Cover not available

In:Tense, Aspect, Modality, and Evidentiality: Crosslinguistic perspectives
Edited by Dalila Ayoun, Agnès Celle and Laure Lansari
[Studies in Language Companion Series 197] 2018
► pp. 165–184

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
authorization required

Chapter 8
‘I think’

An enunciative and corpus-based perspective

 | Université d’Avignon
Published online: 2 August 2018
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.197.08ran
Abstract
This chapter focuses on the sequence ‘I think’ as a discourse marker, used in evidential or epistemic contexts. ‘I think’ is seen to assume a variety of different values, which Kaltenböck (2010), among others, identifies as “shielding”, “approximator”, “structural” or “booster” functions. I hypothesise that ‘I think’ is not inherently ambiguous, but that different values reflect specific configurations, which depend on identifiable contextual features. The present study explores this hypothesis, first with a corpus-based investigation of collocational affinities of the sequence, which reveals a number of characteristic environments. Secondly, I elaborate an enunciative description of ‘I think’ in terms of a basic schematic form, which undergoes certain controlled and calculable deformations to generate local “shapes” (Culioli 1990). I conclude that ‘I think’ in itself expresses neither evidentiality nor epistemic modality, but that these result from specific contextual configurations.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Previous research
    • 2.1Where does ‘I think’ come from?
    • 2.2What does ‘I think’ mean?
    • 2.3How are multiple meanings derived?
  • 3.Corpus-based investigation of collocational affinities
    • 3.1 General considerations
    • 3.2Significant n-grams featuring ‘I think’
    • 3.3N-grams with cluster-initial ‘I think’
    • 3.4N-grams with final ‘I think’
  • 4. Modelisation within an enunciative perspective
    • 4.1The schematic form
    • 4.2 Knowing, believing, thinking
    • 4.3The position of ‘I think’
    • 4.4Configurations with initial ‘I think’
    • 4.5Configurations with final ‘I think’
    • 4.6 Configurations with medial ‘I think’
    • 4.7Summary
  • 5.Discussion and conclusion
  • Notes
  • References
References (27)
References
Aijmer, Karin. 1997. ‘I think’ – An English modal particle. In Modality in Germanic Languages, Toril Swan & Olaf J. Westvik (eds), 1–48. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. 2004. Evidentiality. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brinton, Laurel J. 1996. Pragmatic Markers in English: Grammaticalization and Discourse Functions [Topics in English Linguistics 19]. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2008. The Comment Clause in English: Syntactic Origins and Pragmatic Development. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chafe, Wallace L. & Nichols, Johanna. 1986. Evidentiality: The Linguistic Coding of Epistemology. Norwood NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Culioli, Antoine & Desclés, Jean-Pierre. 1981. Systèmes de représentations linguistiques et métalinguistiques. Les catégories grammaticales et le problème de la description de langues peu étudiées. ERA 642.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Culioli, Antoine. 1990. Pour une linguistique de l’énonciation, Vol. 1. Gap: Ophrys.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1999. Pour une linguistique de l’énonciation: Formalisation et opérations de repérage, Vol. 3. Gap: Ophrys.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fletcher, William H. 2003. Phrases in English. <[URL]>
Hoey, Michael. 2005. Lexical Priming: A New Theory of Words and Language. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hoffmann, Sebastian, Evert, Stefan, Smith, Nicholas & Lee, David. 2008. Corpus Linguistics with BNCweb: A Practical Guide. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Holmes, Janet. 1990. Hedges and boosters in women’s and men’s speech. Language & Communication 10(3): 185–205. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kaltenböck, Gunther. 2009a. English comment clauses: Position, prosody, and scope. Arbeiten aus Anglistik und Amerikanistik 34(1): 49–75.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2009b. Initial ‘I think’: main or comment clause? Discourse and Interaction 2(1): 49–70.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2010. Pragmatic functions of parenthetical ‘I think’. In New Approaches to Hedging, Wiltrud Mihatsch, Stefan Schneider & Gunther Kaltenböck (eds), 237–266. Leiden: Brill. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lakoff, Robin. 1975. Language and Woman’s Place. New York NY: Harper and Row.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lohmann, Arne & Koops, Christian. 2016. Aspects of discourse marker sequencing: Empirical challenges and theoretical implications. In Outside the Clause. Form and Function of Extra-clausal Constituents [Studies in Language Companion Series 178], Gunther Kaltenböck, Evelien Keizer & Arne Lohmann (eds), 417–446. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Palander-Collin, M. 1999. Grammaticalization and Social Embedding: ‘I think’ and Methinks in Middle and Early Modern English. Helsinki: Société Néophilologique.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ranger, Graham. 2018. Discourse Markers: An Enunciative Approach. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ross, John R. 1973. Slifting. In The Formal Analysis of Natural Languages, Maurice Gross, Morris Halle & Marcel-Paul Schützenberger (eds), 133–172. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Simon-Vandenbergen, Anne-Marie. 2000. The functions of ‘I think’ in political discourse. International Journal of Applied Linguistics 10(1): 41–63. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Thompson, Sandra A. & Mulac, Anthony. 1991. A quantitative perspective on the grammaticization of epistemic parentheticals in English. In Approaches to Grammaticalization, Vol. 2: Types of Grammatical Marker [Typological Studies in Language Vol. 19(2)], Elizabeth Closs Traugott & Bernd Heine (eds), 313–329. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Urmson, James Opie. 1952. Parenthetical verbs. Mind 61(244): 480–496. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Van Bogaert, Julie. 2010. A constructional taxonomy of ‘I think’ and related expressions: accounting for the variability of complement-taking mental predicates. English Language and Linguistics 14(3): 399–427. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2011. ‘I think’ and other complement-taking mental predicates: a case of and for constructional grammaticalization. Linguistics 49(2): 295–332.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ziv, Yael. 2002. This, I believe, is a processing instruction: Discourse linking via parentheticals. In Proceedings of Israel Association for Theoretical Linguistics 18, Yehuda N. Falk (ed.). <[URL]>
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue