Cover not available

In:Information Structure in Lesser-described Languages: Studies in prosody and syntax
Edited by Evangelia Adamou, Katharina Haude and Martine Vanhove
[Studies in Language Companion Series 199] 2018
► pp. 51–84

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload Book EPUB
authorization required

Chapter 3
Prosodic and morphological focus marking in Ixcatec (Otomanguean)

 | CNRS
 | University of California at Santa Barbara
 | University of California at Santa Barbara
Published online: 2 August 2018
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.199.03ada
Abstract
This paper presents the first description of the expression of focus in Ixcatec, a nearly extinct language of Mexico. The study is based on experimental tasks carried out with the last three fluent speakers of Ixcatec. Prosodic analysis shows that in Ixcatec, a language with three lexical tones, contrastive focus is associated with raised F0, lack of focus is marked through lowered F0 and decreased duration, and corrective focus is signaled through various speaker-specific means. Finally, this study shows that morphological and phonetic properties display a complex interaction that contradicts the view that focus may be conveyed through either morphological or phonetic exponents but not both.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Focus cross-linguistically
  • 3.Some background on Ixcatec
  • 4.The expression of focus through prosodic and morphological means
    • 4.1Predictions
    • 4.2Methodology
      • 4.2.1Participants
      • 4.2.2Stimuli
      • 4.2.3Procedure
      • 4.2.4Recordings
      • 4.2.5Measurements
      • 4.2.6Statistical analysis and evaluation
    • 4.3Results
      • 4.3.1The main effect of F0
      • 4.3.2The interactions
      • 4.3.3The relationship between the morphological and phonetic expression of focus
    • 4.4Discussion
  • 5.Conclusions
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • Abbreviations
  • References
  • Appendix
References (53)
References
Adamou, Evangelia. 2014. L’antipassif en ixcatèque. Bulletin de la Société de Linguistique de Paris 109(1): 303–326.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2016. A Corpus-driven Approach to Language Contact. Endangered Languages in a Comparative Perspective. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2017. Spatial language and cognition among the Ixcatec-Spanish bilinguals (Mexico). In Multidisciplinary Approaches to Bilingualism in the Hispanic and Lusophone World [Issues in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics 13], Kate Bellamy, Michael W. Child, Paz González, Antje Muntendam & M. Carmen Parafita Couto (eds), 175–209. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Adamou, Evangelia & Costaouec, Denis. 2013. El complementante la en ixcateco: Marcador de clausula relativa, completiva y adverbial. Amerindia 31(1): 193–210.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Alarcón Montero, Rafael. 2010. Temporalidad laríngea en las nasales y obstruyentes del ixcateco. In Entre cuerdas y velo: Estudios fonológicos de lenguas otomangues, Esther Herrera Zendejas (ed.), 65–84. México DF: Colegio de México. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Benkirane, Thami. 1998. Intonation in Western Arabic (Morocco). In Intonation Systems: A Survey of Twenty Languages, Daniel Hirst & Albert Di Cristo (eds), 345–359. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Boersma, Paul & Weenink, David. 2010. Praat: Doing Phonetics by Computer (version 5.1.42) [Computer Program]. <[URL]>
Büring, Daniel. 2009. Towards a typology of focus realization. In Information Structure, Malte Zimmermann & Caroline Féry (eds), 177–205. Oxford: OUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2012. Focus and intonation. In The Routledge Companion to the Philosophy of Language, Gillian Russell & Delia Graff Fara (eds), 103–115. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2016. (Contrastive) topics. In Oxford Handbook of Information Structure, Caroline Féry & Shinichiro Ishihara (eds), 64–85. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chen, Yiya. 2010. Post-focus F0 compression – Now you see it, now you donʼt. Journal of Phonetics 38: 517–525. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chen, Yiya & Gussenhoven, Carlos. 2008. Emphasis and tonal implementation in Standard Chinese. Journal of Phonetics 36: 724–746. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cruttenden, Alan. 1986. Intonation. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
De la Mota, Carmen, Martín Butragueño, Pedro & Prieto, Pilar. 2010. Mexican Spanish Intonation. In Transcription of Intonation of the Spanish Language, Pilar Prieto & Paolo Roseano (eds), 319–350. Munich: Lincom.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
DiCanio, Christian. 2011. Laryngeal timing in Ixcatec consonants. Paper presented at 19th Manchester Phonology Meeting, Manchester, England.
. 2012. La fonética de los tonos y del acento en Ixcateco. Paper presented at Coloquio sobre lenguas otomangues y vecinas (COLOV-V), Oaxaca (Mexico), Centro Académico y Cultural San Pablo, 20–22 April.
Downing, Laura, Mtenje, Al & Pompino-Marschall, Bernd. 2004. Prosody and information structure in Chichewa. ZAS Papers in Linguistics 37: 167–186.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Erguvanlı, Eser. 1984. The Function of Word Order in Turkish Grammar. Berkeley CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Everett, Keren. 1998. Acoustic correlates of stress in Pirahã. The Journal of Amazonian Languages 1: 104–162.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fernández de Miranda, María Teresa. 1959. Fonémica del ixcateco. Mexico: INAH.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1961. Diccionario ixcateco. Mexico: INAH.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Féry, Caroline. 2013. Focus as prosodic alignment. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 31: 683–734. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fiedler, Ines, Hartmann, Katharina, Reineke, Brigitte, Schwarz, Anne & Zimmermann, Malte. 2010. Subject focus in West African languages. In Information Structure from Different Perspectives, Malte Zimmermann & Caroline Féry (eds), 234–257. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fox, John. 2003. Effect displays in R for generalised linear models. Journal of Statistical Software 8(15): 1–27. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fox, John & Hong, Jangman. 2009. Effect displays in R for multinomial and proportional-odds logit models: Extensions to the effects package. Journal of Statistical Software 32(1): 1–24. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gordon, Matthew. 2007. The intonational realization of contrastive focus in Chickasaw. In Topic and Focus: Cross-Linguistic Perspectives on Meaning and Intonation, Chungmin Lee, Matthew Gordon & Daniel Büring (eds), 69–82. Dordrecht: Springer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hartmann, Katharina & Zimmerman, Malte. 2009. Morphological focus marking in Gùrùntùm. Lingua 119(9): 1340–1365. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hironymous, Michael. 2007. Santa Maria Ixcatlan, Oaxaca: From Colonial Cacicazgo to Modern Municipio. PhD dissertation, University of Texas, Austin.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hyman, Larry M. 1999. The interaction between focus and tone in Bantu. In The Grammar of Focus [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 24], Georges Rebuschi & Laurice Tuller (eds), 151–177. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kanerva, Jonni. 1990. Focus and Phrasing in Chichewa Phonology. New York NY: Garland.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Katz, Jonah & Selkirk, Elizabeth. 2011. Contrastive focus vs. discourse-new. Evidence from phonetic prominence in English. Language 87(4): 771–816. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kim, Sahyang & Avelino, Heriberto. 2003. An intonational study of focus and word order variation in Mexican Spanish. In La tonia: Dimensiones fonéticas y fonológicas, Esther Herrera & Pedro Martín Butragueño (eds), 357–374. México DF: El Colegio de México.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kügler, Frank & Skopeteas, Stavros. 2007. On the universality of prosodic reflexes of contrast: The case of Yucatec Maya. In Proceedings of the 16th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences ICPhS XVI, 6–10 August 2007, Saarbrücken, Germany, Jürgen Trouvain (ed.), 1025–1028.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mazaudon, Martine. 2003. From discourse to grammar in Tamang: Topic, focus, intensifiers and subordination. In Language Variation: Papers on Variation and Change in the Sinosphere and in the Indosphere in Honour of James A. Matissof, David Bradley, Randy LaPolla, Boyd Michailovsky & Graham Thurgood (eds), 145–157. Canberra: ANU.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McDonough, Joyce. 2003. The prosody of interrogative and focus constructions in Navajo. In Formal Approaches to Function in Grammar [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 62], Andrew Carnie, Heidi Harley & Mary Ann Willie (eds), 191–206. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Michaud, Alexis & Brunelle, Marc. 2016. Information structure in Asia: Yongning Na (Sino-Tibetan) and Vietnamese (Austroasiatic). In Oxford Handbook of Information Structure, Caroline Féry & Shinichiro Ishihara (eds), 774–789. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Potisuk, Siripong, Gandour, Jackson & Harper, Mary P. 1996. Acoustic correlates of stress in Thai. Phonetica 53: 200–220. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
R Core Team. 2015. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. <[URL]>
Rialland, Annie & Robert, Stéphane. 2001. The intonational system of Wolof. Linguistics 39: 893–939. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rooth, Mats. 1992. A theory of focus interpretation. Natural Language Semantics 1: 75–116. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schwiertz, Gabriele. 2009. Intonation and Prosodic Structure in Beaver (Athabaskan). PhD dissertation, University of Cologne.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Skopeteas, Stavros, Fiedler, Ines, Hellmuth, Samantha, Schwarz, Anne, Stoel, Ruben & Fanselow, Gisbert. 2006. Questionnaire on Information Structure. Potsdam: Audiovisuelles Zentrum der Universität Potsdam und sd:k Satz Druck GmbH Potsdam.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Swerts, Marc & Zerbian, Sabine. 2010. Intonational differences between L1 and L2 English in South Africa. Phonetica 67: 127–146. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Turk, Alice & Sawusch, James R. 1997. The domain of accentual lengthening in American English. Journal of Phonetics 25: 25–41. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Veerman-Leichsenring, Annette. 2000. Popolocan independent personal pronouns: Comparison and reconstruction. International Journal of American Linguistics 66(3): 318–359. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2001a. Ixcateco: La frase nominal. Anales de Antropología 35: 323–358.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2001b. Changes in Popolocan word order and clause structure. In Grammatical Relations in Change [Studies in Language Companion Series 56], Jan Terje Faarlund (ed.), 303–322. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2006. Valency-changing devices in Metzontla Popoloc. In Whatʼs in a Verb: Studies in the Verbal Morphology of the Languages of the Americas, Rowicka J. Grayna & Carlin B. Eithne (eds), 93–118. Utrecht: LOT.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Venables, William N. & Ripley, Brian D. 2002. Modern Applied Statistics with S, 4th edn. New York NY: Springer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vogel, Irene, Athanasopoulou, Angeliki & Pinkus, Nadja. 2016. Prominence, contrast, and the functional load hypothesis: An acoustic investigation. In Dimensions of Phonological Stress, Jeffrey Heinz, Rob Goedemans & Harry van der Hulst (eds), 123–167. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Xu, Yi. 1999. Effects of tone and focus on the formation and alignment of F0 contours. Journal of Phonetics 27(1): 55–105. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zubizarreta, Maria L. 1998. Prosody, Focus and Word Order. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue