Cover not available

In:Non-Canonically Case-Marked Subjects: The Reykjavík-Eyjafjallajökull papers
Edited by Jóhanna Barðdal, Na'ama Pat-El and Stephen Mark Carey
[Studies in Language Companion Series 200] 2018
► pp. 85–114

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
authorization required

Chapter 4
A macrorole approach to dative subjects

 | University of California, Davis
 | University of California, Davis
Published online: 2 November 2018
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.200.04far
Abstract
The arguments of certain Spanish verbs of psychological experience exhibit morphosyntactic properties similar to those of Germanic “oblique subject” verbs, as described, for example, in Barðdal (2001) and Barðdal & Eythórsson (2005). In this article, we show how the behavior of dative experiencers looks neither “quirky” nor “non-canonical” when grammatical privilege is accounted for directly in terms of semantic macroroles in the sense of Role and Reference Grammar (Van Valin 2005), provided that the standard set of Actor (A) and Undergoer (U) macroroles is augmented to include a third, i.e., Receptor (R), that corresponds roughly to Fillmore’s (1968) Dative category of semantic case and the Relational Grammar indirect object relation (Perlmutter 1984). Adding R to the set of macroroles enables us to account straightforwardly for the subject and non-subject properties of dative experiencers in Spanish, as well as parallel properties of possessor/recipient arguments across construction types, without having anything hinge either on dative case per se or on the notion of subject.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Grammatical privilege in Spanish
    • 2.1Verbs of psychological experience
    • 2.2Basic word order
    • 2.3Focus-fronting and VS order
    • 2.4VS order in Wh questions
    • 2.5SV order in embedded clause with a long-distance dependency
    • 2.6SVO order with topic fronting
    • 2.7The causative construction
    • 2.8Impersonal se and passive constructions
    • 2.9Control
    • 2.10Reflexive/reciprocal se
  • 3.The three-macrorole analysis
    • 3.1The R macrorole
    • 3.2Mapping of arguments to macroroles with R in the game
    • 3.3Passive and impersonal se constructions
    • 3.4Reflexive/reciprocal se construction
    • 3.5The causative construction
    • 3.6Word order phenomena and case indexing
    • 3.7Control
  • 4.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
References (52)
References
Ackerman, Farrell & Moore, John. 2001. Proto-Properties and Grammatical Encoding. Stanford CA: CSLI.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Alsina, Alex. 1992. On the argument structure of causatives. Linguistic Inquiry 23(4): 517–556.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1996. The Role of Argument Structure in Grammar: Evidence from Romance. Stanford CA: CSLI.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Barðdal, Jóhanna. 2001. The perplexity of Dat-Nom verbs in Icelandic. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 24(1): 47–70. .Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Barðdal, Jóhanna & Eythórsson, Thórhallur. 2005. Oblique subjects: A common Germanic inheritance. Language 81(4): 824–881. .Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Broadwell, George Aaron. 2006. A Choctaw Reference Grammar. Lincoln NE: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1981. Lectures on Government and Binding. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Contreras, Heles. 1976. A Theory of Word Order with Special Reference to Spanish. Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
CREA. 2008. Corpus de referencia del español actual (CREA). Madrid: Real Academia Española.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cuervo, Maria Cristina. 1999. Quirky but not eccentric: Dative subjects in Spanish. MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 34: 213–227.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dixon, Robert M. W. 1979. Ergativity. Language 55: 59–138.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dowty, David R. 1991. Thematic proto-roles and argument selection. Language 67: 547–619.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dryer, Matthew S. 1986. Primary objects, secondary objects, and antidative. Language 61: 808–845.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Farrell, Patrick. 1995. Lexical binding. Linguistics 33(5): 939–980. .Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2005. Grammatical Relations. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2010. Term relations and relational hierarchies. In Hypothesis A/Hypothesis B: Linguistic Explorations in Honor of David M. Perlmutter, y Donna B. Gerdts, John Moore & Maria Polinsky (eds). Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fernández Soriano, Olga Margarita. 1999. Datives in constructions with unaccusative se . Catalan Working Papers in Linguistics 7: 89–106.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fillmore, Charles J. 1968. The case for case. In Universals in Linguistic Theory, Emmon Bach & Robert T. Harms (eds), 1–88. New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goldberg, Adele E. 1995. Constructions: A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
González, Nora. 1988. Object and Raising in Spanish. New York NY: Garland.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1990. Unusual inversion in Chilean Spanish. In Studies in Relational Grammar 3, Paul M. Postal & Brian D. Joseph (eds), 87–103. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
González Vergara, Carlos. 2006. Las construcciones no reflexivas con se: Una propuesta desde la gramatica del papel y la referencia. PhD dissertation, Universidad Complutense de Madrid.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goodall, Grant. 2001. The EPP in Spanish. In Objects and Other Subjects: Grammatical Functions, Functional Categories, and Configurationality, Stanley Dubinsky & William D. Davies (eds), 193–223. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Grimshaw, Jane. 1990. Argument Structure. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gutiérrez-Bravo, Rodrigo. 2007. Prominence scales and unmarked word order in Spanish. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 25(2): 235–271. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin. 2008. Ditransitive constructions: Towards a new Role and Reference Grammar account. In Investigations of the Syntax-semantics-pragmatics Interface [Studies in Language Companion Series 105], Robert D. Van Valin Jr. (ed.), 75–100. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Landau, Idan. 2010. The Locative Syntax of Experiencers. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Levin, Beth & Rappaport Hovav, Malka. 1995. Unaccusativity: At the Syntax-Lexical Semantics Interface. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Maldonado, Ricardo. 1992. Middle Voice: The Case of Spanish SE. PhD dissertation, University of California at San Diego.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2009. Middle as a basic voice system. In Studies in Role and Reference Grammar, Lilián Guerrero, Sergio Ibáñez & Valeria Belloro (eds). Mexico City: UNAM Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Masullo, Pascual J. 1993. Two types of quirky subjects: Spanish versus Icelandic. NELS 23: 303–317.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Monachesi, Paola. 2005. The Verbal Complex in Romance: A Case Study in Grammatical Interfaces, Vol. 9. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nichols, Johanna. 1986. Head-marking and dependent-marking grammar. Language 62(1): 56–119. .Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Paris, Luis A. 1999. The Spanish causative construction Hacer-infinitive. A Role and Reference Grammar description. Qualifying paper, SUNY Buffalo.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Perlmutter, David M. 1982. Syntactic representation, syntactic kevels, and the notion of subject. In The Nature of Syntactic Representation, Pauline Jacobson & Geoffrey Pullum (eds), 283–340. Dordrecht: Reidel.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1984. Working 1s and inversion in Italian, Japanese, and Quechua. In Studies in Relational Grammar, 2, David M. Perlmutter & Carol Rosen (eds), 292–330. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Perlmutter, David M. & Postal, Paul M. 1983. Some proposed laws of basic clause structure. In Studies in Relational Grammar, 1, David M. Perlmutter (ed.), 81–128. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Primus, Beatrice. 1999. Cases and Thematic Roles: Ergative, Accusative and Active. Tübingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rivero, María Luisa. 2004. Spanish quirky subjects, person restrictions, and the person-constraint. Linguistic Inquiry 35(3):494–502. .Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rizzi, Luigi. 1997. The fine structure of the left periphery. In Elements of Grammar: Handbook of Generative Syntax, Liliane Haegeman (ed.), 281–337. Dorderecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rosen, Carol. 1984. The interface between semantic roles and initial grammatical relations. In Studies in Relational Grammar, 2, David Perlmutter & Carol Rosen (eds), 38–77. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sánchez Arroba, María Elena. 2012. Tipos de cláusula, clases verbales y posición del sujeto en español. Lexis 32(1): 83–105.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Thráinsson, Höskuldur. 2007. The Syntax of Icelandic. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Torrego, Esther. 1984. On inversion in Spanish and some of its effects. Linguistic Inquiry 15(1):103–127.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Van Valin Jr., Robert D. 1991. Another look at Icelandic case marking and grammatical relations. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 9(1): 145–194.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2005. Exploring the Syntax-Semantics Interface. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Van Valin Jr., Robert D. & La Polla, Randy J. 1997. Syntax: Structure, Meaning, and Function. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vanhoe, Henk. 2004. Aspectos de la sintaxis de los verbos psicologicos en espanol. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Villada, Begoña & Vogel, Carl. 2001. Grammatical relations and semantic argument structure in Spanish emotion predicates. In Meaning and the Components of Grammar, Javier Gutiérrez-Rexach (ed.), 57–81. Munich: Lincom.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wunderlich, Dieter & Lakämper, Renate. 2001. On the interaction of structural and semantic case. Lingua 111: 377–418.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zaenen, Annie, Maling, Joan & Thráinsson, Hoskuldur. 1985. Case and grammatical functions: The Icelandic passive. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 3(4): 441–483. .Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zwicky, Arnold M. 1985. Clitics and particles. Language 61: 283–305.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue