In:New Trends in Grammaticalization and Language Change
Edited by Sylvie Hancil, Tine Breban and José Vicente Lozano
[Studies in Language Companion Series 202] 2018
► pp. 105–134
Central Southern Guangxi as a grammaticalization area
Published online: 6 December 2018
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.202.05hua
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.202.05hua
This paper investigates contact-induced grammatical changes that are observed among the Zhuang Tai-Kadai and Sinitic languages in the Central Southern Guangxi Region. Following recent advances in the theoretical analysis of grammaticalization, this paper describes four uncommon grammaticalization processes that represent diffusion from Zhuang into several Sinitic languages. On this basis, we argue that the Central Southern Guangxi Region constitutes a micro-grammaticalization area.
Keywords: Zhuang, Sinitic, language contact, grammaticalization
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.The ecological context and language diversity
- 2.1Geography and history
- 2.2Language profiles
- 3.Polyfunctionality and versatility
- 3.1Polyfunctional ‘finish’
- a.Universal quantifier
- b.Superlative
- c.Perfect/perfective aspect marker
- d.Conjunction
- 3.2Polyfunctional ‘go’
- a.Imperative marker
- b.Emphatic particle
- 3.3Polyfunctional ‘give’
- a.Benefactive marker
- b.Malefactive marker
- c.Cause marker
- 3.4Polyfunctional ‘take’
- 3.5Interim summary
- 3.1Polyfunctional ‘finish’
- 4.Borrowed grammaticalization
- 5.Conclusion
- Abbreviations
- Other symbols
Notes References
References (65)
Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. & Dixon, Robert M. W. 2001. Introduction. In Areal Diffusion and Genetic Inheritance: Problems in Comparative Linguistics, Alexandra Y. Aikenvald & Robert M. W. Dixon (eds), 1–26. Oxford: OUP.
Ansaldo, Umberto. 1999. Comparative Constructions in Sinitic: Areal Typology and Patterns of Grammaticalization. PhD dissertation, Stockholm University.
Bisang, Walter. 1996. Areal typology and grammaticalization: Processes of grammaticalization based on nouns and verbs in East and Mainland Southeast Asian languages. Studies in Language 20(3): 519–597.
Bisang, Walter & Chappell, Hilary. 2008. Problems with areality-The case of East and Southeast Asian languages. Paper presented at the ESF-OMLL Workshop of ‘New Directions in Historical Linguistics’, Lyon, France.
Boas, Franz. 1920. The classification of American languages. American Anthropologist 22(4): 367–376.
Bybee, Joan L. & Dahl, Östen. 1989. The creation of tense and aspect systems in the languages of the world. Studies in Languages 13(1): 51–103.
Bybee, Joan L., Perkins, Revere Dale & Pagliuca, William. 1994. The Evolution of Grammar: Tense, Aspect, and Modality in the Languages of the World. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.
Campbell, Lyle. 1985. Areal linguistics and its implications for historical linguistics. In Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference of Historical Linguistics [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 34], Jacek Fisiak (ed.), 25–56. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Cao, Guangshun. 1995. jìn dài hàn yǔ zhù cí 《近代汉语助词》 (Auxiliaries in the Contemporary Chinese). Beijing: Language and Culture Press.
Chappell, Hilary & Lan, Li. 2016. Mandarin and other Sinitic languages. In The Routledge Encyclopedia of the Chinese Language, Sin-Wai Chan with James Minett & Florence Li Wing Yee (eds), 605–628. London: Routledge.
Cheung, Samuel Hung-nin. 1977. Perfect particles in the bian wen language. Journal of Chinese Linguistics 5(1): 55–74.
Clark, Maybeth. 1989. Hmong and Areal South-East Asia. In Papers in South-East Asian Languages No. 11: South-East Asian Syntax [Pacific Linguistics A77], David Bradley (ed.), 175–230. Canberra: Australian National University.
Comrie, Bernard. 2007. Areal typology of Mainland Southeast Asia: What we learn from the WALS maps. Manusya Special Issue 13: 18–47.
Dahl, Östen & Velupillai, Viveka. 2005. Perfective/imperfective aspect. In World Atlas of Language Structures, Bernard Comrie, Matthew Dryer, David Gil & Martin Haspelmath (eds), 267–275. Oxford: OUP.
Deng, Yurong. 2008. guǎng xī zhuàng zú zì zhì qū gè mín zú yǔ yán jiān de xiàng hù yǐng xiǎng 广西壮族自治区各民族语言间的相互影响(Mutual Influence between Chinese Dialects and Minority Languages in Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region). fāng yán《方言》3: 204–215.
Diller, Anthony. 2001. Grammaticalization and Tai syntactic change. In Essays in Tai Linguistics, M. R. Kalaya Tingsabadh & Arthur S. Abramson (eds), 139–176. Bangkok: Chulalongkorn University Press.
Enfield, Nicholas J. 2005. Areal linguistics and Mainland Southeast Asia. Annual Review of Anthropology 34: 181–206.
Gan, Rui-Jing, Pan, Shang-Ling, Mustavich, Laura F., Qin, Zhen-Dong, Cai, Xiao-Yun, Qian, Ji, Liu, Cheng-Wu, Peng, Jun-Hua, Li, Shi-lin, Xu, Jie-Shun, Jin, Li & Li, Hui. 2008. Pinghua population as an exception of Han Chinese’s coherent genetic structure. Journal of Human Genetics 53: 303–313.
Heath, Jeffrey. 1978. Linguistic Diffusion in Arnhem Land. Canberra: Australian Institute of Aboriginal Studies.
. 2003. On contact-induced grammaticalization. Studies in Language 27(3): 529–572.
Heine, Bernd. 2011. Areas of grammaticalization and geographical typology. In Geographical Typology and Linguistic Areas, with Special Reference to Africa, [Tokyo University of Foreign Studies 2], Osamu Hieda, Christa König & Hirosi Nakagawa (eds), 42–66. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
. 2010. Contact and grammaticalization. In The Handbook of Language Contact, Raymond Hickey (ed.), 86–105. Oxford: Blackwell.
Hong, Bo. 2004. zhuàng yǔ yǔ hàn yǔ de jiē chù shǐ jí jiē chù lèi xíng 壮语与汉语的接触史及接触类型 (The history and characteristic of the language contact between Zhuang and Chinese). In lè zài qí zhōng –wáng shì yuán jiāo shòu qī shí huá dàn qìng zhù wén jí 《乐在其中 –王士元教授七十华诞庆祝文集》 (The Joy of Research: A Festschrift in Honor of Prof. William S-Y. Wang’s 70th Birthday), Feng Shi & Zhongwei Shen (eds), 104–120. Tianjin: Nankai University Press.
Huang, Borong. 1996. hàn yǔ fāng yán yǔ fǎ lèi biān 《汉语方言语法类编》(A Grammatical Compilation of Chinese Dialects). Qingdao: Qingdao Press.
Huang, Yang & Kwok, Bit-Chee. 2013. fāng shì zhù cí zài guǎng xī hàn yǔ fāng yán hé zhuàng dòng yǔ zhōng de kuò sàn: yuán tóu, guò chéng jí qǐ shì 方式助词在广西汉语方言和壮侗语中的扩散:源头、过程及启示 (Diffusions of the manner particles in Chinese dialects and Tai-Kadai languages of Guangxi: Their origins, processes and implications). In dà jiāng dōng qù: wáng shì yuán jiāo shòu bā shí suì hè shòu lùn wén jí 《大江东去:王士元教授八十岁贺寿论文集》 (Eastward Flows the Great River: Festschrift in Honor of Professor William S-Y. WANG on this 80th Birthday), Gang Peng & Feng Shi (eds), 521–540. Hong Kong: City University of Hong Kong Press.
. 2014. zhuàng yǔ fāng yán ‘wán bì’ dòng cí de duō xiàng yǔ fǎ huà mó shì 壮语方言“完毕”动词的多向语法化模式 (Polygrammaticalization of the ‘finish’ verbs in the Zhuang language). mín zú yǔ wén 《民族语文》 1: 21–32.
Huang, Yang. 2014. Synchronic Variation, Grammaticalization and Language Contact: The Development of the finish Morphemes in the Yue-Chinese and the Zhuang Languages in the Guangxi Region. PhD dissertation, City University of Hong Kong.
. 2016. nán níng yuè yǔ de zhù cí ‘shài’ 南宁粤语的助词晒(Rethinking of the auxiliary ‘ɬai’ 晒 in Yue dialect in Nanning, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region). fāng yán 《方言》4: 410–419.
Huffman, Franklin E. 1973. Thai and Cambodian: A case of syntactic borrowing? Journal of the American Oriental Society 93(4): 488–509.
Kwok, Bit-Chee. 2010. yǔ yán jiē chù zhōng de yǔ fǎ biàn huà: nán níng yuè yǔ ‘shù yǔ + bīn yǔ + bǔ yǔ’ jié gòu de lái yuán 语言接触中的语法变化: 南宁粤语“述语+宾语+补语”结构的来源 (Grammatical change in language contact: On the origin of the ‘verb + object + complement’ construction in Nanning Yue).
Journal of Chinese Linguistics Monograph 24: 201–216.
. 2014. nán níng dì qū yǔ yán ‘qù’ yì yǔ sù de yǔ fǎ huà yǔ jiē chù yǐn fā de ‘fù zhì’ 南宁地区语言“去”义语素的语法化与接触引发的“复制” (The morpheme GO in three languages of the Nanning region: Paths of grammaticalization and contact-induced ‘replication’). Language and Linguistics 5: 663–697.
Lan, Qingyuan. 2005. zhuàng hàn tóng yuán cí jiè cí yán jiū 《壮汉同源词借词研究》 (A Study on the Cognates and Loanwords between Zhuang and Han). Beijing: The Minzu University Press of China.
Li, Fang-Kuei. 1940. lóng zhōu tǔ yǔ 《龙州土语》 (The Tai Dialects of Lungchow) [Academia Sinitica]. Shanghai: The Commercial Press.
Li, Lianjin. 2000. píng huà yīn yùn yán jiū 《平话音韵研究》 (A Phonological Study of Pinghua). Nanning: Guangxi People’s Publishing House.
Li, Jinfang. 2002. dòng tái yǔ yán yǔ wén huà 《侗台语言与文化》 (The Tai-Kadai Language and Culture). Beijing: The Minzu University Press of China.
Li, Lianjin. 2007. píng huà de fèn qū nèi bù fèn qū jí xì shǔ wèn tí 平话的分区、内部分区及系属问题 (The Classification/Distribution of Pinghua). Fāng yán 《方言》1: 71–78.
Liang, Min & Zhang, Junru. 1988. guǎng xī zhuàng zú zì zhì qū gè mín zú yǔ yán de xiàng hù yǐng xiǎng 广西壮族自治区各民族语言的相互影响 (The mutual influence of the languages in Guangxi). Fāng yán 《方言》 2: 87–91.
Liu, Cunhan. 1998. guǎng xī de yǔ yán bǎo cáng 广西的语言宝藏 (The values of the languages in Guangxi). wú zhōu shī zhuān xué bào 《梧州师专学报》 14: 12–17.
Masica, Colin P. 1976. Defining A Linguistic Area-South Asia. Chicago IL: The University of Chicago Press.
Matisoff, James A. 1991. Areal and universal dimensions of grammaticalization in Lahu. In Approaches to Grammaticalization, Vol. 2: Types of Grammatical Markers [Typological Studies in Language 19:2], Elizabeth Closs Traugott & Bernd Heine (eds), 383–453. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Migliazza, Brian. 1996. Mainland Southeast Asia: A unique linguistic area. Notes on Linguistics 75: 17–25.
Qin, Dongsheng. 2012. duì guǎng xī sān gè qū yù xìng yǔ fǎ xiàn xiàng de kǎo chá 《对广西三个区域性语法现象的考察》(On the Three Areal Grammatical Features in Guangxi). PhD dissertation, Hebei Normal University, Shijiazhuang.
Qin, Dongsheng & Fengyu Qin. 2015. guǎng xī hàn yǔ ‘qù’ hé zhuàng yǔ fāng yán ‘pai1’ de liǎng zhǒng tè shū yòng fǎ-qū yù yǔ yán xué shì jiǎo xià de kǎo chá 广西汉语“去”和壮语方言pai1的两种特殊用法─区域语言学视角下的考察 (On the two grammatical properties of the GO morpheme ‘去’ and ‘pai1’ in the Sinitic and Tai-Kadai languages in Guangxi: An areal-typological perspective). mín zú yǔ wén 《民族语文》 2: 68–75.
Ramat, Anna G. 2008. Areal convergence in grammaticalization processes. In Rethinking Grammaticalization, Vol. 2: New Perspectives [Typological Studies in Language 76], María José López-Couso and Elena Seoane (eds), 129–168. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Robbeets, Martine & Cuyckens, Hubert. 2013. Towards a typology of shared grammaticalization, In Shared Grammaticalization: With Special Focus on the Transeurasian Languages [Studies in Language Companion Series 132], Martine Robbeets & Hubert Cuyckens (eds), 1–22. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Shao, Longyi, Zhang, Pengfei, Gayer, R. A., Chen, Jialang & Dai, Shifeng. 2003. Coal in a carbonate sequence stratigraphic framework: The Upper Permian Heshan formation in central Guangxi, Southern China. Journal of the Geological Society 160: 285–298.
de Sousa, Hilário 2012. The far southern Sinitic languages as part of Mainland Southeast Asia. Paper presented at the Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology (MPI) MSEA Workshop, Leipzig, Germany.
Stolz, Thomas. 2002. No Sprachbund beyond this line! On the age-old discussion of how to define a linguistic area. In Mediterranean Languages: Papers from the MEDITYP Workshop, Tirrenia, June 2000 [Diversitas Linguarum 1], Paolo Ramat & Thomas Stolz (eds), 259–281. Bochum: N. Brockmeyer.
Sybesma, Rint. 2008. Zhuang: A Tai language with some Sinitic characteristics –Postverbal ‘can’ in Zhuang, Cantonese, Vietnamese and Lao. In From Linguistic Areas to Areal Linguistics [Studies in Language Companion Series 90], Pieter Muysken (eds), 221–274, Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Trubetzkoy, Nikolai. 1928.
Proposition 6. Actes du Premier Congrès International des Linguistes
. Leiden: A. W. Sijthoff.
van der Auwera, Johan. 1998. Adverbial Constructions in the Languages of Europe. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Cited by (7)
Cited by seven other publications
Bi, Yuanhao, Fengyu Qin & Yonglin He
Szeto, Pui Yiu & Chingduang Yurayong
de Sousa, Hilário
de Sousa, Hilário
de Sousa, Hilário
Wu, Fuxiang & Yang Huang
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 3 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
