Studies in Language 80], Ritva Laury (ed.), 179–204. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Polanyi, Livia, van den Berg, Martin & Ahn, David. 2003. Discourse structure and sentential information structure: An initial proposal. Journal of Logic, Language and Information 12(3): 337–350.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schweinberger, Martin. 2015. Comparing ‘like’ in Irish and British Englishes. In Pragmatic Markers in Irish English [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 258], Carolina P. Amador Moreno, Kevin McCafferty & Elaine Vaughan (eds), 114–134. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schwenter, Scott & Traugott, Elizabeth Closs. 2000. Invoking scalarity. The development of in fact . Journal of Historical Pragmatics 1(1): 7–25.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stede, Manfred. 2008. Disambiguating rhetorical structure. Research on Language and Computation 6: 311–332.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs. 1995. The role of the development of discourse markers in a theory of grammaticalization. Paper presented at the 12th International Conference on Historical Linguistics, University of Manchester, August 1995.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1997. The discourse connective after all: A historical pragmatic account. Paper presented at the Sixteenth International Congress of Linguists, Paris, July 1997.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2012. Intersubjectification and clause periphery. English Text Construction 5(1): 7–28.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2013. ‘I must wait on myself, must I?’ at right periphery of the clause in English. Talk given at Lund University, 4 September 2013.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2014. On the function of the epistemic adverbs ‘surely’ and ‘no doubt’ at the left and right peripheries of the clause. In Discourse Functions at the Left and Right Periphery, Kate Beeching & Ulrich Detges (eds), 72–91. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2015. Investigating ‘periphery’ from a functionalist perspective. Linguistics Vanguard 1(1): 119–130.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2016. On the rise of types of clause-final pragmatic markers in English. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 17(1): 26–54.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Gast, Volker
2022. The German modal particle ja and selected English lexical correlates in the Europarl corpus. In Particles in German, English and Beyond [Studies in Language Companion Series, 224], ► pp. 117 ff. DOI logo
Ruskan, Anna & Marta Carretero
2021. A cross-linguistic look at the right periphery. In Pragmatic Markers and Peripheries [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 325], ► pp. 415 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 3 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue