Cover not available

In:New Trends in Grammaticalization and Language Change
Edited by Sylvie Hancil, Tine Breban and José Vicente Lozano
[Studies in Language Companion Series 202] 2018
► pp. 75–104

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
authorization required

Analogy

Its role in language learning, categorization, and in models of language change such as grammaticalization and constructionalization

 | University of Amsterdam
Published online: 6 December 2018
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.202.04fis
This paper investigates and surveys the role played by analogy in language learning and processing, and its position in models of change such as grammaticalization and diachronic construction grammar. I will illustrate the importance of analogy by looking at Hermann Paul’s Prinzipien der Sprachgeschichte (1880), indicating that his ideas on how languages are learned and change are closely connected and pervaded by analogical notions. These ideas have recently become current again, after long neglect within linguistic models since the 1950s, and now form the basis for experiments and recent work in cognitive science. The presence of analogy in change will be highlighted through a review of a number of recent diachronic studies, where I will argue that analogy helps to explain the development of the new constructions there investigated.*
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Analogy in usage-based models: Construction grammar and grammaticalization
  • 3.Analogy
    • 3.1Analogy and Herman Paul’s Prinzipien der Sprachgeschichte (1880 [1909])
    • 3.2Analogy and cognitive science
  • 4.The influence of analogy in morphosyntactic change
    • 4.1A case study where analogy is not given a primary role
    • 4.2Case studies where analogy is given a primary role
  • 5.A brief conclusion
  • Acknowledgement
  • Notes
  • References
References (70)
References
Auer, Peter & Murray, Robert W. 2015. Hermann Paul’s ‘Principles of Language History’ Revisited. Translations and Reflections. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bao, Zhiming. 2010. Must in Singapore English. Lingua 120: 1727–1737.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Barðdal, Jóhanna. 2008. Productivity. Evidence from Case and Argument Structure in Icelandic [Constructional Approaches to Language 8]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Barðdal, Jóhanna, Smirnova, Elena, Sommerer, Lotte & Gildea, Spike (eds). 2015. Diachronic Construction Grammar [Constructional Approaches to Language 8]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Barðdal, Jóhanna & Gildea, Spike. 2015. Epistemological context, basic assumptions and historical implications. In Barðdal, Smirnova, Sommerer & Gildea (eds), 1–50.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bergs, Alexander & Diewald, Gabriëlle (eds). 2008. Constructions and Language Change. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chalmers, David J., French, Robert M. & Hofstadter, Douglas R. 1992. High-level perception, representation, and analogy: A critique of artificial intelligence methodology. Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Artificial Intelligence 4: 185–211. <[URL]>Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Croft, William. 2000. Explaining Language Change. An Evolutionary Approach. London: Longmans.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2001. Radical Construction Grammar. Syntactic Theory in Typological Perspective. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
De Smet, Hendrik. 2009. Analyzing reanalysis. Lingua 119: 1728–1755.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2010. Grammatical interference: Subject marker for and the phrasal verb particles out and forth . In Traugott & Trousdale (eds), 75–104.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2012. The course of actualization. Language 88: 601–633.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2016. How gradual change progresses: The interaction between convention and innovation. Language Variation and Change 28: 83–102.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
De Smet, Hendrik & Fischer, Olga. 2017. The role of analogy in language change: Supporting constructions. In The Changing English Language: Psycholinguistic Perspectives, Marianne Hundt, Sandra Mollin & Simone Pfenninger (eds), 240–268. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
De Smet, Hendrik, Ghesquière, Lobke & Van de Velde, Freek (eds). 2015. On Multiple Source Constructions in Language Change [Benjamins Current Topics 79]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Deacon, Terence W. 1997. The Symbolic Species. The Co-Evolution of Language and the Brain. New York NY: Norton.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Denison, David. 2002. History of the sort of construction family. Ms. <[URL]>
Edwin, E. A. 1973. Analogy and Association in Linguistics and Psychology. Athens GA: University of Georgia Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Entwisle, Doris R., Forsyth, Daniel F. & Muuss, Rolf. 1964. The syntactic-paradigmatic shift in children’s word associations. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 3: 19–29.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ervin, Susan M. 1961. Changes with age in the verbal determinants of word-association. The American Journal of Psychology 74: 361–372.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fischer, Olga. 1997. The grammaticalisation of infinitival to in English compared with German and Dutch. In Language History and Linguistic Modelling. A Festschrift for Jaček Fisiak on his 60th Birthday, Raymond Hickey & Stanisław Puppel (eds), 265–280. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2000. Grammaticalisation: Unidirectional, non-reversable? The case of to before the infinitive in English. In Pathways of Change. Grammaticalization in English [Studies in Language Companion Series 53], Olga Fischer, Anette Rosenbach & Dieter Stein (eds), 149–169. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2007. Approaches to Morphosyntactic Change from a Functional and Formal Perspective. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2011. Grammaticalization as analogically driven change? In The Oxford Handbook of Grammaticalization, Heiko Narrog & Bernd Heine (eds), 31–42. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2015. The influence of the grammatical system and analogy in processes of language change: The case of the auxiliation of HAVE-TO once again. In Studies in Linguistic Variation and Change: From Old to Middle English, Fabienne Toupin & Brian Lowrey (eds), 120–150. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fischer, Olga, De Smet, Hendrik & Van der Wurff, Wim. 2017. A Brief History of English Syntax. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fischer, Olga & Olbertz, Hella. In press. The role played by analogy in processes of language change: The case of English HAVE-to compared to Spanish TENER-que. In Categories, Constructions and Change in English Syntax [Studies in English Language Series], Nuria Yáñez-Bouza, Willem B. Hollmann, Emma Moore & Linda Van Bergen (eds). Cambridge: CUP.
Fried, Mirjam. 2013. Principles of constructional change. In Hoffmann & Trousdale (eds), 419–437.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gentner, Dedre. 2003. Why we’re so smart. In Language in Mind. Advances in the Study of Language and Thought, Dedre Gentner & Susan Goldin-Meadow (eds), 195–235. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2010. Bootstrapping the mind: Analogical processes and symbol systems. Cognitive Science 34: 752–775.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gentner, Dedre, Anggoro, Florencia K. & Klibanoff, Raquel S. 2011. Structure mapping and relational language support children’s learning of relational categories. Child Development 82: 1173–1188.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gentner, Dedre, Holyoak, Keith J. & Kokinov, Boicho K. (eds). 2001. The Analogical Mind. Perspectives from Cognitive Science. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gentner, Dedre & Namy, Laura L. 2006. Analogical processes in language learning. Current Directions in Psychological Science 15: 297–301.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gentner, Dedre & Smith, Linsey. 2012. Analogical reasoning. In Encyclopedia of Human Behavior, 2nd edn, Vilayanur S. Ramachandran (ed.), 130–136. Oxford: Elsevier.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goldberg, Adèle E. 2013. Constructionist approaches. InHoffman & Trousdale(eds), 15–31.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hashimoto, Naomi, McGregor, Karla K. & Graham, Anne. 2007. Conceptual organization at 6 and 8 years of age: Evidence from the semantic priming of object decisions. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research 50: 161–176.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin. 1989. From purposive to infinitive – A universal path of grammaticization. Folia Linguistica Historica 10: 287–310.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hilpert, Martin. 2013. Constructional Change in English. Developments in Allomorphy, Word Formation, and Syntax. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hoffmann, Thomas. 2013. Abstract phrasal and clausal constructions. In Hoffman & Trousdale (eds), 307–328.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hoffman, Thomas & Trousdale, Graeme (eds). 2013. The Oxford Handbook of Construction Grammar. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hofstadter, Douglas. 1995. Fluid Concepts and Creative Analogies. Computer Models of the Fundamental Mechanisms of Thought. New York NY: Basic Books.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2001. Epilogue. Analogy as the core of cognition. In Gentner, Holyoak & Kokinov (eds), 499–538.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2013. The nature of categories and concepts. Lecture delivered at Stanford, March 6, 2013. Made available on Youtube, March 2014.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hofstadter, Douglas & Sander, Emmanuel. 2013. Surfaces and Essences: Analogy as the Fuel and Fire of Thinking. New York NY: Basic Books.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kalénine, Solène, Peyrin, Carole, Pichat, Cédric, Segebarth, Christoph, Bonthoux, Françoise & Baciu, Monica. 2009. The sensory-motor specificity of taxonomic and thematic conceptual relations: A behavioural and fMRI study. NeuroImage 44: 1152–1162.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kaltenböck, Gunther, Heine, Bernd & Kuteva, Tania. 2011. On thetical grammar. Studies in Language 35: 852–897.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kaltenböck, Gunther & Heine, Bernd. 2014. Sentence grammar vs. thetical grammar: Two competing domains. In Competing Motivations in Grammar and Usage, Brian MacWhinney, Andrej Malchukov & Edith Moravcsik (eds), 348–363. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kahneman, Daniel. 2011. Thinking Fast and Slow. London: Allen Lane/Penguin.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kiparsky, Paul. 1974. Remarks on analogical change. In Historical Linguistics, Vol. I., John M. Anderson & Charles Jones (eds), 257–275. Amsterdam: North Holland.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lightfoot, David W. 1979. Principles of Diachronic Syntax. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Malkiel, Yakov. 1993. Etymology. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2017. Radically usage-based diachronic construction grammar and the development of non-deontic be bound to . Lingua 199: 72–93. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Paul, Hermann. 1909 [1880]. Prinzipien der Sprachgeschichte, 4th edn. Halle: Niemeyer.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pulvermüller, Friedemann. 2002. The Neuroscience of Language. On Brain Circuits of Words and Serial Order. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rice, Keren. 2000. Morpheme Order and Semantic Scope. Word Formation in the Athapaskan Verb. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sommerer, Lotte. 2015. The influence of constructions in grammaticalization: Revisiting category emergence and the development of the definite article in English. In Barðdal, Smirnova, Sommerer & Gildea (eds), 107–138.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Steels, Luc. 2011. Introducing Fluid Construction Grammar. In Design Patterns in Fluid Construction Grammar [Constructional Approaches to Language 11], Luc Steels (ed.), 3–30. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2013. Fluid Construction Grammar. In Hoffman & Trousdale (eds), 153–167.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Strong, Herbert Augustus. 1889. Principles of the History of Language. New York NY: Macmillan.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs. 2008a. Grammaticalization, constructions and the incremental development of language. Suggestions from the development of degree modifiers in English. In Variation, Selection, Development. Probing the Evolutionary Model of Language Change, Regine Eckardt, Gerhard Jager & Tonjes Veenstra (eds), 219–250. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2008b. The grammaticalization of NP of NP patterns. In Bergs & Diewald (eds), 23–45.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2008c. “All that he endeavoured to prove was” …: On the emergence of grammatical constructions in dialogual and dialogic contexts. In Language in Flux: Dialogue Coordination, Language Variation, Change and Evolution, Robin Cooper & Ruth Kempson (eds), 143–177. London: Kings College Publications.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2015. Toward a coherent account of grammatical constructionalization. In Barðdal, Smirnova, Sommerer & Gildea (eds), 51–80.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs & Trousdale, Graeme (eds). 2010. Gradience, Gradualness and Grammaticalization [Typological Studies in Language 90]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2013. Constructionalization and Constructional Changes. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Trousdale, Graeme. 2012. Grammaticalization, constructions and the grammaticalization of constructions. In Grammaticalization and Language Change. New Reflections [Studies in Language Companion Series 130], Kirstin Davidse, Tine Breban, Lieselotte Brems & Tanja Mortelmans (eds), 167–198. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2016. Construction grammar. In The Cambridge Handbook of English Historical Linguistics, Merja Kytö & Pavi Pahta (eds), 65–78. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vincent, Nigel & Borjärs, Kersti. 2010. Grammaticalization and models of language. In Traugott & Trousdale (eds), 279–299.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Willems, Klaas. 2016. Georg von der Gabelenz and ‘das lautsymbolische gefühl’. A chapter in the history of iconicity research. In From Variation to Iconicity. Festschrift for Olga Fischer, Anne Bannink & Wim Honselaar (eds), 439–452. Amsterdam: Pegasus.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (8)

Cited by eight other publications

Hundt, Marianne & Laetitia van Driessche
2025. Prepositions in English Argument Structure Constructions. In Constructions in Contact 3 [Constructional Approaches to Language, 40], ► pp. 79 ff. DOI logo
Sommerer, Lotte & Freek Van de Velde
2025. Constructional Networks. In The Cambridge Handbook of Construction Grammar, ► pp. 220 ff. DOI logo
Zuo, Shan & Fuyin Thomas Li
2025. The semantic continuum from disposition to causative meaning. Functions of Language DOI logo
Ungerer, Tobias
2022. Review of Sommerer & Smirnova (2020): Nodes and Networks in Diachronic Construction Grammar. Journal of Historical Linguistics 12:2 ► pp. 317 ff. DOI logo
Kuo, Yueh Hsin
2020. Reinforcement by realignment in diachronic construction grammar. Constructions and Frames 12:2 ► pp. 206 ff. DOI logo
Kuo, Yueh Hsin
2021. A constructional account of the loss of the adverse avertive schema in Mandarin Chinese. In Lost in Change [Studies in Language Companion Series, 218], ► pp. 131 ff. DOI logo
Kuo, Yueh Hsin
2022. Bidirectionality between modal and conditional constructions in Mandarin Chinese. Diachronica 39:1 ► pp. 88 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2021. A constructional account of the loss of the adverse avertive schema in Mandarin Chinese. In Lost in Change [Studies in Language Companion Series, 218], DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 3 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue