In:Explorations in English Historical Syntax
Edited by Hubert Cuyckens, Hendrik De Smet, Liesbet Heyvaert and Charlotte Maekelberghe
[Studies in Language Companion Series 198] 2018
► pp. 139–158
Chapter 5Causative make and its infinitival complements in Early Modern English
Published online: 13 August 2018
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.198.06iye
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.198.06iye
Abstract
The present paper discusses the variability between to- and bare infinitives in the complement of causative make in Early Modern English, with a focus on make used in the active voice. Although bare infinitives are almost exclusively used with active causative make in Present-day English, this has not always been the case in the history of English. Throughout the Early Modern English period, to-infinitives were still encountered to a noticeable extent. Moreover, various linguistic factors were relevant to the choice of to- and bare infinitives. The present paper examines complexity in general, the objects/causees of make, coordination of infinitives, and lexical items used as infinitives.
Keywords: causative make
, complementation, bare infinitives,
to-infinitives, complexity
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Data and methods
- 3.Causative make plus to- and bare infinitives in Early Modern English: A historical overview
- 4.Linguistic factors affecting the choice of to- and bare infinitives
- 4.1Preliminary remarks
- 4.2Complexity in general
- 4.3The object/causee of make
- 4.4Coordination of infinitives
- 4.5Infinitives of different verbs
- 5.Conclusion
Acknowledgements Notes References
References (24)
Ando, Sadao. 1976. A Descriptive Syntax of Christopher Marlowe’s Language. Tokyo: University of Tokyo Press.
Egan, Thomas. 2008. Non-finite Complementation: A Usage-based Study of Infinitive and -ing Clauses in English. Amsterdam: Rodopi.
Fanego, Teresa. 1994. Infinitive marking in Early Modern English. In English Historical Linguistics 1992: Papers from the 7th International Conference on English Historical Linguistics, Valencia, 22–26 September 1992 [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 113], Francisco Fernández, Miguel Fuster & Juan José Calvo (eds), 191–203. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Fischer, Olga. 1995. The distinction between to and bare infinitival complements in Late Middle English. Diachronica 12: 1–30.
. 1996. Verbal complementation in early ME: How do the infinitives fit in? In English Historical Linguistics 1994: Papers from the 8th International Conference on English Historical Linguistics (8 ICEHL, Edinburgh, 19–23 September 1994) [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 135], Derek Britton (ed.), 247–270. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
. 1997. Infinitive marking in Late Middle English: Transitivity and changes in the English system of case. In Studies in Middle English Linguistics, Jacek Fisiak (ed.), 109–134. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Givón, Talmy. 1991. Isomorphism in the grammatical code: Cognitive and biological consideration. Studies in Language 15: 85–114.
Iyeiri, Yoko. 2010. Verbs of Implicit Negation and Their Complements in the History of English. Amsterdam: John Benjamins & Tokyo: Yushodo Press.
. 2011. Early Modern English prose selections: Directions in historical corpus linguistics. Memoirs of the Faculty of Letters, Kyoto University 50: 133–199.
. 2012. The complements of causative make in Late Middle English. In Middle and Modern English Corpus Linguistics: A Multi-dimensional Approach [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 50], Manfred Markus, Yoko Iyeiri, Reinhard Heuberger & Emil Chamson (eds), 59–73. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Kiparsky, Paul. 1987. On theory and interpretation. In The Linguistics of Writing: Arguments between Language and Literature, Nigel Fabb, Derek Attridge, Alan Durant & Colin MacCabe (eds), 185–198. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
Lowrey, Brian. 2013. Syntactic and semantic variation: Middle English causatives and complement types. In Periphrasis, Replacement and Renewal: Studies in English Historical Linguistics, Irén Hegedűs & Dóra Pődör (eds), 92–124. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars.
Mustanoja, Tauno F. 1960. A Middle English Syntax, Part 1: Parts of Speech. Helsinki: Société Néophilologique.
Rohdenburg, Günter. 1995. On the replacement of finite complement clauses by infinitives in English. English Studies 76: 367–388.
. 1996. Cognitive complexity and increased grammatical explicitness in English. Cognitive Linguistics 7: 149–182.
. 1998. Syntactic complexity and the variable use of to be in 16th to 18th century English. Arbeiten aus Anglistik und Amerikanistik 23: 199–228.
. 2000. The complexity principle as a factor determining grammatical variation and change in English. In Language Use, Language Acquisition and Language History: (Mostly) Empirical Studies in Honour of Rüdiger Zimmermann, Ingo Plag & Klaus Peter Schneider (eds), 25–44. Trier: Wissenschaftlicher Verlag.
Rohdenburg, Günter & Schlüter, Julia. 2000. Determinanten grammatischer Variation im Früh- und Spätneuenglischen. Sprachwissenschaft 25: 443–496.
Sawada, Mayumi. 1997. Causative verbs in Chaucer. ERA (The English Research Association of Hiroshima) 15: 1–16.
Schlüter, Julia. 2005. Rhythmic Grammar: The Influence of Rhythm on Grammatical Variation and Change in English. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Cited by (3)
Cited by three other publications
Rohdenburg, Günter
Tichý, Ondřej
2021. Corpus driven identification of lexical bundle obsolescence in Late Modern English. In Lost in Change [Studies in Language Companion Series, 218], ► pp. 101 ff.
[no author supplied]
2021. Corpus driven identification of lexical bundle obsolescence in Late Modern English. In Lost in Change [Studies in Language Companion Series, 218],
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 3 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
