Cover not available

In:Tense, Aspect, Modality, and Evidentiality: Crosslinguistic perspectives
Edited by Dalila Ayoun, Agnès Celle and Laure Lansari
[Studies in Language Companion Series 197] 2018
► pp. 213–238

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload Book EPUB
authorization required

Chapter 10
Questions as indirect speech acts in surprise contexts

 | Université Paris Diderot and University of Colorado
Published online: 2 August 2018
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.197.10cel
Abstract
This chapter offers an analysis of two types of interrogatives used as indirect speech acts in surprise contexts in English – unresolvable questions and rhetorical questions. The function of these questions is not to request information that is unknown to the speaker. It is argued that surprise-induced unresolvable questions are expressive speech acts devoid of epistemic goals. Surprise-induced rhetorical questions are shown not to suggest an obvious answer, but to request a commitment update from the addressee. Adopting a schema-theoretic approach to surprise, it is shown that unresolvable questions and rhetorical questions can express mirativity, the former at the initial stage of the cognitive processing of unexpectedness, the latter at the last stage.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.The data
  • 3.Unresolvable questions
  • 4.Surprise-induced rhetorical questions
    • 4.1Expectation violation
    • 4.2 Informative answers
    • 4.3 The surprise-induced rhetorical scenario
    • 4.4 Addressee commitment
  • 5.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • Corpus data
  • References
References (62)
Corpus data
Base textuelle FRANTEXT, ATILF - CNRS & Université de Lorraine. Site internet : [URL]. Version décembre 2016. [URL]
Jörg Tiedemann, 2009, News from OPUS - A Collection of Multilingual Parallel Corpora with Tools and Interfaces. In N. Nicolov and K. Bontcheva and G. Angelova and R. Mitkov (eds.) Recent Advances in Natural Language Processing (vol V), pages 237–248, John Benjamins, Amsterdam/PhiladelphiaGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
References
Akatsuka, Noriko. 1985. Conditionals and the epistemic scale. Language 61(3): 625–639. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Alcázar, Asier. 2017. A syntactic analysis of rhetorical questions. In Proceedings of the 34th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, Aaron Kaplan, Abby Kaplan, Miranda K. McCarvel & Edward J. Rubin (eds), 32–41. Somerville MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ameka, Felix. 1992. Interjections: The universal yet neglected part of speech. Journal of Pragmatics 18(2): 101–118. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Azzopardi, Sophie & Bres, Jacques. 2014. Futur, conditionnel, et effets de sens de conjecture et de rejet en interrogation partielle. SHS Web of Conferences 8: 3003–3013. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Beyssade, Claire & Marandin, Jean-Marie. 2009. Commitment: Une attitude dialogique. Langue Française 162: 89–107. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bourova, Viara & Dendale, Patrick. 2013. Serait-ce un conditionnel de conjecture? Datation, évolution et mise en relation des deux conditionnels à valeur évidentielle. Cahiers Chronos 26: 183–200.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Caponigro, Ivano & Sprouse, Jon. 2007. Rhetorical questions as questions. In Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung 11, E. Puig-Waldmüller (ed.), 121–133. Barcelona: Universitat Pompeu Fabra.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Carroll, James M. & Russell, James A. 1997. Facial expressions in Hollywood’s portrayal of emotion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 72: 164–176. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Celle, Agnès. 2007. Analyse unifiée du conditionnel de non prise en charge en français et comparaison avec l’anglais. Cahiers Chronos, Etudes Sémantiques et Pragmatiques sur le Temps, l’Aspect et la Modalité 19: 43–61.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2009. Question, mise en question: la traduction de l’interrogation dans le discours théorique. Revue Française de Linguistique Appliquée XIV(1): 39–52.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2018. Epistemic evaluation in factual contexts in English. In Epistemic Modality and Evidentiality in a Cross-Linguistic Perspective, Zlatka Guentchéva (ed.). 22–51 Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Celle, Agnès & Lansari, Laure. 2014. Uncertainty as a result of unexpectedness. Language and Dialogue 4(1) 7–23. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2015. On the mirative meaning of aller + infinitive compared with its equivalents in English. Cahiers Chronos, Taming the TAME Systems 27: 289–305. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Celle, Agnès, & Lansari, Laure. 2016. L’inattendu et le questionnement dans l’interaction verbale en anglais: Les questions en why-would et leurs réponses. In Représentations du sens linguistique: Les interfaces de la complexité, Olga Galatanu, Ana-Maria Cozma & Abdelhadi Bellachhab (eds), 235–248. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Celle, Agnès, Jugnet, Anne, Lansari, Laure & L’Hôte, Emilie. 2017. Expressing and describing surprise. In Expressing and Describing Surprise [Benjamins Current Topics 92], Agnès Celle & Laure Lansari (eds), 215–244. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Celle, Agnès, Jugnet, Anne, Lansari, Laure & Peterson, Tyler. Forthcoming. Interrogatives in surprise contexts in English. In Surprise at the Intersection of Phenomenology and Linguistics, Natalie Depraz & Agnès Celle (eds). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Darwin, Charles. 1965. The Expression of the Emotions in Man and Animals. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
DeLancey, Scott. 2001. The mirative and evidentiality. Journal of Pragmatics 33: 369–382. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dendale, Patrick. 2010. Il serait à Paris en ce moment. Serait-il à Paris? A propos de deux emplois épistémiques du conditionnel: Grammaire, syntaxe, sémantique. In Liens linguistiques. Études sur la combinatoire et la hiérarchie des composants, Castro Camino Alvarez, Flor Marίa Bango de la Campa & Marίa Luisa Donaire (eds), 291–317. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
den Dikken, Marcel & Giannakidou, Anastasia. 2002. From hell to polarity: “Aggressively non-D-linked” wh-phrases as polarity items. Linguistic Inquiry 33(1): 31–61. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Desmets, Marianne & Gautier, Antoine. 2009. “Comment n’y ai-je pas songé plus tôt ?” Questions rhétoriques en comment . Travaux de Linguistique 58: 107–125. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Diller, Anne-Marie. 1977. Le conditionnel, marqueur de dérivation illocutoire. Semantikos 2: 1–17.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
DuBois, John. 2007. The stance triangle. In Stancetaking in Discourse [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 164], Robert Englebretson (ed.), 139–182. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fillmore, Charles. 1985. Syntactic intrusions and the notion of grammatical construction. In Proceedings of the Eleventh Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 73–86. Berkeley CA: BLS.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ginzburg, Jonathan. 2012. The Interactive Stance: Meaning for conversation. Oxford: OUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Guentchéva, Zlatka. 2017. An enunciative account of admirativity in Bulgarian. Special issue The Linguistic Expression of Mirativity. Review of Cognitive Linguistics 15(2): 539–574.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gunlogson, Christine A. 2001. True to Form. Rising and Falling Declarative as Questions in English. PhD Dissertation, University of California, Santa Barbara.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Huddleston, Rodney & Pullum, Geoffrey. 2002. The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Haillet, Pierre-Patrick. 2001. A propos de l’interrogation totale directe au conditionnel. In Le conditionnel en français, Patrick Dendale & Liliane Tasmowski (eds.), 295–330. Paris: Klinksieck.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hoeksema, Jack & Napoli, Donna Jo. 2008. Just for the hell of it: A comparison of two taboo-term constructions. Journal of Linguistics 44: 347–378. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jörg Tiedemann, 2009, News from OPUS - A Collection of Multilingual Parallel Corpora with Tools and Interfaces. In N. Nicolov and K. Bontcheva and G. Angelova and R. Mitkov (eds.) Recent Advances in Natural Language Processing (vol V), pages 237–248, John Benjamins, Amsterdam/Philadelphia[URL]Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kay, Paul, & Fillmore, Charles. 1999. Constructions and linguistic generalizations: The what’s X doing Y? construction. Language 75(1): 1–33. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Korotkova, Natalia. 2016. Heterogeneity and Uniformity in the Evidential Domain. PhD Dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Littell, Patrick, Matthewson, Lisa & Peterson, Tyler. 2010. On the semantics of conjectural questions. In Evidence from Evidentials, Tyler Peterson & Uli Sauerland (eds), 89–104. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Working Papers in Linguistics (UBCWPL).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Meyer, Wulf Uwe, Reisenzein, Rainer & Schützwohl, Achim. 1997. Toward a process analysis of emotions: the Case of Surprise. Motivation and Emotion 21(3): 251–274. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Miceli, Maria & Castelfranchi, Cristiano. 2015. Expectancy and Emotion. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Michaelis, Laura & Feng, Hanbing. 2015. What is this, sarcastic syntax? Constructions and Frames 7(2): 148–180.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Michaelis, Laura & Knud, Lambrecht. 1996. The exclamative sentence type in English. In Conceptual Structure, Discourse and Structure, Adele Goldberg (ed.), 375–389. Stanford CA: CSLI.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mihas, Elena. 2014. Expression of information source meanings in Ashéninka Perené (Arawak). In The Grammar of Knowledge, A Cross-Linguistic Typology, Alexandra Aikhenvald, Robert Dixon & Malcolm Ward (eds), 209–226 Oxford: OUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ortony, Andrew, Clore, Gerald L. & Collins, Allan. 1988. The Cognitive Structure of Emotions. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pesetsky, David. 1987. Wh-in-Situ: Movement and unselective binding. In The Representation of (in)Definiteness, Eric Reuland & Alice ter Meulen (eds), 98–129. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Peterson, Tyler. 2017. Grammatical evidentiality and the unprepared mind. In Expressing and Describing Surprise [Benjamins Current Topics 92], Celle Agnès & Laure Lansari (eds), 51–89. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pinker, Steven. 2007. The Stuff of Thought: Language as a Window into Human Nature. New York NY: Penguin.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Potts, Christopher. 2005. The Logic of Conventional Implicatures. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2007. The expressive dimension. Theoretical Linguistics 33(2): 165–198. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Reese, Brian. 2007. Bias in Questions. PhD dissertation, The University of Texas at Austin.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Reisenzein, Rainer. 2000. Exploring the strength of association between the components of emotion syndromes: The case of surprise. Cognition and Emotion 14(1): 1–38. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rett, Jessica & Murray, Sarah. 2013. A semantic account of mirative evidentials. In Proceedings of SALT 23. Proceedings of the 23rd Semantics and Linguistic Theory Conference, held at the University of California, Santa Cruz, May 3–5, 2013, Todd Snider (ed.), 453–472. <[URL]>
Rocci, Andrea. 2007. Epistemic modality and questions in dialogue. The case of Italian interrogative constructions in the subjunctive mood. In Tense, Mood and Aspect: Theoretical and descriptive issues, Louis de Saussure, Jacques Moeschler & Genoveva Puskas (eds), 129–153. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rohde, Hannah. 2006. Rhetorical questions as redundant interrogatives. San Diego Linguistics Papers, Vol. 2, 134–168. San Diego CA: University of California.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
San Roque, Lila, Floyd, Simeon & Norcliffe, Elisabeth. 2017. Evidentiality and interrogativity. Lingua 186–187: 120–143.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Scherer, Klaus, Clark-Polner, Elizabeth, Mortillaro, Marcello. 2011. In the eye of the beholder? Universality and cultural specificity in the expression and perception of emotion. International Journal of Psychology 46(6): 401–435. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Siemund, Peter. 2017. Interrogative clauses in English and the social economics of questions. Journal of Pragmatics 199: 15–32.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stein, Nancy L. & Hernandez, Marc W. 2007. Assessing understanding and appraisals during emotional experience. In Handbook of Emotion Elicitation and Assessment, James A. Coan & John J. B. Allen (eds), 298–317. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stivers, Tanya. 2010. An overview of the question-response system in American English conversation. Journal of Pragmatics 42(10): 2620–2626. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tutin, Agnès. 2017. Surprise routines in scientific writing: a study of French social science articles. In Expressing and Describing Surprise [Benjamins Current Topics 92], Agnès Celle & Laure Lansari (eds), 153–172. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Van Dijk, Wilco W. & Zeelenberg, Marcel. 2002. What do we talk about when we talk about disappointment? Distinguishing outcome-related disappointment from person-related disappointment. Cognition and Emotion 16(6): 787–807. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vingerhoets, Ad, Bylsma, Lauren & De Vlam, Cornelis. 2013. Swearing: A biopsychosocial perspective. Psychological Topics 22 (2013), 2, 287–304.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zaefferer, Dietmar. 2001. Deconstructing a classical classification: A typological look at Searle’s concept of illocution type. Revue Internationale de Philosophie 2(216): 209–225.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (10)

Cited by ten other publications

Lansari, Laure
2025. Review of Guillemin-Flescher (2023): Linguistique contrastive : énonciation et activité langagière. Languages in Contrast 25:1 ► pp. 148 ff. DOI logo
Silvano, Purificação, Giedrė Valūnaitė Oleškevičienė, Chaya Liebeskind & Mariana Damova
2025. Questions in monologues: an analysis grounded on ISO. Linguistics Vanguard DOI logo
Mitkovska, Liljana & Bužarovska, Eleni
2024. The Discursive Functions of zar-Questions in Macedonian and Serbian . Balcania et Slavia :1 DOI logo
Rodríguez Rosique, Susana
2023. Time after time. In Verb and Context [IVITRA Research in Linguistics and Literature, 34], ► pp. 263 ff. DOI logo
Celle, Agnès & Maud Pélissier
2022. Surprise questions in spoken French. Linguistics Vanguard 8:s2 ► pp. 287 ff. DOI logo
Trotzke, Andreas & Anna Czypionka
2022. The pragmatics of surprise-disapproval questions: An empirical study. Linguistics Vanguard 8:s2 ► pp. 239 ff. DOI logo
Filippi-Deswelle, Catherine
2021. L’étonnement linguistique chez Antoine Culioli, « linguiste philosophe ». Anglophonia 31 DOI logo
Guillaume, Bénédicte
2021. Les interrogatives dites rhétoriques au prisme de la théorie d’Antoine Culioli. Anglophonia 31 DOI logo
Celle, Agnès, Anne Jugnet, Laure Lansari & Tyler Peterson
2019. Interrogatives in surprise contexts in English. In Surprise at the Intersection of Phenomenology and Linguistics [Consciousness & Emotion Book Series, 11], ► pp. 117 ff. DOI logo
Depraz, Natalie & Agnès Celle
2019. Introduction. In Surprise at the Intersection of Phenomenology and Linguistics [Consciousness & Emotion Book Series, 11], ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 3 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue