Cover not available

In:Explorations in English Historical Syntax
Edited by Hubert Cuyckens, Hendrik De Smet, Liesbet Heyvaert and Charlotte Maekelberghe
[Studies in Language Companion Series 198] 2018
► pp. 139158

Get fulltext from our e-platform
References (24)
References
Andersson, Evert. 1985. On Verb Complementation in Written English. Malmö: CWK Gleerup.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ando, Sadao. 1976. A Descriptive Syntax of Christopher Marlowe’s Language. Tokyo: University of Tokyo Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Egan, Thomas. 2008. Non-finite Complementation: A Usage-based Study of Infinitive and -ing Clauses in English. Amsterdam: Rodopi. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fanego, Teresa. 1994. Infinitive marking in Early Modern English. In English Historical Linguistics 1992: Papers from the 7th International Conference on English Historical Linguistics, Valencia, 22–26 September 1992 [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 113], Francisco Fernández, Miguel Fuster & Juan José Calvo (eds), 191–203. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1996. Verbal complementation in early ME: How do the infinitives fit in? In English Historical Linguistics 1994: Papers from the 8th International Conference on English Historical Linguistics (8 ICEHL, Edinburgh, 19–23 September 1994) [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 135], Derek Britton (ed.), 247–270. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1997. Infinitive marking in Late Middle English: Transitivity and changes in the English system of case. In Studies in Middle English Linguistics, Jacek Fisiak (ed.), 109–134. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2011. Early Modern English prose selections: Directions in historical corpus linguistics. Memoirs of the Faculty of Letters, Kyoto University 50: 133–199.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2012. The complements of causative make in Late Middle English. In Middle and Modern English Corpus Linguistics: A Multi-dimensional Approach [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 50], Manfred Markus, Yoko Iyeiri, Reinhard Heuberger & Emil Chamson (eds), 59–73. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kiparsky, Paul. 1987. On theory and interpretation. In The Linguistics of Writing: Arguments between Language and Literature, Nigel Fabb, Derek Attridge, Alan Durant & Colin MacCabe (eds), 185–198. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Los, Bettelou. 2005. The Rise of the To-Infinitive. Oxford: OUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lowrey, Brian. 2013. Syntactic and semantic variation: Middle English causatives and complement types. In Periphrasis, Replacement and Renewal: Studies in English Historical Linguistics, Irén Hegedűs & Dóra Pődör (eds), 92–124. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mustanoja, Tauno F. 1960. A Middle English Syntax, Part 1: Parts of Speech. Helsinki: Société Néophilologique.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rohdenburg, Günter. 1995. On the replacement of finite complement clauses by infinitives in English. English Studies 76: 367–388. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1996. Cognitive complexity and increased grammatical explicitness in English. Cognitive Linguistics 7: 149–182. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1998. Syntactic complexity and the variable use of to be in 16th to 18th century English. Arbeiten aus Anglistik und Amerikanistik 23: 199–228.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2000. The complexity principle as a factor determining grammatical variation and change in English. In Language Use, Language Acquisition and Language History: (Mostly) Empirical Studies in Honour of Rüdiger Zimmermann, Ingo Plag & Klaus Peter Schneider (eds), 25–44. Trier: Wissenschaftlicher Verlag.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rohdenburg, Günter & Schlüter, Julia. 2000. Determinanten grammatischer Variation im Früh- und Spätneuenglischen. Sprachwissenschaft 25: 443–496.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sawada, Mayumi. 1997. Causative verbs in Chaucer. ERA (The English Research Association of Hiroshima) 15: 1–16.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schlüter, Julia. 2005. Rhythmic Grammar: The Influence of Rhythm on Grammatical Variation and Change in English. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Svartvik, Jan & Quirk, Randolph. 1970. Types and uses of non-finite clause in Chaucer. English Studies 51: 393–411. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sugiyama, Ryuichi. 1988. Jugo seiki sanbun no shieki kobun niokeru futeishi hyoshiki nitsuite (On the marker of the infinitive governed by causative verbs in fifteenth-century prose). Studies in Medieval English Language and Literature 3: 43–55.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (3)

Cited by three other publications

Rohdenburg, Günter
2021. Ambiguity Avoidance by Means of Function Words in English? Providing Additional Corpus-based Counterevidence. Zeitschrift für Anglistik und Amerikanistik 69:3  pp. 207 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 3 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue