In:Non-Canonically Case-Marked Subjects: The Reykjavík-Eyjafjallajökull papers
Edited by Jóhanna Barðdal, Na'ama Pat-El and Stephen Mark Carey
[Studies in Language Companion Series 200] 2018
► pp. 23–54
Chapter 2Non-nominative and depersonalized subjects in the Balkans
Areality vs. genealogy
Published online: 2 November 2018
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.200.02fri
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.200.02fri
Abstract
The languages of the Balkan sprachbund are surveyed here with regard to their constructions that show non-nominative subjects, typically in impersonal constructions. The issue of origins is considered, specifically as to whether these constructions represent inheritances from some earlier stage of the relevant languages or instead reflect the effects of contact. In the end, it is argued that a mix of areality, i.e. contact, and genealogy, i.e. inheritance, is needed to explain these constructions, with a nod required as well to typologically common patternings.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Impersonals
- 2.1Atmospheric and natural phenomena
- 2.2Experiencer constructions
- 2.3Impersonal constructions with corresponding personal forms
- 2.4Impersonal passives, real and potential
- 2.4.1Gnomic impersonal passives: Verbs of speaking/communicating
- 2.4.2Impersonal passives for generalized activity
- 2.4.3Impersonal passives expressing potential
- 2.5Impersonal modals
- 2.5.1Internal disposition
- 2.5.2Modality of possibility and necessity
- 2.6‘Have’ existential vs. ‘be’ possession
- 3.Non-imperative imperatives
- 4.Conclusion
Notes References
References (45)
. 2015. Icelandic valency classes: Oblique subjects, oblique anticausatives and the actional passive. In Valency Classes: A Comparative Handbook, Bernard Comrie & Andrej Malchukov (eds). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Barðdal, Jóhanna, Arnett, Carlee, Carey, Stephen Mark, Eythórsson, Thórhallur, Jenset, Gard B., Kroonen, Guus & Oberlin, Adam. 2016. Dative subjects in Germanic: A computational analysis of lexical semantic verb classes across time and space. STUF: Language Typology and Universals 69(1): 49–84.
Barðdal, Jóhanna, Smitherman, Thomas, Bjarnadóttir, Valgerður, Danesi, Serena, Jenset, Gard B. & McGillivray, Barbara. 2012. The dative subject construction in Old Norse-Icelandic, Latin, Ancient Greek, Old Russian and Old Lithuanian. Studies in Language 36(3): 511–547.
Boretzky, Norbert & Igla, Birgit. 2004. Komentierter Dialektatlas des Romani, 2 Vols. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.
Bubenik, Vit. 1998. Historical Syntax of Late Middle Indo-Aryan (Apabhraṃśa) [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 165]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Caragiu–Marioțeanu, Matilda. 1958.
Habēre impersonal în Aromînă și meglenoromînă. In Omagiu lui Iorgu Iordan, 139–141. Bucharest: Academia Republicii Popolare Romîne.
Danesi, Serena & Barðdal, Jóhanna. 2018. Case marking of predicative possession in Vedic: The genitive, the dative, the locative. In Non-canonically Case-Marked Subjects: The Reykjavík–Eyjafjallajökull Papers, Jóhanna Barðdal, Na’ama Pat-El & Stephen Mark Carey (eds). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Eriksen, Pål, Kittilä, Seppo & Kolehmainenm, Leena. 2010. The linguistics of weather: Cross-linguistic patterns of meteorological expressions. Studies in Language 34(3): 565–601.
Friedman, Victor A. 2012. Perhaps mirativity is phlogiston, but admirativity is perfect: On Balkan evidential strategies. Linguistic Typology 16(3): 502–527.
Gawelko, Marek. 2005. La perspective indo-européenne de l’impersonel Polonais. Wiener Slawistisches Jahrbuch 51.21–30.
Gołąb, Zbigniew. 1976. On the mechanism of Slavic–Rumanian linguistic interference in the Balkans. In Bulgaria, Past and Present: Studies in History, Literature, Economics, Music, Sociology, Folklore & Linguistics, Thomas Butler (ed.), 296–309. Columbus OH: AAASS.
Guentchéva, Zlatka. 2010. l’Impersonnel dans les languges balkaniques: Convergences et divergences. In Glagolata sistema na balkanskite ezici – nasledstvo i neologija / The Verbal System of the Balkan Languages – Heritage and Neology, Petya Assenova, Anastasiya Petrova & Tsenka Ivanova (eds), 24–50. Sofia: Faber (for the Commission on Balkan Linguistics, International Committee of Slavists).
Hale, William Gardner & Darling Buck, Carl. 1903[1966]. A Latin Grammar. Tuscaloosa AL: University of Alabama.
Joseph, Brian D. 1983[2009]. The Synchrony and Diachrony of the Balkan Infinitive. A Study in Areal, General, and Historical Linguistics. Cambridge: CUP.
Kibort, Anna. 2001. The Polish passive and impersonal in lexical mapping theory. In Proceedings of the LFG01 Conference, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Miriam Butt & Tracy Holloway King (eds). Stanford CA: CSLI. <[URL]>
Malchukov, Andrej L. & Ogawa, Akio. 2011. Towards a typology of impersonal constructions: A semantic map approach. In Impersonal Constructions: A Cross-Linguistic Perspective [Studies in Language Compaion Series 124], Andrej L. Malchukov & Anna Siewierska (eds), 19–56. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
. 2001. The definition and significance of linguistic areas. In The Yearbook of South Asian Languages and Linguistics, Peri Bhaskararao & Karumuri Venkata Subbarao (eds), 205–268. New Delhi: Sage.
McAnallen, Julia. 2011. Predicative possession in Old Church Slavic Bible translations. In Indo-European Syntax and Pragmatics: Contrastive Approaches, Eirik Welo (ed.), Oslo Studies in Language 3(3):155–172. <[URL]>
Matras, Yaron. 1994. Untersuchungen zu Grammatik und Diskurs des Romanes: Dialekt der Kelderaša/Lovara. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.
Nicolova, Ruselina. 2008. Bălgarska gramatika: Morfologija. Sofia: Universitet “Sv. Kliment Ohridski.”
Papahagi, Pericle N. 1908. Parallele ausdrücke und redensarten im rumänischen, albanesischen, neugriechischen und bulgarischen. Leipzig: J.A. Barth.
Papanastassiou, George & Papadamou, Eleni. 2012. The position of the northern dialects of the Prefecture of Kastoria. Paper presented at Fifth International Conference on Modern Greek Dialects and Linguistic Theory (MGDLT 5). University of Ghent, 21 September.
Perlmutter, David M. & Moore, John. 2002. Language-internal explanation: The distribution of Russian impersonals. Language 78(4): 619–650.
Romalo, Valeria Guțu (chief ed.). 2008. Gramatica limbii române: Cuvîntul. Bucharest: Academia Română.
Siewierska, Anna. 2008. Introduction: Impersonalization from a subject-centred vs. agent-centred perspective. Special guest-edited issue on Impersonal Constructions in Grammatical Theory of Transactions of the Philological Society 106(2): 1–23.
. 2011. Overlap and complementarity in reference impersonals: Man-constructions vs. third person plural-impersonals in the languages of Europe. In Impersonal Constructions: A Cross-linguistic Perspective [Studies in Language Companion Series 124], Andrej L. Malchukov & Anna Siewierska (eds), 57–90. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Skorniakova, Oxana. 2008. The existence of expletive pronominal subjects in Russian impersonal constructions. In Issues in Slavic Syntax and Semantics, Anastasia Smirnova & Matthew Curtis (eds), 35–53. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars.
